Cosatu: The importance of BBBEE in addressing inequality in SA
Unsplash BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society, the writer says.
Image: Unsplash
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) remains an important tool to address our deeply ingrained levels of inequality.
It would be strange for any democratic government of a nation emerging from three hundred and fifty years of the most brutal and institutionalised forms of discrimination that left over 90% of society consigned to the most poorly paid form of manual labour, not to embrace state supported economic empowerment programme.
It would have been tantamount to endorsing South Africa's status as the world's most unequal society, something clearly the fringe right wing extremists wish for.
BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society.
BBBEE in short seeks to give a fair opportunity to millions historically denied such due to their race, gender or disability. People, in particular the race baiting fringe right wing, ignore its inclusivity. BBBEE includes Africans, Coloureds, Indians, plus women, workers and persons with disabilities of all races. In short it covers about 97% of society!
BBBEE is not just the 30% shareholding option but also equity equivalents where investors can offer similar investments supporting local companies, creating jobs and investing in communities. All equally important.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
It includes Employee Shareholder or Worker Ownership Programmes (ESOPs).
This has been an initiative COSATU and many unions have championed. In the recent past few years, it has seen over 550 000 workers become shareholders in their companies.
This has given them a stake in the companies' well-being and growth, but also crucially put money in their pockets.
Some critics lament that BBBEE has failed and must be scrapped. Yet they are silent on its role in creating a growing Black middle class.
They deride efforts to create Black industrialists yet miss the point of their role in opening factories and companies, and the jobs these create in local communities.
Is BBBEE perfect? Of course not. Does it need to be adjusted, lessons learned, mistakes corrected? Without a doubt.
Cosatu does have many concerns with the implementation of BBBEE, notwithstanding appreciating its successes in many instances.
BBBEE does need to be adjusted to learn from challenges experienced, to avoid repeating them and to ensure its progressive objectives reach those most in need of empowerment, the millions of working class residents living in townships, informal areas, rural towns and villages across the nation.
A discussion needs to be had about the once empowered, always empowered notion. Do we want BBBEE to continue to benefit those already empowered?
Or can it be adjusted to prioritise those still in need of empowerment? How can this be practically done? An elegant solution is needed lest BBBEE be dismissed as benefiting only the wealthy.
How can SMMEs, especially emerging ones, and particularly those in townships and rural areas, be elevated?
We should not continue to normalise township and rural economies to be composed of taxis, petrol stations, hawkers and taverns alone. An inclusive targeted approach to these communities where the overwhelming majority of South Africans live, is needed.
Can more be done to eliminate fronting where White South Africans merely add the name of a Black employee or partner to their ownership papers or where a Black owned company simply imports goods from Asia?
BBBEE is not about names on a letter head.
It is meant to reach those in need of empowerment. It cannot be about enriching importers when we need to elevate local procurement and give support to local businesses, Black and White, and not sacrifice them in pursuit of cheap imports.
Public procurement with an annual budget of over R1 trillion, from departments to municipalities, entities and State-Owned Enterprises, has a key role to play in supporting BBBEE and more critically making sure it reaches those who need it, not the nouveau riche.
The recently assented to Public Procurement Act elevating this important objective across the state will be an important boost in this regard. Public representatives across the three spheres of government need to hold the executives accountable in this regard.
The private sector too, in particular large mining, manufacturing, financial and other well-resourced sectors with large procurement budgets, need to provide more solidarity and support to local companies, in particular BBBEE compliant ones. This is key not only to transformation and empowerment, but also to boosting localisation and stimulating badly needed economic growth and tackling unemployment.
Whilst Cosatu supports the thrust of BBBEE, the heart of our support and in fact our passion, lays in ramping up ESOPS or Worker Ownership Programmes.
We want workers to live a better life, to boost their earnings, to have more money to pay their debts, to feed their families and to buy the goods local companies produce and thus spur economic growth and sustain and create more jobs.
We want workers to become co-owners of their companies as this gives them a stake in their success and a direct motive to boost productivity and again spur economic growth and sustain and create jobs.
We want to end the still painfully prevalent apartheid scars that are the feature of almost every township, village and community.
We want workers, African, Coloured, Indian, White, women and with disabilities, to be co-owners in this economy, including on the JSE.
We want this better life now, not in some indeterminate future promised on a Jpeg by irrelevant populists. Workers are the backbone of the economy.
They have made South Africa the industrial hub of the economy. Many have grown wealthy off of their sweat and blood, it is time that this wealth is shared with the working class. ESOPs are a critical path to doing that.
BBBEE is not perfect, but its objectives remain as valid today as they were in 1994. Adjustments are needed, in particular to make sure the SMMEs in our townships, local manufacturers, and most importantly workers are elevated and prioritised at all times.
