JAL Suspends Flights between Haneda and Doha; May Resume Service as Early as Friday
Japan Airlines Co. announced Tuesday that direct Japan Airlines (JAL) flights between Haneda Airport in Tokyo and Doha, the capital of Qatar, were to be canceled until Friday.
On Monday, a Doha-bound JAL flight departing from Haneda Airport turned back midway and was subsequently canceled. The cancellation was ordered out of an abundance of caution after the airspace above Qatar was temporarily closed due to an attack on an American air force base there. JAL said that the suspension may continue beyond Friday.
The Haneda-Doha flight is JAL's only route to the Middle East. The company normally operates one flight each to and from Doha every day. Service has been canceled in both directions from Tuesday to Thursday, as has Friday's flight from Doha to Haneda. JAL has yet to determine what to do about Friday's flight from Haneda to Doha.
'Safety will be our biggest consideration when we resume operations. We'll continue gathering information,' a JAL official said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
7 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Nippon Steel says it rebuffed Trump's attempt to ‘call the shots'
Nippon Steel Corp. overrode resistance from U.S. President Donald Trump and turned U.S. Steel into a wholly owned subsidiary, the Japanese company's chief executive said. Eiji Hashimoto told a shareholders meeting on June 24 that Nippon Steel stood firm on its original plans to acquire all shares of the storied American steelmaker. 'Trump said he did not want to approve a 100-percent ownership and called for lowering our proposed share to 49 percent or less, if possible, but we eventually prevailed,' said Hashimoto, who is also chairman. Nippon Steel acquired all common shares in U.S. Steel for about $14 billion (2 trillion yen) on June 18. In winning approval from the Trump administration, Japan's top steelmaker concluded a national security agreement with the U.S. government and decided to issue a 'golden share,' which will give Washington extensive veto power over key management decisions. When a shareholder asked if Nippon Steel will be tied hand and foot by the U.S. government, Hashimoto said the company would not have gone ahead with the buyout if the deal terms had allowed Washington to 'call the shots.' Up to nine members sit on U.S. Steel's board of directors. An external director will be appointed by the U.S. government, and the appointments of two others must be approved by Washington. Still, Hashimoto said Nippon Steel will be able to secure sufficient freedom in management, noting that a majority of U.S. Steel directors will be nominated by the Japanese company. The annual meeting attracted 1,257 shareholders, about 80 percent more than last year.
Japan Times
10 hours ago
- Japan Times
Twelve day Middle East war shows how 'normal' the unthinkable has become
As the night sky above Doha lit up with Iranian missiles being intercepted on Monday, people across the city were on balconies and in gardens watching the show and filming it on their smartphones. For decades, the idea of a U.S.-Iran conflict raised the specter of World War III. Now Israel has attacked, the U.S. has joined in and the Islamic Republic just aimed its retaliation at the biggest American military base in the Middle East. All of that happened in the last 24 hours, following an equally chaotic 11 days. But on Tuesday morning, consultants in the Qatari capital and financiers in Dubai went to work as normal. Oil fell back to where it was when Israel first struck Iran on June 13; the S&P 500 ended the day higher than it began. The reaction reveals the degree to which the unthinkable has become mundane in a region upended by Hamas's attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and a broader sense that seemingly seismic events are quickly superseded by the next ones. But the ructions that have torn through the Middle East aren't likely to fully reveal their impact for years to come. While Iran is weakened and Israel triumphant, there are some concerning omens. Israel's devastation of Gaza, the decimation of Iranian proxy militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon and last year's swift fall of Iranian ally Bashar al-Assad in Syria have all left deep scars. Mourners attend the funeral of victims of Sunday's suicide bombing at the Mar Elias Church in Damascus. | REUTERS "Iran isn't finished as a regional power,' said Hal Brands, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and a former Pentagon official. "It's a big country with a lot of residual capabilities, but we're going to see a significant regional shakeup.' For now, many in the region just took it in their stride. Some expats in Doha said the strikes were so well telegraphed, it was as if they knew what was coming. Others panicked and took shelter in basements, closing curtains and blackout blinds in case windows shattered. Many couldn't resist going outside to