Understanding the Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill: A new era for financial regulation
The long-awaited Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill – which is set to strengthen regulatory power over financial institutions – aims to bring digital money into its ambit.
Image: IOL
The long-awaited Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill – which is set to strengthen regulatory power over financial institutions – aims to bring digital money into its ambit.
The new law, which has been in the works for more than a decade, will finally be 'submitted to Cabinet shortly for approval for tabling in Parliament,' the Financial Conduct Authority (FSCA) said in response to written questions.
However, over the past 10 years, FinTech has dramatically transformed financial services, moving from a disruptive force to a mainstream innovation. And it has advanced faster than the law – with technology set to always be at least one step ahead of regulations.
FSCA Commissioner Unathi Kamlana is on record as saying that 'as the financial sector continues to evolve, so too must the regulatory framework that governs it. Improving industry practices is essential to ensuring that financial institutions consistently deliver fair customer outcomes, regardless of the models or channels used to provide financial products and services.'
In stating this, Kamlana was speaking specifically about the COFI Bill. 'The COFI Bill represents a legislative response to these challenges, aiming to transform the regulatory landscape into one that is more outcome-focused and principles-based,' he said.
Kamlana also said that the rise of FinTech, digital banking, artificial intelligence, digital assets, and decentralised finance are reshaping how financial services are delivered and accessed'. He noted that these advancements offer opportunities for growth and inclusion, but also pose challenges, such as cybersecurity threats, algorithmic biases, unethical AI-driven decisions, fraud and even financial exclusion, that regulators and industry leaders must address.
In response to questions, the FSCA added that the Bill 'adopts a principle-based approach. In other words, it contains high-level principles that financial institutions must adhere to, to ensure the desired outcomes in the financial sector'.
The story of the Bill is, in itself, a long and complex one. In 2013, the draft of the Financial Sector Regulation Bill was published for consultation, followed by the release of a discussion document outlining the draft market conduct framework used for stakeholder engagement.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
The Financial Sector Regulation Bill is closely related to COFI as they are both key components of South Africa's financial sector reform alongside the so-called 'Twin Peaks' legislation, which resulted in oversight of the financial sector being handled by two entities and not just one and was introduced in 2017. The FSCA was created in 2018 as a result of 'Twin Peaks'.
As the FSCA explained on its website: 'The COFI Bill is a critical development that will shape the future conduct framework and many of the FSCA's current conduct regulatory framework projects have some dependency on the promulgation of the COFI Bill.'
The Bill was approved by Cabinet for publication for public comment towards the end of December 2018 and published for public comment from a few days after that through to the start of April the following year.
The FSCA explained that the next draft of the Bill was finalised and published on September 29, 2020, for a second round of public comments until the end of October that year.
'The Bill was revised to address comprehensive comments received from the public as well as from the State Law Advisers and resubmitted to the Office of the Chief State Law Advisers in December 2024. Once tabled in Parliament, the Bill will [be] published for public comment again by Parliament,' it said.
The FSCA is not the only entity concerned with regulating the digital realm when it comes to financial services. In 2016, a FinTech Working Group was developed under the auspices of several regulators, including the South African Reserve Bank and FSCA, to 'work together as South African financial sector regulators to demystify the regulatory landscape, provide a space for safe experimentation and actively advance innovation'.
