707 Cayman Holdings Limited Announces Pricing of $10.0 Million Initial Public Offering
HONG KONG, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- 707 Cayman Holdings Limited ('707' or the 'Company') (Nasdaq: JEM), a Hong Kong-based company that sells quality apparel products and provides supply chain management total solutions, today announced the pricing of its initial public offering (the 'Offering') of an aggregate 2,500,000 ordinary shares at a public offering price of $4.00 per share for total gross proceeds of $10.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. The Company is offering 1,750,000 ordinary shares and the selling shareholder is offering in aggregate 750,000 ordinary shares. The Company will not receive any proceeds from any sale of shares by the selling shareholder.
The shares are scheduled to begin trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market on June 9, 2025, under the ticker symbol 'JEM.' The Offering is expected to close on or about June 10, 2025, subject to customary closing conditions.
Bancroft Capital, LLC is acting as sole underwriter for the Offering. Troy Gould PC is acting as U.S. legal counsel to the Company, and Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP is acting as U.S. legal counsel to Bancroft Capital, LLC.
This Offering is being conducted pursuant to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No. 333-281949), which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') and was declared effective on June 9, 2025. The Offering of the securities is being made only by means of a prospectus. Electronic copies of the final prospectus relating to the Offering may be obtained by visiting the SEC's website located at http://www.sec.gov or by contacting Bancroft Capital, LLC, 501 Office Center Drive, Suite 130, Fort Washington, PA 19034, Attention: Jason Diamond or email: investmentbanking@bancroft4vets.com or by telephone at 484-546-8000.
This press release has been prepared for informational purposes only and shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
About 707 Cayman Holdings Limited
707 Cayman Holdings Limited is a Hong Kong-based company that sells quality apparel products and provides supply chain management total solutions to our customers spanning from Western Europe, North America to the Middle East. Our customers include mid-size brand owners and apparel companies that have comprehensive operations with private labels that are sold worldwide.
Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and views of future events, including but not limited to, the Company's proposed Offering. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those listed under 'Risk Factors,' may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. You can identify some of these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as 'may,' 'will,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'aim,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'believe,' 'is/are likely to,' 'potential,' 'continue' or other similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
Contact:
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Contact:HBK Strategy Limited ir@hbkstrategy.com +852 2156 0223
Underwriter Contact:Bancroft Capital, LLC,501 Office Center Drive, Suite 130Fort Washington, PA 19034Email: investmentbanking@bancroft4vets.comSign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Missouri Attorney General threatens legal action against 18 hemp companies; more to come
(Rebecca Rivas/The Missouri Independent) Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has sent several cease-and-desist letters to companies selling a hemp product called THCA flower that looks exactly like marijuana flower sold at dispensaries. Bailey's letters threaten legal action, including injunctions, civil penalties and attorney's fees if the companies continue to sell the products. 'When purchasing products, Missourians deserve to know if they are being exposed to dangerous side effects like psychotic episodes, hallucinations or other life-threatening risks,' said Attorney General Bailey in a statement to The Independent. 'We have issued 18 cease and desist letters so far, and more are forthcoming.' Cannabis lobbyist Eapen Thampy said about a dozen smoke shops in St. Louis received the letters, and in some cases, THCA flower makes up 60% to 80% of the companies' inventories. Thampy said he's working with the companies to put together a response to the letters and preparing for potential litigation. The action is the first major move since Bailey created a new specialized unit last fall, with the aim to assist the state's alcohol and tobacco regulators in cracking down on intoxicating hemp products. In September, Bailey vowed his new unit would work with the Missouri Alcohol and Tobacco Control Division to bring legal action against licensees selling unregulated psychoactive cannabis products that violate the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. 'The ATC will assist by making its investigators available as witnesses for legal proceedings resulting from actionable referrals,' Bailey said in September. 