logo
Supreme Court Rules on Birthright Citizenship: What to Know

Supreme Court Rules on Birthright Citizenship: What to Know

Newsweek4 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Supreme Court is meeting on Friday to decide the final cases of its term, including one concerning President Donald Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship for U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally.
Why It Matters
The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that all children born in the United States are automatically American citizens.
But the issue before the justices in Trump v. CASA is not the lawfulness of Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for some people. Rather, they are weighing whether judges have the authority to issue the nationwide, or universal, injunctions, that have blocked Trump's order from being implemented.
The Trump administration has complained that judges are overreaching by issuing orders that apply to everyone instead of only the parties involved.
Such orders have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations over the past decade, but they have emerged as an important check on Trump's agenda, increasingly frustrating the president and his allies.
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C., on June 24, 2025.
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C., on June 24, 2025.
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
Trump signed an executive order to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily shortly on his first day back in office on January 20.
Federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts have issued nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's order, with one calling it "blatantly unconstitutional."
The Trump administration then made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented his executive order from taking effect anywhere in the U.S.
At oral arguments in May, the high court appeared highly skeptical on how Trump would implement the changes to birthright citizenship. But justices also showed signs they wanted to limit nationwide court orders.
What People Are Saying
Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, previously told Newsweek: "It's very possible, maybe even likely, that the Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions in Trump v. CASA. Some of the conservative justices, like Justice Gorsuch, have expressed concern that such injunctions give district judges the power to block federal laws nationwide.
The Supreme Court may establish a rule to limit injunctions to the parties in the case or the district or circuit where the case is filed. Or it may require a higher standard to grant nationwide relief. Though the criticism of nationwide injunctions may be warranted, having inconsistent immigration holdings in different states may be its own problem. Immigration law needs to be uniform and applied consistently across the country."
President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social ahead of oral arguments in the case in May: "Birthright Citizenship was not meant for people taking vacations to become permanent Citizens of the United States of America, and bringing their families with them, all the time laughing at the 'SUCKERS' that we are!
"The United States of America is the only Country in the World that does this, for what reason, nobody knows — But the drug cartels love it! We are, for the sake of being politically correct, a STUPID Country but, in actuality, this is the exact opposite of being politically correct, and it is yet another point that leads to the dysfunction of America."
Ama Frimpong, Legal Director for immigrant rights nonprofit CASA, said in a statement after oral arguments in the case: "This is not a law or policy that needs to be changed. Let's be clear about what this is. This is an attempt at white supremacy. This is an assault on Black and brown families. On our very existence.
"What Trump and the administration are trying to do is erase our communities and our families from this country entirely. They want to deny citizenship to children born here—our children, our babies—just because their parents are immigrants."
What's Next
The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on October 6.
This article includes reporting from The Associated Press.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship
Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship

Associated Press

time17 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship

The U.S. Supreme Court will issue decisions on the final six cases left on its docket for the summer, including those that are emergency appeals relating to U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda. Cases on the court's emergency docket are handled swiftly, and decisions often come without explanations of the justices' reasoning. Decisions released today will be related to appeals on birthright citizenship, an online age-verfication law in Texas, the Education Department's firing of nearly 1,400 workers and DOGE-related government job cuts. Update: Date: 2025-06-27 13:23:15 Title: The justices will take the bench at 10 a.m. Content: Once they're seated, they'll get right to the opinions. The opinions are announced in reverse order of seniority so that the junior justices go first. It's likely that the birthright citizenship case will be announced last by Chief Justice John Roberts.

GOP rep speaks out after being forced to evacuate offices over threats from pro-abortion activists
GOP rep speaks out after being forced to evacuate offices over threats from pro-abortion activists

Fox News

time17 minutes ago

  • Fox News

GOP rep speaks out after being forced to evacuate offices over threats from pro-abortion activists

Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., is speaking out about the death threats she's received from pro-abortion activists after publicly sharing her experience with a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy — an ordeal that ultimately led to the evacuation of her offices. Cammack told "Fox & Friends First" on Friday that she was targeted by pro-abortion activists after sharing her life-threatening ectopic pregnancy story with The Wall Street Journal. Last May, the Florida congresswoman found herself in a frightening position when her doctors were hesitant to treat her possibly fatal pregnancy complication due to the state's near-total abortion ban. "It took about 10 days to discover exactly what was going on. Doctors originally thought that I was just miscarrying, and then they discovered a very rare ectopic — actually one of the rarest and most dangerous types of ectopic pregnancies you can have," she said. Cammack noted that while Florida's abortion laws have exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother, her doctors were still hesitant to provide her with life-saving care because they were scared they would face losing their license or even being sent to prison. "I literally was lying on the table reading them the law, and it dawned on me as I was sitting there with my husband — this is what women are experiencing because of the fearmongering around women's healthcare, and it has to stop," she asserted, adding, "The left absolutely played a role in making sure that doctors and women were scared to seek out the help that they needed." Following the publication of her story in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday, Cammack began receiving death threats from pro-abortion activists, leading to the evacuation of her offices. One of the threats she received read: "We would be better off if you hadn't survived. The only good Republican is a dead Republican." Cammack said that she's received "thousands of threatening phone calls" and more than three dozen "actionable, credible" death threats since sharing her story. "Things that are so horrible, like 'I'm going to come cut out your unborn child and roast it over a fire.' Things that I can't say on air," the congresswoman recalled. "What is really, really scary is the vitriol and the fact that people don't even want to look into the details or take accountability for their actions," she said. According to Cammack, the most important lesson she's taken away from her traumatic experience is that there's not only a "literacy crisis" unfolding in the country, but also a basic lack of understanding of "what healthcare for women is," adding that "ectopic pregnancies are not abortions."

Trump admin live updates: White House sticks to megabill deadline despite Senate GOP's Medicaid setback

time18 minutes ago

Trump admin live updates: White House sticks to megabill deadline despite Senate GOP's Medicaid setback

President Donald Trump is back in Washington after his trip overseas for a NATO summit, where allies committed to an increase in defense spending long pushed for by Trump. On Thursday morning, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine provided more information about U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, with Hegseth pushing back against a preliminary U.S. intelligence report that said Tehran's nuclear program may have only been set back months. Meanwhile, the Senate is making changes to the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as Republicans try to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline for passage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store