Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 am ET (0401 GMT) on Monday, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from 'foreign terrorists.'
The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
The entry of people from seven other countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela — will be partially restricted.
Trump, a Republican, said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a 'large-scale presence of terrorists,' fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States.
He cited last Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt is not part of the travel ban.
The travel ban forms part of Trump's policy to restrict immigration into the United States and is reminiscent of a similar move in his first term when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations.
Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned expressed dismay and disbelief.
Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to US citizens in response to Trump's action.
'Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride,' he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the US a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the US
Afghans who worked for the US or US-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the US expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban.
Democratic US lawmakers also voiced concern about the policies.
'Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional,' said US Representative Ro Khanna on social media late on Thursday. 'People have a right to seek asylum.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Americans deserve the truth about Biden's decline
America is waking up to a truth many suspected, but few dared to say out loud. Former President Joe Biden, the leader of the free world, was not entirely in charge during some of the most critical years of his presidency. The recently released book 'Original Sin,' by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson, lays out in painful detail a scandal that may well be the biggest of our era: a cover-up of the president's decline, executed by those closest to him and enabled by an obedient political class and a complicit media. This was not just about an aging man who slowed down. According to the book, based on nearly 200 interviews with senior White House officials, Democratic strategists and other insiders, President Biden frequently forgot names, even those of his own national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, and close allies like George Clooney. Staff privately discussed whether he needed a wheelchair. His schedule was carefully limited, his access to the press tightly managed and key decisions were increasingly made not by him but those around him. Let us pause and think about that. Who was making those decisions? If the president was not capable, who was really running the country? Was it Chief of Staff Ron Klain or his successor, Jeff Zients? First Lady Jill Biden? Cabinet members? Or a shadow circle of advisers acting in his name? More importantly, who knew and chose to say nothing? The answer is nearly everyone in power. Members of Congress, top donors, Democratic operatives and members of the press all knew something was wrong. Yet they continued to assure the public that Biden was 'sharp,' 'focused' and 'fit to serve.' They brushed off any concern about his age as 'right-wing smears' or 'misinformation.' Hollywood elites, late-night television show hosts and social media influencers joined in, mocking anyone who dared ask real questions. They were not just wrong. They were lying. This was not a momentary lapse in judgment but a coordinated effort to mislead the American people. It was a calculated political gamble: keep Biden on the ticket, protect the brand and do whatever it takes to hold on to power. Truth was sacrificed for strategy. Integrity was buried for the sake of winning. Even when signs of decline were impossible to ignore, his stumbling debate performances, long pauses mid-speech, lost trains of thought and confusion about global leaders led Democratic leaders to close ranks. When Tapper, who now admits that the media fell short, says this scandal 'may be worse than Watergate,' we should listen. Because unlike Watergate, which involved the abuse of power in a reelection campaign, this deception significantly shaped America's national security, economy and global standing. For years, the US was led by someone who was increasingly not fully present, while those around him quietly managed the illusion. We need to determine what decisions were made during this period and by whom. What was the real chain of command during the withdrawal from Afghanistan, when chaos erupted and American allies were left behind? Who shaped Washington's response to rising tensions with Beijing, the war in Ukraine and the growing unrest at the southern border? This was not a momentary lapse in judgment but a coordinated effort to mislead the American people. Dalia Al-Aqidi If Biden was unable to engage meaningfully, then these decisions were made by unelected staffers or advisers, people the American people never voted for. This scandal goes beyond Biden. It reflects how far today's Democratic Party is willing to