Shashi Tharoor On Why Op Sindoor Delegation To US Visited 9/11 Memorial
The Shashi Tharoor-led Indian delegation, which is visiting the US to expose Pakistan's role in terrorist acts on Indian soil, visited the memorial for the 9/11 attacks in 2011 that had shaken the world. Nearly 3,000 people had died and thousands of others were injured when three planes hijacked by terrorists crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
The delegation led by Mr Tharoor comprises BJP MPs Bhubaneswar Kalita, Shashank Mani Tripathi, Shiv Sena's Milind Deora, TDP's GM Harish Balayogi and former diplomat Taranjit Singh Sandhu. The delegation visited the 9/11 memorial and paid their respects to the victims.
#WATCH | New york, US: After paying tribute at 9/11 memorial, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, " It was obviously a very moving moment for us, but it was also meant to send a very strong message that we are here in a city which is bearing still the scars of that savage terrorist… pic.twitter.com/pRBiT4miKC
— ANI (@ANI) May 24, 2025
Speaking to the media later, Mr Tharoor said it was a "very moving moment", but it was also meant to "send a message". "It was obviously a very moving moment for us, but it was also meant to send a very strong message that we are here in a city which is bearing still the scars of that savage terrorist attack in the wake of yet another terrorist attack in our own country... unlike the US I am afraid we have had to endure a very much larger number of terrorist attacks in India," he said.
The All-Party Delegation from India, led by Dr. Shashi Tharoor @ShashiTharoor, visited the National September 11 Memorial @Sept11Memorial in New York.
The delegation solemnly paid tribute to the innocent lives lost in the tragic 9/11 attacks and reaffirmed India's unwavering… pic.twitter.com/WXIGKF7cN5
— India in New York (@IndiainNewYork) May 25, 2025
"We came both as a reminder that this is a shared problem, but also out of a spirit of solidarity with the victims, who included Indians...it is a global problem, it's a scourge, we must fight it unitedly," the Congress MP and former diplomat added.
Mr Tharoor leads one of the seven delegations New Delhi has rushed to different parts of the world with its message on Operation Sindoor, India's counterstrike in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack that left 26 innocents dead.
On May 7, India carried out airstrikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir. While India stressed that its offensive is restricted to terror bases, Pakistan responded by firing hundreds of drones and missiles at India's defence installations and civilian areas. India responded by targeting Pakistan's military installation before a ceasefire was announced on May 10 on Pakistan's request. While Islamabad has thanked the US for its intervention in the conflict, New Delhi has maintained that Washington DC's role was limited to expressing concern.
"The US was in the United States," Mr Jaishankar said in an interview when he was asked about Washington's involvement. He confirmed that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance had reached out but their role was limited to expressing concern. "We made one thing very clear to everybody who spoke to us, not just the United States but to everyone, saying if the Pakistanis want to stop fighting, they need to tell us. We need to hear it from them. Their general has to call up our general and say this. And that is what happened," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that US President Donald Trump took several actions, including the secondary tariffs on India, to bring the war in Ukraine to an end. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible.(AFP) This reiteration comes as a top US official said that India made "huge" profits on the sale of Russian oil during and after the war in Ukraine, and Trump said that his sanctions on New Delhi probably played a role in Russian President Vladimir Putin meeting him. Addressing a press briefing, Leavitt said, "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war and he has rejected the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meetings takes place." She asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, with the former signalling his openness to a trilateral meeting with Putin to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump said that he had a very successful day, while Zelensky noted that this was the "best conversation" he had with the US President so far. Scott Bessent on India tariffs US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, while speaking to CNBC, argued why China has not yet seen any penalties for buying Russian oil, while the case for India has been otherwise. He said that the treatment is different because India has been "profiteering" and "making billions" from its reselling of the oil. Bessent said India had "less than 1 per cent" of its oil from Russia "and now its up to 42 per cent". He added, "India is just profiteering, they are reselling... They made 16 billion in excess profits, some of the richest families in India." "This is a completely different thing. Indian arbitrage, which is buying cheap oil and reselling it, has just sprung up during the [Ukraine] war. This is just unacceptable," Bessent added. Top US advisor criticises India over Russian oil trade Meanwhile, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to "hit India where it hurts" to get New Delhi to change its policy. He termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to end the war in Ukraine and isolate the Russian economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times. Before his meeting with Putin in Alaska last week, Trump had told a Fox News Radio show that his 'penalty' on India prompted the Russian President to meet him, saying that "everything has an impact". The US President said that when he told India about the doubled tariffs, it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia". He noted that India is the second largest purchaser of Russian oil and said it was getting pretty close to China, the largest buyer of oil from Russia. Before Trump doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per cent, he said that India was "fueling the war machine" by buying oil from Russia.