Solly Phetoe is the General Secretary of Cosatu.
Solly Phetoe is general secretary of Cosatu.
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
12 hours ago
- eNCA
Cosatu holds rally in Cape Town
CAPE TOWN - Unemployment, crime, and lack of economic opportunities remain major hurdles for young people. In the Western Cape, Cosatu is marking Youth Day by placing these pressing issues front and centre. ANC provincial leaders will join the union at a rally to mark Youth Day.

IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Cosatu: The importance of BBBEE in addressing inequality in SA
Unsplash BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society, the writer says. Image: Unsplash Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) remains an important tool to address our deeply ingrained levels of inequality. It would be strange for any democratic government of a nation emerging from three hundred and fifty years of the most brutal and institutionalised forms of discrimination that left over 90% of society consigned to the most poorly paid form of manual labour, not to embrace state supported economic empowerment programme. It would have been tantamount to endorsing South Africa's status as the world's most unequal society, something clearly the fringe right wing extremists wish for. BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society. BBBEE in short seeks to give a fair opportunity to millions historically denied such due to their race, gender or disability. People, in particular the race baiting fringe right wing, ignore its inclusivity. BBBEE includes Africans, Coloureds, Indians, plus women, workers and persons with disabilities of all races. In short it covers about 97% of society! BBBEE is not just the 30% shareholding option but also equity equivalents where investors can offer similar investments supporting local companies, creating jobs and investing in communities. All equally important. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading It includes Employee Shareholder or Worker Ownership Programmes (ESOPs). This has been an initiative COSATU and many unions have championed. In the recent past few years, it has seen over 550 000 workers become shareholders in their companies. This has given them a stake in the companies' well-being and growth, but also crucially put money in their pockets. Some critics lament that BBBEE has failed and must be scrapped. Yet they are silent on its role in creating a growing Black middle class. They deride efforts to create Black industrialists yet miss the point of their role in opening factories and companies, and the jobs these create in local communities. Is BBBEE perfect? Of course not. Does it need to be adjusted, lessons learned, mistakes corrected? Without a doubt. Cosatu does have many concerns with the implementation of BBBEE, notwithstanding appreciating its successes in many instances. BBBEE does need to be adjusted to learn from challenges experienced, to avoid repeating them and to ensure its progressive objectives reach those most in need of empowerment, the millions of working class residents living in townships, informal areas, rural towns and villages across the nation. A discussion needs to be had about the once empowered, always empowered notion. Do we want BBBEE to continue to benefit those already empowered? Or can it be adjusted to prioritise those still in need of empowerment? How can this be practically done? An elegant solution is needed lest BBBEE be dismissed as benefiting only the wealthy. How can SMMEs, especially emerging ones, and particularly those in townships and rural areas, be elevated? We should not continue to normalise township and rural economies to be composed of taxis, petrol stations, hawkers and taverns alone. An inclusive targeted approach to these communities where the overwhelming majority of South Africans live, is needed. Can more be done to eliminate fronting where White South Africans merely add the name of a Black employee or partner to their ownership papers or where a Black owned company simply imports goods from Asia? BBBEE is not about names on a letter head. It is meant to reach those in need of empowerment. It cannot be about enriching importers when we need to elevate local procurement and give support to local businesses, Black and White, and not sacrifice them in pursuit of cheap imports. Public procurement with an annual budget of over R1 trillion, from departments to municipalities, entities and State-Owned Enterprises, has a key role to play in supporting BBBEE and more critically making sure it reaches those who need it, not the nouveau riche. The recently assented to Public Procurement Act elevating this important objective across the state will be an important boost in this regard. Public representatives across the three spheres of government need to hold the executives accountable in this regard. The private sector too, in particular large mining, manufacturing, financial and other well-resourced sectors with large procurement budgets, need to provide more solidarity and support to local companies, in particular BBBEE compliant ones. This is key not only to transformation and empowerment, but also to boosting localisation and stimulating badly needed economic growth and tackling unemployment. Whilst Cosatu supports the thrust of BBBEE, the heart of our support and in fact our passion, lays in ramping up ESOPS or Worker Ownership Programmes. We want workers to live a better life, to boost their earnings, to have more money to pay their debts, to feed their families and to buy the goods local companies produce and thus spur economic growth and sustain and create more jobs. We want workers to become co-owners of their companies as this gives them a stake in their success and a direct motive to boost productivity and again spur economic growth and sustain and create jobs. We want to end the still painfully prevalent apartheid scars that are the feature of almost every township, village and community. We want workers, African, Coloured, Indian, White, women and with disabilities, to be co-owners in this economy, including on the JSE. We want this better life now, not in some indeterminate future promised on a Jpeg by irrelevant populists. Workers are the backbone of the economy. They have made South Africa the industrial hub of the economy. Many have grown wealthy off of their sweat and blood, it is time that this wealth is shared with the working class. ESOPs are a critical path to doing that. BBBEE is not perfect, but its objectives remain as valid today as they were in 1994. Adjustments are needed, in particular to make sure the SMMEs in our townships, local manufacturers, and most importantly workers are elevated and prioritised at all times. Solly Phetoe is the General Secretary of Cosatu. Solly Phetoe is general secretary of Cosatu. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers.

