A book that tackles white supremacy, racism and the radical right
Although the spread of radical ideologies is not new, it is now fuelled by social media.
Racism, prejudice and discrimination is everywhere. Think of yourself in traffic, consider current local and global politics. In South Africa, themes like BBBEE and xenophobia, sport, gender discrimination impact every day of citizens' lives.
It's a contentious hit parade of themes that could go on for days. This, when on the surface, society remains convinced that it has erased the scourge of prejudice.
In his book White Supremacy, author Gavin Evans does not shy away from difficult conversations. He has them, and this book will likely become the foundation of critical discussions on racism for years to come. The author pulls no punches in tracing the toxic lineage of racist ideologies from their roots in whack-job scientific theory right through to the extremist underbelly, or not-so-underbelly, of the internet today.
Racist ideologies rooted in whack-job science
Racism, discrimination and the modern incarnation of the 'great replacement' theory have their roots in the alt-right online chatrooms 4chan, 8kun, Gab, and the darknet, where racist and misogynistic ideologies can breed and multiply quickly.
Evans researched these rabbit holes. He said the level of misogyny went off the charts. 'And what's frightening is how easily it turns into racism. One minute it's about women, the next it's about immigrants and black people. These forums are shaping how a whole generation of young men see the world.'
ALSO READ: Partner habits that drive you crazy
He said many young men enter extremist online spaces because they feel excluded.
'In the US, for example, many men feel left behind. Women are doing better in school, getting better jobs. Some young men don't see a place for themselves anymore. So, they start looking for someone to blame.'
They find them in people of colour.
Extreme ideas permeate social media. Evans said these are then fuelled by algorithmic reinforcement on various platforms.
'Code and machines don't understand morality,' he said. 'They just feed people more of what grabs their attention. So, if a young guy is drawn to grievance-based and racism-based content, the algorithm serves him more of it – stronger, darker, faster.'
Discrimination is diversifying
'Discrimination seems to be diversifying, too,' Evans added. 'We're splitting down every available fault line, including class, religion and culture. It's a fracturing of society that's being accelerated by the very technology we use to connect.'
These 21st-century divisions and racism are also becoming increasingly visible in politics. 'In the last German election, young men voted for the AfD in significant numbers. Young women voted overwhelmingly for the left. The divide between young men and women is growing,' he said.
The book, however, shows that the spread of radical ideologies is not new. Evans wrote about the major pillars of today's various far-right ideological mutations. He traced it back to the work of Charles Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton, who coined the term 'eugenics' and promoted the belief that intelligence and success were innate traits predominantly found in white populations.
'Galton believed intelligent white people needed to breed more, and inferior races needed to be eliminated,' Evans said.
Race-based politics
Evans suggested that these theories laid the foundation for early 20th-century race-based policies. White Supremacy connects the historical dots between scientific racism, mainstream discourse and acts of modern extremism.
'Many of the people cited in the manifestos of far-right (mass) shooters were the same figures I'd already written about in Skin Deep,' he said. 'They were being referenced as authorities. That's when I realised I had to write this book.'
Skin Deep was an academic publication that deep-dived into the fundamentals of race-based science. It focuses on the victims, in this instance, and not the killers.
It is an absolute social indictment of how far down the pathway to hatred people have ventured.
And while Evans doesn't believe that reading White Supremacy may change anyone's mind, he feels it should be a roadmap for a fact-based argument to counter racism and discrimination.
'You can't tell people to stop thinking a certain way'
'You can't just tell people to stop thinking a certain way. It needs to come from people they know, teachers, friends, siblings. People of influence. And you need to offer alternatives. Role models, platforms that young people actually want to engage with. If you want to challenge someone's ideas, you need to understand where those ideas come from,' he said.
