Video: 60 missing kids rescued in 'largest child rescue operation' in US history
Federal and state officials announced on Monday that 60 missing children were recently rescued in Florida as part of 'Operation Dragon Eye,' which has been described as the 'largest child rescue operation' in the history of the United States.
Announcing the results of Operation Dragon Eye during a press conference on Monday, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Republican, said, 'We are here to announce the most successful completion of the largest child rescue operation, not just in Florida history, but in the United States history.'
'Protecting our kids and keeping Florida the safest state to raise a family is our number one priority,' the Florida attorney general added. 'Today is a result of the hard work to deliver on that promise.'
According to First Coast News, Uthmeier confirmed on Monday that many of the children rescued as part of Operation Dragon Eye were in 'critical danger' and were at risk of human trafficking.
'Many of these kids have been through painful, disastrous situations,' Uthmeier stated. 'But at least today we've rescued them and we now can work towards recovery.'
READ MORE: 244 child sex predators arrested, 109 kids rescued in major FBI operation
U.S. Marshal William Berger also highlighted the historic results of Florida's Operation Dragon Eye during Monday's press conference. Berger explained that 60 juveniles, ages nine to 17, were rescued in just two weeks. Berger also confirmed that over 20 agencies and over 100 people were involved in the recent child rescue operation.
According to Berger, in addition to the 60 children rescued in Operation Dragon Eye, eight people were arrested by law enforcement officials. Berger explained that the individuals arrested currently face charges of human trafficking, drug trafficking, drug possession, and child endangerment. Berger added, 'When arrested, they were given bonds ranging from no bond to $250 million bond.'
🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: U.S. Marshals and Florida officials announce LARGEST single child rescue operation in American history.Over 2 weeks, 60 KIDS are safe, in custody.
This involved over 20 agencies and 100+ people. 8 people were arrested, charged with human trafficking, child… pic.twitter.com/trkcFMhtmX — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 23, 2025
In a Monday press release, Uthmeier wrote, 'The real heroes behind this operation are the law enforcement who built and executed this mission. As your Attorney General and a father of three young kids, protecting children is my top priority. If you victimize children, you're going to prison, end of story.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
43 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Did a Tourist Get Blocked From the U.S. Over a J.D. Vance Meme?
'Two pictures spoiled Mads' dream vacation,' read a headline from Norwegian newspaper Nordlys on Monday, which was amplified by British tabloid the Daily Mail on Tuesday. Mads Mikkelsen—not the Danish actor but a 21-year-old tourist from Norway—told his hometown outlet that he was denied entry to the U.S. at Newark Liberty International Airport on June 11 after handing over his phone to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who came across a meme of U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance. Mikkelsen claimed the officials threatened him with a $5,000 fine or five years in prison if he refused to give the password to his mobile device and that, after he relented and it was scrutinized, he was sent back to Norway. On social media, anti-Trump influencers including former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger and #Resistance movement activist Brian Krassenstein, among others, shared reports of the denial of entry and encouraged the spreading of more Vance memes, which became popular after President Donald Trump's explosive meeting with Volodomyr Zelensky in the Oval Office in February, when Vance demanded the Ukrainian President say 'thank you' to Trump. 'These are the same people who blame Europe for a lack of free speech,' disinformation researcher Pekka Kallioniemi posted on X about the Trump Administration in relation to the story. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), called the claims of Mikkelsen's denied entry over the Vance meme 'FALSE' and 'BS.' CBP said in a post on X that 'Mads Mikkelsen was not denied entry for any memes or political reasons, it was for his admitted drug use.' The second photo seen by the ICE officials, by Mikkelsen's own admission, was a wooden pipe he'd made himself a few years ago. He also told Nordlys that the officials asked him 'direct questions about drug smuggling, terrorist plots, and right-wing extremism' and that he had been forced to give a blood sample. It remains unclear why Mikkelsen was subjected to heightened scrutiny. CBP did not answer TIME's requests for comment. The bigger picture Tighter immigration controls, however, have become a cornerstone of Trump's second term. Besides an outright ban on nationals from certain countries and heightened vigilance on nationals from others, the Trump Administration has required immigration officials to improve vetting procedures for some non-immigrant visas, including social media screening of international student visa applicants. DHS also announced in April that authorities would begin screening the social media accounts of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. for 'antisemitic activity.' While border agents have long been empowered to deny entry on a case-by-case basis, reports of increased scrutiny, detentions, and denials of tourists have proliferated in recent months. Some incidents have sparked concerns about border agents' discretion becoming politicized. In March, a French minister deplored how a researcher for the French National Center for Scientific Research was denied entry to the U.S. after authorities found 'personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy' on his phone. And just last week, border agents reportedly sent back an Australian writer to Melbourne from Los Angeles after they interrogated him about his views on the conflict in Gaza. Some countries, including China, Denmark, and Finland, have issued travel advisories to their citizens about heading to the U.S. in response to various Trump policies. Amid all this, travelers are increasingly turning away from the U.S., and the World Travel & Tourism Council said the U.S. economy is set to lose $12.5 billion in international traveler spending this year. There's not much visitors can do if border officials want to deny them entry. You have the right to remain silent, an immigration lawyer told the New York Times, but a border officer is likely to deny you entry as a result. And if they detain you instead of sending you back right away, they can hold you for up to 90 days. Nate Freed Wessler, a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told the Guardian that after landing on an international flight but before clearing customs, you have fewer civil rights than you do elsewhere in the U.S. 