
As India and Pakistan eye each other, this superpower eyes the whole map
The recent terrorist attack in India's Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, which originated in Pakistan and resulted in the death of 26, mostly Hindu, civilians, has triggered another wave of heightened tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad.
While public discourse has focused on terrorism and hostilities between the two nuclear-powered nations, a deeper analysis reveals the unmistakable imprint of another key actor – China's strategic calculus in the region.
The relationship between Islamabad and New Delhi has evolved significantly in recent decades. Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar travelled to Beijing days after the military standoff with Delhi and met his counterpart Wang Yi. The Chinese Foreign Minister called Pakistan an 'iron-clad friend' and 'all-weather strategic partner.'
China is pursuing a strategy that aligns with its regional interests — including economic engagement, defense cooperation, and influence-building. This strategy, logically, includes efforts to slow down India's rise.
Pahalgam incident thus cannot be seen an isolated terrorist attack, but as a signal within a larger geostrategic landscape that is shaping Asia's future.
The flareup in South Asia has come at a time of major geopolitical developments. With the mass shift of Western companies like Apple away from China to India, India is poised to become the next big manufacturing hub.
As global businesses explore alternatives to rising operational costs and geopolitical uncertainties in China, India is increasingly seen as a competitive option. Additionally, the proposed US tariffs may add pressure to China's manufacturing sector, which is already adapting to evolving global supply chains. For the strongman leader, Xi Jinping, sustaining economic growth and employment remains a top priority.
Any escalation involving India could introduce uncertainty that might affect investor sentiment and infrastructure momentum. Regional instability could redirect global attention away from India's growth narrative toward internal and border-related concerns. China's close political, economic and defence ties with Pakistan – an economically vulnerable partner – gives Beijing a certain level of influence on the way Islamabad deals with India.
New Delhi was compelled to act militarily, risking escalation and economic fallout. To India's credit, it managed to negotiate a ceasefire after achieving its key objectives of affecting 11 Pakistani air bases and nine terrorist camps and other strategic terrorist infrastructures against the popular sentiment against de-escalation.
Pakistan has been struggling with near to bankruptcy. Its foreign exchange reserves have fallen to $4.3bn, its lowest levels since February 2014. Despite a $2.4 billion bailout from the IMF – approved on May 9, when Islamabad and New Delhi were firing missiles at each other – the Pakistani economy is still in tatters. China's offer of financial and military aid to Islamabad at such times comes in more than handy.
China's support for Pakistan is not circumstantial. It is also institutional and deeply entrenched. Between 2014 to 2024, China sold over $9 billion worth of advanced weaponry to Pakistan, accounting for around 80% of imported weapons, including J-10CE fighter jets, Wing Loong drones, LY-80 air defence systems, and naval assets. The operational use of these systems in the recent conflict, including Pakistani claims of downing Rafales using Chinese PL-15 missiles, has allowed Beijing to showcase its weapons systems in live combat.
Beyond India, China's motivation also ties into its long-term strategic objectives in the Persian Gulf. Pakistan provides China access to the Arabian Sea via Gwadar port, a linchpin in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and part of the broader Belt and Road Initiative. This maritime access offers China two significant advantages: a strategic military presence near key Middle Eastern shipping lanes and an alternative route for oil imports in case of a US-China maritime standoff in the South China Sea.
China's defence industry is another big beneficiary of the escalation. Claims by the Pakistan Air Force that Chinese-made jets outmanoeuvred India's French-built Rafales, regardless of their authenticity, have created a nationalist fervour in Chinese social media and boosted investor confidence. Stocks in Chinese defence manufacturers surged as hashtags like 'J-10 shot down Indian warplanes' trended online, and praise for the PL-15 missile system flooded Weibo.
Indeed, Beijing wants to use this as an inflexion point for its arms export ambitions. With Western suppliers often constrained by political alignments or human rights concerns, China's relatively unrestricted military exports offer an attractive alternative, especially in conflict-prone or authoritarian regimes across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia. A perceived successful battlefield performance strengthens China's pitch as a reliable arms supplier.
From shaping regional dynamics to advancing its defense exports and maintaining strategic interests in West Asia, China may perceive certain advantages in the current situation in the region. While the Pahalgam attack was carried out by terrorist actors, it may also reflect broader regional undercurrents in which multiple stakeholders play complex and calculated roles.
