logo
Trump Admin's Disturbing Changes On LGBTQ+ Health Data Are Worrying Medical Experts

Trump Admin's Disturbing Changes On LGBTQ+ Health Data Are Worrying Medical Experts

Yahoo05-02-2025

Members of the LGBTQ+ community, and transgender people in particular, are currently facing a massive blackout of crucial health information and scientific research.
Following a flurry of executive orders from President Donald Trump, webpages on topics like LGBTQ+ health and safety were removed from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.
The CDC has reportedly also sought to rid new scientific papers of terms such as 'LGBT' and 'pregnant person.' And HuffPost recently reported on how the Trump administration formally blocked gender-affirming care for people under the age of 19 who are on federally run insurance programs.
Naturally, these moves have led to intense scrutiny from scientists and the general public. Some CDC resources were put back online following public outcry, including AtlasPlus, which is a disease surveillance tool.However, Dr. Stacy De-Lin, the associate medical director at Planned Parenthood Hudson Peconic in New York, said webpages are now stripped of certain terms and information.
Experts told HuffPost that they're concerned about these moves, and about the health and safety of queer people. Below, De-Lin and other doctors share their thoughts about what's going on and where people can still access important health information.
'I just want to point out as a physician, none of these decisions are in any way based in science,' De-Lin said. 'This is politically motivated, and it is discrimination against a group of people.'
When it comes to gender-affirming care specifically, decades' worth of research indicates that health decisions are 'best left to patients, their families and their doctors,' De-Lin said.
'Lawmakers should not have any say in people's personal medical decisions,' she argued.
Restricting care or removing certain words from a federal health website not only discounts years and years of research, but jeopardizes patient safety, according to De-Lin. 'We know, medically, that there's not just two genders,' she said. 'There's a broad spectrum, including intersex people.'
De-Lin added: 'We know transgender, nonbinary, intersex, gender-nonconforming people will continue to exist. Trans people have always existed and always will, and legislating without having just a basic understanding of sex and gender is only going to harm people who need care.'
Not having a reliable and reputable source for information — which is what the CDC is, for physicians and others — can be dangerous, and experts are worried that the Trump administration's moves may result in poorer treatment for marginalized groups.
'There are a lot of knowledge gaps with many health care providers when it comes to the unique aspects of trans health care, and unfortunately that leads to a lot of stigmatization,' said Dr. Eric Burnett, an internal medicine doctor at an academic medical center in New York and a health communicator on social media.
'A lot of trans people don't feel safe going to the doctor,' Burnett added.
Plus, the majority of doctors aren't members of the LGBTQ+ community, said Dr. Janine Zee-Cheng, a pediatrician in Indiana.
In Indiana, 'where the small towns tend to be pretty homogenous, if you have a minoritized community of any kind, they're going to stick out like a sore thumb already,' Zee-Cheng said, adding that 'they're going to be treated differently' and 'potentially worse' than those in the majority population.
If certain groups ― in this case, the LGBTQ+ population ― don't feel safe getting care, the health of the community as a whole will get worse, said Zee-Cheng. If a queer person goes in for an annual physical and feels dismissed or mistreated, they may be less inclined to go back to the doctor when they have a new problem like pain or breathing trouble.
Of course, doctors can look for information in places other than the CDC website, but that could take more time, Zee-Cheng added.
'If each doctor has to look up stuff for an additional 20 minutes per day, multiply that by the number of doctors in your city — that is that many hours wasted,' Zee-Cheng said. 'It's going to be such a huge [depletion] just from a time and resource standpoint.'
In the medical field, doctor and nurse burnout is already common. Having to do extra research to get an answer that used to be readily available could make that burnout even worse, Zee-Cheng noted.
Experts also say the removal of important health resources can severely affect vulnerable populations. For example, 'a lot of the HIV resources got pulled down, and that's obviously very detrimental because you really can't talk about certain aspects of health without talking about health care disparities and how certain conditions, certain diseases, disproportionately affect certain groups,' such as gay men, trans women, African Americans and Latinos, Burnett said.
'Those are just medical facts. But then if you consider that 'DEI' or if you consider that 'woke, radical gender ideology,' you're going to remove our ability as physicians to target resources to at-risk communities,' Burnett added, using an abbreviation for diversity, equity and inclusion.
