Tshwane metro pushes Lynnwood BRT contractor for revised timelines
Metro spokesperson Lindela Mashigo confirmed that the project has not yet been completed due to safety concerns and conflicting statements between the metro and its contractor.
'The city is awaiting the revised programme from the contractor, and the date for completion will be communicated once it is finalised,' Mashigo said.
The line is designed to extend the existing A Re Yeng BRT service to Mamelodi, and as of mid-July, just over 90% of the work has been completed, according to the metro.
Mashigo explained that the latest delays stem from challenges in the delivery of materials to the site, for which the city holds the contractor responsible.
'There have been delays in the delivery of materials due to challenges on the contractor's side,' he said.
He confirmed that penalties have been imposed on the contractor, as part of measures to enforce accountability for the missed deadlines.
Mashigo added that, while there have been no additional costs directly linked to the multiple deadline extensions, the initial extension to replace a section of pipeline did result in increased costs.
'The value of the contract increased from R123-million to R139.9-million following the pipe replacement,' Mashigo explained.
One of the issues flagged earlier this year was outstanding design approval for a pipeline section, which previously stalled progress on the project.
Mashigo confirmed that the metro has since granted conditional approval, but a few comments still need to be addressed before final sign-off.
Motorists may still encounter minor disruptions as traffic accommodation remains in place for safety reasons on Lynnwood Road.
In response to complaints from motorists about rubble, broken barriers, and safety hazards on site, Mashigo said the metro continues to address these issues through its contractor.
'Instructions have been issued to the contractor upon receiving complaints through the community liaison officer,' he said.
He noted that a physical audit verification was conducted in June to assess the site, and there were no issues identified as the contractor was actively working on site and previous audit findings had been addressed.
Mashigo said the metro remains committed to completing the BRT project and ensuring residents benefit from safe, efficient transport infrastructure.
'We are monitoring the project closely and will continue to implement corrective measures where necessary to avoid further delays,' he said.
He emphasised the importance of balancing progress with public safety and cost control as work nears its conclusion.
In June, contractor Buhle Shabalala disputed claims of worker payment delays, insisting all workers had been fully compensated.
He pointed to heavy rains and delayed design approvals from the metro as primary reasons for the missed deadlines.
'It's not true that there were extensions due to non-payment of workers. All of my workers on site are paid,' said Shabalala.
'The delays were due to the time it took to get design approvals and changes in scope.'
He also denied allegations of site neglect. Shabalala said rubble was cleared daily and broken barriers had been replaced after storm damage earlier this year.
DA councillor Dikeledi Selowa acknowledged that the project was back on track but stressed the importance of improved project management and oversight.
'The issue is poor project management within the metro. These ongoing extensions beyond the initial contract period can potentially lead to extra, unforeseen expenses,' Selowa said.
At that stage, she said visible progress had been made and that workers' wages were no longer in dispute.
Selowa urged the metro to ensure contractors adhered to their obligations, particularly regarding site safety and timely completion.
Residents and motorists in the area are encouraged to remain patient as the metro works with the contractor to finalise outstanding items and prepare for the project's full handover in the coming months.
Do you have more information about the story?
Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114.
