Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
Representative of California, Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon on Wednesday will file the My Body, My Data Act in both the US House and Senate. The bill aims to block companies from collecting, using, retaining or disclosing information about someone's reproductive health unless that data is essential to providing a requested service. This provision would apply to information about pregnancy, menstruation, abortion, contraception and other matters relating to reproductive health.
'Young people live our lives online, right? That includes tracking our periods, but it also includes our phones tracking our location and using Google to think about your medical care or how to obtain an abortion for yourself or a friend, or ordering abortion pills online, or using an Uber to travel to an abortion clinic,' Jacobs said. 'All of those things are tracked online, and none of those are protected right now.'
Law enforcement officials have already attempted to use people's data trails to identify abortion seekers. In 2022, the year that the US supreme court overturned Roe, Nebraska brought a series of felony and misdemeanor charges against a teenager and her mother in connection to the teen's abortion. The charges relied on Facebook chats, which the social media giant had turned over. (Both the teenager and her mother pleaded guilty and were sentenced to time behind bars .) In 2023, anti-abortion activists used cellphone location information to send anti-abortion messages to people who had visited some Planned Parenthood clinics. And in May, a Texas police officer searched tens of automatic license plate reader cameras, including in states that permit abortion, for a woman who officials suspected of self-managing an abortion.
The post-Roe landscape is also creating more opportunities for online surveillance. In recent years, orders for abortion pills online have spiked, as tens of thousands more Americans have used online services to obtain pills to 'self-manage' their own abortions.
A number of women have also faced criminal charges over miscarriages, leading abortion rights advocates to worry that women who Google phrases like 'how to get an abortion' and then miscarry could find themselves in law enforcement's crosshairs.
'It doesn't deal with everything in terms of data brokers, but it does put women in a much stronger position to protect their rights,' Wyden said of the My Body, My Data Act. 'Reproductive rights are the ultimate privacy priority, because the fundamental right of a woman to control her own body and her own healthcare is as private as it gets.'
An earlier version of the bill was introduced in 2023. Given that Republicans control Congress, the bill is not likely to pass.
'I have many Republican colleagues who say they care about data privacy. We work together on data privacy in every other area, but when it comes to anything abortion-related, they refuse to do it,' Jacobs said. 'This is also the third oldest Congress in history, and I'll be honest, many of my colleagues don't understand how period tracking apps or website searches or location data even work.'
Jacobs says she uses a period tracker run by a company based in Europe that is subject to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, a set of strict regulations that governs how businesses obtain and handle people's online data.
While the US has no similar regulations on the federal level, Washington state in 2023 became the first in the country to create a state version of the My Health, My Data Act. That law covers health data that is not otherwise protected by the US Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (Hipaa) – including information about reproductive healthcare services – and requires companies to give their customers more privacy disclosures and seek their authorization before selling their data. It also gives Washington residents the ability to demand those companies delete their personal information.
Jacobs advises people to use apps based in states with some degree of protection for reproductive health data.
She added: 'If you live in a state that is really criminalizing abortion and going after people, you should be careful about what you put online.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mike Collins rolls out 159-county organization in Georgia Senate bid
Rep. Mike Collins's (R-Ga.) campaign is rolling out a grassroots organization in all of Georgia's 159 counties in support of his Senate bid as he vies for the GOP nod to take on Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.). The news of the 159-county organization, which was first shared with The Hill, includes 413 county captains across the state and is aimed at turning out low-propensity voters. The campaign noted the last few Republicans to have county-level mobilization campaigns who were successful in statewide reelection bids were President Trump and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R). In a press release, the Collins campaign touted the initiative's creation, noting the Georgia Republican had only been in the race for two weeks, and calling it 'a testament to the appeal of Collins' message, authentic brand, and his team's experience in the state.' The Collins campaign noted it included leaders who had previously served on Trump's and Kemp's county-level mobilization efforts. Collins is vying against Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) and former football coach Derek Dooley, seen as Kemp's preferred candidate, for the Republican nomination to challenge Ossoff next year. Collins has gained several endorsements from his congressional delegation in addition to state legislative leaders, which include some of Kemp's allies. Meanwhile, Carter has a financial edge so far with more cash on hand than Collins. Carter ended the latest quarter with $4 million in the bank while Collins, who's been in the race for several weeks, ended the last quarter with $1 million. Carter loaned himself $2 million in the last quarter as he puts some of his own financial resources into the race. Dooley, meanwhile, enjoys connections to Kemp's political orbit. Collins and Carter have both hammered the former football coach hard since Dooley announced, setting up what's expected to be a hotly contested primary.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
On gerrymandering, Democrats should fight fire with fire
