Seven families sue to block AR law requiring Ten Commandments display in schools
The families said the new law 'pressures students into religious observance' of the state's preference and sends a 'religiously divisive message' to students, according to the complaint, filed June 11 in the Western District of Arkansas.
Four Northwest Arkansas school districts — Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville and Siloam Springs — are cited as defendants in the complaint.
'We are reviewing the lawsuit and considering our options,' a spokesperson for the attorney general's office told McClatchy News in a June 13 email.
In April, Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a bill ordering the display of a Protestant version of the Ten Commandments and the motto 'In God We Trust' into law.
The complaint asks for an order declaring the law a violation of the First Amendment and an order to enjoin the school districts from complying with the act.
'This law is part of the nationwide Christian Nationalist scheme to win favor for one set of religious views over all others and nonreligion — in a country that promises religious freedom,' Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said in a June 11 news release. AU is one of the organizations representing the families, according to the lawsuit.
What families said about the new law
The families bringing the lawsuit represent several differing religious beliefs, including Judaism, atheism and Unitarian Universalism, according to the complaint.
Many of them believe the required display will signal to their children that it is wrong to not be Christian or that they are outsiders for not sharing the same faith, attorneys said.
One of the families of Jewish background said the display will make it difficult for their children to 'maintain and express their Jewish identity.'
While they recognize the Ten Commandments as part of their faith, the Protestant version lawmakers want displayed in public schools is contrary to their beliefs, according to the complaint.
'They believe strongly that it is important to teach their children about the Ten Commandments within the context of the Jewish faith,' attorneys said.
Another family, who practices Humanist and atheist traditions, said the displays will remind their child of previous trauma experienced at school due to religious proselytizing.
According to the complaint, a teacher at a different public school got mad at their child 'for not believing in God' and told them 'the family's beliefs were wrong.'
This caused the child to feel pressured to 'pretend to believe in God while at school,' attorneys said.
'Being subjected every day to the Ten Commandments in every classroom and the library will remind (the child) of this trauma and further pressure (them) to observe, meditate on, venerate, and adopt the religious directives, as well as to suppress any expression of (their) nonreligious beliefs and background,' attorneys said.
While the new law is set to take effect Aug. 5, the families have also filed a motion for preliminary injunction asking the court to temporarily prevent implementation while the lawsuit is pending, according to a news release.
Similar lawsuits filed
The Arkansas lawsuit is the latest in a string of federal cases examining the constitutional separation of church and state.
In May, groups sued the state of Texas over a similar law requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments, according to a May 29 American Civil Liberties Union news release.
In November, a federal district court blocked a Louisiana law ordering the Ten Commandments to be shown in public schools after nine multi-faith families filed a lawsuit, according to a Nov. 12 ACLU news release.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 minutes ago
- Politico
Are Christian nationalists targeting women's right to vote?
Happy Friday. Thanks for keeping up with us! As always, reach out with thoughts, questions, offerings: ecordover@ and klong@ This week we examine the theocratic, patriarchal movement making waves in Washington. Last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reposted a CNN interview of his pastor, Christian nationalist Doug Wilson, writing 'All of Christ for All of Life.' In the video, church members discussed why they believe women shouldn't be allowed to vote — a tenet of Wilson's main church, Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho. In the CNN segment, Wilson, who founded a network of churches in the late 1990s called the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, or CREC, said 'women are the kind of people that people come out of.' He has written several books on marriage, masculinity and childrearing, along with blog posts with titles like 'The Lost Virtues of Sexism.' He has referred to various women as 'small-breasted biddies,' 'lumberjack dykes' and 'cunts' and extolled the 'benefits' of slavery. The pastor's views are coming under scrutiny as he gains influence within the Republican Party. Last year, he declared that his church was seeking to make inroads with 'numerous evangelicals who will be present both in and around the Trump administration.' Since then, he's appeared at congressional events, cheering when Hegseth — one of his congregants in Tennessee — was confirmed. Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought also has ties to the church. Christian nationalism is the belief that the U.S. was founded as a Christian nation and should remain so in the future — and that our laws should reflect Christian values. A 2024 survey by the Pew Research Center found that half of U.S. adults think the Bible should have some influence on federal laws, even though the First Amendment prohibits the government from 'establishing a religion.' The public support for Christian nationalism from high-ranking members of the White House cabinet is alarming for civil rights advocates, political scientists and Christians alike who say it could impact policy, further gender inequality and promote fear among women. 