For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East
For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
Hawks probe City Power contract payments
JOHANNESBURG - The Hawks has visited the offices of Johannesburg's power utility. The move is reportedly part of an ongoing probe into allegations of corruption at City Power. The Hawks is looking into three questionable payments to contractors. READ: Heads 'will roll' as City Power uncovers internal fraud syndicate And some of the payments in question were inflated. City Power's executives allegedly approved the payments amounting to about R500-million. But the utility insists that there was not a raid, but rather a formal visit to inquire about the business.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Limpopo megaproject sued over 'stolen' rocks
Subcontractor removed R12-million worth of white rock from private land Construction vehicles belonging to Tshiamiso Trading 135, photographed while excavating and loading road-building materials from Boetie Visser's old mine dumps. Photo supplied. A subcontractor on the multi-billion-rand Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone (MMSEZ) project removed R12-million worth of white rock, used to build roads, from a private property without permission. The state-owned company behind the MMSEZ is now being sued by the property owner. But MMSEZ has told the owner to collect the rocks at his own expense, before the end of the month. The subcontractor, Tshiamiso Trading, terminated its contract after receiving R50-million. The company has a track record of receiving controversial government contracts. The state-owned company behind the controversial Musina-Makhado Special Economic Zone (MMSEZ) in Limpopo is facing a R12-million lawsuit after a subcontractor removed approximately 35,000 cubic meters of white rock from a private property without permission. The MMSEZ is a multi-billion-rand megaproject launched by President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2018. More than R100-million has been spent on the project, but there are still no roads, electricity or water connections. It has now emerged that a company subcontracted to build roads, Tshiamiso Trading 135, removed R12-million worth of white rock from an old mine dump owned by Boetie Visser Groep Kontrakteurs, without permission. A subsequent investigation by MMSEZ SOC found that the removal of the road material by Tshiamiso is likely unlawful and criminal. But MMSEZ has not followed the investigator's recommendations and has rejected Visser's requests to be paid for the rocks or for the rocks to be returned. Visser has launched a court case in the Polokwane High Court to claim the R12-million he says is owed to him. But earlier this month, MMSEZ told Visser to collect the rocks at his own expense, denying that they were responsible for the removal of the rocks. Tshiamiso, which has a track record of receiving controversial government contracts, has since cancelled its R200-million contract, after receiving R50-million, citing standing time and ongoing court action. The company's director, Hlamani Bruce Mohlaba, insists the rocks were lawfully removed. Adding to the debacle is that part of the area on which this infrastructure is supposed to be built does not belong to the MMSEZ SOC, and the northern site has not been gazetted to allow for such a development. The MMSEZ has, on several occasions, been accused of bulldozing ahead with development plans, while ignoring legal concerns and the fact that no sustainable plans are in place to secure water on the sites. Unlawful mining In 2022, Tshiamiso was awarded a R200-million contract with MMSEZ to build internal roads and stormwater infrastructure at the MMSEZ's northern site at Artonvilla, north of Musina. They received an additional R100-million contract to build stormwater drainage. On 2 August 2023, the MMSEZ obtained a permit from the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR), which allowed Tshiamiso to start mining for white rock to be used for the roads. An old mine dump was fenced off by Tshiamiso, and the company started removing rocks and taking them to the construction site, about 2km away. But it appears the land, in fact, was owned by Boetie Visser, of Boetie Visser Groep Kontrakteurs CC. In January 2024, Visser contacted the MMSEZ, claiming that Tshiamiso was, without permission, removing crushed stone material that belonged to him. Visser sent several letters to the MMSEZ requesting that they halt the excavation, but Tshiamiso continued. Visser sent a proposal to the MMSEZ on 10 January, offering to sell the high-quality stones to the company. During a meeting between Visser and MMSEZ officials on 22 January, the matter was discussed, and a follow-up meeting was planned to reach an amicable resolution. On 25 January 2024, Visser's lawyer, advocate Elandré Bester, issued a memorandum about the unlawful removal of processed material from his old mine dumps. The memo highlighted that Visser is the lawful owner of the old mine dumps and alleged that the conduct of the MMSEZ and Tshiamiso constituted 'fraud, theft, and larceny'. MMSEZ investigates Officials from the MMSEZ's Legal Services and Infrastructure Development units visited the site on 6 February to investigate. They found it was 'highly unlikely' that Tshiamiso was extracting material from within the permitted area and that it was 'clear that the mining dumps… were outside the designated area of the borrow pit permit'. The MMSEZ investigators also met with Visser, who presented documents to prove he was the owner of the property and had his own mining permit for the white rocks. Visser reiterated his willingness to sell the stones, failing which they should be returned. At that stage, an estimated 35,000 cubic metres, at a value of about R12-million, of crushed stone had already been taken by