
Female MP leaves Parliament speechless by holding up nude image of 'herself' and delivering a 'terrifying' message
A New Zealand MP has stunned colleagues by showing a nude portrait of herself in parliament.
Laura McClure created headlines when she held up an AI-generated image during general debate last month, as she described how quick it took to create.
'This image is a naked image of me, but it is not real. This image is what we call a 'deepfake',' she told parliament.
'It took me less than five minutes to make a series of deepfakes of myself. Scaringly, it was a quick Google search for the technology of what's available.
'When you type in 'deepfake nudify' into the Google search with your filter off, hundreds of sites appear.'
Three weeks on, McLure doesn't regret about the stunt and insisted 'it needed to be done'.
'It was absolutely terrifying, personally having to speak in the house, knowing I was going to have to hold up a deepfake,' McClure told Sky News.
'I felt like it needed to be done, it needed to be shown how important this is and how easy it is to do, and also how much it can look like yourself.'
McLure hopes to overhaul NZ legislation to make it illegal to share deepfakes, as well as nude photographs, without consent of parties involved.
She said the problem was the abuse of AI technology, not the new technology itself.
Targeting AI itself 'would be a little bit like Whac-A-Mole', McLure said.
'You'd take on site down and another one would pop up.'
She said deepfake pornography, however, was a huge concern among Kiwi youth.
'Here in New Zealand a 13-year-old, a young 13-year-old, just a baby, attempted suicide on school grounds after she was deepfaked, so it's not just a bit of fun,' she said.
'It's not a joke. It's actually really harmful.'
McLure was prompted to speak out after concerned parents and education professionals raised the worrying issue.
'The rise in sexually explicit material and deepfakes has become a huge issue,' she said.
'As our party's education spokesperson, not only do I hear the concerns of parents, but I hear the concerns of teachers and principals, where this trend is increasing at an alarming rate.'
McLure warned the issue was not specific to NZ.
'I think it's becoming a massive issue here in New Zealand; I'm sure it's showing up in schools across Australia … the technology is readily available,' she said.
In February, police launched an investigation in the circulation of AI-generated images of female students at a Melbourne school.
It was thought that 60 students at Gladstone Park Secondary College had been impacted.
A 16-year-old boy was arrested and interviewed at the time, but was later released without charge.
The investigation remains open but no further arrests have been made.
Another Victorian school had a found itself at the centre of an AI nude scandal.
At least 50 students in years 9 to 12 from Bacchus Marsh Grammar featured in AI-generated nude images shared online.
One boy, 17, was cautioned by police before authorities closed their investigation.
The state's Department of Education expects schools to report incidents to police if students are involved.
Last month NRLW star Jaime Chapman lashed out online after being targeted in a deepfake photo attack, revealing it's not the first time someone has used AI to produce a doctored photograph of her.
The 23-year-old said the deepfakes had a 'scary' and 'damaging' effect on her.
'Have a good day to everyone except those who make fake ai photos of other people,' she wrote.
'AI is scary these days. Next time think of how damaging this can be to someone and their loved ones. This has happened a few times now and it needs to stop.'
NRL presenter Tiffany Salmond hit out at criminals online later last month after being targeted in a deepfake photo attack.
The 27-year-old New Zealand-based sports reporter said a photo she had posted to Instagram had been doctored and then shared.
'This morning I posted a photo of myself in a bikini,' Salmond posted on Instagram.
'Within hours a deepfake AI video was reportedly created and circulated.
'It's not the first time this has happened to me, and I know I'm not the only woman in sport this is happening to.'