'To have the Secretary of Defense repost this message is especially worrisome ... because it resonates so strongly with this notion of threat. What role does Pete Hegseth see the military playing in carrying out, in enforcing, in reinforcing this Christian nationalist understanding of women's submission?' Traci West, professor emerita of Christian Ethics and African American Studies at Drew University Theological School, tells Women Rule. A 2024 study from the Public Religion Research Institute found that a 'key aspect often linked to Christian nationalism is adherence to patriarchal ideals.' According to their research, 33 percent of Americans agree that 'in a truly Christian family, the husband is the head of the household, and his wife submits to his leadership,' while 51 percent of Christian nationalism sympathizers and nearly seven in 10 adherents to Christian nationalism agree with that statement. Also, 'there is a very, very high correlation between support for Christian nationalism, and those who voted for Trump in 2024,' says Diana Orcés, director of research at PRRI. According to Samuel Perry, a professor of sociology at the University of Oklahoma, with Hegseth and others in the Trump administration, there's a 'reassertion that 'No, patriarchy is not just an option, I think it's a good thing.'' Perry says that the Christian nationalist ideology has already influenced Trump administration policy, particularly regarding childbearing and fertility. He says that data shows that 'conservatives, even when they're quite pronatatalists,' i.e. promote having more babies, 'are actually the least likely to support things like paid leave and childcare, even tax credits — which, he says could make it 'more difficult for women to go back to work.' Jared Longshore, a minister of Wilson's church, tells Women Rule he personally supports President Donald Trump and is 'very grateful for what he's doing. … I'm certainly grateful for what he did with Supreme Court justices. … I know Pete has done things' related to women in combat roles. 'Scripture calls the husband the head and then the woman the body,' Longshore says. 'When you hear that the husband has a hierarchy in the home, we should think in the same way that we think about the relationship between our heads and our bodies.' Longshore says repealing the 19th Amendment is 'not something I'm pressing for, but when asked would I support that, I said yes, I would. … from the beginning of our nation up until the time of the suffrage movement, we had one vote per household and I think that would be a good thing.' Women Rule reached out to Hegseth to ask if he supported his church's belief that women should not vote or participate in government. In response, Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in an emailed statement, 'The Secretary is a proud member of a church affiliated with the Congregation of Reformed Evangelical Churches, which was founded by Pastor Doug Wilson. The Secretary very much appreciates many of Mr. Wilson's writings and teachings.' POLITICO Special Report 'My Life Became a Living Hell': One Woman's Career in Delta Force, the Army's Most Elite Unit by Seth Harp for POLITICO: 'Courtney Williams was 24 years old when she learned of an intriguing job opportunity at an unnamed 'special mission unit' at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the headquarters of the top secret Joint Special Operations Command. It was 2010, and she was coming off a four-year enlistment in the Army, in which she'd been an interrogator and Arabic linguist but never deployed. She was recruited at a job fair by K2 Solutions, a contractor in Southern Pines, North Carolina, run by former members of Delta Force, the Army component of JSOC.' Eleanor Holmes Norton Keeps a Low Profile as Trump Takes Aim at DC by Nicholas Wu for POLITICO: 'Washington's locally elected government is under attack from President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans. But the capital city's self-proclaimed 'warrior on the Hill' is nowhere to be seen on the front lines. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's nonvoting House delegate, issued a written statement Monday after Trump seized control of the city's police force and moved to send in National Guard troops, calling it 'counterproductive,' a 'historic assault on D.C. home rule' and 'more evidence of the urgent need to pass my D.C. statehood bill.' Donald Trump Took Over DC's Police. Why Is the City's Mayor So Zen? By Michael Schaffer for POLITICO: 'Muriel Bowser has given Donald Trump everything a blue-city mayor could possibly give a MAGA president. And he kicked her in the teeth anyway. But what's most telling about the power dynamics between Washington's mayor and Trump's administration is that the Bowser allies I spoke to think Trump's furious White House press conference on Monday actually represented a victory of sorts.' Number of the Week Read more here. MUST READS Trump Has Said Abortion Is a State Issue. His Judicial Picks Could Shape It Nationally for Decades. by Christine Fernando for The Associated Press: 'One called abortion a 'barbaric practice.' Another referred to himself as a 'zealot' for the anti-abortion movement. Several have played prominent roles in defending their state's abortion restrictions in court and in cases that have had national impact, including on access to medication abortion. As President Donald Trump pushes the Senate to confirm his federal judicial nominees, a review by The Associated Press shows that roughly half of them have revealed anti-abortion views, been associated with anti-abortion groups or defended abortion restrictions.' A Right-Wing Influencer Tried to Be a Tradwife. It Almost Broke Her. by Michelle Goldberg for The New York Times: 'Lauren Southern, one of the most well-known right-wing influencers during Donald Trump's first term, first went viral with a 2015 video titled 'Why I Am Not a Feminist.' Then 19, beautiful and blond, Southern argued that women are advantaged in many areas of life, including child custody disputes and escaping abusive relationships. 