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
GNU Extravagance Making a Mockery of Austerity Measures
Deputy President Paul Mashatile delivers opening remarks at a roundtable discussion with the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) on March 19, 2025. For the past few days, there has been a war of words among different constituencies regarding Mashatile's expenses on international trips, says the writer. Image: GCIS Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu When Deputy President Paul Mashatile appeared before Parliament to answer questions as is required in terms of the Constitution, he found himself having to respond to questions which went beyond his political work but touched on issues related to the current state of the country's finances. Dr Teboko Letlape from ActionSA asked for a complete updated breakdown of all official travels by Mashatile since he assumed office on 3 July 2024. This included information about the purpose of each visit and whether it was justified or not; details about the countries visited; costs involved on each trip; the names and roles of each member of the delegation; and any additional costs on each trip. While this appeared to be a normal question-and-answer session which both the President and Deputy President must honour, the questions triggered a debate which has caught the attention of many South Africans. For the past few days, there has been a war of words among different constituencies regarding Mashatile's expenses on international trips. The bone of contention is about the amounts involved in these international trips which include countries such as Botswana, France, Ireland, Japan, United Kingdom, and Zimbabwe. For the Japan trip, one source placed the figure at a staggering R580 582. Responding to this figure, Mashatile's office released a statement on 10 June 2025 arguing that most of the figures (including this one) were blown out of proportion. The statement said that the cost for the Japan trip was less than R66 000. Among other things, the statement reminded the country that South Africa must strengthen relations with other countries. It also indicated that some of Mashatile's trips were undertaken following President Ramaphosa's decision to delegate him (Mashatile) while he was busy with other assignments. To take the nation into confidence, Mashatile's office provided what it called 'correct' figures and other related information. While the question from ActionSA was fair, and while the response from Mashatile's office was justifiable and necessary, the main question becomes: what should South Africans focus on beyond being fixated on the debatable numbers that have been presented by different stakeholders? Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading In addressing this question, we should not lose sight of the need for the executive members to execute their mandate. We should also not ignore the fact that it is important for our country to forge new relations while strengthening preexisting ones. Importantly, as part of multilateral institutions like G20 and others, South Africa must remain visible in the global arena. But, having said all that, there are many critical questions which have been invoked by the ongoing debate about Mashatile's international trips. The first question can be phrased as follows: given the country's economic situation, is it advisable for the executive to embark on too many trips which eat on the country's thin budget? A logical answer is an emphatic no! Any argument against too many trips should not be misconstrued to mean that there should be no international trip at all. Secondly, given the reasons provided by Mashatile's office, what is the role of South Africa's foreign missions or embassies? If our embassies have properly trained staff, can't they do some of the work which is done by the executive? In the same vein, given that most of the countries our executive visits have embassies with staff, is it not possible to use some of the staff members already stationed in those countries to assist our executive so that the delegation from South Africa could be trimmed to cut costs? In short, is there a return on investment when each member of the executive is accompanied by a big delegation? Is it wise for the South African government to equate itself with First World countries like America that can afford huge delegations? If the answer is in the negative, then we should cut the cloth according to our size. Another very critical question is about the political parties which were very critical of the ANC during their campaigns for the 2024 general election. What has become of their criticism? Have they suddenly lost voices? If they were critical of the ANC because they were listening to the cries of many South Africans, did they miraculously become 'deaf-mute' as soon as they signed the historic statement of intent which produced the multiparty coalition which is touted as the Government of National Unity (GNU)? The reality is that poverty is rife in South Africa. The high unemployment rate of 32.9 per cent is unacceptable. The high crime rate does not encourage foreign investment and tourism. Even continued inequality in the country is not something we can be proud of. To what extent has the coalition government assisted in changing this situation for the better? One glaring irony is that many of the ten political parties that are in a coalition were vocal about our bloated cabinet during their campaigns. Even the ANC was in favour of a reduced cabinet. Intriguingly, after the 2024 election, all of that changed. The seventh administration witnessed a bigger cabinet compared to that of the sixth administration. The mundane argument is that this was necessitated by the coalition government. But were politicians more concerned about cabinet positions than being MPs to serve the people?