Trump cancels $400m in federal funding to Columbia University over 'antisemitism'
On Monday, a federal task force notified the Ivy League institution that it would conduct 'a comprehensive review' of the university's federal contracts and grants as part of its ongoing investigations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
Four government agencies including the Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, and the US General Services Administration make up the "Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism".
The task force was set up in February following Trump's executive order, "Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism", signed at the end of January. The Task Force announced last week it would visit ten university campuses which have experienced antisemitic incidents since October 2023 after the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel and the subsequent war on Gaza.
In a joint press statement on Friday, the agencies said the funding cuts were due to 'the school's continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students'.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'Since October 7 [2023], Jewish students have faced relentless violence, intimidation, and anti-Semitic harassment on their campuses – only to be ignored by those who are supposed to protect them,' Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in the press release.
The statement warned that the cancellations represent the first round of action and additional cancellations are expected to follow. Columbia University currently holds more than $5bn in federal grant commitments. The amount announced today is almost eight times more than the amount the federal task force announced it was considering halting on Monday.
Former Fox News commentator Leo Terrell, who is leading the task force, said: 'Freezing the funds is one of the tools we are using to respond to this spike in anti-Semitism. This is only the beginning. Cancelling these taxpayer funds is our strongest signal yet that the Federal Government is not going to be party to an educational institution like Columbia that does not protect Jewish students and staff.'
The Ivy League university has been accused of allowing antisemitism on its campuses after a series of protests and encampments erupted last year that were sparked by Israel's war on Gaza. After Columbia students held an encampment, universities across the country followed suit.
While university leadership has consistently condemned the protests, the institution has continued to be targeted by the government.
Both the Biden and Trump administrations have sought to characterise anti-Israel and anti-Zionist protests as "antisemitic", leading to congressional hearings, with members of congress grilling university administrators and law enforcement forcefully shutting down protests on campuses.
Last April, the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce staged a congressional hearing entitled, 'Columbia in Crisis: Columbia University's Response to Antisemitism.'
Columbia's Barnard College is first to expel students over Gaza war Read More »
Congress members grilled former president Minouche Shafik and other board of trustee co-chairs in what was hailed as a 'new McCarthyism' in a letter signed by almost two dozen Jewish faculty members at Columbia and its affiliate, Barnard College.
Observers say the targeting of one of the most liberal universities in the country is calculated to send a chilling effect across the country. The task force is also investigating nine other universities.
In the wake of the political backlash, universities like New York University and Harvard have scrambled to adopt the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism as they come under federal scrutiny.
Since coming into office, Trump ordered a pause on federal grants and loans, which has since been blocked by a judge. The Associated Press reported in February that the Trump directive has universities nationwide "scrambling to determine how a funding freeze could affect their research programs, students and faculty".
Impact on Columbia and other universities
'The Columbia endowment is so big it can absorb the loss and subsidise research but other universities, especially public research universities, would struggle immensely and their research could collapse. Second tier or R2 universities would certainly not be able to absorb the loss of research grants and their research would fold,' a professor of anthropology at a US university, who wished to remain anonymous, told Middle East Eye.
Tenured Columbia law professor Katherine Franke, who was forced into an early retirement by Columbia for articulating concerns to Democracy Now! about Israeli students attending Columbia right out of military service, said that what happened to her is just part of a larger climate of targeting academic freedom.
'If you look at what is happening on our campuses, it has been about anti-Palestinian racism, which gets dressed up as fighting antisemitism. That's not where they stop - that's low-hanging fruit," Franke told MEE in January.
'Where they go next is critical legal studies, critical race theory, feminism, queer theory, all the stuff the right-wing has identified as dangerous ideas.'
In its press release, Josh Gruenbaum, a task force member, said, 'Doing business with the Federal Government is a privilege.'
Franke added that Florida had been the testing ground for this curtailment of academic freedom, where they (Republicans) are reforming the education system, or as Franke put it, potentially 'breaking it'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dubai Eye
42 minutes ago
- Dubai Eye
US Senate passes Trump's tax-cut, spending bill; sends to House
The Republican-controlled US Senate passed President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill on Tuesday, signing off on a massive package that would enshrine many of his top domestic priorities into law while adding $3.3 trillion to the national debt. The bill now heads back to the House of Representatives for final approval. Trump has pushed lawmakers to get it to his desk to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Trump's Republicans have had to navigate a narrow path while shepherding the 940-page bill through a Congress that they control by the slimmest of margins. With Democrats lined up in opposition, Republicans have had only three votes to spare in both the House and Senate as they wrangled over specific tax breaks and healthcare policies that could reshape entire industries and leave millions of people uninsured. Yet they have managed to stay largely unified so far. Only three of the Senate's 53 Republicans joined with Democrats to vote against the package, which passed 51-50 after Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The vote came after an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. It was not immediately clear what changes had been made to the massive package to resolve those concerns. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close as well. An initial version passed with only two votes to spare in May, and several Republicans in that chamber have said they do not support the version that has emerged from the Senate, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates will add $800 billion more to the national debt than the House version. The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline conservatives who repeatedly threatened to withhold their support for the tax bill, is pushing for deeper spending cuts to reduce its total price tag. "That's not fiscal responsibility. It's not what we agreed to," the group said on Monday. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, object to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. 