'Our enforcement toolkit will be robust from cease-and-desist letters and investigations to subpoenas and lawsuits to referrals for criminal prosecution where appropriate.' The letters that went out last month state that the companies are 'directed to cease and desist from selling' hemp products that contain more than 0.3% THCA on a dry weight basis. THCA is a naturally abundant cannabinoid that transforms into Delta-9 THC when smoked or heated. However, this is not what an official cease and desist order looks like, said Jefferson City-based attorney Chuck Hatfield. 'It is an informal cease and desist,' Hatfield said. 'It is not a letter that has the force and effect of law. It's more in the nature of a request to stop.' Under state law, if Bailey wanted to issue an official cease and desist order – as he did for Planned Parenthood in March – Hatfield said Bailey would have to issue a notice of intent first. The company would have the right to appeal through an administrative hearing, as well as challenge the order in court. 'But he hasn't done any of that,' Hatfield said. Bailey could also file a lawsuit under Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, and that doesn't require a cease and desist order, he said. Charles Alovisetti, a cannabis attorney with Vincente law firm in Boston, said the lack of a state law to support the action could put Bailey in a tricky spot. 'If the goal is to control THCA flower sales, states should regulate hemp products in their final form, including THCA flower, through clear legislation,' Alovisetti wrote in a LinkedIn post. 'Letters like this may not hold up in court.' For the third year in a row, state lawmakers failed to pass legislation to regulate intoxicating hemp products by the end of the session in May. At issue in Bailey's letters is THCA, which is not intoxicating in its natural state. Most marijuana flower found in dispensaries contains about 20-40% THCA, which would not get a person high if they consumed it without heating it. It has to be smoked to transform it into Delta-9 THC, which produces the desired high for consumers. The process of heating is called decarboxylation. Legal action against THCA hemp flower raises a dizzying debate about distinction between hemp and marijuana under federal law. Cannabis attorney Rod Kight, who has represented hemp businesses in lawsuits nationwide, said Bailey's letter accurately states that the sole distinction between legal hemp and illegal marijuana is the concentration of delta-9 THC, which cannot exceed 0.3% for hemp. The part Bailey gets wrong, Kight said, is claiming that THCA is part of the calculation for determining whether harvested hemp or a hemp product is lawful. 'Given that Missouri law does not address THCA at all, it is clear that the attorney general is relying on recent letters from the DEA in support of its position that the concentration of THCA must be taken into account when determining the legal status of harvested hemp and hemp products,' Kight said. However, he said the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's interpretation has caused a lot of confusion. 'Hemp growers must account for THCA before harvesting their hemp crops,' Kight said. 'Thereafter, the THCA concentration does not matter under federal law or the laws of Missouri and the 'post-decarboxylation' test does not apply to harvested hemp or hemp products sold by wholesalers or retailers.' Since the 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp, botanists have figured out how to breed cannabis plants capable of passing the only federal checkpoint required on hemp plants — a visit from U.S. Department of Agriculture inspectors 30 days before harvest. At that point, the levels of Delta-9 THC and THCA are below the federal threshold, but both increase before being harvested 30 days later. Kight said he believes there's lots of marijuana flower sold in dispensaries that would probably meet this standard of hemp as well. It's a point that's being argued in court, he said. 'THCA is the most abundant cannabinoid that cannabis produces,' he said. 'If there's any cannabinoid that humans have truly ingested for thousands of years, it's THCA. The hemp industry is moving kind of back towards this more natural sort of state of affairs, and I'm very pleased with that.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk-Trump Space Showdown Sends Rocket Lab Shares Soaring
June 9 - Rocket Lab USA Inc (NASDAQ:RKLB) shares climbed about 8% on Monday as investors reacted to a weekend spat between SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump. The feud began when Musk criticized Trump's proposed tax legislation on X, prompting Trump to suggest cutting Musk's government contracts. Musk fired back, hinting he might decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, currently the only U.S. vehicle for ferrying astronauts to the International Space Station, before retracting the comment. Over the weekend, Musk posted that we have got the spaceships, and they do not, implying U.S. reliance on SpaceX. That argument appears to be fueling interest in rival aerospace firms. RKLB, which holds multiple NASA contracts and is viewed as a contender for Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense initiative, saw its stock hit $31.21 in morning trading. AST SpaceMobile Inc (NASDAQ:ASTS) shares surged about 17% after reports suggested U.S. policymakers may look beyond SpaceX for various space investments. ASTS, a top customer of Blue Origin, inked a November launch deal with Jeff Bezos' company to deploy up to 45 satellites. Both RKLB and ASTS traded on above-average volume, signaling heightened investor focus on alternative space players amid the high-profile Musk-Trump clash. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are Companies About to Dump Their Bitcoin? The Warning Signs Are Here
