Germany stops Israeli arms exports after Gaza City plans
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz stated the ban would remain "until further notice," following the Israeli Cabinet's recent announcement of plans to take over Gaza City.
In a statement, Merz emphasized that Israel 'has the right to defend itself against Hamas ' terror' and said that the release of Israeli hostages and 'purposeful' negotiations toward a cease-fire in the 22-month conflict 'are our top priority.' He said Hamas must not have a role in the future of Gaza.
'The even harsher military action by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip, approved by the Israeli Cabinet last night, makes it increasingly difficult for the German government to see how these goals will be achieved,' he added. 'Under these circumstances, the German government will not authorize any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice.'
The German government remains deeply concerned about the suffering of civilians in Gaza, he said, adding: 'With the planned offensive, the Israeli government bears even greater responsibility than before for providing for their needs.'
He called on Israel to allow comprehensive access for aid deliveries — including for U.N. organizations and other NGOs — and said Israel 'must continue to comprehensively and sustainably address the humanitarian situation in Gaza.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
22 minutes ago
- Spectator
Friedrich Merz's reign of error
We are 100 days into Friedrich Merz's chancellorship, and Germany has achieved something truly remarkable: a coalition government so perfectly dysfunctional that it appears to have been designed by the AfD's campaign strategists. The signs of trouble emerged from the very beginning. Merz, who could barely contain his eagerness to finally assume the chancellorship, stumbled at the first hurdle on 6 May when he failed to secure the necessary majority in the first Bundestag vote, only managing to cross the line later that day. Some observers already spoke of a botched start and they were not wrong. What we are witnessing is not mere political incompetence. It is a masterclass in how to gift-wrap a democracy for populists while maintaining the earnest conviction that one is defending it Where one might expect the traditional honeymoon period, that blessed interval when voters give new governments the benefit of the doubt, Merz has instead been greeted with tepid approval ratings that would make even the most modest politician wince. While Gerhard Schröder enjoyed 63 per cent satisfaction after his first hundred days, Angela Merkel a robust 74 per cent, and even the ill-fated Olaf Scholz managed 56 per cent, Merz limps along at a dismal 32 per cent – with some pollsters offering an even more brutal 29 per cent. What we are witnessing is not mere political incompetence. It is a masterclass in how to gift-wrap a democracy for populists while maintaining the earnest conviction that one is defending it. Merz, that stalwart champion of conservative principle, swept to power promising four concrete changes within his first hundred days: reform the bloated Bürgergeld welfare system, slash business taxes, turn back migrants at the borders and eliminate the bureaucratic stranglehold on German enterprise. Simple enough goals for a man who had spent years thundering from the opposition benches about the urgent need for such reforms. What could possibly go wrong when your coalition partner fundamentally opposes every single one of these objectives? Enter the Social Democrats, stage left, with a performance that borders on the supernatural. Having been comprehensively rejected by the German electorate – scraping together a humiliating 16 per cent of the vote – they have nonetheless managed to transform this historic repudiation into remarkable negotiating leverage. It is political sorcery of the highest order: turning electoral lead into policy gold. While their traditional working-class constituency defects en masse, the very party they claim to oppose, the AfD, now leads national polling. The SPD has since doubled down on defending precisely the policies that hemorrhaged their support in the first place. Minister Bärbel Bas recently declared from the Bundestag that 'there will be no cuts with us' regarding the Bürgergeld system, a programme that has seen benefit sanctions plummet from 19 per cent to 8 per cent while costs soar to €41.5 billion annually. Their genius lies in their unwavering commitment to ignoring the message their former supporters have sent them: that perhaps, just perhaps, unlimited welfare payments to all (including Ukrainian refugees who, unlike asylum seekers, qualify immediately) might not be the vote-winner they imagine. To be fair to the Chancellor, he has managed to implement precisely half of his promises, rather like a surgeon who successfully removes half a tumour. His tax package delivers real benefits to business: €46 billion over five years in various write-offs and incentives. Companies can now depreciate machinery faster, electric company cars receive preferential treatment, and corporate tax rates edge downward. Whether this will spark the 2 per cent annual growth he promised is another matter entirely, particularly when the economy actually contracted by 0.1 per cent in the second quarter of his tenure. On migration, Merz has delivered something resembling action. The Federal Police have indeed turned back 474 asylum seekers since May – a modest achievement when measured against the 23,000 people who filed initial asylum applications in the same period. It is rather like claiming to have solved London's traffic problems by removing three cars from the M25 during rush hour. While this coalition comedy unfolds, the AfD watches with barely concealed delight. Every SPD defence of unpopular welfare policies, every half-hearted Merz reform, every economic indicator pointing toward recession – it all feeds directly into their narrative that the established