'That's going to leave those communities at even more of a disadvantage than they already are,' he said. 'It frustrates me as a physician because these communities are already struggling, already facing challenges, and the administration gutting all of this information makes it that much more difficult.'
Zee-Cheng said young people's mental health will suffer as a result of the administration's moves. That includes suicide rates and depression, as well as mental health outcomes throughout their lives, the pediatrician said. Or it could impact how a child performs at school, interacts with their peers or their ability to go to college, Zee-Cheng said.
A 2024 report from the Trevor Project nonprofit said that '39% of LGBTQ+ young people seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year — including 46% of transgender and nonbinary young people.' And according to a now-unavailable page on the Census Bureau's website, a 2022 survey found that 'Half of LGBT respondents ages 18-29 reported symptoms of depression, compared with about 29% of non-LGBT respondents in this age group.'
'One thing I really want to make sure that people are aware of is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally strip people of their rights,' said De-Lin.
Following an executive order on halting federal support for gender-affirming care among minors, some hospitals moved to restrict such care. De-Lin said she's disappointed to see this happening, adding that there is no reason for hospitals to comply right now.
'These orders definitely take time to put into action. They don't override the rights and protections that the Constitution holds, or federal law or court decision,' De-Lin said. 'I think everyone is really feeling very dizzied and very panicked.'
At health care providers like Planned Parenthood, there are doctors 'who are continuing to proudly provide gender-affirming care to our LGBTQ+ people who come to our centers, and that's not changing,' she said.
'I'll just say that at Planned Parenthood, we absolutely will not be complying in advance,' De-Lin said. 'We will continue to fight and advocate for our patients.'
Still, Burnett urged people not to be complacent.
'We have to take lessons from the communities that came before us, specifically with the HIV/AIDS epidemic where groups like ACT UP [the AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power] and queer activists didn't just sit and take it. They stood up and they fought for their friends, for their family that were dying of AIDS because the government inaction was killing them,' Burnett said.
'I think we're back in that mindset where we're not going to let the government try to erase queer people. ... I think this shows that if you have enough public activism, if you have enough outcry, it can actually impact policy.'
The federal government may be restricting the use of certain words on its websites, but this doesn't mean that local and state health departments can't use those terms, Burnett said.
For people in some states and cities, local health departments have sections of their own websites that cover the information stripped from the CDC site.
'I know in New York City, the New York City Department of Health [and Mental Hygiene] has a really robust sexual health division,' Burnett said. 'I also just encourage people to go to their state and local health department websites, and often they will have resources there and local resources that are easily accessible to people within the community.'
But with queer rights under attack throughout the country, local health departments won't always be a reliable place to get information on LGBTQ+ health care. (Of course, a person in any state can learn from the general health resources on the New York City site, for example; any information on local doctors or local programs just won't apply to them.)
In those cases, Burnett recommended visiting the Human Rights Campaign website to find resources for the queer community and information for providers who treat members of this group. Burnett also suggested checking out the Trans Health Project, an initiative of the Advocates for Trans Equality organization.
De-Lin said she refers people to the Planned Parenthood website for resources on LGBTQ+ health and gender-affirming care.
And if you have a doctor or medical center in your community that you already trust, continue to talk with them, Zee-Cheng said.
'I know it's easy to look at this and feel extraordinarily dejected and that you're not worthy, and that you don't matter, but I think there are more people out there who support you and want what's best for you,' said Burnett. 'Speaking from personal perspective, I'm going to keep fighting until I until I can't anymore. I'm just going to keep going. And there are people out there who are fighting, especially within the health care community, to ensure that that we don't take this lying down.'
If you or someone you know needs help, call or text 988 or chat 988lifeline.org for mental health support. Additionally, you can find local mental health and crisis resources at dontcallthepolice.com. Outside of the U.S., please visit the International Association for Suicide Prevention.
RFK Jr.'s Stunning Claim About Black People And Vaccines Sparks Concern From Medical Experts
Experts Share What Another Trump Presidency Could Mean For Your Health
109 Ways To Fight Back Against What's Happening In The U.S. Right Now

