India says it has powers to suspend Celebi's clearance without warning
NEW DELHI, May 22 (Reuters) - India's government told a court on Thursday it was well within New Delhi's legal powers to revoke Turkey-based Celebi's clearance to provide aviation ground services without giving it advance warning, given the matter concerned national security.
Celebi's clearance was cancelled by India last week amid growing public anger after Turkey supported Pakistan in the recent India-Pakistan conflict. Indians have also been boycotting everything from Turkish coffee, jams and chocolates to Turkey holidays.
Celebi (CLEBI.IS), opens new tab asked the Delhi High Court this week to quash the cancellation by arguing it was issued without any warning and based on "vague" and unexplained "national security" concerns, but Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said on Thursday it did not need to share details of its reasons with the company.
Indian courts have previously held that in some cases national security concerns can outweigh the requirement of fairness and in this case, there was no need to comply with principles of natural justice, he said.
"In some situations, it is not possible to give reasons of action and neither giving a hearing is possible," Mehta said in the court in Indian government's first detailed remarks on Celebi's challenge.
The Indian government handed some details to Justice Sachin Datta in a sealed envelope. The case will next be heard on Friday.
Earlier in the day, Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for India's foreign ministry, said the Celebi matter had been discussed with the Turkish embassy in New Delhi.
Celebi argued in its court filing that the decision impacts 3,791 jobs and investor confidence. It added that it provided ground handling services at airports in New Delhi, Kerala, Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Goa.
In defending Celebi's cancellation, Mehta also argued on Thursday that airport ground operators have detailed access to the physical infrastructure as well as passenger details including VIP movements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
China-US trade deal kicks the rare earths can down the road
LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 12 (Reuters) - The tentative deal between the United States and China may represent a retreat from the worst-case scenario of a total collapse of trade between the world's two biggest economies, but it creates more problems than it solves. President Donald Trump touted the agreement, which is still subject to final approvals on both sides, as a "great deal" that will be good for both countries. "We have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too," Trump told reporters prior to attending a performance on Wednesday evening at Washington's Kennedy Center. While not all the details are known, what has been revealed shows a deal that will probably hurt both economies, and not solve some of the pressing issues, such as China's dominance of the rare earths supply chain. The United States will impose tariffs of 55% on imports from China, while China can levy 10% on its purchases from the United States. This still represents a sharp increase in tariffs from the 25% on imports from China that was in place when Trump returned to the White House in late January. Tariffs at such a level are likely high enough to cause trade to shrink while boosting inflation in the United States, and lowering economic growth in both countries. If Beijing does keep 10% tariffs on imports of U.S. energy commodities, these will be high enough to ensure that virtually no U.S. crude oil, coal or liquefied natural gas enters China, eliminating one of the few products that China is able to buy in large quantities from the United States. It's also questionable whether the tariffs will be enough to prompt more manufacturing in the United States, or whether they will simply cause some production to shift from China to countries with lower import duties. Trump did single out rare earths when talking up the trade deal, saying China will provide the metals that are found in a wide range of electronics and vehicles "up front". But the deal does little to solve the underlying problem with rare earths, magnets and other refined metals such as lithium and cobalt, which are dominated by Chinese supply chains. At best, the agreement this week is a kick the can down the road type of deal, insofar as it prevents an immediate crisis in manufacturing in the United States, but leaves open the possibility that Beijing will once again threaten supplies if there are problems between the two sides in the future. China controls 85% of global rare earths refining, a situation that has hitherto largely benefited Western companies as they have been able to source the metals at prices far lower than what they would have had to pay had they tried to mine and process the elements by themselves. Rare earths are an example of the wider problem with so-called critical minerals. It's all very well to designate a mineral as critical, but if you don't actually do anything to secure a supply chain, then you really have to question just how critical the mineral is. Rare earths aren't really that rare, although finding economic deposits is challenging. It's the same for lithium, copper, cobalt, tungsten and a range of other metals that many governments designate as critical. But developing supply chains for these minerals and refined metals outside of China is costly, and so far Western countries and companies have been unwilling to commit funds. Companies won't develop new mines and processing plants if they have to compete with China at market prices, as very few projects would be economic. Governments have been sluggish in developing policies that would support new supply chains, such as guaranteeing offtake at prices high enough to justify investment, or by providing loans or other incentives. This means that the world remains beholden to China for these metals, and is likely to remain so until governments start to act rather than just talk. It's also worth noting that China will have learned from its latest talks with the Trump administration. As Trump himself may have put it, the United States doesn't hold all the cards, with Beijing having a few aces up its sleeve as well. The danger is always in overplaying one's hand. If Beijing keeps using rare earths as a trump card, it runs the risk that the West will cough up the cash to build its own supply chain. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Chinese fighter jet in near miss with Japanese military plane as Pacific tensions rise
