Governor Returns Aparajita Bill To Bengal Government, Trinamool May Protest
West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose has sent back the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, 2024 to the state government.
As the Mamata Banerjee government faced public heat over the RG Hospital rape and murder case last year, the state had passed the an anti-rape bill in the assembly to enhance punishment, ensure speedy probe and rapid dispensation of justice for sexual assault cases.
The bill was tabled by the chief minister less than a month after a junior doctor was allegedly raped and murdered inside the seminar hall of RG Kar College and Hospital, run by the West Bengal government.
This bill was referred to the President by the governor but has now been returned to the state.
The reasons cited are while the bill proposes increase in punishment for rape from a minimum 10 years to life imprisonment for the remainder of one's life or death, the proposed punishment is "disproportionate and excessively harsh."
The other proposal of the bill deleting Section 65, which distinguishes between rape of women under 16 years and 12 years was also turned down. The objection stated was,"Removal of this classification violates the principle of proportionality, as the same punishment for different degrees of offence is legally inappropriate."
The proposed bill also made the death penalty mandatory in cases where the victim dies or is left in a persistent vegetative state. However, that too was objected as mandatory death penalty violates the Supreme Court's precedent (especially Mithu vs Punjab, 1983), which ruled that judicial discretion in sentencing is essential.
When questioned about women safety and security in the state since the RG Kar case and the recent Kasba Law College student rape incident, ministers and Trinamool Congress leaders said they would raise the Aparajita anti-rape bill.
With the bill now being returned, Trinamool state general secretary Kunal Ghosh said this would be met with protests.
"Why did the Centre return the Aparajita Bill to the state? Did they object, labeling the death penalty for rape and murder as an excessively cruel punishment?" he said.
"Details are being sought. If this is true, there will be strong protests. Mamata Banerjee has the strictest stance on women's safety. On the other hand, the BJP's mentality has now become clear," Mr Ghosh said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
In Supreme Court, EC may share same draft roll it gave to political parties
New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) is likely to inform the Supreme Court that it had shared the draft electoral rolls of Bihar with various political parties on August 1 and had also circulated lists detailing reasons for the deletion of nearly 6.5 million electors, people familiar with the matter told HT on Wednesday. The Election Commission of India headquarters in New Delhi(File Photo) The top court, which is hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the ECI's ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, on Wednesday directed the poll body to file to file a reply by August 9 in response to allegations that over 6.5 million names were deleted from the draft rolls. An official aware of the matter, requesting anonymity, said: 'The roll shared with parties on August 1 has detailed classifications of the 65 lakh (6.5 million) deletions. While there is no separate category for those who didn't fill enumeration forms, they have been grouped under 'migrated'. Suspected foreign nationals are also under review and listed under the same head, but they are being separately verified by electoral registration officers (EROs).' The top court's order came on a plea filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), a non-profit working on electoral and political reforms, alleging that ECI removed a column titled 'Uncollectable Reason' from the version of the draft roll published on August 1. The petition also sought disclosure of booth-wise deletions and their reasons. The top court asked ECI to inform it when were the draft rolls shared to the parties, which parties received these rolls, as well as to submit the list of deleted names. The official cited above said the draft rolls were handed over to all political parties by district collectors at 11 am on August 1, and published on the ECI's website at 3 pm the same day. Booth-level data, the official added, was shared with political party representatives. In a press note on July 25, the commission had said that 2.2 million electors were found deceased, 700,000 were registered in more than one place, and 3.5 million had either migrated permanently or were untraceable. After top court's direction on Wednesday, ECI issued a press note saying: '…lists of electors found dead, permanently shifted, having duplicate entries, or uncontactable after at least three visits by Booth Level Officers (BLOs) had been shared with all political parties and their BLAs on or before July 20.' It further shared a series of posts with various BLAs saying they have received the draft electoral roll and separately a list of the 6.5 million individuals removed from the roll. ECI also said that between August 1 and August 6 (9 AM), no political party had filed claims or objections related to the draft roll. However, 3,659 individual objections and claims have been submitted directly by electors. The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) rejected EC's 'no objections' received remarks, saying EC is trying to create an impression that everything is fine with the Bihar SIR and there are no complaints coming in. 