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LA protesters and police in standoff as Trump doubles National Guard deployment
LA protesters and police in standoff as Trump doubles National Guard deployment

CNN

time14 minutes ago

  • CNN

LA protesters and police in standoff as Trump doubles National Guard deployment

Update: Date: 18 min ago Title: Protesters outside US Embassy in Mexico City call for end to immigration raids across the border Content: Protesters in Mexico City staged a demonstration outside the US Embassy on Monday, calling for an end to sweeping immigration raids across the border. Video captured by Reuters showed people waving Mexican and US flags and burning an effigy resembling US President Donald Trump. 'We cannot remain silent as the Trump administration escalates its war on our communities in the United States,' said activist Alejandro Marinero from Migrant Organization Aztlan. 'Immigration policy is not a party issue, but a class issue. It is the tool of a system that seeks to divide us, exploit us and keep us in the shadows to ensure its profits at the expense of our humanity,' he told Reuters. Update: Date: 42 min ago Title: Thousands rally in San Francisco against ICE raids Content: Thousands of people marched through San Francisco's Civic Center and Mission neighborhoods on Monday night in protests that were 'overwhelmingly peaceful,' police said. Demonstrators rallied against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids across the country and expressed solidarity with immigrant communities, CNN affiliate KGO reported. 'At the very end of the night, two small groups broke off and committed vandalism and other criminal acts,' the San Francisco Police Department said. Police said they detained multiple people who refused to comply with orders, made arrests, and are currently addressing one unresolved situation. 'I'm deeply concerned about what's going on in Los Angeles and all around the country. California, we are better because of our diversity, and for people to be torn away from school graduations, torn away from their children, that's not right. We have to come out here and tell people that's not right,' Holly Minch, who marched with a sign that read 'MELT ICE,' told KGO. The police said they coordinated with public safety agencies under the leadership of San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie to 'protect numerous First Amendment actions' in the affected neighborhoods. On Sunday, about 150 people, including some under the age of 18, were arrested near the Immigration Services building. Police said the arrests were made after protesters ignored dispersal orders and engaged in acts of violence and vandalism. Anti-ICE protests have popped up around the country, including in New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Dallas and Louisville. Update: Date: 57 min ago Title: Law enforcement helicopters have been circling above protests, flight tracker shows Content: Helicopters from the LAPD and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department circled the areas of Boyle Heights and Little Tokyo throughout the day on Monday, according to data from Flightradar24. Earlier in the night, several police helicopters and a plane deployed by the California Highway Patrol were flying over the downtown area. By midnight, only two police helicopters remained airborne. Since protests erupted over the weekend, authorities have maintained a consistent presence in the air, with multiple helicopters sighted above protest zones all day yesterday. Update: Date: 1 hr 23 min ago Title: In pictures: Protesters clash with police in Downtown Los Angeles on Monday Content: Update: Date: 1 hr 23 min ago Title: Who is protesting in LA? Content: The protests appear divided into separate groups: progressive citizens who felt called to defend the rights of the undocumented, and protesters who appeared determined to drag the city into violent chaos. A senior law enforcement source told CNN that intelligence analysts have been conducting assessments on the crowds that gathered Sunday night. They found the many of the protesters were motivated by the recent immigration raids and disdain for the federal government's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. But some protesters, the intelligence source said, fit law enforcement profiles of so-called 'professional rioters,' who continually seek out confrontation with law enforcement. Defending 'La Raza': Unión del Barrio, an organization whose members are dedicated to defending the rights of 'la raza' — or Mexican and indigenous people — within the US, praised the efforts to fight back against ICE and other agencies. The Los Angeles community has 'the moral authority and universal right to defend our people from kidnappings and family separation,' a spokesman said. Toll on vulnerable communities: After being informed ICE agents were questioning workers at a Pasadena hotel, Pablo Alvarado, the co-executive director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, began calling for protests to protect vulnerable immigrant communities throughout the city. 'The Pasadena community showed up in large numbers and the message was loud and clear, we don't want to see your armored vehicles, men in masks coming to our communities to pick people up to rip families apart.' But, Alvarado added, he felt the violence that spread throughout the city in response to the raids was tainting their cause. Read the full story. Update: Date: 1 hr 23 min ago Title: Analysis: LA's crisis rests on what Trump does next Content: Donald Trump is talking and acting like an authoritarian as he escalates a constitutional clash with California over his migration crackdown. Much now depends on whether he's simply talking tough or if he's ready to take an already-tense nation across a fateful line in his zeal for strongman rule. On Monday, the president of the United States — the country seen as the world's top steward of democracy for 80 years — endorsed the arrest of the Democratic governor of the nation's most populous state. 'I think it would be a great thing,' Trump said. Trump's decision to deploy troops despite the opposition of California Gov. Gavin Newsom represented the latest example of his willingness to flex extraordinary executive power and marked a break with a first term when he was often talked out of his extreme impulses by establishment officials. For all Trump's multiple previous challenges to the rule of law and democracy, a grave new chapter may be opening. The trajectory of the crisis could now turn on whether Trump follows through on his dictator's theatrics by crossing lines not approached by modern presidents — notably on the use of troops in a law enforcement capacity. It may also rely on the restraint of protesters, who would play into Trump's hands by taking part in more unrest that creates alarming television pictures that can fuel Trump's dystopian rhetoric. Creating or escalating a law-and-order crisis or threat to public security and then using it to justify the use of the military on domestic soil would mirror the methodology of tyrannical leaders throughout history. Read the full analysis. Update: Date: 1 hr 23 min ago Title: Newsom hasn't done anything to warrant arrest, Trump's border czar says Content: White House border czar Tom Homan joined CNN's Kaitlan Collins to discuss comments President Donald Trump made suggesting Homan arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom.

