Japan urges China to stop flying fighter jets too close to Japanese military aircraft
Japan's Defense Ministry said a Chinese JH-7 fighter-bomber flew as close to 30 meters (98 feet) to a YS-11EB electronic-intelligence aircraft of the Japan Air Self-Defense Force on Wednesday and Thursday. The ministry said it occurred outside Japanese airspace over the East China Sea and caused no damage to the Japanese side.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nuclear Powered Naval Vessels Market Forecast to Reach USD 33.92 Billion by 2030, Growing at 5.50% CAGR: MarkNtel Advisors (Leading Defense Companies - BAE Systems, Huntington Ingalls Industries, CSSC, Naval Group, Thales Group)
NEW DELHI, Aug. 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- According to a recent market research report by MarkNtel Advisors, the Global Nuclear Powered Naval Vessels Market is poised for significant growth, with projections estimating a value increase from USD 24.6 billion in 2024 to USD 33.92 billion by 2030. This translates to a robust CAGR of 5.50% during the forecast period (2025–2030). Fueled by rising geopolitical tensions, modernization of aging naval fleets, and government investments in maritime defense capabilities, the market is experiencing a surge in demand for high-end nuclear-powered vessels, particularly in submerged applications. Strategic Takeaways Market Size (2024): USD 24.6 Billion Projected Size (2030): USD 33.92 Billion CAGR (2025–2030): 5.50% Top Segments: Submerged Vessels, PWR Reactors Top Region: North America (40% Market Share) Download Free PDF Brochure - Key Growth Drivers 1.) Escalating Geopolitical Conflicts Tensions between military powers—particularly involving the U.S., China, Russia, India, and Australia—are a leading force behind increased naval investments. Nuclear-powered submarines provide superior capabilities in conflict-prone regions such as the South China Sea and Indo-Pacific. For example, Russia deployed its Yasen-M Class submarines during the 2022 Ukraine conflict, showcasing nuclear-powered submarines' strategic role in modern warfare. 2.) Government-Led Modernization Programs Substantial national investments are being directed toward the upgrade and replacement of older naval platforms. Notable programs include: Australia's Submarine Industry Strategy (2025): A USD 170 million investment to bolster local production and the nuclear submarine supply chain. France's SNLE3G Program (2024): Aims to develop new ballistic missile submarines by 2035. India's Project 77 (2024): Greenlit the production of six nuclear-powered attack submarines. These initiatives, among others, are creating a fertile environment for defense contractors and naval technology firms to meet evolving global demands. Key Industry Players – Leader from 2025 to 2030 By MarkNtel Advisors, Top Nuclear Powered Naval Vessels Manufacturing Companies in the Global Market are: General Dynamics Electric Boat Huntington Ingalls Industries BAE Systems Naval Group China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) Austal Ltd. Babcock International Group Plc BWX Technologies, Inc. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA Thales Group Rosatom United Shipbuilding Corporation Kawasaki Heavy Industries Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Others Explore Complete Research Report for Detailed Information About Companies, Shares, and Data - Market Segmentation & Dominance By Type: Submerged Vessels Lead Submerged vessels dominate the market, holding over 55% of the global share. Their enhanced stealth capabilities, longer operational endurance, and ability to carry strategic weaponry undetected make them the preferred choice for many navies. The global production rate reflects this preference—with 3–5 submarines produced per year per country on average, compared to only 1 surface vessel every 3–5 years. By Reactor Type: Pressurized Water Reactors Reign Supreme Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) account for approximately 80% of the market, far surpassing Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs). PWRs are favored for their compact design, reliability, and ease of maintenance. Key examples include: U.S. Navy: Entire nuclear fleet powered by PWRs. Russian Navy: Predominantly PWR-based submarine propulsion systems. BWRs remain less popular due to their larger size and operational complexity, limiting their deployment in compact naval platforms. Regional Market Insights North America: Market Leader with 40% Share North America, led by the United States, holds the largest regional share—approximately 40%. Key contributors to this dominance include: Largest Global Fleet: The U.S. Navy operates roughly 70 nuclear-powered naval vessels. Defense Budget Superiority: The 2025 U.S. defense budget is set at USD 890 billion—the highest globally. R&D Leadership: Programs like the Columbia-Class Submarine and next-gen nuclear propulsion R&D by the U.S. Department of Energy are driving innovation and growth. Asia-Pacific & Europe: Rapid Expansion Zones Countries such as China, India, and Australia are rapidly expanding their nuclear naval capabilities. France, Russia, and the U.K. continue to make strategic investments to modernize fleets and retain global influence. Schedule a Consultation with Our Experts!