It hasn't published any news since 2022 though, when it said its regulatory sandbox is open for applications.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
16 hours ago
- The South African
Trump vs Musk vs Gates: Battle of the billionaires has just begun
By now you've probably heard the cyber supersonic boom of the internet exploding after Elon Musk dropped a bombshell tweet about President Donald Trump. Musk alleged that the reason why the Epstein files have not been fully disclosed to the public yet is because POTUS Donald J. Trump is in them. Musk ended the tweet with, 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He then attached a second tweet which read: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' In response, Trump dropped a post on his Truth Social announcing that his administration is revoking funding and subsidies for Musk's companies, including Tesla and Space X. To which Musk responded by announcing on X that he would be decommissioning the latest SpaceX Dragon rocket programme – which is much needed by NASA to service and supply the International Space Station. Given these latest developments, one has to wonder whether the rumours and reports are indeed true – is Musk on hard chemical drugs? Part of the backlash in the media and on social media right now is around who started the spat, and who's going to 'win'. One Musk-supporting X user pointed out: 'Musk criticized Trump's Bill. Trump, however, criticised Musk. Elon Musk played the ball, some are arguing, while Donald Trump played the man.' Musk's first salvo against Trump's budget came when, on 3 June, he could no longer contain his disgust at Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and spilt his guts about it on X, when he tweeted: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' During a live press briefing in the Oval Office on 5 June, while hosting neo-Nazi, pro-Zionist, ex-Blackrock executive, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump addressed Musk's comments about the bill. 'We've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He campaigned for me.' Then Trump said, 'I think I would've won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump told reporters. Elon must've been watching that press briefing live because minutes later, he responded to Trump's statement by tweeting: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' 'Such ingratitude,' he then added. Trump went on to tell the press: 'I'm very disappointed, because, Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. He only developed a problem when he found we're going to cut the EV [electric vehicle] mandate…because that's billions and billions of dollars. We wanna have cars of all types.' Trump also said, 'When he left, he said the most beautiful things about me. He hasn't said anything bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next. But, I'm very disappointed in Elon, I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump also later posted on his Truth Social: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That's when the break-up started to turn nastier than the War of the Roses. The jibes went back and forth until it culminated in that earth-shattering tweet of the century from Musk. But Trump is not the only one Musk has just thrown under the Epstein bus. He recently, and in the past, did the same to Bill Gates. On 7 October 2024, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, Musk said: 'You know, I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome.' Carlson asked Musk: 'Do you think Reid Hoffman (billionaire founder of LinkedIn) is uncomfortable?' Musk answered: 'Yes.' After a brief pause, he added, 'And Gates.' Last month, on 20 May 2025, at the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha, Musk was interviewed before a live and online audience by Bloomberg's Mishal Husain. Husain started to ask Musk about comments made by Bill Gates regarding Elon's decision to cut funding to the USAID programme – when Musk interjected. 'He's a huge liar', Musk said. 'I know, you've said that already,' Husain replied. The comments they're referring to emerged when Bill Gates, in an interview with the Financial Times on 8 May, accused Elon Musk of 'killing children in the world's poorest countries' by cutting foreign aid under the Trump administration. Gates assailed Musk for the actions he took as head of President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'He could go on to be a great philanthropist,' Gates told the magazine. 'Meantime, he's involved in the deaths of the world's poorest children.' Sticking the blade in a little deeper, he added, 'The picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one.' Responding to Gates' comments in Qatar, Musk sprung an unexpected gobsmacker on Husain and the audience; 'Who does Bill Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children, given that he has frequented Jeffrey Epstein?', he said. 'Ok, Well…', Husain started to respond, but she was drowned out by applause and cheers from the audience.' When the ovation died down, Musk added, 'I wouldn't trust that guy to babysit my kids.' It's worth noting that, curiously, Jeffrey Epstein 'committed suicide' (by breaking his own neck twice with paper sheets, while the prison cameras were switched off and the guards were fast asleep) during Trump's first term. It's also worth noting that the last remaining, vocal survivor in the Epstein case, Virginia Giuffre – who accused Prince Andrew of raping her when she was 17, a woman who was close to seeing justice served for being sex-trafficked by Epstein to Andrew and other predatory paedophiles – allegedly committed suicide on 6 April this year…during Trump's second term. What's all the more mysterious about her death is the fact that…just a few years earlier, on 11 Dec 2019, she tweeted: 'I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. If something happens to me – for the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.' Here's where it gets dubiously curious. The person who recruited Virginia Giuffre to be Jeffrey Epstein's personal 'masseuse' was Epstein's partner in life and crime, Ghislaine Maxwell (currently serving time for child sex trafficking). Ghislaine is the daughter of (media mogul and alleged ex-Mossad agent) Robert Maxwell. Do you know where Ghislaine Maxwell met and recruited Virginia Giuffre? At a place called Mar-a-Lago. Ring any bells? That's right, Donald Trump's Florida mansion. Where 16-year-old Giuffre was working as a spa attendant at the time. It's been rumoured and reported that Epstein himself was also a Mossad agent, running a 'honey