Editorial: Misusing the National Guard — Trump's LA interference with local policing
Editorial: Misusing the National Guard — Trump's LA interference with local policing

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Misusing the National Guard — Trump's LA interference with local policing

Always looking to provoke a crisis, Donald Trump has federalized 2,000 soldiers of the California National Guard against the wishes of the state's governor to put down a rebellion in Los Angeles that doesn't exist. And Trump is acting counter to federal law in doing so, which is no surprise for him. After demonstrators gathered in L.A. to protest ICE raids, some idiots in the crowd threw rocks at the immigration law enforcement officers. That's a crime and is not free speech. But the president used the sporadic violence, which was quickly quelled, to overstep his legal authority. On Saturday, he issued a directive claiming: 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Then, latching on to his own word 'rebellion,' he invoked a federal statute, 10 U.S. Code § 12406, covering the National Guard. The law is brief. It says that 'Whenever 1) the United States is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation; 2) there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or 3) the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States; the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws.' There's no invasion, there's no rebellion and ICE is able to carry out its functions. And there is no lawlessness in the streets of L.A. that can't be contained by the local L.A. County sheriff's department, which has almost 10,000 sworn and armed deputies and the LAPD, which has almost 9,000 sworn and armed cops. If those law enforcement professionals need help, California Gov. Gavin Newsom could activate the National Guard. But Newsom didn't call up the Guard for backup because the soldiers weren't needed. That Trump went around Newsom, who he 'cleverly' calls 'Newscum,' is something that hasn't been done in 60 years, when Lyndon Johnson federalized the Alabama National Guard in 1965 because segregationist Gov. George Wallace wouldn't protect civil rights demonstrators. There, Wallace was trying to defy the federal courts and the federal government. This is nothing like that. Trump says 'It's about law and order,' but he's the one who is going against the law and against regular order. And he's also talking about bringing in active duty Marines from nearby Camp Pendleton. That is also against the law, 18 U.S. Code § 1385. This statue is just a single sentence: 'Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, or the Space Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.' 'Posse comitatus,' or 'posse' for short, are non-law enforcement persons acting as such. The military cannot be so used on the word of even the president. Trump should relent and demobilize the Guardsmen he wrongly brought into L.A. and let local and state officials secure the streets. _____

Uncle Elon's final report card
Uncle Elon's final report card

Business Insider

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Uncle Elon's final report card