- Market Opportunities 1.) Public and Private Sector Collaborations The formation of public-private partnerships is strengthening manufacturing capabilities. A recent example includes the partnership between Naval Group and Dutch shipbuilder Royal IHC, which will produce Orka-class submarines beginning in 2026—bringing new life to the Netherlands' defense industry and shipbuilding workforce. 2.) AI-Powered Naval Systems Artificial Intelligence is revolutionizing naval combat. AI-integrated systems are enhancing real-time threat detection, predictive maintenance, and autonomous decision-making. Key innovations include: Fathom5: Developed the first AI-powered surface warship for the U.S. Navy, processing over 10,000 real-time signals for predictive maintenance. BAE Systems: Introduced Dreadnought-Class Submarines with autonomous threat detection systems. These smart vessels are reducing operational risks and transforming the way navies approach combat readiness. Market Challenges 1.) High Entry Costs and Extended Timelines Despite robust demand, high capital investment and long production timelines (10–15 years on average) remain major barriers. Examples include: Virginia-Class Submarine (U.S.): USD 3.4 billion per unit. Columbia-Class Submarine (U.S.): >USD 10 billion per unit. Triomphant-Class Submarine (France): ~USD 3 billion. Type 094 Submarine (China): USD 1 billion. Such costs hinder scalability, and the low annual output rate affects the global supply chain's responsiveness to defense needs. Don't You Need Global Report, Submit Your Request for Region or Country-Specific Insights - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the current market value of the nuclear‑powered naval vessels industry? Estimated at USD 24.6 billion in 2024, projected to reach USD 33.92 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 5.50%. Which vessel type dominates the nuclear‑powered navy fleet? Submerged nuclear submarines hold over 55% market share due to superior stealth, prolonged endurance, and strategic deterrence. Which reactor design is most widely used in naval nuclear propulsion? Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) account for around 80% of the market, favored for reliability, compactness, and ease of control. Which region leads in nuclear‑powered naval vessel deployment? North America leads with approximately 40% market share, driven by the U.S. Navy fleet of ~70 nuclear vessels and its dominant defense R&D infrastructure. What key market drivers are accelerating growth? Geopolitical tensions, modernization programs in the U.S., China, India, Australia, and adoption of AI‑enabled combat systems are fueling market expansion. What major challenges does the market face? High capital costs (e.g., Virginia‑class ~$3.4 B, Columbia‑class >$10 B), long lead times (10–15 years), and limited annual production constrain scalability. How is AI enhancing nuclear naval vessel capabilities? AI-integrated systems—such as predictive maintenance, autonomous threat detection, and real-time signal processing—are being deployed by firms like Fathom5 and BAE Systems in advanced submarines Which countries have invested in nuclear submarine modernization programs? Australia (2025): USD 170 million Submarine Industry Strategy, France (SNLE3G, 2024): new ballistic missile subs by 2035, and India (Project 77, 2024): six attack submarines under production. Is the nuclear‑powered market growing faster than the broader submarine market? Yes. While overall submarine CAGR estimates range from 3.8%–4.2%, nuclear-powered vessels lead with a stronger forecast CAGR of ~5.45% in the submarine propulsion segment Why haven't nuclear power systems been adopted in commercial shipping? High reactor costs and long payback periods hinder adoption. Early nuclear merchant ships like N.S. Savannah proved uneconomic, and advanced commercial reactor concepts remain experimental About Us – MarkNtel Advisors is a leading consulting, data analytics, and market research firm that provides an extensive range of strategic reports on diverse industry verticals. We being a qualitative & quantitative research company, strive to deliver data to a substantial & varied client base, including multinational corporations, financial institutions, governments, and individuals, among others. We have our existence across the market for many years and have conducted multi-industry research across 80+ countries, spreading our reach across numerous regions like America, Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East & Africa, etc., and many countries across the regional scale, namely, the US, India, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Brazil, and several others. Discover More Market Insights Like This One! Global Helicopter Market Research Report: Forecast (2025-2030) - The Global Helicopter Market size was valued at around USD 35.27 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 45.33 billion by 2030. Along with this, the market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of around 4.27% during the forecast period, i.e., 2025-30. Global Automated