'You don't make deepfakes of women you overlook. You make them of women you can't control.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
40 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Fact check: Amendment would stop prosecutions of women for getting abortions
The poster also said: 'On 4 July, Parliament will vote on a law that would: Remove ALL criminal penalties for abortion.' They added: 'Under MP Diana Johnson's amendment: No time limits. No gestational protections. No punishment for abortions at 7, 8, even 9 months.' The proposal being discussed was not tabled by Diana Johnson, nor is there any evidence Parliament will be voting on it on July 4. It also does not remove all criminal penalties for abortion and maintains most of the limits that are currently in place. If the amendment is made into law it will still be illegal for a woman to terminate her pregnancy outside of the current rules – which among other things limit abortions after 24 weeks into a pregnancy – but her actions would be decriminalised, meaning she would not be punished. However doctors who perform abortions which are not permissible under current laws could still be punished. Who has tabled the amendment? The poster initially said that the changes could come under an amendment from Diana Johnson MP. Ms Johnson did table an amendment to the last Government's criminal justice bill, however that bill – and therefore the amendment – was abandoned when the election was called. In a reply to another user, the original poster instead said they were referring to an amendment which 'has been tabled by Tonia Antoniazzi to the government's Crime & Policing Bill.' Ms Antoniazzi has indeed filed an amendment to the current crime and policing bill which is making its way through Parliament. The two amendments are very similar in their wording, although not identical. What does the amendment say? Ms Antoniazzi's amendment is called NC1 and reads: 'Removal of women from the criminal law related to abortion. For the purposes of the law related to abortion, including sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929, no offence is committed by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy.' Ms Antoniazzi's explanatory note which accompanies the amendment states that the change would 'disapply existing criminal law' on abortion from 'women acting in relation to her own pregnancy.' This is at any point in the pregnancy, the note states. It adds: 'It would not change any law regarding the provision of abortion services within a healthcare setting, including but not limited to the time limit, telemedicine, the grounds for abortion, or the requirement for two doctors' approval.' What does the current law on abortion say? The 1967 Abortion Act made abortion legal in some circumstances. In its current form the act allows an abortion if the pregnancy is terminated by a registered medical practitioner, and as long as the woman is not more than 24 weeks pregnant. The act also sets other restrictions on when an abortion can be legally carried out, including the need for sign-off by two registered medical practitioners. Outside of the parameters in which the 1967 act made abortion legal in certain circumstances, the practice is still governed by acts passed in 1929 and 1861 which can punish abortion with life imprisonment. When will the amendment be voted on? The Crime and Policing Bill, which this amendment has been attached to, has passed its first and second reading in the House of Commons. It is currently in the so-called report stage and a third reading in the Commons is due to happen 'on a date to be confirmed'. In a first reading the bill is presented to the Commons and not debated. The bill's general principles are debated at the second reading, then amendments come at committee and report stage. At the third reading MPs decide on whether to pass the bill. If they do it then goes onto the House of Lords. At the time of writing there was no sign of the crime and policing bill on the House of Commons schedule for July 4. In fact that day is a Friday and the House of Commons normally only sits on Mondays to Thursdays, sometimes sitting on Fridays to consider private member's bills. The crime and policing bill is not a private member's bill. Would this legalise abortion up to birth? No, the bill would decriminalise abortion up to birth for the pregnant woman, not legalise it. Decriminalising something means that while it is still illegal, breaking that law does not carry any penalty. The suggested amendment would only deal with 'a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy'. Therefore the amendment does not change the current law on whether doctors can provide an abortion after 24 weeks. Other safeguards around legally provided abortions remain unchanged. Doctors and others who provided an abortion outside of the legally defined parameters could still be punished. It is just the pregnant woman who would escape punishment in such a scenario. Thread of posts on X (archived) UK Parliament – Dame Diana Johnson's amendment (archived) UK Parliament – Criminal Justice Bill, news (archived) Post referring to amendment (archived post and thread) House of Commons – Crime and Policing Bill, Amendment Paper (archived) Criminal Justice Bill – Cross-party amendment briefing (archived) – Abortion Act 1967 (archived) – Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 (archived) – Offences against the Person Act 1861, section 58 (archived) – Offences against the Person Act 1861, section 59 (archived) UK Parliament – Crime and Policing Bill, details (archived) UK Parliament – Crime and Policing Bill, news (archived) UK Parliament – Bill stages (archived) UK Parliament – What's on: Friday 4 July 2025 (archived) – Guide to Parliamentary Work (archived)


Glasgow Times
