Keeping Dobie Middle School open could cost teachers their jobs
In August 2024, Dobie was identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement under the Federal Accountability System for the third consecutive year. A campus that fails to exit CSI for multiple years is required to prepare a campus Turnaround Plan.
Dobie and the discussion about what the district will do moving forward has been a hot button topic, with AISD discussing closing the school, moving students to Lamar Middle School and the most recent announcement that they are looking at a district managed restart plan.
Another option could mean a charter school and AISD work together to turn things around at Dobie.
'Current teachers and staff and the principal has been working so hard for the past two years,' said Yessyka Velasquez, a parent at Dobie.
While the district is no longer exploring a temporary closure for Dobie, the district is now proposing a district-managed restart plan, which could mean that not all staff will be around next year.
'It is concerning because they want to get rid of the principal along with every staff member, teachers and all,' Velasquez said.
TEA extends deadline for Dobie MS turnaround plan
Velasquez said the school has seen a lot of turnover through the years and students have not had stability. She said she's hoping some of the same faces return next year if AISD decides on a restart plan.
Jose Carrasco, with Austin Voices, shares the same concern with a restart.
'We need to stabilize things, we need a consistency of things, not restarts,' Carrasco said.
He said the STAAR Test and the A to F accountability system are also part of the reason some schools are seeing failing grades.
'Especially for a school like Dobie who has 73% of students that don't have the strong English, then to give them an English test,' said Carrasco. 'That test is a broken system nobody likes it.'
In a recent meeting with Texas Education Agency (TEA) commissioner Mike Morath, he said the A to F accountability system will help improve student outcomes.
'What the evidence shows is that schools that have a D or F rating, they get better very quickly because people realize that, hey, we need to change what we have been doing
because what we have been doing hasn't worked,' Morath said.
Webb and Burnet Middle School are also facing the same decisions.
AISD will hold a meeting Thursday to discuss these plans.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KXAN Austin.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
When is the next Powerball drawing? Jackpot rises to more than $550 million
More than $500 million is up for grabs on Saturday, Aug. 16, as the Powerball jackpot continues to grow. Since no one won the previous drawing on Wednesday, Aug. 13, the search for a new winner continues. The Powerball jackpot has increased to $565 million ahead of the next drawing with an estimated $255.3 million lump-sum payment after taxes, according to the lottery. There have been four Powerball jackpot winners in 2025, most recently on May 31, when a person in California won the $204.5 million prize. A lucky player in Oregon had the first jackpot-winning Powerball ticket of 2025, netting $328.5 million on Jan. 18. A second jackpot winner matched all six Powerball numbers on March 29, winning $527 million. A third jackpot winner from Kentucky won the $167.3 million prize on April 26. The next drawing will take place at 11 p.m. ET on Aug. 16, and here's what you need to know: When is the next Powerball drawing? The next drawing will take place on Saturday, Aug. 16, just after 11 p.m. ET. How to play the Powerball To play Powerball, you have to buy a ticket for $2. You can do this at a variety of locations, including your local convenience store, gas station, or even grocery store. In some states, Powerball tickets can be bought online. Once you have your ticket, you need to pick six numbers. Five of them will be white balls with numbers from 1 to 69. The red Powerball ranges from 1 to 26. People can also add a 'Power Play' for $1, which increases the winning for all non-jackpot prizes. The 'Power Play' multiplier can multiply winnings by: 2X, 3X, 4X, 5X, or 10X. If you are feeling unlucky or want the computer to do the work for you, the 'Quick Pick' option is available, where computer-generated numbers will be printed on a Powerball ticket. To win the jackpot, players must match all five white balls in any order and the red Powerball. Powerball drawings are held on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday nights. If no one wins the jackpot, the cash prize will continue to tick up. Where to buy lottery tickets Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets. You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington D.C. and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to pick your lottery game and numbers, place your order, see your ticket and collect your winnings all using your phone or home computer. Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. Must be 18+, 21+ in AZ and 19+ in NE. Not affiliated with any State Lottery. Gambling Problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY); 1-800-327-5050(MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (all others). Visit for full terms. Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: When is the next Powerball drawing? Jackpot rises past $550 million


Associated Press
17 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Putin shakes hands with Trump ahead of high-stakes summit on Russia-Ukraine war
The Associated Press is an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting. Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business. More than half the world's population sees AP journalism every day.