NOW READ: Life after death? The question that's been tossed for ages
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Cosatu: The importance of BBBEE in addressing inequality in SA
Unsplash BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society, the writer says. Image: Unsplash Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) remains an important tool to address our deeply ingrained levels of inequality. It would be strange for any democratic government of a nation emerging from three hundred and fifty years of the most brutal and institutionalised forms of discrimination that left over 90% of society consigned to the most poorly paid form of manual labour, not to embrace state supported economic empowerment programme. It would have been tantamount to endorsing South Africa's status as the world's most unequal society, something clearly the fringe right wing extremists wish for. BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society. BBBEE in short seeks to give a fair opportunity to millions historically denied such due to their race, gender or disability. People, in particular the race baiting fringe right wing, ignore its inclusivity. BBBEE includes Africans, Coloureds, Indians, plus women, workers and persons with disabilities of all races. In short it covers about 97% of society! BBBEE is not just the 30% shareholding option but also equity equivalents where investors can offer similar investments supporting local companies, creating jobs and investing in communities. All equally important. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading It includes Employee Shareholder or Worker Ownership Programmes (ESOPs). This has been an initiative COSATU and many unions have championed. In the recent past few years, it has seen over 550 000 workers become shareholders in their companies. This has given them a stake in the companies' well-being and growth, but also crucially put money in their pockets. Some critics lament that BBBEE has failed and must be scrapped. Yet they are silent on its role in creating a growing Black middle class. They deride efforts to create Black industrialists yet miss the point of their role in opening factories and companies, and the jobs these create in local communities. Is BBBEE perfect? Of course not. Does it need to be adjusted, lessons learned, mistakes corrected? Without a doubt. Cosatu does have many concerns with the implementation of BBBEE, notwithstanding appreciating its successes in many instances. BBBEE does need to be adjusted to learn from challenges experienced, to avoid repeating them and to ensure its progressive objectives reach those most in need of empowerment, the millions of working class residents living in townships, informal areas, rural towns and villages across the nation. A discussion needs to be had about the once empowered, always empowered notion. Do we want BBBEE to continue to benefit those already empowered? Or can it be adjusted to prioritise those still in need of empowerment? How can this be practically done? An elegant solution is needed lest BBBEE be dismissed as benefiting only the wealthy. How can SMMEs, especially emerging ones, and particularly those in townships and rural areas, be elevated? We should not continue to normalise township and rural economies to be composed of taxis, petrol stations, hawkers and taverns alone. An inclusive targeted approach to these communities where the overwhelming majority of South Africans live, is needed. Can more be done to eliminate fronting where White South Africans merely add the name of a Black employee or partner to their ownership papers or where a Black owned company simply imports goods from Asia? BBBEE is not about names on a letter head. It is meant to reach those in need of empowerment. It cannot be about enriching importers when we need to elevate local procurement and give support to local businesses, Black and White, and not sacrifice them in pursuit of cheap imports. Public procurement with an annual budget of over R1 trillion, from departments to municipalities, entities and State-Owned Enterprises, has a key role to play in supporting BBBEE and more critically making sure it reaches those who need it, not the nouveau riche. The recently assented to Public Procurement Act elevating this important objective across the state will be an important boost in this regard. Public representatives across the three spheres of government need to hold the executives accountable in this regard. The private sector too, in particular large mining, manufacturing, financial and other well-resourced sectors with large procurement budgets, need to provide more solidarity and support to local companies, in particular BBBEE compliant ones. This is key not only to transformation and empowerment, but also to boosting localisation and stimulating badly needed economic growth and tackling unemployment. Whilst Cosatu supports the thrust of BBBEE, the heart of our support and in fact our passion, lays in ramping up ESOPS or Worker Ownership Programmes. We want workers to live a better life, to boost their earnings, to have more money to pay their debts, to feed their families and to buy the goods local companies produce and thus spur economic growth and sustain and create more jobs. We want workers to become co-owners of their companies as this gives them a stake in their success and a direct motive to boost productivity and again spur economic growth and sustain and create jobs. We want to end the still painfully prevalent apartheid scars that are the feature of almost every township, village and community. We want workers, African, Coloured, Indian, White, women and with disabilities, to be co-owners in this economy, including on the JSE. We want this better life now, not in some indeterminate future promised on a Jpeg by irrelevant populists. Workers are the backbone of the economy. They have made South Africa the industrial hub of the economy. Many have grown wealthy off of their sweat and blood, it is time that this wealth is shared with the working class. ESOPs are a critical path to doing that. BBBEE is not perfect, but its objectives remain as valid today as they were in 1994. Adjustments are needed, in particular to make sure the SMMEs in our townships, local manufacturers, and most importantly workers are elevated and prioritised at all times. Solly Phetoe is the General Secretary of Cosatu. Solly Phetoe is general secretary of Cosatu. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers.
eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
US police hunt gunman after state lawmaker killed, another injured
USA - A manhunt was underway Saturday for a gunman who shot two Democratic state lawmakers in Minnesota, killing one and her husband and wounding the other, in what the northern US state's governor said were politically motivated attacks. The shootings came as deep political divisions have riven the United States, the same day that tens of thousands of protestors across the country took to the streets against the policies of Republican President Donald Trump. Authorities named the assailant as 57-year-old Vance Luther Boelter, who was still at large and considered "armed and dangerous." "We believe he's working to potentially flee the (Minneapolis-St Paul) area," Drew Evans, superintendent of the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, told reporters. Boelter had been spotted Saturday morning in the Minneapolis area on surveillance footage obtained from a business, the official said. Evans said authorities were still investigating the suspect's motives, and did not know if additional people were involved in the attacks. Trump and US Attorney General Pam Bondi decried what they called "horrific violence" and said perpetrators would be prosecuted to "the fullest extent of the law." The Federal Bureau of Investigation offered a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to the capture or conviction of Boelter. - 'Targeted political violence' - State Representative Melissa Hortman - the former speaker - and her husband Mark were killed at their home in the Minneapolis suburb of Brooklyn Park, Governor Tim Walz told an earlier press conference. State Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were shot and wounded at their home in nearby Champlin, the governor said, his voice breaking with emotion. "This was an act of targeted political violence," Walz told reporters. "Peaceful discourse is the foundation of our democracy. We don't settle our differences with violence or at gunpoint." Evans said Hoffman was out of surgery and "in stable condition" but that he had suffered "significant injuries." The state official said Hoffman and his wife were shot first, and as police investigated, Hortman and her husband were shot about 90 minutes later. The gunman was able to escape during an exchange of fire with officers near Hortman's residence, Evans said. Praetorian Guards Security Services, a home security company, described Boelter on its website as its director of security patrols. - Impersonating law enforcement - GETTY IMAGESvia AFP | Stephen Maturen In both attacks, authorities believe the assailant impersonated a law enforcement officer. An image of Boelter released by the FBI showed him wearing what appeared to be a life-like latex mask, potentially an attempt to evade identification. An anti-Trump rally in Minneapolis - part of the national wave of "No Kings" protests planned for Saturday - was canceled after police issued a shelter-in-place order because of the shootings. Flyers for the protests were found in the suspect's car, as well as a manifesto that named numerous politicians and state officials, police said. Tensions were high across the country, and in Texas authorities said they evacuated the state capitol complex after a "credible threat" towards lawmakers planning to attend a protest there. In Brooklyn Park, where Hortman lived, authorities lifted a shelter-in-place order Saturday afternoon, saying that while the suspect remained at large, there was "reason to believe he is no longer in the area." The United States has been deeply divided since Trump returned to the White House in January. The Republican president has drawn criticism from Democrats over his harsh immigration policy, his assault on universities and the media and a perceived flouting of limits on executive power. "At this precipice moment we're on, this tragic act here in Minnesota should serve as a reminder to all of us," Walz said, lauding democracy as a way to settle differences peacefully. Former US congresswoman Gabby Giffords, who survived a shooting to the head in 2011 and is now a prominent advocate for the prevention of gun violence, described herself as "devastated" by Hortman's death. "We must protect our democracy from those who try to destroy it with a gun," Giffords wrote on X. By Ulysse Bellier
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
We need to rebuild the idea of the public
The struggle against white rule in South Africa was always grounded in a shared conviction — across organisations, ideologies and forms of struggle — that the country to come would not only end white supremacy, but would also be fundamentally just. The declarations of the Freedom Charter are seldom recalled today but this confidence is powerfully expressed in a still famous remark by Steve Biko: 'In time, we shall be in a position to bestow on South Africa the greatest possible gift — a more human face.' For many years after apartheid it was widely thought that, although we faced many serious problems, time was on the side of progress and justice. Jacob Zuma's cynical, violent, lying kleptocracy put an end to that and we have not been able to recover it. Impoverishment and inequality are worsening. More than 40% of people are without work — with over 60% of young people affected. It has been years since we last had any meaningful economic growth. Rural land reform has not been a success. The struggle for urban land is frequently met with criminalisation and violence. More than a fifth of our people do not have enough food. Almost 30% of children under five suffer from stunted growth. More than 11 000 children die of malnutrition each year. Public institutions — from schools to hospitals — and essential infrastructure like the rail network are in a dire state. Many municipalities have collapsed, and we endure one of the highest murder rates in the world. Extortion is endemic. People are desperate and in KwaZulu-Natal there is enthusiastic public support for the now regular executions by the police. While the capture of the state for private gain is no longer centrally directed, it continues — and in many cases worsens — through shifting, decentralised networks, some of which are well described as mafias. There is a systemic intersection of politics and criminality, and it is this, not ideology, that drives most political assassinations. Many of our laws and policies are an expression, even if modest, of an aspiration for a more just society. But while laws and policies matter, the decisive factor in whether we are able to move forward will be political will. If the right forms of political will are not developed, organised and mobilised — if democracy does not make significant progress in resolving our crisis — there is a significant risk that the crisis will further corrode or even explode democracy. As the legitimacy of the current order declines, there is, as is happening across much of the world, an active attempt to scapegoat migrants for the crisis. This process is accelerated by the now-endemic fake news on social media. This turn to a politics of cruelty cannot offer anything but the pleasures of public sadism as compensation for social suffering. It is also a politics of deflection that pulls attention away from the real issues we confront. Xenophobia builds a toxic sense of the nation as determined by exclusion rather than a positive aspiration. This is a problem wherever xenophobia is incited and exploited, but in South Africa — where the nation was forged in struggle against oppression — it means xenophobia is often entangled with some of the language and sentiment of the idea of national liberation, an idea with deep legitimacy. The same is often true of the now systemic and deeply embedded forms of predation on the state. Because they enable accumulation by previously oppressed and excluded people, they are often experienced and presented as a continuation of the national liberation struggle. This means that competing ideas of how we understand that struggle are themselves a key site of struggle. There is a reason Frantz Fanon — and many great thinkers in the movement of African emancipation, such as Amílcar Cabral and Ngugi wa Thiong'o among others — insisted on the need to confront predatory national elites as well as colonialism and imperialism. Fanon's observation that 'the sole motto of the bourgeoisie is 'Replace the foreigner'' and that this is taken up by 'the 'small people' of the nation' as xenophobia speaks directly to the limits of some forms of elite politics today. But along with these attempts to turn the idea of national liberation into what Fanon calls chauvinism, we also face an increasingly strident, and often white-led, demand to put an end to the idea of national liberation. This often includes a demand for the standard set of neoliberal measures — privatisation, austerity, commodification, undoing labour rights, doing away with racial redress and all the rest. The primary desire is to more fully subordinate society to the market. Building a viable political project against these contesting elites requires more than just developing a popular project. Gayton McKenzie, Zuma, Herman Mashaba and others are trying to build populist forms of often hard-right authoritarianism. Challenging the capture of the idea of national liberation by predatory elites and the attempts to consign national liberation — and all ideas of collective emancipation — to history by rival elites requires, among other things, a strong and inclusive commitment to the idea of the public and the public good. To recover a sense of shared future and rebuild trust in democratic life, we need to place the idea of the public at the centre of our political imagination. While bureaucratic and technical systems are important, the fundamental task is to build a moral and political vision of shared life, of dignity, solidarity and social rights. State services and institutions with a social function, such as health and education, can only be nurtured and defended if they are embedded in a shared sense of purpose. To recover a robust idea of the public — and thereby public services and institutions — we need to understand it as both virtue and entitlement. As entitlement, it means that everyone has the right to housing, clean water, good schools, healthcare, transport and public space. As virtue, the idea of the public demands a culture of stewardship, care and responsibility. We need to aspire to what the American activist and intellectual Ruth Wilson Gilmore calls 'life-affirming institutions', an infrastructure that prioritises care, enables flourishing and anchors people in the collective affirmation of dignity. Ultimately this requires a sense of politics as the creation of a shared world, a world where public services and institutions are not crumbling, corrupt or humiliating, but sources of shared belonging and dignity. Public money has to be understood as public wealth. Theft from public wealth has to be understood as theft from the people. Public institutions have to be understood as critical parts of the infrastructure of freedom. These kinds of ideals are never fully achieved, but in many societies political projects have been built that have enabled gains towards affirming an idea of the public and translating it into institutions that support its realisation. This includes countries in the Global South that have built impressive healthcare systems, public transport, education and more. In the early 2000s the Treatment Action Campaign made hugely important progress in building an idea of public healthcare, and then realising huge gains in the health system. Over the past 20 years Abahlali baseMjondolo, a very different kind of organisation, has made significant gains in challenging exclusionary forms of urbanism. None of the contenders for influence in the intra-elite battles over the future of our society has any meaningful interest in building a democratic and strong sense of the public. If we are to make progress towards this, we will require a lot more of the patient labour of organising and building progressive ideas and power from below. Richard Pithouse is distinguished research fellow at the Global Centre for Advanced Studies, an international research scholar at the University of Connecticut and professor at large at the University of the Western Cape.
