Does Chinese privilege exist in Singapore? Study finds views differ by age and race
Advertisement
For the 30-year-old ethnic Indian Singaporean postgraduate student, who spoke to This Week in Asia under a pseudonym, the comment reflected a kind of casual insensitivity he said he had encountered as a racial minority in Singapore.
'I would ascribe the confidence of saying such things without having to endure a blowback or to blow it off as a joke to Chinese privilege,' he said, when asked about moments when he felt the majority Chinese population held an unspoken advantage.
His experience aligns with sentiments expressed by some respondents in a new study by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, which sheds light on how Singaporeans of different ages and ethnicities perceive racial inequality – and the very idea of 'Chinese privilege' – in the multiracial city state.
Released on Friday, the study surveyed 4,000 residents and found that while only 44.7 per cent of respondents overall said they believed Chinese privilege exists, younger Singaporeans were far more likely to hold the view. Among those aged 18 to 35, seven in 10 said it existed, compared with less than three in 10 of older respondents above 65 years of age, according to the study conducted between April and August last year.
Advertisement
Furthermore, six in 10 Malays and Indians said they believed Chinese Singaporeans enjoy certain advantages, while just four in 10 Chinese respondents held the view.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
29 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Same-sex partnerships in Hong Kong: conscience vote would set good precedent
Before humans invented law, human behaviour was governed by innate moral ethics. This is the starting point of all laws across the world. Theft is illegal, murder is a crime – these are universally accepted moral standards. Advertisement However, the idea that same-sex couples should enjoy the same legal status as heterosexual marriages is not a universally accepted moral standard. So where should Hong Kong draw the line? This is not a matter for the executive, the legislature or the judiciary. It is a moral question. The moral view of the chief executive, lawmakers and legal experts carries not one ounce more weight than the view of a Kwun Tong housewife. That is why whether to introduce a same-sex partner registration system should be decided by the collective will of the people of Hong Kong. Hong Kong is not a sovereign state, so we don't have a mechanism for a public referendum to determine our collective opinion, but our system has its own strengths. Without great fuss or cumbersome procedures, we can let our 90 legislators elected from every walk of life cast a free vote based on their individual conscience, independent of all external pressure. All political, professional and business organisations and trade unions should publicly declare that they will not issue any voting instructions to their affiliated legislators, allowing them to vote freely according to their conscience. Advertisement Likewise, the government should make clear that legislators who serve in both the Executive Council and Legislative Council are not bound by Exco's principle of collective responsibility on this particular issue and may vote freely. The executive may, as with other policy proposals, explain their rationale to the legislature but must not lobby behind the scenes or attempt to sway votes. The central government's liaison office should likewise refrain from intervening.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US-South Korea strike 15% tariff deal with US$350 billion in investments
After weeks of frenzied negotiations and mounting economic anxiety, the United States and South Korea have reached a sweeping trade agreement that slashes threatened tariffs and secures billions in investment. US President Donald Trump announced the trade agreement on his Truth Social platform late on Wednesday. Under the deal, South Korean exports to the US will face a 15 per cent tariff – down from the 25 per cent levy that had been set to take effect on Friday. In exchange, South Korea has pledged US$350 billion in US investments, echoing a similar arrangement recently struck with Japan . As with Tokyo's US$550 billion pledge, the spending will be directed by the US president, with a focus on American industries. South Korean farmers hold a rally in Seoul on Monday demanding the government protect the country's agricultural industry from US tariffs. Photo: AP 'We have agreed to a Tariff for South Korea of 15 per cent. America will not be charged a Tariff,' Trump wrote on his social media platform. He also announced Seoul's commitment to 'accept American product including Cars and Trucks, Agriculture, etc.', a move likely to mean that US vehicles built to American standards can enter South Korea without additional restrictions.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US to impose 15% tariff on South Korean imports, says Trump
US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States would charge a 15 per cent tariff on imports from South Korea as part of an agreement with the Asian trading partner that avoids even higher levies. Advertisement 'I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has agreed to a Full and Complete Trade Deal with the Republic of Korea,' Trump said on Truth Social. The South Korean government could not immediately be reached for comment. Reuters has not verified the terms of a deal. As part of the arrangement, South Korea would invest US$350 billion in the United States in projects selected by Trump and buy US$100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products, the US president said. It was not immediately clear how the investment deals would be structured or over what time frame. Trump said additional investments would be announced later. Advertisement