New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Robin Lakoff, Expert on Language and Gender, Is Dead at 82
Robin Lakoff, a linguist who analyzed what she considered the unique ways women speak and argued that language enforces the power imbalance between the sexes — an insight that inspired an entire academic field, the study of language and gender — died on Aug. 5 in Walnut Creek, Calif. She was 82. Her son, Andrew, said she died in a hospital from complications of a fall that led to respiratory failure. Dr. Lakoff, a professor of linguistics at the University of California, Berkeley, from 1972 to 2012, maintained that women and men communicate differently, and that women are brought up to speak in a way that triggers their powerlessness. ''Woman's language' has as foundation the attitude that women are marginal to the serious concerns of life, which are pre-empted by men,' she wrote in 1973 in a groundbreaking paper, 'Language and Woman's Place,' which was expanded into a 1975 book. Dr. Lakoff's thesis that women are raised to accept a secondary role in the world, one enforced partly by the speech they are taught, sets off academic arguments to this day. Her 1973 paper 'created a huge fuss,' the linguists Penelope Eckert and Sally McConnell-Ginet wrote in 2012. 'Thus was launched the study of language and gender.' Dr. Lakoff observed that women's speech was marked by hedging phrases ('like,' 'y'know'), which convey that the speaker is uncertain; empty adjectives like 'adorable' and 'lovely,' which trivialize statements; so-called tag questions at the end of sentences, like 'John is here, isn't he?,' which convey hesitancy; overly polite phrases like 'Won't you please close the door?,' which suggest submissiveness; and a habit of ending declarative statements with a rising tone of voice that saps them of force. She also observed that women are less likely to tell jokes than men, less likely to use vulgarity, more likely to use hyper-correct grammar and to speak with exaggerated politeness, and more likely to 'speak in italics' — that is, stressing words because the speaker fears she is not being listened to. She acknowledged that men also sometimes use these speech patterns, and that not all women employ them to the same degree. (She herself had a well-developed sense of humor; she began a book chapter about Hillary Clinton with Clinton jokes.) 'But,' she wrote, 'it happens that, as a result of natural gender, a woman tends to have, and certainly tends to feel she has, little real-world power compared with a man; so generally a woman will be more apt to have these uses than a man will.' Early in her academic career, Dr. Lakoff developed an interest in an emerging area of study: sociolinguistics, 'a way to talk about how language makes us who we are, how language creates personal and social identity,' as she explained in a 2023 oral history for Berkeley. Her arguments kicked off a burst of research and debate. Other linguists recorded and analyzed men's and women's speech to test her claims, while critics sought to rebut her notions that men and women speak differently, and that any differences enforce a power imbalance. 'There was a period where every article on language and gender would start by attacking Lakoff,' said Deborah Tannen, a former graduate student of Dr. Lakoff's who popularized some of her ideas in the 1990 blockbuster 'You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation,' which spent nearly four years on The New York Times's best-seller list. As a student in the Berkeley linguistics department in the 1970s, Dr. Tannen once asked Dr. Lakoff why she didn't attend academic conferences. Her answer, she said, was 'I don't need to go and sit there while everybody tears my work apart.' Dr. Lakoff was primarily vilified in her male-dominated field for saying there were differences between men's speech and women's. 'They didn't like the implications,' Dr. Tannen said. Nevertheless, she added, Dr. Lakoff 'was a towering figure' whose 'influence was enormous.' Robin Beth Tolmach was born on Nov. 27, 1942, in Brooklyn, and grew up in the Stuyvesant Town area of Lower Manhattan. Her father, Samuel Tolmach, was a high school social studies teacher, and her mother, Beatrice (Bressler) Tolmach, taught elementary school. Her parents, democratic socialists who were active in union organizing in New York's public schools, were members of Three Arrows, a communitarian summer colony in Putnam Valley, N.Y. She attended Hunter College High School in Manhattan and graduated from Radcliffe College with a bachelor's degree in classics. In her sophomore year, she met George Lakoff, a student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was taking a class with the famous linguist Noam Chomsky, who believed that the underlying structure of language was inborn in human beings. She also began to attend the class. 'Linguistics at M.I.T. during that period was a cult in all but name,' Dr. Lakoff recalled in the oral history. She and Mr. Lakoff, who received a Ph.D. in linguistics from Indiana University, married in 1964. She earned an M.A. in linguistics there and a Ph.D. from Harvard University. In 1968, M.I.T. published her dissertation on Latin subjunctives. ('Went right to the top of the best-seller list,' she once wryly noted.) After a year as a postdoctoral scholar at M.I.T., she taught with her husband at the University of Michigan. In 1972, they were both hired by Berkeley. The marriage ended in 1975. Besides her son, she is survived by a sister, Martha Bauer; a brother, Philip Tolmach; and two grandchildren. Dr. Lakoff moved away from teaching in the Chomskyan school of linguistics, which involved analyzing rules of grammatical syntax, and became an influential figure in the evolving field of sociolinguistics, the study of how language is shaped by culture and social groups. But after kick-starting the field of language and gender, Dr. Lakoff did little academic work in that area; instead, she wrote more often as a cultural critic. Her 2000 book, 'The Language War,' was a collection of essays on the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings, the O.J. Simpson trial, Hillary Rodham Clinton as first lady and other cultural minefields of the 1990s. Dr. Lakoff wrote 'more as a lefty pundit and media critic than a linguist,' a review in Salon noted. Similarly, in an essay for Time on the eve of the 2016 presidential election, Dr. Lakoff seethed over the attacks on Mrs. Clinton's use of a private email server, while nodding just slightly at the topic of speech. 'But here's Hillary Rodham Clinton,' she wrote, 'the very public stand-in for all bossy, uppity and ambitious women. Here are her emails. And since it's a woman, doing what decent women should never do — engaging in high-level public communication — well, there must be something wrong with that, even if we can't quite find that something. Her other books included 'Face Value: The Politics of Beauty,' with Raquel L. Scherr (1984), and 'Talking Power: The Politics of Language' (1990). In the Berkeley oral history, looking back on her early years of teaching as the only woman on the linguistics faculty, Dr. Lakoff drew some parallels with female candidates in the 2020 presidential primaries. 'How to be a woman in a man's place?' she said. 'You get criticized for being schoolmarmish or overbearing or a scold. And only women are criticized for that. A woman using a public voice is in trouble.'