43 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Gangland violence 'out of control' John Swinney is told
The First Minister was challenged about justice policy following the killing of two Scottish drug gang leaders in Spain. Eddie Lyons jnr and Ross Mnaghan were shot dead at a bar in Fuengirola last Saturday night. READ NEXT: Glasgow's drug consumption centre is working says health secretary At First Minister's Questions, Conservative leader, Russell Findlay, said gangs have been allowed to operate as 'the Scottish Parliament has failed to tackle organised Crime' He branded the gang leaders parasites and cowards and highlighted policing and sentencing policy that he claimed led to a failure to tackle the problem. Findlay said: 'Two Scottish drug dealers have now been shot dead in Spain.' Referring to the ongoing, decades long, feud between the rival Daniel and Lyons gangs in Glasgow, he said: 'Their gang has waged a turf war on Scotland's streets since the dawn of devolution. 'And this has mutated to include proxy groups, including the US US-sanctioned Kinahan cartel. 'These parasites grow rich by preying on societies most vulnerable, these cowards cause terror and death with guns, knives and firebombs. 'These thugs go after journalists, politicians, businessmen, police and prison officers. 'Organised Crime is out of control and communities are living in fear.' READ NEXT: 'Don't blame us': Taxis hit back in Glasgow city centre transport row Findlay said police numbers have been cut by almost 1000, Under 25 sentencing guidelines are part of the problem and proceeds of crime law failed to recover the rtrue wealth drug dealers accumulate. He said police say 'Organised crime groups' are 'coercing young and vulnerable people to carry out some of these crimes because they are under reduced risk of imprisonment.' On Proceeds of crime, he added: 'According to the Crown Office, one drug dealer made £126m but they can only find £118,000 of assets' and called for a review. The First Minister said the government and justice authorities were tackling organised crime, which he said was 'intolerable' and 'unacceptable'. He said he did not agree it was 'out of control' and said , 'Tt requires the forensic attention of our police and criminal justice authorities to tackle it and that is being undertaken within Scotland on a relentless basis.' Swinney said there were 'flaws' with Findlay's arguments. He said: 'There are a high number of organised crime participants who are currently incarcerated for a very long time in the jails of Scotland, contributing to the significant congestion that is in our prison system just now.' On sentencing, he said he could not allow the remarks to stand. He said:' It is misleading to say to the public there are no consequences for criminal activity under the age of 25. 'There are very serious consequences which involve imprisonment.' He added: 'Scottish Crime Campus is viewed across the world as one of the most innovative and successful measures of bringing together all of the intelligence gathering in one place. And he said: 'It has to be acknowledged that the criminal justice authorities have been successful in apprehending, imprisoning, interrupting and disrupting organised crime in this country. 'That will be sustained in the years to come.'

The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Swinney responds to 'controversial' ScotRail AI voiceover
The Government-owned train operator recently rolled out 'Iona', an AI voice on some routes, which replaced older messages recorded by Mathers since 2005. While established Scottish voiceover artist and actress Gayanne Potter is seeking 'an apology from ScotRail and an acknowledgement they have made a mistake' when basing "Iona" on recordings she made in 2021 without her consent, Mathers revealed to The National she also had no knowledge of the AI rollout. ScotRail later told Mathers's agent which trains the AI has now been rolled out on and contracted the actress for another six months of usage. READ MORE: I've voiced ScotRail trains for 20 years. No one told me AI was replacing me During FMQs on Thursday, Tory MSP Sandesh Gulhane asked the First Minister about the issue, to which John Swinney said Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop had told him ScotRail were "fixing it", referring to the voiceover. Gulhane said: "ScotRail is owned by the Scottish Government, yet it has chosen to use an AI voice, instead of employing a Scottish voice actor. "Is this how the Scottish Government supports actors?" Responding to Gulhane, Swinney said: "ScotRail have taken forward a development and I understand it has caused some controversy. "I'm sure ScotRail is engaging constructively with all concerned. "I think sometimes, these things just need careful handling, and I'm sure ScotRail will be doing exactly that. "The Transport Secretary tells me they're fixing it, so they'll be fixing it." ScotRail has been contacted for comment. READ MORE: Union slams Scottish companies using voice data without consent for new AI announcers SNP MSP Ben Macpherson has earlier highlighted Netflix's experience of filming Department Q — a drama currently ranked number one in the UK — in Edinburgh, asking the First Minister what was being done to encourage the growth of Scotland's film industry. Swinney said: "I welcome very much the investments that were made surrounding Department Q. I think it's been a tremendous success, and will be a great advert and showcase for our country. He added: "We have increased the budget for Screen Scotland and of course, the screen strategy that was published last year outlines an ambitious plan to grow the sector further and to combine international investment with increased support for emerging Scottish producers and local creative originations."