Tshiamiso. It was agreed that the MMSEZ would provide Visser with feedback three days later, by 9 February 2024. The day after the site visit, Mashile Mokono, the MMSEZ's Senior Manager for Legal Services, compiled a report. It concluded that Tshiamiso could be charged for conducting illegal mining and committing a criminal offence, and said that the company should be held liable for damages. The report recommended that the MMSEZ urgently instruct Tshiamiso to cease excavation, enter into negotiations with Visser to purchase the collected material, and produce records of all materials taken. An estimated 35,000 cubic metres of 'white rock' road-building material stockpiled at Tshiamiso Trading's construction site, approximately two kilometres from Mr Boetie Visser's mine dump. Photo supplied Development stalled By 9 February 2024, the MMSEZ had not provided Visser with feedback as promised. This prompted Visser to apply for an urgent interdict in the Polokwane High Court to stop the unlawful removal and ensure the materials were recovered. But on 5 March, the matter was dismissed because of a lack of urgency. Visser is proceeding with the court action against MMSEZ, SLM Engineers (the consulting engineers overseeing the project) and Tshiamiso and wants to be paid R12-million for the materials removed from his land. In May this year, the MMSEZ board chairperson, Dr Nndweleni Mphephu, presented a report to the Limpopo legislature's portfolio committee on economic development. The report revealed that Tshiamiso had terminated its R200-million contract, citing non-payment of standing time and ongoing court action. Tshiamiso had already been paid R50-million by the time of termination. The report also revealed that the land earmarked for the project's northern site did not belong to the MMSEZ. The land belonged to the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform. Additionally, the area designated for the northern site had not yet been gazetted. 'Come and fetch your rocks' Visser has still not received any payment for the materials. 'I have done nothing wrong. They stole my stone, moved it unlawfully, and now I'm left with a bill and legal costs amounting to half a million rand. And I still don't have my stone back,' said Visser. Visser claims that SLM Engineers knew that Tshiamiso had been extracting rocks from the wrong area. In spite of his ongoing court action, Visser, on 15 July this year, received a letter from Tshifhiwa Irish Bologo, acting CEO of the MMSEZ, telling him to collect the rocks at his own expense before the end of the month. 'As you are aware, MMSEZ was not responsible for the removal of the white rock material from your site as that was done by Tshiamiso Trading without any direct or indirect involvement of MMSEZ,' stated Bologo. This left Visser outraged. 'I didn't put it there. They put it there – their contractors. Now I must transport it back at my own expense? … My offer was simple. I said, pay me, and I'll take my stone back. Now they're saying no, take it back at your own cost,' said Visser. In response to a media enquiry, Bologo said 'Visser is currently engaging with MMSEZ on the removal of the white rocks.' Bologo said that 'MMSEZ is not aware of any instructions by SLM to Tshiamiso Trading to collect the white rocks and therefore no action will be taken against SLM.' As for Tshiamiso, Bologo confirmed that the company still holds the R100-million contract for bulk sewer and waste treatment works construction. She confirmed that a new contractor will have to be appointed to complete the internal roads and stormwater infrastructure. In response to questions, Mohlaba, Tshiamiso's director, said: 'The removal of material occurred lawfully. The claims by Mr Visser presently form the subject matter of an application in the high court. A cost order has already been granted against Mr Visser and is in the process of execution. The application is still pending.' SLM Engineering said that part of the matter had been dismissed with costs by the court. 'Thus, in respect of the law, we cannot comment any further at the moment as this matter is before the court,' concluded Sello Matlakal, a director of SLM. (The cost order referred to by Mohlaba and Matlakala relates only to the urgent application that was dismissed for lack of urgency, not Visser's ongoing court case). A controversial contractor Mohlaba is no stranger to controversy. In 2019, Tshiamiso was taken to court by the Greater Tzaneen Municipality, which accused it of 'undue enrichment' after the company was awarded a R26-million contract for the construction of a 5.8km road and stormwater drainage system. Costs escalated rapidly, and construction was halted when Tshiamiso demanded further payments. It emerged in court that Tshiamiso had made errors in its bid calculations, which influenced the procurement process. The court ruled that the municipality's decision to award the tender to Tshiamiso was unlawful and constitutionally invalid from the outset. At the time, Tshiamiso was also entangled in other similar disputes. In 2016, the Makhado Municipality awarded the company contracts for the construction of two roads, where costs escalated and the projects were halted. Tshiamiso is listed as a legal contingency in the municipality's 2022/23 annual financial statements. At the time, the company was suing the municipality for R7.4-million in unpaid standing time, while the municipality lodged a counterclaim for R11.8-million, alleging 'undue enrichment'. The outcomes of these claims remain unknown. During the covid pandemic, Tshiamiso diversified into the medical supply sector. It was one of 42 suppliers contracted by the Limpopo provincial government to deliver masks and infrared thermometers. This article is published in association with the Limpopo Mirror/Zoutpansberger. This article was republished from GroundUp. Read the original here.
Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Nelson Mandela Bay mayor accused of ‘financial misconduct' over funding rollover for flood disaster projects
The ANC-led coalition government in Nelson Mandela Bay on Thursday rammed through the approval of a 'top up' from city coffers to fund flood disaster projects that were intended to be financed by a R53-million conditional grant. While the Nelson Mandela Bay metro remains at high risk of losing R53-million in flood disaster funding for Kariega, Executive Mayor Babalwa Lobishe on Wednesday urged council to approve that a top-up amount be paid from city coffers to fund the shortfall in the projects. According to council documents, the metro has spent R1.6-million of the proposed R52.3-million so far — and the mayor wants R7-million from the Roads and Stormwater budget to be reprioritised for flood projects as a 'top up'. Democratic Alliance councillor Rano Kayser pointed out to the mayor that the rollover for the funding had not yet been approved by the National Treasury. He cited a Treasury circular stating that rollovers would not be granted in cases where key positions such as city manager and chief financial officer (CFO) have been vacant for more than six months — or where CFOs have been serving in acting roles beyond that period. Kayser said the city failed to spend the money in time. 'The Acting City Manager gave us the assurance that the money will be spent,' Kayser said. 'He even boldly said he visited Kariega, but after all these visits he still failed to spend the R53-million.' In June 2024, Kariega was hit by devastating flash-flooding after a cloud burst dumped 230mm of rain in the area in less than two hours. In October, heavy rains in the metro again damaged parts of Kariega and Gqeberha. But as it was a conditional grant, there was a limited time during which the money could be spent. The metro did not spend the money in time and now has to apply for a rollover of funds. In a letter addressed to Lobishe, Kayser pointed out that the metro must apply for a rollover of the funds by 31 August and a decision in this regard will only be made by 22 October. He said despite no application for a rollover being made by the metro, Lobishe has now asked the metro to approve a 'top-up' budget to be paid from the metro's budget. This, Kayser pointed out in his letter, was 'financial misconduct. This item illustrates the failure and incompetence of the administration. The item is misleading to the council.' He stressed in council that no rollover of the funding had been approved. On its social media pages, the metro claimed the council approved the rollover of funding, but added that this must still be approved by National Treasury. 'I wrote to the executive mayor tabling the allegations of misconduct,' Kayser added. 'She has 7 days to bring the item to council. It has all the elements of misconduct.' He said the metro, through its failure to spend the money, had lost R53-million. 'It may be in the bank account, but it cannot be used. For every project relating to the floods the money has been lost.' The ACDP's Lance Grootboom agreed. 'This is conditional funding. You must apply to the National Treasury for a rollover first,' he said. He pointed out that Treasury was clear in a circular that no rollover requests will be considered where a municipality has a vacant CFO post or had a CFO in an acting position for more than six months. Added to the risk, Grootboom pointed out, is that the metro's city manager has been on suspension (since 2023). 'It is basically an illegal request,' he said. 'You want the metro to top up the money, but you will only get an answer [later].' He later said the issue would have to be addressed by the Standing Committee on Public Accounts. The metro has a pattern of underspending grant funding from National Treasury and has in the past three years lost millions. The MMC for Budget and Treasury Khanya Ngqisha said the opposition was telling the metro not to spend the money. 'We have an accounting officer. He doesn't take decisions without advice. The problem is that some of the political parties listen to wrong advice from junior officials.' He admitted that no money was spent yet. 'If there is anything wrong, the Auditor-General will deal with it.' Acting City Manager Ted Pillay said Lobishe's request should be amended to indicate a budget adjustment instead of a rollover. This was then approved by the council. However, Lobishe then later, after voting, said she didn't want the changes proposed by Pillay. 'He had no right to correct my item. I didn't fix it myself.' A second decision, this time based on the original, unamended item, was then passed — despite objections from opposition councillors, who argued this violated council procedures. They said the proper route was for the Speaker to take the item on review. DM