'Feminists are unintentionally creating a world of reverse sexism that I don't want to be a part of,' she said. But being an antifeminist, it turns out, is no shield against abusive male power. Southern's new self-published memoir, 'This Is Not Real Life,' is the story of conservative ideology colliding with reality.' How One Oregon Activist Is Using a Decades-Old Liberal Policy to Stall Green Energy Projects in Rural Areas by Tony Schick for ProPublica: 'During the outcry against nuclear power in the 1970s, liberal Oregon lawmakers hatched a plan to slow an industry that was just getting started. They created a burdensome process that gave the public increased say over where power plants could be built, and the leading anti-nuclear activists of the day used appeal after appeal to delay proposed nuclear plants to death. It had a huge impact: Oregon's first commercial nuclear plant, the one that spurred lawmakers into action, was also the state's last. What those lawmakers didn't plan for was that 50 years later, an Oregon citizen activist would use that same bureaucracy to hinder some of the very energy projects that today's liberals want: wind farms and the new high-voltage lines needed to support them. They didn't plan for Irene Gilbert.' QUOTE OF THE WEEK Read more here. on the move Families Against Mandatory Minimums President Shaneva D. McReynolds has been appointed as a voting member of the United States Sentencing Commission's newly formed Sentence Impact Advisory Group. Dezenhall Resources has added Katie Runkle and Steffen Newman as associates, Amma Boateng as senior director of coalitions, Mary Grace Lucas as vice president and Jana Spacek as managing director of organizational development and operations. (h/t POLITICO Playbook) Meghan Green is now general counsel for the Senate Budget Committee. She most recently was general counsel for the House Intelligence Committee. (h/t POLITICO Playbook)
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
20 years after its landmark withdrawal from Gaza, Israel is mired there
Israel Gaza Withdrawal Anniversary TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Twenty years ago, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip, dismantling 21 Jewish settlements and pulling out its forces. The Friday anniversary of the start of the landmark disengagement comes as Israel is mired in a nearly two-year war with Hamas that has devastated the Palestinian territory and means it is likely to keep troops there long into the future. Israel's disengagement, which also included removing four settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's controversial attempt to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians. But it bitterly divided Israeli society and led to the empowerment of Hamas, with implications that continue to reverberate today. The emotional images of Jews being ripped from their homes by Israeli soldiers galvanized Israel's far-right and settler movements. The anger helped them organize and increase their political influence, accounting in part for the rise of hard-line politicians like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. On Thursday, Smotrich boasted of a settlement expansion plan east of Jerusalem that will 'bury' the idea of a future Palestinian state. For Palestinians, even if they welcomed the disengagement, it didn't end Israel's control over their lives. Soon after, Hamas won elections in 2006, then drove out the Palestinian Authority in a violent takeover. Israel and Egypt imposed a closure on the territory, controlling entry and exit of goods and people. Though its intensity varied over the years, the closure helped impoverish the population and entrenched a painful separation from Palestinians in the West Bank. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians claim all three territories for a future independent state. A unilateral withdrawal enhanced Hamas' stature Israel couldn't justify the military or economic cost of maintaining the heavily fortified settlements in Gaza, explained Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Misgav Institute and the Institute for National Security Studies think tanks. There were around 8,000 Israeli settlers and 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza in 2005. 'There was no chance for these settlements to exist or flourish or become meaningful enough to be a strategic anchor,' he said. By contrast, there are more than 500,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, most living in developed settlement blocs that have generally received more support from Israeli society, Michael said. Most of the world considers the settlements illegal under international law. Because Israel withdrew unilaterally, without any coordination with the Palestinian Authority, it enhanced Hamas' stature among Palestinians in Gaza. 