'The normal Fourth Amendment requirement of a warrant or individualized suspicion doesn't apply,' he said. 'The only minimal protection CBP has in their policy is distinguishing between manual and forensic searches,' he added, explaining that a forensic search of a mobile phone, for example, involves plugging it into another device to analyze it, while a manual search includes scrolling through its contents. 'For a forensic search, they say they need reasonable suspicion, but they don't define what that means. For a manual search, there are no guardrails. They argue it's less invasive, but that's just not true. They can still do keyword searches and spend hours combing through your device.' 'Keep calm (but delete your nudes)' advised the Guardian's headline for tourists headed to the U.S. WIRED has advised traveling with a separate phone altogether—though a phone that appears 'too squeaky clean,' it warns, 'can arouse suspicion'—or at the very least minimizing risk by printing your boarding pass and any other documents you may need to present so you can avoid taking your phone out of your pocket. Noor Zafar, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, told the Washington Post that travelers should keep the contact information of an immigration attorney in case they run into complications at the border. 'The stories are definitely concerning,' Zafar said in March. 'I think we're just in a period of more aggressive policies being implemented at the border. And I think that requires people to take extra precautionary measures.'
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Congress' 'big beautiful' bill proposes new Medicaid work requirements. Here's what to know
The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that is making its way through Congress may put millions of people at risk of losing access to Medicaid. One reform that may prompt that loss of coverage — the implementation of new work requirements — was included in both the Senate and House versions of the bill. In 2034, about 4.8 million additional people would be uninsured based on work requirements in the House Republican budget bill, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan legislative scorekeeper. More from Personal Finance:Health-care cuts in GOP budget bill prompt medical debt: ReportSenate tax bill includes $1,000 baby bonus in 'Trump accounts''SALT' deduction in limbo as Senate Republicans unveil tax plan "There's no question that millions of people will be harmed," said Allison Orris, senior fellow and director of Medicaid policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Overall, 16 million individuals may be uninsured by 2034, according to CBO, based on the combined effects of the House Republicans' budget bill on Medicaid and Affordable Care Act coverage; the expiration of enhanced premium tax credits tied to the ACA; and a separate rule proposed by the Trump administration targeting ACA marketplaces. The House and Senate versions of the "big beautiful" bill would impose federal work requirements on Medicaid for the first time. Per the House and Senate proposals, individuals ages 19 to 64 who apply for Medicaid or who are enrolled through Affordable Care Act expansion group would need to would need to work or participate in qualifying activities for 80 hours per month. Adults may be exempt if they have dependent children or have qualifying circumstances such as medical conditions; however, "exemptions don't always work, and people could lose coverage anyway," Orris said. Medicaid work requirements proposed in the House bill would cut federal spending by $344 billion over 10 years, representing the legislation's largest source of Medicaid savings, according to KFF, a nonprofit provider of health policy research. Current law prohibits basing Medicaid eligibility on work requirements or work reporting requirements, according to KFF. "Many people on Medicaid, if they're able to, are already working," said Robin Rudowitz, director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured at KFF. However, some states may implement work requirements if they receive approval through waivers. Georgia is currently the only state with a Medicaid work requirement. "Several" other states have recently submitted waiver requests to put such requirements in place, according to KFF. Arkansas previously implemented Medicaid work requirements. However, estimates have shown while more people became uninsured because of that policy, there were not meaningful increases in employment, according to Rudowitz. The Senate version of the bill introduced a "harsher" take on the work requirements that would apply to some parents, Orris said. The Senate calls for limiting parental exemptions to those with children ages 14 and under, rather than all parents of dependent children as the House proposed. Individuals who apply for Medicaid coverage would need to meet work and other requirements for one or more consecutive months before they apply. Eligibility redeterminations would be conducted at least twice per year to ensure enrollees still meet those requirements. The Senate version proposes capping the look-back period for showing compliance with work requirements to three months, which on net may be helpful to people, Orris said. If an individual is denied coverage or disenrolled because they do not meet the Medicaid work requirements, they would be ineligible for subsidized marketplace coverage. The Senate bill also allows for a longer timeline for states to comply with the Medicaid work requirements. The chamber's bill would give states the ability to ask for a good faith waiver that would give them an additional two years to come into compliance with the provision, or until the end of 2028, rather than the end of 2026 in the House version.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Bombings set back Iran's nuclear program, but likely didn't kill it