Border Control Market Research Report: Forecast (2025-2030) - The Global Automated Border Control Market size was valued at around USD 1.85 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 4.60 billion by 2030. Along with this, the market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of around 16.38% during the forecast period, i.e., 2025-30. Japan Space Launch Services Market Research Report: Forecast (2025-2030) - The Japan Space Launch Services Market size was valued at around USD962.28 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD2,266.77 million by 2030. Along with this, the market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of around 15.35% during the forecast period, i.e., 2025-30 Global Aircraft Seating Market Research Report: Forecast (2025-2030) - The Global Aircraft Seating Market size was valued at around USD 8.7 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 11.53 billion by 2030. Along with this, the market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of around 4.80% during the forecast period, i.e., 2025-30. Contact: MarkNtel Advisors Office No.109, H-159, Sector 63, Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201301, IndiaContact No: +91 8719999009Email: sales@ our Website: Source: Logo: View original content: SOURCE MarkNtel Advisors Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he will meet China's Xi if a trade deal is struck
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Tuesday the U.S. was close to a trade deal with China and that he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if an agreement is struck. "He asked for a meeting, and I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year most likely, if we make a deal. If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting," Trump told CNBC in an interview referring to China's Xi. "We're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well," Trump said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week he believed the U.S. had the "makings of a deal" with China after officials from the two countries met in Stockholm in a bid to resolve economic disputes aimed at extending their truce on a trade war by three months. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with the U.S. administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without a deal, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. Speaking to CNBC, Trump also said his administration would soon impose tariffs on U.S. imports of pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and chips, which is expected to impact China.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump lifts veil on US submarines in warning shot to Kremlin in 'clever' repositioning move
President Donald Trump broke with decades of strategic silence when he publicly revealed the repositioning of U.S. nuclear-powered submarines in a thinly veiled warning to Russia. The announcement — targeted at Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman and former President Dmitry Medvedev after his latest nuclear threats — sent shockwaves through the defense world not just for its provocation, but for the sheer fact that it was said out loud. Presidents have long moved military assets like aircraft carriers and bombers to signal resolve. But submarines, especially the covert, nuclear-powered kind, are rarely mentioned. "We rarely, if ever, talk about submarine movements unless there's been an undeniable accident," Gene Moran, a former Navy captain and Pentagon strategic advisor, told Fox News Digital. Plenty of other military assets — Patriot batteries, aircraft carriers, even B-52 bombers — are deployed publicly to send a diplomatic message. But this time, the secretive nature of the nuclear submarine positioning may have been the reason for the choice. "Submarine deployments are unverifiable," said Moran. "That's what gives them strategic value, but also what makes this announcement clever — if you're aiming for a headline." Vice Admiral Mike Connor, former commander of U.S. submarine forces, said Trump's statement may have sounded bold, but was in fact consistent with long-standing doctrine. "He didn't really give away too much," Connor, who now serves as CEO of maritime tech company ThayerMahan, told Fox News Digital. "It's generally understood, by our potential adversaries, that our submarines are out there, have been out there for 60-plus years, and are able to strike pretty much where they want, when they want, if needed." "It's a more gentle message done this way," Connor added. "It's not really in your face. It's just a reminder of what already exists." The president was vague in revealing his plans, only announcing that nuclear submarines would be positioned in the "appropriate regions" following Medvedev's accusations that he was escalating the war. Trump told reporters Sunday the submarines are "already in the region, where they should be." Moran said Trump may have simply aligned a routine rotation with a strategic message. "It doesn't cost anything," he said. "But if you do it repeatedly, it begins to reveal where your thresholds are. That has long-term consequences." He also cast doubt on the depth of coordination behind