'This contributed to Hamas' win in the elections in 2006, because they leveraged it and introduced it as a very significant achievement,' Michael said. 'They saw it as an achievement of the resistance and a justification for the continuation of the armed resistance.' Footage of the violence between Israeli settlers and Israeli soldiers also created an 'open wound' in Israeli society, Michael said. 'I don't think any government will be able to do something like that in the future,' he said. That limits any flexibility over settlements in the West Bank if negotiations over a two-state solution with the Palestinians ever resume. 'Disengagement will never happen again, this is a price we're paying as a society, and a price we're paying politically,' he said. An early settler longs to return Anita Tucker, now 79, was part of the first nine Jewish families that moved to the Gaza Strip in 1976. She and her husband and their three kids lived in an Israeli army outpost near what is today Deir al-Balah, while the settlement of Netzer Hazoni was constructed. Originally from Brooklyn, she started a farm growing vegetables in the harsh, tall sand dunes. At first relations were good with their Palestinian neighbors, she said, and they worked hard to build their home and a 'beautiful community.' She had two more children, and three chose to stay and raise their families in Netzer Hazoni. She can still recall the moment, 20 years ago, when 1,000 Israeli soldiers arrived at the gate to the settlement to remove the approximately 400 residents. Some of her neighbors lit their houses on fire in protest. 'Obviously it was a mistake to leave. The lives of the Arabs became much worse, and the lives of the Jews became much, much worse, with rockets and Oct. 7,' she said, referring to the decades of rockets fired from Gaza into Israel and the date in 2023 of the Hamas attack that launched the ongoing war. Despite the passage of time, her family still is 'yearning and longing for their home,' she said. Several of her 10 grandchildren, including some who spent their early childhood in the Gaza settlements, have served in the current war and were near her old house. 'It's hard to believe, because of all the terrible things that happened that we predicted, but we're willing to build there again,' said Tucker. Palestinians doubt Israel will ever fully withdraw from Gaza again After Israel's withdrawal 20 years ago, many Palestinians described Gaza as an 'open-air prison.' They had control on the inside – under a Hamas government that some supported but some saw as heavy-handed and brutal. But ultimately, Israel had a grip around the territory. Many Palestinians believe Sharon carried out the withdrawal so Israel could focus on cementing its control in the West Bank through settlement building. Now some believe more direct Israeli occupation is returning to Gaza. After 22 months of war, Israeli troops control more than 75% of Gaza, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of maintaining security control long term after the war. 'Over the past 20 years we were relieved of occupation, shelling and seeing the Jews. Now we hear that they want to occupy here again after two years of war," said Sabah Abu Audeh, a 67-year-old grandmother who was displaced to Gaza's Shati refugee camp. Aouni Timras, 55, from the Nuseirat refugee camp said he felt optimistic when Israel pulled out, thinking things would get better. 'We were hopeful but now the occupation returned for the second time,' Timras said. "What can people do? This is what we live through. We hope that there will be a truce so that people can stand up again.' Amjad Shawa, the director of the Palestinian NGO Network, said he doesn't believe Netanyahu will repeat Sharon's full withdrawal. Instead, he expects the military to continue controlling large swaths of Gaza through 'buffer zones.' The aim, he said, is to keep Gaza 'unlivable in order to change the demographics,' referring to Netanyahu's plans to encourage Palestinians to leave the territory. Israel is 'is reoccupying the Gaza Strip' to prevent a Palestinian state, said Mostafa Ibrahim, an author based in Gaza City whose home was destroyed in the current war. Missed opportunities Israeli former Maj. Gen. Dan Harel, who was head of the country's Southern Command during the disengagement, remembers the toll of protecting a few thousand settlers. There were an average of 10 attacks per day against Israeli settlers and soldiers, including rockets, roadside bombs big enough to destroy a tank, tunnels to attack Israeli soldiers and military positions, and frequent gunfire. 'Bringing a school bus of kids from one place to another required a military escort,' said Harel. 'There wasn't a future. People paint it as how wonderful it was there, but it wasn't wonderful.' Harel says the decision to evacuate Israeli settlements from the Gaza Strip was the right one, but that Israel missed crucial opportunities. Most egregious, he said, was a unilateral withdrawal without obtaining any concessions from the Palestinians in Gaza or the Palestinian Authority. He also sharply criticized Israel's policy of containment toward Hamas after disengagement. There were short but destructive conflicts over the years between the two sides, but otherwise the policy gave Hamas 'an opportunity to do whatever they wanted.' 'We had such a blind spot with Hamas, we didn't see them morph from a terror organization into an organized military, with battalions and commanders and infrastructure,' he said. The Oct. 7 attack, Israel's largest military intelligence failure to date, was not a result of the disengagement, said Harel. 'The main issue is what we did in the 18 years in between.' ___ Associated Press writers Fatma Khaled contributed from Cairo and Wafaa Shurafa from Deir al Balah, Gaza Strip. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's assault on universities is a war on thinking