trap' operation for Israeli intelligence. So far, the rumours and accusations by the Democrats of Trump playing golden showers and glass-topped coffee tables with Russian hookers in a swanky Moscow Hotel have proven to be unfounded. But if there is compromising footage of POTUS Donald Trump on Epstein island molesting minors, and that footage is being held by Mossad, it would certainly explain a lot about why Trump has allowed barbaric Bedlam Bibi Netanyahu to steamroll over him…like that bulldozer did to Rachel Corrie. Of course, the whole world and their brother – including me – have dropped everything to weigh in on this Musk-Trump (and Gates) feud. On X and other platforms, people are digging up and dropping videos from the '90s of Donald Trump with Jeffrey Epstein (and Ghislaine Maxwell) surrounded by a bevy of beautiful nubile babes, partying their a**es off at Mar-a-Lago. Others have posted photos of Elon posing alongside Maxwell. Someone posted: 'Elon Musk didn't kill himself.' Another, recommended Musk multiply his security detail immediately. Piers Morgan posted: 'Holy sh*t!' And a string of 'shocked' emojis. Alex Jones posted: 'God Help Us ALL…' Russell Dobular from Due Dissidence said in the duo's commentary video: 'This actually reinforces the idea that Elon is whacked out on drugs, because…this is such a self-destructive move.' 'Going out on a limb here – the Tesla board is going to replace Elon as the CEO by the end of the year,' he added. Tesla shares have slumped by 14% on Wall Street since Thursday's clash of the titan tycoons. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
19 hours ago
- The Citizen
Basic Income Grant implementation postponed again
The department's target for the current financial year is to table the Basic Income Support policy to Cabinet for approval. The implementation of South Africa's Basic Income Grant has been delayed once again, with the Department of Social Development announcing that further consultations are required before the policy can be finalised. The department presented its progress report to the portfolio committee on social development on Wednesday, outlining the ongoing challenges and next steps in developing the Basic Income Support policy. Despite more than two decades of policy development, the Basic Income Grant remains elusive, with approximately 9.2 million people currently dependent on the Covid-19 Social Relief of Distress Grant and 19.2 million beneficiaries across the South African Social Security Agency's (Sassa) other programs. The department has been working to create opportunities for grant-dependent individuals while navigating concerns about affordability and sustainability. Latest Basic Income Grant policy developments The Department of Social Development has been actively working on the Basic Income Support policy, with the first draft presented to the social protection, community and human development cluster Cabinet committee on 26 November 2024. However, the committee directed that additional consultations be conducted with internal members, with a particular focus on the policy's affordability and its linkages to economic opportunities. Following this directive, an interdepartmental workshop was organised on 31 March 2025 to discuss the revised document. During this meeting, all members agreed on the necessity of identifying ways to connect the grant with employment and sustainable livelihood opportunities targeted at the economically active population. The meeting acknowledged that the labour market, especially public employment initiatives, would not be able to absorb all current Social Relief of Distress beneficiaries. Deputy director-general Brenda Sibeko informed members of parliament (MPs) that the policy has been revised again and could potentially be approved within a year. 'If the policy is approved in the current financial year, then it means that after that, we have to write the law that makes the basic income support to be a permanent income support policy like the other grants,' she explained. ALSO READ: Sassa CEO's multimillion-rand package revealed amid suspension and grant hikes Ongoing consultations and timeline A second interdepartmental workshop is planned for the end of June 2025, which will be followed by bilateral meetings with the Presidency, Department of Labour, and National Treasury. The department intends to approach the committee in the second quarter of the 2025/26 financial year to request Cabinet consideration of the revised draft Basic Income Support policy. 'Once the consultations are concluded, the department will approach the SPCHD Cabinet Committee again in the second quarter of the 2025/26 financial year, to request Cabinet to consider the revised policy, and if approved, publish it for public comments,' the department explained. ALSO READ: Sassa SRD grant to be 'converted' to basic income grant – Mbalula says [VIDEO] Parliamentary frustration mounts MPs expressed growing frustration with the prolonged delays in developing a comprehensive Basic Income Grant policy. EFF MP, Noluvuyo Tafeni, voiced this concern directly, asking: 'When was the Basic Income Grant policy proposal first made? It was about some 30 years back, and there is still no progress.' The Basic Income Grant has indeed been on the country's policy agenda for more than 20 years, with the first proposal dating back to 1998. A technical proposal was subsequently drafted in 2002, but it failed to gain Cabinet approval. Financial challenges and sustainability concerns National Treasury has expressed significant concerns about the affordability and sustainability of introducing a Basic Income Support policy, given the country's high unemployment rate and current fiscal position. The department is working with various stakeholders to identify alternative ways to strengthen the implementation of the current Social Relief of Distress grant while creating pathways for beneficiaries to transition to other economic opportunities. Despite these challenges, the committee heard that the department has received approval to extend the Social Relief of Distress provision until the end of March 2026, with a budget of R35 billion. The department has proposed that the Social Relief of Distress grant be made permanent, with a phased approach to increase benefits progressively. The proposed entry-level Basic Income Support grant would be set at the Lower Bound Poverty Line, with long-term plans to eliminate poverty at the Upper Bound Poverty Line. ALSO READ: Sassa problems and glitches this year, will we get a basic income grant in 2025? Basic income grant supporting infrastructure and pilot programs While policy development continues, the Department of Social Development is working on several parallel initiatives to support the eventual implementation of the Basic Income Support policy. The department said it was collaborating with stakeholders to assist the South African Social Security Agency in enhancing system interoperability to improve efficiency in data-sharing for both eligibility assessment and economic linkages. Additionally, the department, along with Sassa and partners, is piloting ways to link grant beneficiaries to employment activities. An interdepartmental task team, including key departments such as National Treasury, the Presidency, Higher Education and Training, and Public Works, is working on various pathways to improve access to training, employment, and entrepreneurship support to reduce reliance on social grants as the only pathway out of poverty. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa hints again at expanding SRD grant – and will Treasury go 'BIG' this time? Next steps and legislative process The department's target for the current financial year is to table the Basic Income Support policy to Cabinet for approval. Should such approval be granted, the department will need to amend the Social Assistance Act to introduce a new social grant category. While the formulation of the amendment can be done relatively quickly, the timing of the legislation and its passage will depend on how rapidly Cabinet approves the draft bill, which will then be tabled to Parliament for processing. During this legislative process, it will be necessary for the Social Relief of Distress grant to be extended beyond March 2026 to ensure the continuation of income support. 'In order to ensure stability during this consultation period, the department will consult National Treasury for the SRD provision to be extended until the legislative process is complete, to ensure that its beneficiaries are protected from extreme poverty and vulnerability,' the department stated. NOW READ: Household food basket shows food prices still increasing
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Donald Trump vs Elon Musk
President Donald Trump said on June 5, 2025, that he asked "crazy" Elon Musk to leave his administration and threatened to take away the tech tycoon's government contracts, as a growing row over the US president's budget bill triggered a bitter public divorce with his top donor. Image: AFP / IOL Graphics By Danny KEMP Donald Trump and Elon Musk's unlikely political marriage exploded in a fiery public divorce Thursday, with the US president threatening to strip the billionaire of his huge government contracts in revenge. Trump said in a televised Oval Office diatribe that he was "very disappointed" after his former aide and top donor criticised his "big, beautiful" spending bill before Congress. The pair then hurled insults at each other on social media -- with Musk even posting, without proof, that Trump was referenced in government documents on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The row could have major political and economic fallout, as shares in Musk's Tesla car company plunged and the South African-born tech tycoon vowed that he would end a critical US spaceship program. Speculation had long swirled that a relationship between the world's richest person and its most powerful could not last long -- but the speed of the meltdown took Washington by surprise. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz looked on silently. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." A hurt-sounding Trump, 78, noted in a 10-minute diatribe that it had been only a week since he hosted a grand farewell for Musk as he left the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump later called Musk "crazy" and insisted he had asked the tycoon to leave because he was "wearing thin." 'Ingratitude' Musk hit back in real time on his X social media platform, saying the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming Trump for "ingratitude." As the spat got increasingly vindictive, Musk also posted that Trump "is in the Epstein files," referring to US government documents on Epstein, whose 2019 jail cell suicide, while awaiting trial, sparked a major conspiracy theory. "Have a nice day, DJT!" added Musk. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told AFP that Musk's Epstein tweet "is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted." Musk, who was Trump's biggest campaign donor to the tune of $300 million, separately claimed the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without his support and accused him of "such ingratitude." He replied "yes" to a post suggesting Trump should be impeached, and blasted Trump's global tariffs for risking a recession. Trump finally suggested hitting the "crazy" entrepreneur where it hurts, threatening Musk's multibillion-dollar government contracts including for launching rockets and for the use of the Starlink satellite service. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump said on Truth Social. Again Musk fired back, with the SpaceX chief saying he would begin "decommissioning" his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station -- in response. In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 He later appeared to walk that back, replying to a user on Twitter: "OK, we won't decommission Dragon," though his tone was unclear. 'Abomination' When the crossfire finally relented after several astonishing hours, Tesla had seen more than $100 billion wiped off the company's value. Trump and Musk's whirlwind relationship had initially blossomed, with the president backing DOGE's cost-cutting rampage through the US government and the tycoon sleeping over at the White House and traveling on Air Force One. But the 53-year-old ultimately lasted just four months on the job, becoming increasingly disillusioned with the slow pace of change and clashing with some of Trump's cabinet members. The two men had however kept tensions over Trump's tax and spending mega-bill relatively civil -- until Musk described the plan, the centerpiece of Trump's domestic policy agenda for his second term, as an "abomination" because he says it will increase the US deficit. Washington will now intently watch the fallout from the row. Musk posted a poll on whether he should form a new political party -- a seismic threat from a man who has signaled he is ready to use his wealth to unseat Republican lawmakers who disagree with him. Trump ally Steve Bannon -- a vocal opponent of Musk -- meanwhile called for the tycoon to be deported, the New York Times reported. AFP
