Protest art piece planned to starve 3 piglets to death. Then they escaped.
Three piglets have vanished from a controversial Denmark art exhibit in which they were deprived of food and water as a form of protest of mass meat production.
Since debuting last week, the Copenhagen art installation − titled "And Now You Care?" − has captured headlines after an artist caged three live piglets and let them starve. The decision was part of an effort to raise awareness of the cruelty caused by the nation's pork industry, according to the Washington Post and The New York Times.
Chilean artist Marco Evaristti said the animals disappeared after a maintenance crew briefly exited the room to clean a toilet, the Times reported. He said that animal rights activists were around at the scene.
"After four minutes, they come out and it was no pigs," Evaristti told the Times.
Copenhagen police have not confirmed whether the disappearance was theft though Evaristti reported it as such, according to the Post. He later learned that one of his staff had sought the help of the Organization Against the Suffering of Animals to snatch the piglets.
USA TODAY has reached out to Evaristti and Copenhagen police for comment.
Evaristti has said he has experienced outrage and death threats against him and his family following his exhibit.
"I receive serious threats, hate letters - so my son is threatened and pictured with a garden cross on his forehead," he wrote on Facebook.
Yet he has not wavered from his mission of showing the world the cruelty that pigs face, adding that he initially believed those on his team shared that same vision, the Washington Post reported.
"I wanted them to die," Evaristti told the Post. "I wanted the people in Denmark to see how a piglet starves to death."
High demand for pigs has led to a rise in both pig breeding and piglet morality, the Post reported. Denmark produces around 28 million pigs annually, according to the data from the Danish Food and Agriculture Council.
Organization Against the Suffering of Animals said in a Monday statement that the disappearance was not burglary or theft but rather an "arranged transfer" between one of Evaristti's staff.
The colleague contacted the non-profit Saturday morning to say the pigs could be picked up that day, according to the statement.
"We quickly initiated a plan for the collection, which was completed as agreed. During the pickup, there was no burglary or theft, and Evaristti's colleague delivered subsequent pig feed to our driver," the group said, adding that they want to "emphasize that our purpose in this case has been to keep the animals safe."
Evaristti has previously hosted other controversial art exhibits, including one where people could turn on a blender with a swimming goldfish inside and another where he made and served meatballs out of his own body fat with agnolotti pasta, People Magazine reported.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Starving piglets escape from protest art exhibit: Reports
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times
Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times was dismissed by a judge on Monday, according to court documents obtained by HuffPost. The news marks the latest in the tumultuous back-and-forth legal battle that stems from the film 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni directed and starred in. Lively, who is married to Reynolds, starred in the film as well. Baldoni filed a $400 million countersuit against Lively, Reynolds and Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane, in January, claiming that they attempted to extort and defame him with sexual harassment claims and that the two actors tried to take control of his film. He also claimed in a defamation suit that the Times had falsely reported that he had created a smear campaign against Lively. Baldoni's countersuit also lists the film producer Jamey Heath, Wayfarer partner Steve Sarowitz and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel as plaintiffs. However, Judge Lewis J. Liman of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan argued that Lively had relied on 'legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions' rather than extortion. Liman also said that Lively's statements accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment are privileged because they were made in a California Civil Rights Department complaint and therefore not considered defamation. Additionally, Liman wrote that Baldoni's claim that Reynolds, Sloane and the Times defamed him does not hold up because the suit does not prove that any of the parties 'seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them.' In a 132-page opinion, the judge explicitly wrote that the Wayfarer Parties, which refer to Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and others in the company, 'have not adequately alleged that Lively's threats were wrongful extortion rather than legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions. Additionally, the Wayfarer Parties have not shown that some of Lively's allegedly extortionate acts damaged them.' (Baldoni is a co-founder of Wayfarer Studios, an independent production studio involved in the film.) 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged,' the opinion also stated. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.' 'The Times had no obvious motive to favor Lively's version of events,' Liman added.'The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.' While the judge dismissed the lawsuit, Baldoni is allowed to file an amended complaint by June 23. However, he may only include claims relevant to breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with a contract, which were also included in his complaint. Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb told HuffPost that the ruling is 'a total victory and a complete vindication.' 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it,' the statement continued. The attorneys said they will be seeking attorneys' fees, and treble and punitive damages from Baldoni and other Wayfarer Studios parties. Sigrid McCawley, Sloane's attorney, told HuffPost in a statement on Monday that she was 'wrongfully dragged' into this lawsuit in an attempt to damage her reputation. 'Today's decision by the Court makes clear that Sloane did nothing wrong. Sloane stands fully vindicated, and justice has been served,' McCawley said. The New York Times celebrated the lawsuit's dismissal in a statement to HuffPost. 'We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit for what it was: a meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting,' a spokesperson for the Times said. 'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism. We will continue to stand up in court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work comes under attack.' Lively's lawsuit was filed in New York in December. 