President Trump's assault on liberal ideals in the world's greatest institutions of learning reveals a vacuous anti-intellectual conservatism. His strategy speaks to his MAGA supporters culturally and politically in pushing back against what he calls the 'radical' or 'woke' left. In doing so, he threatens the academic freedoms underpinning the strengths of liberal arts, science and intellectual achievement in America. It is important for me to state upfront that I have built a career defending markets and innovation, and providing evidence against discriminatory preferences rooted in beliefs that benefit one cultural group over the greater good of many. The birth of the modern world lies in a simple idea: Virtue is acquired and not bestowed as fortune to people of rank. This was not easy for conservative people of rank to digest, and fierce battles were fought along the way against institutions supporting colonialism, aristocracy, patriarchy, sexism and homophobia. Acquisition of virtue underscores Machiavelli's advice to a prince in the 15th century questioning class privilege. The notion of virtue was once only available to conservative white men who were propertied and often aristocratic. Being of leisure, they were at liberty to think with a free mind. This was the foundation of the liberal arts in the 17th century. Concerted struggle brought new groups to universities — men from middle and working classes in the 19th century, women in the early 20th century and minorities in the late 20th. However, it was their virtue that elevated the ranks of American academics and their students, leading to great scientific discoveries and human achievement. At the mundane level, their struggles were difficult. Women and minorities in academia faced —and continue to face — sexism, homophobia and racism. Court records on these issues laid out page to page would extend from Maine to California and beyond. For any one case someone might find of a minority being favored, one can find a hundred others who faced discrimination. Many of them were immigrants. Over one-third of the Nobel laureates in economics, chemistry, medicine and physics are immigrants to the U.S. There are nearly 400,000 immigrant professors in the country. American tech leadership, whether in Silicon Valley or in its engineering schools, rests on the hard work (dare I say, Protestant ethic) of immigrants. Given the rampant discrimination that immigrants, women and minorities have faced in higher education, Trump's claim that white Christians are being discriminated against is laughable, manipulative and political. In equating liberal arts with 'radical communism' and other such nonsense, Trump pulls off a masterful deceit. But his lies will never make American great again. Most knowledge is built on principles of science and refinements based on successive waves of evidence. But science is neither easy nor linear in its progress. Galileo, Newton and Darwin debunked extant religious beliefs about the centricity of the Earth and human beings. But the path was convoluted. For example, Darwin's ideas also encouraged beliefs about women and racial minorities being inferior. These ideas eventually lost out, but we kept the best of Darwin. Science is and will always be biased, but its ideas win through evidence and debate, not sanctions or prohibitions on free speech. Trump would have cut off Darwin's science funding, deported Newton and put Galileo on trial for heresy. Paranoid politicians like Trump cannot recognize that science is not about who votes in elections. The Western world has survived such political assaults in the past. Most of us now believe that the Earth is relatively round and that homo sapiens are descended from apes. Since Socrates, ideas have won through the strength of their innovation and debate, to make us see things we had not seen before, or to make the world a better place. Trump, who claims to be supporting abstract ideals such as merit, brings a poisoned chalice to the nation's thinkers. He sanctions us with punitive measures, cuts off our funding, drowns us in lawsuits and floods the academy with his meddlesome government coercions. Debating ideas using evidence or upholding free speech are not Trump's strengths. Bullying and suing people for money are. Trump's actions are those that the world of knowledge has fought from the time of Socrates to that of McCarthyism. One of my German colleagues often tells me that the mistake we make is in assuming that Nazis were dumb. It breaks a professor's heart to see intellectually gifted people such as Ted Cruz (Princeton, Harvard Law School) JD Vance (Ohio State, Yale Law School) or Josh Hawley (Stanford, Yale Law School) lay aside their intellectual capital for the illiberal purposes of undermining our knowledge producers. Liberal arts, science and ideas in general will always threaten those in power. The Trump administration's legal mumbo-jumbo — about Title VI and antisemitism investigations that it employs to shut down knowledge production — has been rightly called out as a war on liberalism, but it is more fundamentally a war on intellectual pursuit. Regulating our universities into safe spaces for MAGA-type conservatism will not make American academia great again. Punishing the gifted to make the vindictive better off is not the same as robbing the rich to pay the poor, as it leaves everyone worse off. This Western liberalism-loving libertarian professor provides the following grades to Trump: A+ for serving hemlock, F- for virtue.