Japan has voiced 'serious concern' over a near miss involving one of its military planes and a Chinese fighter jet in the Pacific, where recent manoeuvres by Chinese aircraft carrier groups have raised tensions across the region. The Chinese aircraft took off from a moving aircraft carrier, the Shandong, and reportedly flew within 45 metres of a Japanese Self-Defence Force (SDF) patrol plane shortly afterwards. On Thursday, Japan's chief cabinet secretary, Yoshimasa Hayashi, urged Beijing to prevent a repeat of the incident, which took place at the weekend. Hayashi said the near miss, which occurred in international waters, could have caused an accidental collision. Japan's defence ministry said a J-15 fighter jet from the Chinese aircraft carrier Shandong had engaged in other 'dangerous' activity, including passing in front of an SDF aircraft flying at the same altitude about 900 metres away. Although there was no damage to the Japanese plane or injuries among its crew, Japan had 'expressed serious concerns' over the 'abnormal approaches', the ministry said. The incidents have added to concern across the Asia-Pacific about China's increasingly bold naval and air activity. China sees its carrier groups as essential to its goal of projecting power in the region's oceans. It routinely sends coast guard vessels, warships and warplanes to areas around disputed islands in the east China Sea, but it appears to be extending its reach. China's military and government have not responded publicly to Japan's complaint about the near miss. Earlier this week, however, the foreign ministry defended the dual aircraft carrier drills in the Pacific, urging Japan to 'view those activities objectively and rationally'. 'China's military vessels' activities in relevant waters are fully consistent with international law and international practices,' spokesman Lin Jian said. 'China pursues a national defence policy that is defensive in nature.' The dual carrier drills, which officials said were designed to test 'troops' capabilities in far-sea defence and joint operations', are a sign of China's intention to expand its presence beyond the first and second island chains that border its eastern coastline. The first chain refers to the Pacific archipelago off the Asian mainland that includes Japan, Taiwan and part of the Philippines; the second is a strategic line that extends to Guam, a US territory in the Pacific. Last weekend was the first time a Chinese carrier had sailed east of the second chain. Japan's defence minister, Gen Nakatani, said: 'China apparently aims to elevate its capability of the two aircraft carriers, and to advance its operational capability of the distant sea and airspace.' Chinese fighter pilots have been accused of dangerous manoeuvres in the past, including by Australia, the Philippines, the US and Canada, as recently as February. In February the People's Liberation Army (PLA) also held live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand. State officials and media insist the naval activity is not aimed at a specific country or entity, but the PLA is openly working towards being able to launch a land invasion of Taiwan. On Wednesday, Chinese state media accused Japan of potentially breaching its postwar constitution, which limits its armed forced to a strictly defensive role, with plans to deploy new missile systems to the southern main island of Kyushu. The reports said the deployment, along with other weapons procurement, was 'confrontational' and would 'ultimately affect the peaceful development prospects of the entire region'. The Shandong and a second Chinese aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, entered an area of Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) – an area within 200 nautical miles (370km) of its coastline – in the Pacific for the first time last weekend. The Shandong sailed through waters 550km south-east of Japan's Miyako Island in the southern prefecture of Okinawa on Saturday, the ministry said, adding that it had conducted takeoff and landing drills involving fighter jets and helicopters north of Okinotori, Japan's southernmost island, and inside its EEZ. The Liaoning was spotted the same day 300km south-west of the easternmost island of Minamitori, before leaving Japan's EEZ to conduct similar exercises on Sunday, the Kyodo news agency said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India's Paytm slumps after government says reports of UPI transaction fees false
June 12 (Reuters) - Shares of digital payments firm Paytm ( opens new tab slumped as much as 10% on Thursday after India's finance ministry said, opens new tab that reports about the introduction of fees on the popular unified payments interface (UPI) transactions were false and baseless. The shares posted their sharpest intraday fall since February 2024, before coming off lows to trade down 8%. India's benchmark Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab was trading 0.2% lower. In India, merchants pay fees to banks or payment service providers, such as Paytm, for transactions. There is no fees on UPI payments. The delay or non-introduction of the fees is "sentiment negative for Paytm", brokerage UBS said, adding that the firm's adjusted core profits could decline more than 10% in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 if increased incentives are absent.
