Louisiana lawmakers propose ‘loser pays' law to prevent frivolous suits
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — A bill was prefiled to prevent lawsuits from giving the plaintiffs the financial burden after trial.
Louisiana Senator Blake Miguez (R-La.) and State Representative Mike Johnson (R-La.) are credited with being the authors of SB148. The legislation is referred to as the 'loser pays legislation.'
The bill states that if a defendant wins a pretrial dismissal, they can recover attorney fees from the plaintiff. If a defendant wins at a trial, resulting in the dismissal of all claims, they are also entitled to attorney fees and costs from the plaintiff.
Current Louisiana law states that each party takes care of their own attorney fees unless ruled otherwise or if there's a finding of frivolous litigation.
Miguez mentioned on X, formerly known as Twitter, that 'reducing the number of frivolous lawsuits filed will lower insurance costs.'
If the legislation were to pass, it would go into effect on Aug. 1, 2025.
The 2025 Regular Legislative Session will convene, starting at noon on Monday, April 14.
Dad's last-minute Christmas gift becomes $7M lotto winner
Disgraced former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick has died at age 94
Senate Republicans join push to limit power of judges
TikTok deal pulled after Trump tariff announcement
Louisiana lawmakers propose 'loser pays' law to prevent frivolous suits
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
KeyBanc cuts solar names to Underweight on ‘overwhelming' overhang
KeyBanc analyst Sophie Karp downgraded Sunrun (RUN), Enphase Energy (ENPH) and SolarEdge (SEDG) to Underweight from Sector Weight after Senate Republicans last night released a bill that would end tax credits for wind and solar earlier than for other sources. The new version of the bill would end incentives for wind and solar in 2028, though tax breaks for other sources of power including nuclear, hydropower and geothermal would be allowed to remain until being phased out in 2036. KeyBanc cites the 'ongoing and overwhelming regulatory overhang' for the downgrades. The Senate bill 'fails to deliver optimism' and the solar provisions are 'particularly punishing for the sector,' the analyst tells investors in a research note. KeyBanc's price targets are $31 for Enphase, $6 for Sunrun, and $16 for SolarEdge. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on RUN: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Video: Verve, solar stocks among major pre-market movers Why Is Sunrun Stock (RUN) Down 35% Today? Sunrun downgraded to Underweight from Sector Weight at KeyBanc Sunrun downgraded to Sell with 1c price target at GLJ Research Sunrun downgraded to Sell from Hold at GLJ Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tax law might be coming for your free office snacks
A change in tax law may make companies rethink a popular workplace perk: food and drink. Starting in 2026, companies will no longer be able to deduct the cost of on-site cafeterias or takeout for workers who stay late. And accountants say the change probably applies to office snacks and coffee, too. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Though the cost of such staff freebies is relatively small in the grand scheme of employee benefits, the potential change in tax law comes as many businesses are trimming expenses in the face of tariffs and economic uncertainty. 'Companies are in cost-cutting mode, and if they don't have some incentives, they will continue to cut back,' said Ellen Kossek, an emerita professor of management at Purdue University. 'We've seen this in Silicon Valley,' she added, referencing the onetime center of such upmarket perks as unlimited vacation time, on-site hair stylists, deluxe cafeterias and coffee bars. Because food can be a powerful motivator - especially at a time when many companies are abandoning remote and hybrid work - Kossek said companies' ratcheting down of staff offerings could affect the broader corporate culture and return-to-office initiatives. 'If you have to pay for your food, it's one less reason to come to the office.' U.S. tax law allow companies to deduct certain business costs, such as insurance, rent and office supplies, from their income before they pay taxes. But meals are treated differently, depending on the category. For instance, a company can deduct 50 percent of the restaurant bill for taking a client or a job candidate to lunch under current law. But a provision that allows companies to deduct cafeteria costs or any meals they provide in the workplace 'for the convenience of the employer' is poised to sunset in 2026. If it does, U.S. businesses would be looking at an additional $300 million a year in taxes, based on estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation. With congressional Republicans racing to advance President Donald Trump's tax and immigration bill and extend his 2017 tax cuts, some accountants had expected lawmakers to retain the workplace meal deduction. But the House version made an exception only for the restaurant industry, according to Christa Bierma, vice chair of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' committee on employee benefits. Unless the Senate makes further changes to the legislation, which tax experts say is unlikely, restaurants will continue to get the write-off. 'For some industries, it is culturally demanded,' Bierma noted of the exception. 