'I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on,' Representative David Valadao, a California Republican, said during the weekend debate. Still, House Republicans are likely to face enormous pressure to fall in line from Trump in the days to come. The bill would make permanent Trump's 2017 business and personal income tax cuts, which are due to expire at the end of this year, and dole out new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime and seniors that he promised during the 2024 election. It provides tens of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration crackdown and would repeal many of Democratic President Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The bill would also tighten eligibility for food and health safety net programmes, which nonpartisan analysts say would effectively reduce income for poorer Americans who would have to pay for more of those costs. The CBO estimates the latest version of the bill would add $3.3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion debt pile. That increased debt effectively serves as a wealth transfer from younger to older Americans, nonpartisan analysts say, as it will slow economic growth, raise borrowing costs and crowd out other government spending in the decades to come. The bill also would raise the nation's borrowing limit by $5 trillion, postponing the prospect of a debt default this summer that would roil global markets. Republicans rejected the cost estimate generated by the CBO's long-standing methodology. Nonetheless, foreign bond investors see incentives to diversify out of US Treasuries as deficits deepen. Republicans say the bill will help families and small businesses and put benefit programmes like Medicaid on a more sustainable path, and they have broadly agreed on its main contours. But they have struggled to agree on the Medicaid funding mechanism and a tax break for state and local tax payments that is a top priority for a handful of House Republicans from high-tax states including New York, New Jersey and California. Others worry that a crackdown on a funding mechanism for the Medicaid health programme could lead to service cutbacks in rural areas. Some on the party's right flank, meanwhile, have pushed for deeper Medicare cuts to lessen its budgetary impact. Trump has singled out those Republican dissenters on his Truth Social network and excluded them from White House events, and few have been willing to defy him since he returned to office in January. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of the three Republicans who voted against the bill, said on Sunday he would not run for re-election next year. Republican senators Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky also voted against the bill.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UK academic body accused of trying to force Palestinian scholar into Israeli court system
A Palestinian-American academic is taking his British employer to court after it attempted to force him to sue the organisation for wrongful dismissal in Israel instead of the UK. In 2023, the Council for British Research in the Levant (CBRL) Kenyon Institute in East Jerusalem fired Toufic Haddad, a leading scholar in Palestine Studies, who was employed as the institute's director, citing funding cuts from the British Academy. Haddad believes the CBRL unfairly dismissed him because of political discrimination linked to his scholarly work and public position on Palestine, where he has opposed Israel's war on Gaza and its ongoing clampdown against Palestinian academics. He noted that these actions came in the wake of the 7 October attacks, when trustees of the CBRL called on Haddad to "maintain a low profile and not talk to the media". Following his dismissal, the CBRL, a UK-registered academic institute publicly funded by the British Academy and British government and based in London, attempted to block Haddad's unfair dismissal claims by insisting that an Israeli court hear his claim instead of a British one. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Haddad's legal team is contesting the move to hear his case in Israel by providing a 50-page witness statement, backed by more than 3,000 pages of evidence, to prove that his employment is more closely connected to the UK than to Israel. The CBRL, which has an office in Jordan, is not a registered entity in Israel or the occupied Palestinian territories from where it operates. However, when they decided to hire Haddad, they gave him an Israeli contract despite giving British contracts to its other directors in Amman. Unfair dismissal claim Haddad is now attempting to take the CBRL to a British court for unfair dismissal and discrimination based on his anti-Zionist political beliefs and trying to deny jurisdiction to UK courts in favour of Israel. He is contesting the move to try his case in Israel over concerns that Israel's legal system - which rights groups have criticised for being discriminatory towards Palestinians - will not give him a fair hearing because of his Palestinian background. 'CBRL has a professional, moral and historical duty in the context of the Israeli genocide and scholasticide unfolding in Gaza. Instead, it tried to silence me and then sacked me' - Toufic Haddad Since 1967, Israel has illegally occupied East Jerusalem and imposed a military occupation that is deemed illegal under international law. Unlike Israeli citizens, Palestinians living in Jerusalem are issued permanent residency cards by the Israeli state but not full citizenship. These residency cards can be revoked at any given time by Israel, making their legal status precarious. 'CBRL has a professional, moral and historical duty in the context of the Israeli genocide and scholasticide unfolding in Gaza. Instead, it tried to silence me and then sacked me," Haddad told Middle East Eye. "What happened to me exposes rotten interests and instincts within CBRL, British academia and its funding structures, which questions their commitment to academic freedom, labour rights, and human decency.' The European Legal Support Centre (ELSC) and the University and Colleges Union (UCU) are supporting Haddad's case. British institutions 'complicit' Tasnima Uddin, a spokesperson for the ELSC, said the case "lays bare the complicity of British institutions still operating in Palestine today. UK police arrest Israeli academic Haim Bresheeth after pro-Palestine speech Read More » "CBRL is trying to silence a Palestine academic; it is asking a British court to hand him over to Israel's apartheid legal system, legitimising annexation and racial domination that the International Court of Justice has ruled illegal." Sean Wallis, who serves as the London region secretary for the UCU, said Haddad's case represents a wider issue on worker's rights for academic staff employed at British research institutes and universities overseas. "The British government says that academic freedom is essential for universities, and the British academy trumpets its defence of academic freedom," said Wallis. "Dr Haddad was dismissed, and the research institute he was the director of was shut down because he spoke out about his area of research, which is Palestine studies. "So it is shocking to see a British Academy-backed research institute engaging lawyers to prevent Dr Haddad exercising his right to argue his case in the UK courts."
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran embassy in Berlin rejects accusations of alleged planned attack on Jewish institutions
Iran's embassy in Berlin has rejected accusations of "an alleged planned attack on Jewish institutions" in the German capital. Earlier, German prosecutors said a Danish national had been arrested on suspicion of spying for Iran with the aim of collecting information on Jewish sites and individuals in Berlin. "These unfounded and dangerous accusations appear to be part of a deliberate campaign to divert public attention," the Iranian embassy said in a statement.