parties are fundamentally unfit for purpose. The mathematics are brutally simple: either mainstream parties offer genuine solutions to the concerns that drive ordinary Germans to despair, or the AfD will eventually eclipse the CDU as the dominant force on the right. Each migrant who arrives at Germany's borders, each headline about migrant crime, each welfare payment to a non-contributor adds another few thousand votes to the AfD column. The countdown clock is ticking, and this coalition appears determined to accelerate the tempo. What makes this betrayal particularly devastating is its timing. As Europe confronts unprecedented challenges from Russian aggression, Chinese economic warfare, and the uncertainties of a second Trump presidency, Germany desperately needs coherent centre-right leadership. Instead, it has received a reheated grand coalition dominated by a party that voters explicitly rejected. The fiscal consequences alone should terrify anyone with passing familiarity with economic history. Germany's constitutional debt brake – that sacred pillar of fiscal conservatism – has been functionally neutered through accounting gimmickry worthy of Enron's finance department. The proposed €500 billion 'future investment fund' represents nothing less than deficit spending dressed in Sunday clothes, coming precisely when Germany's economy teeters on recession and its industrial giants flee to more hospitable shores. More devastating still is what this capitulation reveals about the state of Germany's political imagination. The CDU, once the party of visionaries like Adenauer and Erhard, the architects of the post-war economic miracle, now appears incapable of articulating any vision distinct from social democratic orthodoxy. They have become SPD tribute artists, performing covers of leftist greatest hits with marginally less enthusiasm. The truly artistic achievement here is how both coalition partners simultaneously undermine each other while strengthening their mutual enemy. The SPD blocks the very changes that might stem their electoral collapse, while Merz appears increasingly impotent – hardly the image of decisive leadership his party promised. This leaves Germany's centre-right electorate with a grotesque non-choice: stomach Merz's SPD-lite compromises, drift toward the AfD's 'brown-tinged socialism', or withdraw from politics altogether. The AfD, despite its nationalist packaging, offers economic policies that would make trade unionists blush: protectionism, expanded welfare, and state intervention. Their rightward cultural positioning merely disguises a fundamentally collectivist economic agenda. For Germany's disillusioned centre-right voters, watching this government is not merely observing political failure – it is attending the funeral of the political home they once knew. When mainstream conservatives betray their principles so thoroughly, they do not convert their voters to progressivism. They orphan them politically, leaving them susceptible to whatever radical alternative promises to address their abandoned concerns. Merz positioned himself as the saviour who would restore conservative credibility after years of Merkelian drift. Instead, he has revealed himself as just another spineless politician, willing to sacrifice principle for the illusion of power. His first 100 days have not been a failure – they have been something far more dangerous, a masterpiece of political suicide disguised as governance. The AfD could scarcely have scripted it better themselves.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
JD Vance delivers special message from Trump to US troops based at UK RAF base
JD Vance delivered a message from Donald Trump to American troops stationed at a British navy base during his visit to the UK. Speaking at RAF Fairford on Wednesday (13 August), the US vice president said that Trump was 'damn proud of the good job you do every single day'. Reciting the US president's message, Vance said: 'We're proud of you, we're grateful to you, we know it's not always an easy job, it's often long hours but I hope you know that the peace and prosperity and safety of your countrymen depends on you.' The Gloucestershire base houses troops from the United States Air Force's 501st Combat Support Wing and the 99th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Germany and allies to send major military aid package to Ukraine using new NATO supply line
Germany announced on Wednesday that it will work with a group of Ukraine's Western backers to supply a package of military aid to the war-ravaged country worth up to $500 million using a new NATO supply line. Earlier this month, NATO started coordinating regular deliveries of large weapons packages to Ukraine after the Netherlands said that it would provide air defense equipment, ammunition and other military aid worth 500 million euros ($582 million). Sweden announced the following day that it would contribute $275 million to a joint effort along with its Nordic neighbors Denmark and Norway to provide $500 million worth of air defenses, anti-tank weapons, ammunition and spare parts. Germany's foreign and defense ministries said the support is focused on equipment like 'critical air defense capabilities. These are urgently needed to defend against Russia's ongoing air strikes, which are killing more and more civilians throughout Ukraine.' The United Nations has said that Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians. Two deliveries of equipment, most of it bought in the United States, were scheduled for this month, although the Nordic package was more likely to arrive in September. Germany did not name the group of countries it would be working with. The equipment is supplied based on Ukraine's priority needs on the battlefield. NATO allies then locate the weapons and ammunition and send them on. Germany has delivered or pledged military support to Ukraine worth around 40 billion euros ($47 billion) since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022.