'Nothing could be farther from the truth', the opposition party said in a post on X, listing several concerns, including the claim that its leaders had submitted complaints which were not being counted because they were not routed through BLAs. It also questioned the assumption that all 15,000 Form 6 applications received were from first-time voters and not from electors who had been deleted from the rolls. 'We have been repeatedly asking the EC to provide us with booth level lists of deletion specifying the ground thereof, but to no avail,' the Left party added.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Snake venom case: Supreme Court halts trial court proceedings against Elvish Yadav
The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted interim relief to YouTuber Elvish Yadav by staying proceedings against him in connection with the snake venom case.A bench led by Justice MM Sundresh issued notice on Yadav's petition challenging the FIR, chargesheet, and the summoning order passed by the trial court. The trial proceedings would not be allowed to procced in the meantime, the bench has approached the top court against the Allahabad High Court's order which had refused to quash the chargesheet and the trial court's cognisance of the case. In his plea filed before the Top court through Advocate Shahrukh Ali, Advocate Raman Yadav and Advocate Aman Jha, Elvish Yadav has argued that and cognisance of the offence under the Wildlife Protection act has been taken without a complaint filed by a competent officer, adding that police have no authority to investigate offences under the WPA or to file a chargesheet in relation with there is no legally admissible complaint against the petitioner, the disclosure statement alone cannot form the basis for prosecution, the court has argued that at the time of the registration of FIR, he was not present at the venue, and no recovery-whether of snakes, venom, or narcotics-has been made from or in connection with plea also claims that the High Court had dismissed the petition for quashing merely on the ground that graver offences were added in the chargesheet, without examining whether the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were made out against CASE AGAINST ELVISH YADAVThe case dates back to a complaint lodged in November 2023 by members of the NGO People For Animals, who accused Elvish Yadav of organising rave parties where snake venom was used as a recreational intoxicant. In a subsequent police raid at a banquet hall in Noida, nine snakes (including cobras and kraits) and around 20ml of snake venom were was arrested on March 17, 2024, based on the FIR filed under several sections of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, sections 284 and 289 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section120A (criminal conspiracy), and multiple provisions of the NDPS was remanded for 14 days but released on bail shortly after. The chargesheet filed in April 2024 spanned over 1,200 pages and included allegations of exotic snake smuggling, the involvement of foreign nationals in consuming venom, and links to rave the Supreme Court's stay in place, all proceedings before the trial court are paused for now. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on August 29, when responses are sought from the state and the complainant.- EndsTrending Reel
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Will Raise J&K Statehood Issue InINDIA Bloc Meet In Delhi": Farooq Abdullah
Srinagar: Ruling National Conference (NC) president Farooq Abdullah Wednesday said he would raise the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir issue in the meeting of INDIA bloc parties in Delhi the following day. Farooq Abdullah was responding to a question about Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's letter on Tuesday to the presidents of 42 political parties, including Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge, urging them to press the Centre to bring legislation in the ongoing Parliament session to restore statehood to J-K. "I am going there myself tomorrow. A Congress leader has called all opposition leaders. I will raise this issue there and hope that they have stood with us before as well, and will stand with us in future also," Abdullah told reporters in Anantnag district in south Kashmir. The NC chief also said the plea for the restoration of statehood to J-K is likely to be heard by the Supreme Court on Friday. "The statehood case is being heard by the Supreme Court on (August) 8. So, let us wait and see what happens there," he added. To a question about Mehbooba Mufti-led People's Democratic Party's (PDP's) criticism of the ruling party, the senior Abdullah said it is the PDP that brought "misfortune on us". "They joined hands with the BJP. What will they tell us? Unfortunately, they are fooling the people. Article 370 and 35A would not have been abrogated had (former CM) Mufti (Mohammad Sayeed) accepted the support from the National Conference and the Congress. "We had told him to take our support and we did not want any ministries. But they brought the BJP here and they are responsible. God has drowned them before and will drown them in the future as well," he added.