the announcement. "Submarines don't just move at the snap of a finger." Matthew Shoemaker, a former defense intelligence official, echoed that point. "It's certainly unusual to announce it from an operational perspective," he said, "which means this is primarily about sending a message to the Russians rather than trying to achieve a military goal." Meanwhile, Trump's frustration with Putin has grown in recent weeks amid stalled negotiations to end the war, prompting him to scale back the deadline for Russia to agree to a peace deal this week. Trump's disclosure of the submarine presence puts additional pressure on Russia to come to the negotiating table, according to Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer and director of the Hudson Institute think tank's Center for Defense Concepts and Technology. "We have used very sparingly submarines to try to influence adversary behavior before, but this is pretty unusual, to do it against a nuclear-powered adversary like Russia in response to a nuclear threat by Russia," Clark told Fox News Digital Monday. "So I think this is trying to essentially push back on Russia's frequent and long-standing threats to use nuclear weapons in part of the Ukraine conflict." Mark Cancian, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, believes it's more likely that two already-deployed U.S. submarines were repositioned rather than any new vessels dispatched. "At any one time there are about a dozen U.S. submarines deployed," he said. "We probably just moved two of them to different spots. There hasn't been any report of new submarine sailings — you'd have heard about that." Retired Navy Capt. Todd Sawhill, who served as a targeting expert with the Joint Staff and U.S. Central Command, said there's precedent for moving submarines in response to tensions — but rarely is it spoken of this openly. "It is atypical to have a sitting president telegraph it so plainly," Sawhill said. "It's consistent with Trump's desire to direct-message, so in that sense it's not surprising. But it's not how these things are usually done." Experts agree that once a U.S. submarine leaves port, it becomes difficult — though not impossible — for adversaries to track. "These are very tightly controlled pieces of information," Cancian said. "The U.S. has good confidence that deployed submarines aren't being followed — though we've been wrong before." Shoemaker noted that geography plays a significant role. "The closer one gets to an adversary's shores, the more likely they can find and track our subs," he said. "So it depends on where exactly these subs are sent near Russia." Moran added that both sides exaggerate their tracking capabilities. "It's easy to claim you know where your adversary is. But with modern submarines, that's a very difficult task." Connor also pointed to a recent case that underscored the low-profile potency of submarines. "A few weeks ago, there was a strike on Iranian nuclear weapon component manufacturing sites," he said. "There was a lot of noise about the fact that some Air Force planes flew from the U.S. and struck two deeply buried targets. And it was more or less a side note that a submarine — who knows which one or where it was —struck 30 targets at the same time." "It's a capability that's always there, not often used and doesn't need to be talked about too overtly to be effective." But unlike the Iran strikes, it appears improbable that the submarines dispatched in response to increased tension with Russia would see the same kind of action, according to Clark. That's because the U.S. hasn't directly intervened militarily to back Ukraine, and the locations where these submarines operate are not best suited to launch attacks against Russian adversaries since the cruise missiles would go over NATO countries like Romania, Clark said. "It's unlikely to be a cruise missile attack that we threaten or even conduct," Clark said. "I think it's much more likely that we will be using attack submarines to sort of convey to the Russians that we can hold important targets of their own at risk if they do decide to escalate." Asked whether Russia might respond with its own maneuvers, Shoemaker was unequivocal: "Yes, almost certainly. Russia routinely and historically likes to do comparable responses to American actions." Moran pointed to a recent example from last year: "Russia moved ships near Cuba, and we responded by surfacing a submarine in Guantanamo Bay. That's a case of operational schedules aligning with an opportunity to send a message." But such cat-and-mouse signaling carries risk. "Missteps can be made. Things can be misinterpreted," Moran warned. "We've been here before." Connor agreed that the oceans will remain a chessboard of silent signaling. "Both countries have the freedom to operate as they would like in international waters," he said. "They've done that for decades and will likely continue to do so." The move appears to be part deterrence, part diplomacy. "[Trump] is showing annoyance with Russia's unwillingness to negotiate seriously on Ukraine. But more significantly, he's pushing back on Russia's nuclear saber-rattling — a pattern that's existed since the beginning of the war," said Cancian.