'For years prior to the release of the Film, Mr. Baldoni portrayed himself asa leader of the male feminist movement, writing books, hosting podcasts, and holding TED Talks on the topic. In reality, however, Mr. Baldoni's public persona is a stark contrast to his private behavior, which is replete with hypocrisy, misogyny, and retaliation,' Lively's attorneys wrote in her complaint. Baldoni's countersuit argued that Lively and Reynolds used their prestige 'to steal an entire film right out of the hands of its director and production studio.' It added that Baldoni and Wayfarer only took legal action because Lively had 'unequivocally left them with no choice, not only to set the record straight…But also to put the spotlight on the parts of Hollywood that they have dedicated their careers to being the antithesis of.' The trial is expected to start in March 2026. Representatives for Reynolds, Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios did not immediately reply to HuffPost's request for comment. Blake Lively's Lawyer Accused Of Threatening To Leak Taylor Swift Texts Blake Lively Accuses Justin Baldoni Of Making Women On 'It Ends With Us' Set Uncomfortable Justin Baldoni Reportedly Admits He 'F***ed Up' In Voice Note Apology To Blake Lively
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
US judge dismisses actor Baldoni's lawsuit against Lively, NYT
A US judge on Monday rejected a $400 million lawsuit that actor Justin Baldoni filed against former co-star Blake Lively and The New York Times after she accused him of sexual harassment and other misbehavior. Back in December the Times reported that Lively had filed a complaint against Baldoni and producer Jamey Heath for allegedly inappropriate behavior and comments during the shooting of the movie "It Ends with Us." The complaint said Baldoni -- who also directed the film -- had spoken inappropriately about his sex life and sought to alter the film to include sex scenes that were not in the script and had not been agreed to. It also said Heath had watched Lively while she was topless, despite having been asked to turn away. It further said Baldoni waged a PR campaign to wreck Lively's reputation. A lawyer for Wayfarer, the studio behind the film, said in a statement released to the New York Times at the time that neither the studio, its executives, nor its PR team did anything to retaliate against Lively. "These claims are completely false, outrageous and intentionally salacious with an intent to publicly hurt and rehash a narrative in the media," lawyer Bryan Freedman wrote in December. Baldoni filed suit in January against the actress, her husband Ryan Reynolds and the Times, arguing that an article the paper ran in December defamed him. On Monday, Judge Lewis Liman of the US District Court in Manhattan dismissed the lawsuit filed by Baldoni. The judge said the Times had simply reported on Lively's original legal filing alleging harassment on set and a retaliatory smear campaign, and that it had taken the trouble to seek a reaction from Baldoni to the actress's allegations. The judge also rejected allegations by Baldoni that Lively, whose Instagram account has more than 43 million followers, had tried to seize control of the film and its promotion. Baldoni accused her husband, Reynolds, of wrongly describing him as a sexual predator. In a statement carried by US media, Lively's lawyers celebrated what they called a "total victory" over Baldoni's "retaliatory lawsuit." Baldoni's lawyer did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment. Based on a best-selling novel by the US writer Colleen Hoover, "It Ends with Us" is a romantic drama that made more than $350 million at the box office in 2024, making it one of the biggest hits of the year. gl/bdx/dw/sla
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni countersuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds dismissed
(NewsNation) — Justin Baldoni's countersuit against 'It Ends With Us' co-star Blake Lively, her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and their publicist has been dropped by a judge, according to court documents. The judge also reportedly dropped Baldoni's $250 million lawsuit against The New York Times. Judge Lewis J. Liman granted a motion to drop the $400 million lawsuit, which alleged defamation and extortion by Lively and her husband. The judge said that Baldoni's team could amend part of the claims if they wanted, but they had to do so by June 23. Blake Lively withdraws emotional distress claims against Justin Baldoni Liman said that Baldoni's team had not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements outside of her CRD complaint, which he said is privileged. The decision said, in part: 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and (publicist Leslie) Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.' Diddy's legal team again asks for a mistrial Read the full document below: Credit: United States District Court – Southern District of New YorkDownload Lively recently withdrew some of the emotional distress claims she made against Baldoni, according to a court filing. Streaming services next steps: What are Mubi, Tubi and more? Lively's claims had led Baldoni's lawyers to request her medical information. This included therapy notes and information on her mental health providers. Liman wrote that Baldoni's motion to get Lively's medical information was denied 'based on (Lively's) representation that the relevant claims will be withdrawn.' Liman claimed that Lively didn't want to disclose information but wanted to keep her right to re-file her claims. However, the judge decided that Lively 'cannot have it both ways,' and he closed the claims. Lively's attorneys will now not be able to use evidence regarding her alleged emotional distress. Her lawyers said that Baldoni team's request of her medical information was a 'press stunt,' leading them to urge the court to sanction Baldoni's attorneys for allegedly abusing the docket. 'It is based on two brazenly false assertions. First, they claim that Ms. Lively has 'refused' to disclose medical and mental health information, but as counsel for the Wayfarer Parties concede, that information is relevant only to Ms. Lively's stand-alone tort-based emotional distress claims that she indicated she was withdrawing,' the Lively filing claimed. Lively originally brought the lawsuit against Baldoni for alleged sexual harassment. One insider told NewsNation's Paula Froelich in February that Lively and Reynolds 'have no idea what's coming down the pike.' Tony Awards laud android rom-com 'Maybe Happy Ending' and history-making 'Purpose' Another source said that no one wanted to work with Lively since the lawsuits. A trial for Lively's suit against Baldoni has been scheduled for March 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