go to protect its grip on power. Rather than face the truth and find a viable leader, they doubled down, attacked critics and told Americans to look the other way. Even after Biden's disastrous debate performance last June and his withdrawal from the 2024 election race the following month, the damage was done. Former Vice President Kamala Harris stepped in, but the voters had lost trust. The deception cost Democrats the White House and, more importantly, shattered public confidence. This betrayal also sends a dangerous message: that image matters more than honesty, that loyalty to the party outweighs duty to the country and that political victory is worth more than democratic accountability. Honesty should be a nonnegotiable principle, no matter who is in power. This scandal is not about defending a Republican or attacking a Democrat. It is about the responsibility that comes with leading the free world. It is about preserving dignity, transparency and the trust of the people. If the roles were reversed, if a Republican president showed signs of severe cognitive decline, Democrats would be on every network demanding transparency, invoking the 25th Amendment and calling for impeachment. But when it was one of their own, they chose silence. This is not just about Democrats versus Republicans. It is about truth versus power. And the American people deserve better than this kind of politics. Those who stood by silently, including elected officials, Cabinet members, media figures and celebrities, owe the nation more than just a retrospective apology. They owe the country the truth, the whole truth. And they owe the people their resignation if they played a role in hiding this scandal. This moment should be a turning point not just for one party but for the entire country. Leaders should be held accountable not only for what they do but for what they hide. This is not just about one presidency, it is about a culture that allowed deception to masquerade as leadership. It is about the warning signs that were ignored, the voices that were silenced and the consequences that will echo for years. The presidency is not a performance, it is a responsibility. And those who turned it into a cover story must be held to account. Truth should never have a side; it must stand alone. That is the foundation of American democracy.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
National Guard troops arrive in Los Angeles on Trump's orders to quell immigration protests
LOS ANGELES: National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles early Sunday on orders from President Donald Trump in response to clashes in recent days between federal immigration authorities and protesters seeking to block them from carrying out deportations. Members of California's National Guard were seen staging early Sunday at the federal complex in downtown Los Angeles that includes the Metropolitan Detention Center, one of several sites that have seen confrontations involving hundreds of people in last two days. The troops included members of the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, according to a social media post from the Department of Defense that showed dozens of National Guard members with long guns and an armored vehicle. Trump has said he is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell the protests, which he called 'a form of rebellion.' Early Sunday, the deployment was limited to a small area in downtown Los Angeles. The protests have been relatively small and limited to a downtown section. The rest of the city of 4 million people is largely unaffected. Their arrival follows clashes near a Home Depot in the heavily Latino city of Paramount, south of Los Angeles. As protesters sought to block Border Patrol vehicles, with some hurling rocks and chunks of cement, federal agents unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls. Tensions were high after a series of sweeps by immigration authorities the previous day, as the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the city climbed past 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement. On Sunday morning, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the National Guard would 'keep peace and allow people to be able to protest but also to keep law and order.' In a signal of the administration's aggressive approach, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also threatened to deploy active-duty Marines 'if violence continues' in the region. The move came over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, marking the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Newsom, a Democrat, said Trump's decision to call in the National Guard was 'purposefully inflammatory.' He described Hegseth's threat to deploy Marines on American soil as 'deranged behavior.' Trump's order came after clashes in Paramount and neighboring Compton, where a car was set on fire. Protests continued into the evening in Paramount, with several hundred demonstrators gathered near a doughnut shop, and authorities holding up barbed wire to keep the crowd back. Crowds also gathered again outside federal buildings in downtown Los Angeles, including a detention center, where local police declared an unlawful assembly and began to arrest people.