watch the missile trails. Once the choreographed Iranian response to U.S. strikes on its nuclear program was over, there was some worry and confusion because of a lack of information. But by Tuesday morning, it was business as usual after U.S. President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire had been agreed. Trump went as far as thanking Iran for "giving us early notice,' ensuring the base was evacuated and there were no casualties. The Qatar Stock Exchange closed almost 2% higher. Meanwhile, energy exports have continued without interruption. "It's surreal how quickly we revert to 'normal' life and that is what had happened by the time dawn broke this morning,' said Charlie Eastwood, a U.K. citizen who has lived and worked in Qatar for 13 years, "with the additional and even more surreal news that, honor clearly having been satisfied, a ceasefire had been agreed.' Emergency workers recover a body from the site of an Iranian missile attack on a residential building in Beersheeba, Israel, on Tuesday. | Daniel Berehulak / The New York Times Beyond the Middle East, a world also dealing with Russia's war in Ukraine, Trump's trade tariffs and tension with China is more inured to turmoil and unpredictability. Late Monday night, Trump wrote on Truth Social that the war "could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!' Indeed, the Iranian response demonstrated "calculated thinking,' according to Bader Al-Saif, assistant professor at Kuwait University and an associate fellow at Chatham House. Getting embroiled in a conflict with the U.S. would be "the kiss of death for Iran and they know that,' he said. But there were other harbingers of the essential flimsiness of the ceasefire. In between Trump's declaration and Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu's confirmation, Israel and Iran struck each other. A few hours later, the Israel Defense Forces said they had identified Iranian missiles headed toward Israel, which Tehran denied. A man clears broken glass from a sidewalk near the site of an Iranian missile attack in Beersheeba, Israel, on Tuesday. | Daniel Berehulak / The New York Times There is also Israel's own track record when it comes to ceasefires. It's been accused of not honoring them in Gaza and Lebanon. Netanyahu's government is unlikely to be willing to countenance any threat emanating from Iran, and has already said it will respond with force to any breaches of the truce. Some ministers — and even Netanyahu himself — have already floated the prospect of regime change. The echo of previous Middle East conflicts and uprisings that begin in triumph but end in sectarian violence and chaos resounds. Israel's attack on Iran also helped turn attention away from its war in Gaza against Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. and Europe. Israeli forces have killed tens of thousands of people, destroyed most of the enclave and sparked a hunger crisis. If the Iran conflict is brought to a simmer, Europe — which expressed support for strikes on nuclear targets — may go back to threatening the Netanyahu government with trade sanctions over its prosecution of the war. People inspect the damage at the site of a reported suicide attack at the Saint Elias church in Damascus on Sunday. | AFP-JIJI In Gaza, around the time Israel was agreeing to the ceasefire with Iran, its forces opened fire toward hundreds of people waiting for aid, killing at least 25, the Associated Press reported. The same day, the U.N. — which Israel has blocked from administering aid — condemned the country's "weaponization of food.' Leaders from Qatar to Iraq warned that the Israeli and U.S. strikes could spark regional unrest. On Sunday, as U.S. missiles rained down on Iran's nuclear sites, a suicide bombing that killed dozens in a Damascus church offered a grim reminder of what that instability can look like. And then there are Iran's nuclear aspirations. The U.S. bombed three key sites on Sunday, including the underground enrichment facility at Fordow. Trump claimed they had been "totally obliterated,' but two days later the International Atomic Energy Agency still doesn't know the location of Iran's near bomb-grade uranium. That leaves Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei a choice that many autocrats must be weighing. One option is to pursue the bomb with great speed — if that's still possible — and become not just untouchable but even admired by Trump, like North Korea's Kim Jong Un. The alternative is to give up the nuclear program, come in from the cold, and risk suffering the fate of Libya's deceased dictator Moammar Qaddafi. "The Iranian nuclear program has taken a major hit, but hasn't been totally destroyed,' said Aaron David Miller, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a former State Department Middle East negotiator under former U.S. Presidents Clinton and Bush. "They're going to want to keep the option of enrichment and potential weaponization open. This is a long game.'