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Why India Can't Accept China's ‘Zero-Tariff' Offer Despite Its Market Appeal
New Delhi: After U.S. President Donald Trump signalled the possibility of higher tariffs on Indian exports, China renewed its pitch to bring India into a zero-tariff Asian trade market. Extending access to a massive consumer base, the offer has been positioned as a strategic opportunity. Analysts say the proposal, however, could pose a far more significant challenge for India than Trump's tariff threats. India's market is enormous. A population of 1.4 billion, coupled with a growing middle class and strong purchasing power, makes it one of the most attractive markets in the world. Global powers cannot achieve maximum economic leverage in the region without India's participation. In response to the rising pressure from Washington, China has once again invited India to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Beijing has been lobbying for New Delhi's inclusion in the RCEP since 2019, offering zero tariffs as a key incentive. Still, India has repeatedly declined. It is wary of Beijing's ambitions and the potential risks to its domestic industries. Understanding RCEP The RCEP is a free-trade agreement encompassing 15 countries: 10 ASEAN members and five of their Free Trade Agreement (FTA) partners – China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. The RCEP is the world's largest trade bloc, representing nearly 30 percent of global GDP and covering roughly three billion people. The agreement aims to simplify trade rules, reduce barriers and integrate the markets of its member nations. Signed in November 2020, the RCEP came into effect on January 1, 2022. Its primary goals include lowering or eliminating tariffs, easing non-tariff restrictions and facilitating cross-border investment and commerce. China's Perspective China's state-run Global Times highlighted India's growing vulnerability due to its heavy reliance on the U.S. market, especially in light of Trump's proposed 50 percent tariff increases. The newspaper argued that diversifying toward Asian markets could not only mitigate risks but also provide India with strategic flexibility and greater market opportunities. According to the daily, India must actively explore alternative markets. Asia's expansive economies and untapped potential could provide India with a more stable path for growth. The paper suggested that joining the RCEP would represent a critical step toward restructuring India's trade orientation within the region. The publication also emphasised 'long-term benefits'. Over next 10 to 15 years, it says, RCEP's zero-tariff framework could apply to 90 percent of goods. For India, the daily says, this could act as a protective buffer against the volatility of U.S. trade policies, while opening access to a dynamic and growing market. India's Concerns India has consistently expressed reservations about the RCEP. The government believes the agreement does not adequately reflect India's interests and could have unbalanced outcomes. A primary concern is the potential impact on domestic industries. Cheap imports from China and other Asian nations could flood the Indian market, undermining local manufacturing and making it difficult for Indian products to compete. China's production efficiency exacerbates this risk. India had proposed mechanisms to limit imports of certain goods exceeding set thresholds, but negotiations failed to yield consensus. India also faces a significant trade deficit with China, which reached $99.2 billion in the 2024-25 fiscal year. Joining the RCEP without safeguards could worsen this imbalance. For China, India's inclusion is both an economic and geopolitical priority, supporting regional dominance and the Belt and Road Initiative. India continues to prioritise national interests, self-reliance and strategic autonomy. The government aims to maintain control over supply chains and assert a strong position in any scenario that may challenge its trade or geopolitical stance vis-à-vis China.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US accuses India of ‘profiteering' from Russian energy purchases
WASHINGTON: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday accused India of 'profiteering' by purchasing Russian energy cheaply and reselling refined energy products in global markets while defending Washington's decision not to punish China for similar trade with Russia. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol (REUTERS) Bessent said in a television interview that Beijing's longstanding purchases of Russian oil were in contrast to India's rapid increase in imports after the war in Ukraine broke out. Bessent was asked why Washington had not placed tariffs on China for purchasing Russian energy, after imposing a 25% penalty, on top of a 25% reciprocal tariff, on India for the same. 'China importing Russian oil is sub-optimal. But if you go back and look, before the 2022 invasion, 13% of China's oil was already coming from Russia and now it's 16%. So China has a diversified input of their oil. If you go back and look back, India had less than 1% of their oil (coming from Russia) and now it's up to, I believe, 42%. So India is just profiteering,' Bessent said . 'They (India) made $16 billion in excess profits. Some of the richest families in India. This is a completely different thing. This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage — buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product, has just just sprung up during the war - which is unacceptable,' Bessent added.. Bessent's comments come just a day after White House trade advisor Peter Navarro levelled similar accusations against New Delhi. Navarro claimed India's purchases of Russian energy were 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to isolate Russia's economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion column for the Financial Times. The top trade advisor welcomed a 'two-pronged policy' of restricting Indian access to US markets and forcing India to reduce oil imports from Russia. 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one,' Navarro added. Tensions between India and the United States have risen considerably in recent weeks over deadlocked trade talks and Indian purchases of energy from Russia. A planned visit to advance trade negotiations by a team from the office of the United States Trade Representative was put off amid wider difficulties in the relationship. New Delhi has refused to grant greater market access for US companies to India's agriculture, dairy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) sectors. It has also defended purchases of Russian oil as essential to guaranteeing national energy security. India has also called US tariff penalties 'unreasonable' and 'unjustified' by pointing to continued US and EU trade with Russia in energy and other sensitive materials.