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The cryptocurrency landscape has witnessed a significant shift as corporations increasingly adopt bitcoin as a treasury asset. While this trend has contributed to bitcoin's recent price surge, it may also be creating new vulnerabilities in the market that warrant careful consideration. Corporate adoption of bitcoin has accelerated notably, with companies following the playbook pioneered by MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR). According to Bitcoin Treasuries data, 110 publicly listed companies globally now hold bitcoin, representing a substantial institutional commitment to the digital asset. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Standard Chartered's analysis focuses on a refined sample of 61 companies that purchase bitcoin purely as a treasury holding, excluding industry participants like miners, exchanges, and service providers. This subset collectively owned nearly 674,000 bitcoins as of May's end—representing 3.2% of bitcoin's total 21 million coin supply. The numbers tell a compelling story: these 'bitcoin treasuries' have doubled their holdings over just two months, accumulating close to 100,000 additional bitcoins during this period. This buying pressure has been a key factor driving bitcoin to recent all-time highs. However, Standard Chartered's analysis reveals a concerning dynamic that could eventually reverse this supportive trend. Unlike Strategy, which accumulated bitcoin over time at various price points, many newer corporate entrants have purchased at significantly higher average prices. The bank's research suggests that approximately half of the monitored corporate treasuries would find themselves underwater if bitcoin fell below $90,000. This creates a potential domino effect where companies that entered the bitcoin treasury strategy during price peaks could become forced sellers during market downturns. The risk stems from several interconnected factors: Purchase Price Disparities: Most corporate treasuries in Standard Chartered's sample have average purchase prices well above Strategy's cost basis, making them more vulnerable to market volatility. NAV Multiple Justification: Currently, companies holding bitcoin trade at Net Asset Value multiples above 1, justified by market inefficiencies such as regulatory constraints and conservative institutional investment processes. As these barriers diminish over time, the premium valuations may compress. Corporate Pain Thresholds: Unlike dedicated cryptocurrency companies, traditional corporations may have lower tolerance for significant losses on treasury holdings. Standard Chartered estimates that newer entrants likely couldn't withstand a 50% decline from their average purchase price—a threshold that Strategy weathered during the 2022 crypto winter. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. The analysis suggests that if bitcoin drops more than 22% below companies' average purchase prices, forced selling could emerge. This creates a feedback loop where price declines trigger corporate selling, potentially accelerating further declines. This dynamic differs markedly from Strategy's experience in November 2022, when bitcoin halved but the company maintained its position. Several factors may have aided Strategy's resilience: smaller absolute dollar losses at the time, the absence of U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs providing alternative exposure, and the company's fundamental commitment to bitcoin as a long-term strategy. This corporate treasury trend presents both opportunities and risks for the broader bitcoin market: Positive Factors: Corporate adoption provides institutional legitimacy and substantial buying pressure that has supported recent price appreciation. Risk Factors: The concentration of recent purchases at higher price levels creates potential selling pressure during market stress, possibly amplifying volatility. Timing Considerations: As market inefficiencies that currently justify premium valuations are resolved, bitcoin treasuries could shift from price supporters to sources of downside pressure. While corporate bitcoin adoption represents a significant maturation of the cryptocurrency market, investors should recognize that these treasury strategies may behave differently than those of dedicated bitcoin companies during market stress. The sustainability of this trend will likely depend on bitcoin's price stability and these companies' ability to maintain their positions through potential volatility. As Standard Chartered notes, the question isn't whether these companies will face pressure, but rather how much volatility they can withstand before strategic considerations shift. For market participants, understanding these dynamics becomes crucial as corporate treasuries represent an increasingly significant portion of bitcoin's circulating supply. Their behavior during the next major market downturn will provide important insights into the resilience of this newer form of institutional bitcoin adoption. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Are Companies About to Dump Their Bitcoin? The Warning Signs Are Here originally appeared on