'Nobody would want to be the first one to say we're not going to do this anymore.' Ending the tax advantage makes philosophical sense for conservatives, said Tax Foundation analyst Alex Muresianu. Under current rules, a company-paid lunch is essentially a form of tax-free income. And if the employee isn't paying tax, the company should, Muresianu said. 'We want to tax all employee compensation the same,' he said. 'And instead of wages, having employer-provided meals in various contexts is a form of nonwage compensation.' That thinking, though, doesn't align with other provisions in the Republican bill, which treats overtime wages and tips as tax-free. Trump is pushing senators to pass his tax bill by July 4 despite warnings from many economists and some lawmakers about the projected price tag; the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office expects it to expand the deficit by $2.4 trillion over a decade. In 2017, when lawmakers opted to sunset the in-house meal deduction in eight years, the coronavirus pandemic had not yet driven millions of workers home from their desks. Today, some management experts question the wisdom of removing a business incentive at a time when many workers are chafing at RTO mandates. 'I think the corporate culture will change in several ways,' said University of Manchester professor Cary Cooper, who has researched hybrid work arrangements. Free food can be a powerful motivator, he said. 'If they're taking that away … or minimizing the quality of the food being provided - and there will be companies that will do that - you're not going to motivate people to return to the office.' Cooper suggested that senators consider extending the deduction as they reshape the tax bill. Without a delay, he foresees repercussions for businesses that need employees on-site, such as hospitals. 'In our day and age, I think it's just silly. I don't know why you would want to change the law in that direction at all.' Last summer, Bierma's committee of CPAs submitted a long list of questions and suggestions to the IRS seeking guidance on how companies should plan for the change. It hasn't received an answer. The law clearly removes tax advantages for company cafeterias - businesses can no longer deduct the cost of food, beverages or operations, which are now fully or partly deductible. Also out are meals that employers might provide in the workplace, such as dinner for staffers who stay beyond their shifts. But that leaves questions about more modest niceties. Accountant Richard Pon, who counts law firms and retailers among his clients, is convinced that the deduction will also go away for break-room staples such as coffee, fruit, chips and granola bars. 'Just having a small kitchen … some people will take the position that's not an eating facility. That's not a cafeteria,' he said. 'I think the position of the IRS might say that's an eating facility, no matter how small it is.' Related Content Russian attack destroys Kyiv building as Trump avoids talk of new sanctions Field notes from the end of life: My thoughts on living while dying He's dying. She's pregnant. His one last wish is to fight his cancer long enough to see his baby. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who will replace Rep. Grijalva? Meet the heir apparent, centrist and next gen influence
Early voting begins June 18 in the only federal race this year in Arizona. An election to fill the seat of the late U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva is underway in Arizona's Congressional District 7. The race in southern Arizona has produced competitive primaries on both the Republican and Democratic sides, but most of the attention has been focused on three of the five Democrats seeking their party's nod. Running to continue the representative's legacy is his daughter, Adelita Grijalva. She's gotten big endorsements from national progressive organizations and Arizona political heavyweights, but her victory is far from guaranteed. Positioning himself as more of a centrist is Daniel Hernandez, who is laser-focused on cost of living and is establishing himself as a pro-business Democrat. Using TikTok to her advantage is Gen-Z candidate Deja Foxx. She believes the Democrats need new leaders and, at 25 years old, feels strongly that Democrats should be commanding attention in a political era that is dominated by social media. They are not the only candidates for CD 7 voters, but they are the frontrunners in the reliably blue district. This week on The Gaggle, a weekly politics podcast, host Mary Jo Pitzl is joined by Congressional reporter Laura Gersony. Together, they break down the pros and cons of all the candidates on the ballot and explore how the race is shaping up so far. The best way to listen is to subscribe to The Gaggle on your favorite podcast app, but you can also stream the full episode below. Note: The Gaggle is intended to be heard. But we also offer an AI transcript of the episode script. There may be slight deviations from the podcast audio. Follow The Gaggle and all azcentral podcasts on X, formerly Twitter, and Instagram. Listen to The Gaggle : Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher You can share your thoughts with us at 602-444-0804 or via email here. Reach the producer Amanda Luberto at aluberto@ Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, @amandaluberto and on Bluesky @amandaluberto. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Who's running to replace Raúl Grijalva in Arizona's 7th District?