All good buddy comedies come to an end. For President Donald Trump and first friend "Uncle Elon" Musk, theirs wrapped up with the same explosive fanfare upon which it started. But now their shared enthusiasm for cutting government waste has morphed into animosity for each other so deep and personal that it's become a textbook case study in management gone wrong. In November, just after Trump's reelection, I asked management experts if Musk could mimic his track record of juicing everything he could out of his lean companies to make the government run more efficiently. They were reluctant to doubt Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, but just as reluctant to think his efficiency tactics at Tesla and X meant he could single-handedly transform the government. I checked back in with some of them in March, six weeks into DOGE's chaotic tenure, after it dismantled USAID and axed tens of thousands of federal workers. They described his management as "clumsy," "wrongheaded," and full of "political recklessness." Now, the breakup of the bromance between two of the world's biggest, boldest personalities is surprising only in that it took so long to unfold and, once it did, moved with the speed that only two social media savvy, chronically online posters could propel. (Musk posted on X more than a dozen times lambasting Trump and his " Big Beautiful Bill" late last week, since deleting some of the most disparaging claims, and Trump suggested Musk might be suffering from "Trump derangement syndrome.") If DOGE is a cautionary tale in how not to manage, it's one from the furthest extreme, marked by a clash between the egos of two of the world's most powerful men that made politics extremely personal. Still there are business lessons to be gleaned even for those of us who run fewer than six companies and have fewer than 220 million social media followers. DOGE has proved "unsuccessful" up to this point, and is so far a "failed venture" for Musk and for the government, says Subodha Kumar, a professor at Temple University's Fox School of Business. It brought "disruption, a lot of delays, a lot of mistrust, and a lot of good people have left the organization," he says. "This kind of damage takes a long time to repair." To date, DOGE has claimed it found $180 billion in savings (Musk in May called DOGE "effective," but "not as effective as I'd like," as the original goal was to save $2 trillion). An analysis in April from nonpartisan research group Partnership for Public Service found that the department's actions could cost as much as $135 billion, an estimate of the costs of the firings, re-hirings, and lost productivity. Meanwhile, the four months Musk spent working taking a chainsaw to the federal government are wrapping up doused in drama that has spilled over to his other companies. After his 130-day post as a special government employee ends, Musk is pointing the blame for government waste back on Trump, skewering the spending bill for being too big and ugly, and endorsing a call to impeach Trump and replace him with Vice President JD Vance (that post has since been deleted). The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor The escalating tension is just the beginning of a fight that could get worse for Musk, and likely has little benefit for Trump, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor who has studied Trump for decades and advised presidents, tells me in an email. DOGE, he notes, overpromised savings and may actually cost US taxpayers more when it comes to rehiring costs, repairing systems, and weakened cybersecurity. As WIRED reported last week, DOGE is hiring, and even has reached out to technologists who formerly worked for the government. Musk's involvement with the DOGE proved tumultuous for his businesses from the start. His personal wealth ballooned by some $200 billion in 2024, surpassing $400 billion after Election Day. Once he got to work in the White House, his absenteeism from his companies — paired with a growing distaste for DOGE's actions among the electorate and protests targeting Tesla — led his net worth to drop alongside Tesla's market cap. Last Thursday, Musk's open beef with Trump further hampered his wealth, leading the Tesla CEO to lose $34 billion personally in a single day. Tesla stock, which has taken a beating as people turn on the company to protest Musk's government work, took its biggest tumble since March, closing 14% lower and wiping out $152 billion from the company's market cap. Musk is still the richest person in the world. For Musk, there's damage to the Tesla brand in need of repair. His next step could be "to portray himself as a purist who came in to offer his technical help and didn't realize how deep the corruption runs," says Michael Morris, a professor at Columbia Business School. "Musk could potentially portray himself as a wayward son of the tech industry." This might only work if the Trump administration continues to stumble, and if Musk also sees more success, like winning big with his robotaxi push. As Taylor Lorenz reported in User Mag Friday, some high-profile Democrats are already signaling that they would welcome Musk back into the fold. Trump over the weekend told NBC News Musk would face "serious consequences" if he donated to Democratic candidates (he did not specify what they would be). It's yet to be seen where Musk will find his next political alliances: On Friday, he ran a poll on X asking if a third political party should emerge to include the 80% of Americans in the middle of Republicans and Democrats, as he sees it. The president has threatened to go after Musk's government contracts — which total in tens of billions of dollars for SpaceX and Tesla. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump himself bought a Tesla just three months ago, and is now considering selling it. (Best of luck to him, the cars' resale values have tanked). As Trump and Musk part ways, it's clear that Musk's brazen, fully autonomous leadership style didn't work in the government world, as it eschewed transparency and collaboration in favor of a top-down approach. "The one-size-fits-all policy does not work everywhere," says Kumar. "You have to understand the culture of the organization and you have to work from inside rather than from outside." Back in November, experts told me it wasn't clear what authority Musk would actually wield in the newly-created position to implement massive spending cuts. Trying to employ tech-world leadership tactics from the White House created a rivalry between Musk and Trump for power and control, undercutting the alliance between the two and leaving DOGE far short of its savings goals. "The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss — with surging parallel drives for grandiosity," Sonnenfeld says. "Musk's tragic mistake was that he forgot his role — as a staffer and advisor to Trump, not the primary character he foolishly believed himself to be, and even now, continues to overestimate his own importance and indispensability."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store