The Mainichi
15 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Powell says Fed rate cut is on hold even as Trump demands cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Federal Reserve will continue to wait and see how the economy evolves before deciding whether to reduce its key interest rate, Chair Jerome Powell said Tuesday, a stance directly at odds with President Donald Trump's calls for immediate cuts. "For the time being, we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance," Powell said in testimony Tuesday before the House Financial Services Committee. Several Republicans on the committee pushed Powell to consider reducing borrowing costs more quickly, as soon as its next meeting at the end of July. But on the whole, the hearing was uniformly polite and Powell did not face sharp criticism over the Fed's decision to leave its rate unchanged. Members of both parties thanked Powell for maintaining his focus on the Fed's dual mission of controlling inflation and supporting maximum employment. Powell has often cited his support in Congress as a bulwark against Trump's attacks. Trump lashed out again early Tuesday, posting on his social media site: "I hope Congress really works this very dumb, hardheaded person, over. We will be paying for his incompetence for many years to come." Several Republicans asked Powell why the central bank has yet to lower borrowing costs. Powell responded that most economists, inside and outside the Fed, still expect tariffs to push inflation higher, and Fed policymakers want to see what happens over the next couple of months before making any changes. "We do expect tariff inflation to show up more," Powell said. "We really don't know how much of that's going to be passed through the consumer. We have to wait and see." Under questioning, Powell acknowledged that tariffs might not push up inflation as much as economists forecast. That, he said, could lead the Fed to reduce rates more quickly. A sharp rise in the unemployment rate could also spur the Fed to cut borrowing costs more quickly, he said. "We could see inflation come in not as strong as we expect," he said. "And if that were the case, that would tend to suggest cutting sooner." But when asked specifically about July, Powell declined to comment. Powell also said he expected to see tariffs' impact on prices emerge in the next few months, starting in June. The June inflation report will be released July 15. Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat from New Jersey, asked Powell whether Trump's "bullying" would impact the Fed's decision-making. Powell said the Fed wants to "deliver a good economy for the benefit of the American people, and that's it." "Anything else is kind of a distraction," Powell added. "We always do what we think is the right thing to do, and we live with the consequences. I don't know how else to do the job." The Fed's 19-member interest rate setting committee, led by the chair, decides whether to cut or raise borrowing costs. They typically increase rates to cool the economy to fight or prevent inflation, and lower rates when the economy is weak to boost borrowing and spending. The Fed's committee voted unanimously last week to keep its key rate unchanged, though the Fed also released forecasts of future rate cuts that revealed emerging divisions among the policymakers. Seven projected no rate cuts at all this year, two just one, while 10 forecast at least two reductions. The Fed chair said the bump to inflation from tariffs could be temporary, or it could lead to a more persistent bout of inflation. The Fed's "obligation," Powell said, "is ... to prevent a one-time increase in the price level from becoming an ongoing inflation problem." At a news conference last week, Powell suggested the Fed would monitor how the economy evolves over the summer in response to Trump's tariffs, hinting that a rate cut wouldn't occur until September. Yet two high-profile members of the Fed's governing board, Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, have since suggested the central bank could cut its rate as early as July. Both officials were appointed by Trump during his first term and Waller is often mentioned as a potential replacement for Powell when his term ends next May. Powell was also appointed by Trump in late 2017. Other officials, however, are still cautious about rate reductions. Beth Hammack, president of the Federal Reserve's Cleveland branch, said Tuesday that given the uncertainty enveloping the economy, rates may be on hold for "quite some time" before the Fed decides to make "very modest cuts." Trump is urging the Fed to cut rates to save the U.S. government money on interest payments affixed to the vast national debt. Yet the Fed has long resisted consideration of the government's financing costs when making interest rate decisions, preferring instead to focus on the health of the economy and inflation.. Waller, in an interview Friday, said that lowering the government's borrowing costs is "not our job" and added that it was up to Congress and the White House to reduce the budget deficit. Trump meanwhile, on social media Tuesday repeated his false claim that the European Central Bank has cut its key rate ten times while the Fed has not cut at all. In fact, in the last 12 months the ECB has reduced its rate eight times and the Fed has done so three times, all late last year. The Fed's cuts last year lowered its rate to about 4.3%. Since then it has put reductions on pause out of concern that Trump's tariffs lead to inflation. The president has slapped a 10% duty on all imports, along with an additional 30% levy on goods from China, 50% on steel and aluminum, and 25% on autos. Yet inflation has steadily cooled this year despite widespread concerns among economists about the impact of tariffs. The consumer price index ticked up just 0.1% from April to May, the government said last week, a sign that price pressures are muted.