If you want to understand how Congress became so polarized, look no further than Texas. Egged on by President Trump, Gov. Greg Abbot (R) and Republican leaders in the state are trying to engage in mid-decade redistricting, bucking the norm of waiting until the conclusion of the census every 10 years to redraw congressional maps to accommodate population changes. Both Democrats and Republicans have weaponized gerrymandering over the years. But only Texas Republicans have tried twice — in 2003 and now — to exercise the nuclear option of mid-decade redrawing of districts twice. I understand the motivations of these Republicans — and the desire of Democrats to take revenge. In 2012, I chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and we had a score to settle with Republicans for eliminating six Democratic seats in Texas in their 2003 mid-decade assault. We might have tried to persuade Democratic governors and legislators to strike earlier than the typical redrawing of maps after the 2010 census, but we decided not to retaliate against Republican rule-breaking with rule-breaking of our own. Instead, we waited for the regular process to take place ahead of the 2012 election. Once the decennial census concluded, we quickly realized that our best opportunity to pick up more seats was in Illinois, where the House delegation had eight Democrats and 11 Republicans. Gov. Pat Quinn and Democratic leaders in the statehouse became political Picassos, redrawing districts to create three more Democratic seats after the 2012 elections. That was not a one-off. Both parties have regularly engaged in designing their own abstract district art. Pennsylvania's old Seventh District — designed in 2011 to protect Republican incumbent Rep. Patrick Meehan — was famously called ' Goofy kicking Donald Duck ' for its bizarre resemblance to the Disney characters. In 2000, Arizona created a district that snaked oddly along the Colorado River so as to include the Hopi Reservation but not the surrounding Navajo Reservation, circumventing longstanding tensions between the two tribes. In 2022, a plan favored by Democrats in New York extended my former Third Congressional District across several bridges and the Long Island Sound, into the Bronx. But that gerrymandering plan backfired, as a state judge struck it down. The result of this map madness is that the moderate, competitive districts have shriveled, while the number of highly partisan districts has skyrocketed. When I first entered Congress in 2001, there were 29 districts with a partisan voting index within a range of four points, reliably swinging between a two-point Republican or Democratic advantage, depending on national trends. In other words, they were toss-ups, and the incumbents needed crossover voters to win reelection. Bipartisanship wasn't a fuzzy goal — it was an urgent strategic imperative. Today, the number of those districts is just 16. Most of the other districts have been drawn to be more red or blue. That means that many House members don't lay awake at night fretting about being defeated in the general election by someone in the other party. Instead, they lay awake thinking about being defeated by a fringe, extreme candidate in their next primary. The political gravity of Congress has shifted. Our system forces legislators to the ideological extremes, when most Americans fall closer to the center. That's without even accounting for the trend of partisan residential sorting, as Americans increasingly live with ideologically likeminded neighbors. We've divided ourselves into Fox News and MSNBC districts, where contradicting views are rarely found on any given block. Of course, some states have attempted redistricting reforms. California and Arizona adopted independent commissions. New York has a bipartisan redistricting commission that places guardrails on just how much Democrats can gerrymander. And that's part of the problem Democrats face: Republicans in Texas and elsewhere play to win by breaking the rules, while in Democratic controlled states, leaders often play to protect the rules, even when it costs them. Over the years, many have argued that Democrats need to fight fire with fire. Instead, Democrats have historically focused on writing a fair fire code even as arson consumes American bipartisanship. But this new Texas mid-decade redistricting push seems to have finally changed the Democratic mindset. Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, Kathy Hochul of New York and JB Pritzker of Illinois are teasing mutual assured gerrymandering destruction by threatening mid-decade redistricting in their own states if Texas Republicans go through with their plan. Each of these efforts faces an uphill legal climb, however, given that voters in two of those three states outlawed such practices. Democrats have realized that patiently waiting until the next redistricting cycle is not an option. Congressional majorities aren't won on a moral high ground but on the streets. Only when Republican members of Congress from New York, California and Illinois see their seats turn blue will national GOP leaders recognize that, in gerrymandering, 'an eye for an eye' makes the whole political system blind. And so to restore bipartisanship in the long run, Democrats may need to play by Texas Republican rules.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cuomo knocks Mamdani for rent-stabilized apartment
Andrew Cuomo is going on offense against fellow New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani over his rent-stabilized apartment despite his well-off financial status. Cuomo formally unveiled a legislative proposal on Tuesday that he's calling 'Zohran's Law,' which would require that upon a rent-stabilized apartment becoming vacant, the rent for the next renter must be no less than 30 percent of their income. He said this would ensure that rent-stabilized apartments are available for those who need it and not the wealthy. 'We must build more housing quickly, but we also need to ensure that our rent-stabilized apartments are going to the New Yorkers who need them the most,' the former New York governor said. 'They are supposed to be for hardworking men and women, but far too many rich people are taking advantage. 'We must stop the Zohran Mamdanis of the world from gaming the system and boxing out lower income New Yorkers who are barely scraping by and Zohran's law will do that,' Cuomo continued. Mamdani earns over $140,000 per year in his role as a New York state Assembly member and has said he pays $2,300 per month in his rent-stabilized apartment. Cuomo also rents an apartment but pays significantly more than Mamdani does. A release from Cuomo's campaign touts his plan to build and preserve more than 500,000 affordable units, two-thirds of which would be for low-income and moderate-income New Yorkers. But he said the affordable units must be for those who truly need them. The release states about 46 percent of tenants in rent-stabilized apartments and 40 percent of tenants in market-rate housing pay at least 30 percent of their income on rent. The campaign said Cuomo's proposal builds on a reform he enacted as governor in 2019 to prevent housing units from no longer being rent controlled if the rent or the tenant's income reached a certain high level. But some housing experts expressed skepticism about Cuomo's plan, telling The Associated Press that the proposal would by definition require individuals to pay a significant portion of their income on rent. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment. The general election race for New York City mayor has been heating up as Election Day approaches, with Cuomo running as an independent after losing the Democratic primary to Mamdani. The field is made up of five candidates — Mamdani, Cuomo, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, Republican Curtis Sliwa and independent Jim Walden. Adams is a registered Democrat but is also running as an independent. Mamdani has hit back at Cuomo recently, taking shots at a phone call that Cuomo and President Trump reportedly had to discuss the race. Cuomo denied this, saying he 'can't remember' the last time he spoke to Trump and that he and Trump haven't ever discussed the race. Mamdani also released a video on Tuesday criticizing Cuomo over a consulting business he's had for the past couple years without publicly revealing his clients, calling on him to release a list. Mamdani has led in polling of the general election by double digits, with the other candidates splitting opposition to him.