Asharq Al-Awsat
6 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Chinese Hackers, User Lapses Turn Smartphones into a 'Mobile Security Crisis'
Cybersecurity investigators noticed a highly unusual software crash — it was affecting a small number of smartphones belonging to people who worked in government, politics, tech and journalism. The crashes, which began late last year and carried into 2025, were the tipoff to a sophisticated cyberattack that may have allowed hackers to infiltrate a phone without a single click from the user, The AP news reported. The attackers left no clues about their identities, but investigators at the cybersecurity firm iVerify noticed that the victims all had something in common: They worked in fields of interest to China's government and had been targeted by Chinese hackers in the past. Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in US cyberdefenses. Groups linked to China's military and intelligence service have targeted the smartphones of prominent Americans and burrowed deep into telecommunication networks, according to national security and tech experts. It shows how vulnerable mobile devices and apps are and the risk that security failures could expose sensitive information or leave American interests open to cyberattack, those experts say. 'The world is in a mobile security crisis right now,' said Rocky Cole, a former cybersecurity expert at the National Security Agency and Google and now chief operations officer at iVerify. 'No one is watching the phones.' US zeroes in on China as a threat, and Beijing levels its own accusations US authorities warned in December of a sprawling Chinese hacking campaign designed to gain access to the texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. 'They were able to listen in on phone calls in real time and able to read text messages,' said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois. He is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the senior Democrat on the Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, created to study the geopolitical threat from China. Chinese hackers also sought access to phones used by Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance during the 2024 campaign. The Chinese government has denied allegations of cyberespionage, and accused the US of mounting its own cyberoperations. It says America cites national security as an excuse to issue sanctions against Chinese organizations and keep Chinese technology companies from the global market. 'The US has long been using all kinds of despicable methods to steal other countries' secrets,' Lin Jian, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a recent press conference in response to questions about a CIA push to recruit Chinese informants. US intelligence officials have said China poses a significant, persistent threat to US economic and political interests, and it has harnessed the tools of digital conflict: online propaganda and disinformation, artificial intelligence and cyber surveillance and espionage designed to deliver a significant advantage in any military conflict. Mobile networks are a top concern. The US and many of its closest allies have banned Chinese telecom companies from their networks. Other countries, including Germany, are phasing out Chinese involvement because of security concerns. But Chinese tech firms remain a big part of the systems in many nations, giving state-controlled companies a global footprint they could exploit for cyberattacks, experts say. Chinese telecom firms still maintain some routing and cloud storage systems in the US — a growing concern to lawmakers. 'The American people deserve to know if Beijing is quietly using state-owned firms to infiltrate our critical infrastructure,' US Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Mich. and chairman of the China committee, which in April issued subpoenas to Chinese telecom companies seeking information about their US operations. Mobile devices have become an intel treasure trove Mobile devices can buy stocks, launch drones and run power plants. Their proliferation has often outpaced their security. The phones of top government officials are especially valuable, containing sensitive government information, passwords and an insider's glimpse into policy discussions and decision-making. The White House said last week that someone impersonating Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, reached out to governors, senators and business leaders with texts and phone calls. It's unclear how the person obtained Wiles' connections, but they apparently gained access to the contacts in her personal cellphone, The Wall Street Journal reported. The messages and calls were not coming from Wiles' number, the newspaper reported. While most smartphones and tablets come with robust security, apps and connected devices often lack these protections or the regular software updates needed to stay ahead of new threats. That makes every fitness tracker, baby monitor or smart appliance another potential foothold for hackers looking to penetrate networks, retrieve information or infect systems with malware. Federal officials launched a program this year creating a 'cyber trust mark' for connected devices that meet federal security standards. But consumers and officials shouldn't lower their guard, said Snehal Antani, former chief technology officer for the Pentagon's Joint Special Operations Command. 'They're finding backdoors in Barbie dolls,' said Antani, now CEO of a cybersecurity firm, referring to concerns from researchers who successfully hacked the microphone of a digitally connected version of the toy. Risks emerge when smartphone users don't take precautions It doesn't matter how secure a mobile device is if the user doesn't follow basic security precautions, especially if their device contains classified or sensitive information, experts say. Mike Waltz, who departed as Trump's national security adviser, inadvertently added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal chat used to discuss military plans with other top officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols set up in his office so he could use the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, the AP has reported. Hegseth has rejected assertions that he shared classified information on Signal, a popular encrypted messaging app not approved for the use of communicating classified information. China and other nations will try to take advantage of such lapses, and national security officials must take steps to prevent them from recurring, said Michael Williams, a national security expert at Syracuse University. 'They all have access to a variety of secure communications platforms,' Williams said. "We just can't share things willy-nilly.'