Through India-Pakistan rivalry, China is executing a proxy strategy that would halt India's rise, safeguard its own economic interests and bolster its defence exports and regional clout. Beijing has much to gain and little to lose from this rivalry — as long as it stays just below the threshold of full-scale war.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
New railway sabotage derails Russian train near Ukraine
A diesel locomotive derailed in Russia's Belgorod region on Friday morning after an explosive device planted under the tracks damaged the rail, according to regional governor Vyacheslav Gladkov. The incident follows what Moscow described as two Ukrainian 'terrorist attacks' on railroad infrastructure earlier last week in the border regions of Bryansk and Kursk, which killed seven people and injured more than 100, including children. 'According to preliminary information, there were no casualties as a result of the explosive device planted under the rails. Train traffic was delayed for 2.5 hours. But now all trains are already running according to schedule,' Gladkov wrote in a post on his Telegram channel around 6:50am. Repair crews were quickly dispatched to restore the affected section in the Prokhorovsky District of the region, the governor said, noting that he was personally affected by the delays. 'My train only reached Prokhorovka due to the bombing of the railway tracks,' he said in a video message. 'Thank God that no one was injured, but there is damage.' On Wednesday, a similar case of railway sabotage occurred in the Voronezh region near the Ukrainian border, halting train traffic and delaying more than 20 trains. Moscow has blamed Kiev for the recent string of incidents, following a ramp-up in Ukrainian drone raids and other attacks on Russian territory. President Vladimir Putin called the deadly train sabotage in the two Russian border regions 'undoubtedly a terrorist act,' aimed at disrupting the US-backed direct talks between Moscow and Kiev.


Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump says Xi invited him to China
US President Donald Trump has said that his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, invited him to visit Beijing during a phone call on Thursday, aimed at deescalating trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. The 90-minute conversation, first reported by Chinese state media, was later confirmed by Trump on Truth Social. The US leader described it as a 'very good phone call,' focused 'almost entirely' on trade. Trump said Xi 'graciously invited' him and First Lady Melania Trump to visit China, and that he had 'reciprocated.' 'As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing,' he wrote. Trump last made a state visit to Beijing in November 2017, less than a year into his first term. Xi last traveled to the US in November 2023 for a trade summit, but his most recent state-level reception was in 2015, under then-President Barack Obama. Thursday's call marked the first known direct conversation between Xi and Trump since his return to the White House and aimed to stabilize relations after Trump reignited a trade dispute with China earlier this year. Trade tensions escalated sharply on April 2, when Trump imposed sweeping new duties on imports from more than 90 countries, including China, citing trade imbalances. Beijing retaliated, prompting Trump to raise US tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, while Chinese duties on US goods reached 125%. The sides reached a fragile trade truce in Geneva on May 12, agreeing to a 90-day pause on the initial US tariff hike and reciprocal measures from Beijing. They also pledged to roll back further tariff increases but agreed to maintain a baseline 10% duty on mutual imports. However, tensions flared again this week as both sides accused each other of breaching the Geneva deal. The Chinese Foreign Ministry on Wednesday denounced the latest US chip export controls as 'harmful extreme measures,' warning that 'pressuring and coercion' were not the right way to engage China. Trump said US and Chinese trade teams would meet soon 'at a location to be determined.' The US delegation will include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.


Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump bans citizens of 12 countries from US
US President Donald Trump has barred citizens of 12 countries from entering the country, including nationals from Afghanistan, Iran, and Yemen, citing national security concerns. The proclamation, signed by Trump on Wednesday, also imposes travel restrictions on nationals from seven additional states, including Cuba and Venezuela. The document lists 'aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes' A full travel ban, effective June 9, will apply to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Partial restrictions will affect travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. The listed countries allegedly either host terrorist organizations, fail to cooperate on security matters, have high visa overstay rates, or have refused to accept deportees. Exceptions will apply to lawful permanent US residents, dual nationals, diplomats, athletes and their relatives attending major sporting events, and those with family or adoption immigrant visas. Additional exemptions cover Afghans with Special Immigrant Visas — typically issued to those who worked with the US military — and Iranians already holding visas or belonging to religious or ethnic minorities the US considers persecuted. The document labels Iran and Cuba as a 'state sponsors of terrorism,' accusing them of failing to cooperate with the US on security issues. Venezuela, meanwhile, is under sanctions over alleged election rigging and is accused of lacking a competent passport authority and screening systems. Human rights groups and foreign governments, who view it as discriminatory and politically motivated, have criticised the legislation. Trump cited Sunday's attack in Boulder, Colorado, where Egyptian national Mohamed Sabry Soliman allegedly threw a gasoline bomb at pro-Israel demonstrators, as evidence for the need for new restrictions, noting that Soliman had overstayed his tourist visa and held an expired work permit. Trump imposed a similar travel ban in 2017 during his first term as president, which faced legal challenges and was revised multiple times before President Joe Biden revoked it in 2021.