How does a country destroy another's know-how to build a technology? That is the dilemma facing US and Israeli leaders. President Donald Trump said Iran will never be able to rebuild its bombed nuclear facilities, asserting the American strikes "completely obliterated" the sites. But that's not the same as assessing whether Iran can still build nuclear weapons — the reason that drew the US into Israel's attacks on Iran this weekend. Officials and many experts say the attack likely only delayed Iran's ability to build nuclear weapons and that the whereabouts of its highly enriched uranium — enough to build at least a half dozen warheads — remain unknown. It's unlikely the recent bombing of Iranian facilities by the US and Israel has killed Iran's nuclear program and may only harden its ambitions. Surviving stockpiles of highly enriched uranium, the resilience of Iran's deeply buried underground facilities, the potential for undisclosed or covert sites, and its scientific and technical expertise, coupled with Iran's strong desire to protect and preserve this program, all potentially point to this being a significant speed bump, not a roadblock. US stealth bombers and a guided-missile submarine executed precision strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan this past weekend. In the aftermath, Trump declared that the sites, all key to Iran's nuclear program, "were totally destroyed." Satellite images of the areas showed surface damage caused by US strikes, which included the use of GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-buster bombs dropped by US Air Force B-2 Spirit bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles fired by a US Navy submarine. Internal damage at the facilities was far less clear but could be substantial, as Trump has said. An early classified US intelligence assessment obtained by CNN and The New York Times determined the strike only set Iran's developments back a few months and did not eliminate its enriched uranium stockpile or its centrifuges,the devices that can spin uranium gas to weapons-grade level. Iran could rebuild lightly damaged centrifuges or construct new ones and is not restricted to doing so only at the sites the US attacked. A final battle assessment, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Sunday, "will take some time." Operation Midnight Hammer was designed to "severely degrade" Iran's nuclear program, Pentagon leaders said. US Vice President JD Vance and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the strikes had set Iran's nuclear program back a number of years. In recent days, nuclear weapons experts have debated just how long that'll be — questions that turn on how much enriched uranium Iran retains, how quickly it can enrich more and build the bomb it goes into and, most critically, whether Iran intends to do so now. Jeffrey Lewis, a prominent arms control expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, posted an analysis on X explaining that satellite images had tracked Iranian trucks at Fordow days before the US strike, potentially moving sensitive equipment. He noted that there had been no effort to strike the underground facility next to Natanz, and it had enrichment facilities that weren't affected by the strikes. "Let's say Iran decides to rush a bomb," Lewis wrote. He said that based on the abilities and materials likely still available, the Iranians could theoretically enrich a substantial quantity of weapons-grade uranium in a matter of months. Vance said that it's unclear where Iran is keeping stockpiles of near-weapons-grade uranium, telling ABC's "This Week" that the US was planning on having conversations with Tehran about it. The biggest unknown after the recent strikes is how much weapons-grade or near-weapons-grade uranium was actually destroyed. Iran had about 900 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% as of the middle of last month, per the International Atomic Energy Agency. The head of the IAEA said Iran protected its existing enriched uranium and believes it was moved before the strikes. James Acton, the co-director of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's nuclear policy program, wrote in a Politico op-ed on Monday that this is enough for a few nuclear weapons after further enrichment. "Iran has a decent shot at keeping that highly enriched uranium safe and secret," Acton said, explaining that the material is typically stored "in small cylinders that are roughly the same size and shape as scuba tanks" and tracking that will be difficult. Most of Iran's nuclear scientists and technicians likely survived the strikes. The facilities were evacuated in advance, as the possibility of an attack on the nuclear sites was telegraphed ahead of time even if the bombing was a surprise. Their expertise, along with potential hidden facilities, other known sites that weren't struck, and the remaining uranium stockpiles, suggest Iran could revitalize its program, potentially very quickly. Speaking to CNN's Christiane Amanpour this week, former Secretary of State John Kerry, one of the architects of the now defunct Iran nuclear deal, said that the issue here is that "you can't bomb away the memory of how to make a bomb." "You can't bomb away the knowledge that they have developed," he said, adding that "you can't bomb away the broad array of technicians that have been working on this for years who will go back to work if that's the mission they're given by the leadership of the country." The possibility that Iran's nuclear program may not be as devastated as first announced, as well as media coverage and a classified US assessment, have angered Trump. "The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it," he posted on Truth Social on Monday. "Only the Fake News would say anything different in order to try and demean, as much as possible." After the US strikes, it's also possible that Iran will expedite efforts to develop a nuclear weapon, seeing it as a path to security. Prior to the attack on Iran, intelligence agencies assessed that Iran was undecided on building a bomb — and that military action could push it to do so.
