
Paddleboarders rescued off Pembrokeshire coast after being blown out to sea
During the Cabinet debate on April 28, Cllr Miller opined that Welsh-medium schools were popular because they were new and had good facilities. He added fuel to the flames generated by his words by stating that most parents don't care what language their children are taught in, as long as the quality of the education is good.
Cllr Miller's words no doubt express his personal view and the view of those to whom he speaks.
Deputy Leader: Cllr Paul Miller
However, their effect was to undo much of the good work the Council had done in meeting its obligations under the Welsh Government's Code for Welsh in Education. Moreover, a Cabinet decision to ask officers to survey parents about the reasons for their choice of their children's education was so poorly debated that it gave the impression that only parents electing to choose Welsh-medium education would be canvassed.
While the final wording of the Cabinet resolution on canvassing parents' views is sufficiently neutral, the manner in which the Cabinet conducted its debate raised concerns among those more deeply rooted in the Welsh language than any Cabinet member.
Cllr Miller's words and those of other contributors to the April 28 debate were dismissive and inflammatory.
They prompted Cllr Huw Murphy to refer the debate to the Welsh Language Commissioner and request a call-in to the local authority's powerful Education Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
The Welsh Language Commissioner's response was blunt and excoriated the Cabinet debate.
Efa Gruffydd Jones wrote: 'In 2019, the Welsh Government introduced significant changes to the School Standards and Organisation (Wales) Act 2013 and also to the Welsh in Education Strategic Plans (Wales) Regulations 2019.
One of the main changes was to move away from the concept of measuring demand, and, rather, to place a duty on local authorities to encourage the demand for Welsh-medium education. That is, local authorities are expected to expand Welsh-medium provision proactively, thereby encouraging more parents to choose Welsh-medium education for their children.'
She added: 'It is not clear to me why there is a need to question the choices of parents regarding Welsh-medium education in particular.
'It is also difficult to see how a process of questioning parents' motivation for choosing Welsh-medium education would be compatible with the commitments that have been made in Pembrokeshire County Council's WESP.'
Cllr Miller's attempt to defuse the row at the Education Committee meeting on Wednesday, May 14, was undone by his failure to reassure Committee members that the decision reached on April 28 was a neutral act by an authority merely seeking to capture potentially valuable data that might inform its future decisions. Cllr Miller constantly asked members to consider the issue in the context of the words of the resolution that the Cabinet passed. However, he failed to appreciate that the resolution's context was framed by his and his fellow Cabinet members' attitudes on April 28.
Instead, unwilling to apologise for fostering the wrong impression, Cllr Miller doubled down on his assertions about parents' motivations for sending their children to the new Welsh-medium schools, stating that the parents he spoke to 'couldn't give a toss' about the medium of their children's education. He also attacked Cllr Huw Murphy for calling in the decision and the Welsh Language Commissioner for her criticisms.
During the debate, it became apparent that the Cabinet was unaware of the additional cost of capturing the data it sought, how such a request might be framed, or how the received data would be handled. The Director of Education, Stephen Richards-Downes, could not help committee members who asked about the additional costs of the Cabinet's proposal.
Cllr Miller might have paused to reflect that, accepting his rationale that free transport and good facilities in Welsh-medium schools enticed parents to send their children to Welsh-medium schools, the Council had work to do improving its English-medium provision.
At the conclusion of the debate, Cllr Huw Murphy pointed out the Cabinet had no Welsh speaker in its membership and that the absence of someone with a perspective on the importance of Welsh to Pembrokeshire's communities would have avoided the loaded way in which the Cabinet conducted its debate.
The Committee voted to send the Cabinet decision back for reconsideration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Live
34 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
Kneecap bring Welsh cafe owner on stage at Green Man as they attack BBC
Irish rap trio Kneecap took a swipe at the BBC during their performance at Green Man Festival on Thursday night, with the band chanting "f*** the BBC". They criticised the corporation following its decision not to broadcast the group's set live from Glastonbury Festival. During their politically charged performance at the festival, the band from Belfast also addressed their ongoing support for Palestine and band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh's upcoming court appearance. Thousands of festival goers attended their set on the Far Out stage, with crowds spilling outside. The trio welcomed Helen Wilson on stage, the Welsh cafe owner who live streamed their Glastonbury performance on TikTok, which attracted millions of viewers. The band described Helen as their "hero". "Diolch," they told the crowd at Green Man. "It's not a bad crowd for our first time playing in a festival in Wales." They continued: "We recently played Glastonbury and the BBC wouldn't live stream our set. F*** the BBC." They added: "So the BBC, they said that they wouldn't show Kneecap live... but there was one woman. Do you know who we are talking about? "There was one hero who decided to TikTok live our gig, and she's from Wales. Can we have a massive round of applause for Helen?" The cafe owner joined the trio on stage and was seen giving band member Móglaí Bap a big hug as the crowd gave a loud cheer. In June, calls were made to pull their Glastonbury slot, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer saying the planned performance at Worthy Farm was not "appropriate", after band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, known as Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence for displaying a Hezbollah-supporting flag during a gig in 2024. Mo Chara has denied the offence, labelling the terror offence charge a "political" move designed to "silence" them. Glastonbury organisers refused to pull the trio's slot on the West Holts stage at the festival. However, while the BBC decided not to live stream their performance, they later uploaded a largely unedited version of their performance on BBC iPlayer. Welsh cafe owner Helen Wilson from Swansea live streamed Kneecap's performance on TikTok, which saw over two million people interact with the broadcast. At the time the BBC said: "Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists, our plans ensure that our programming meets our editorial guidelines. "We don't always live stream every act from the main stages and look to make an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance available on our digital platforms, alongside more than 90 other sets." On the Far Out stage at Green Man Festival, the band also addressed Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh's upcoming court appearance, saying that he would be back in court "next Wednesday", seemingly confirming that it would take place on Wednesday, August 20. On stage, the rapper said that he was returning to the court "to beat the British government in their own court for the second time". He later added that "they stole our funding two years ago, and we went to court and we won," which was in reference to the band winning a case against now Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch after she blocked an arts grant to the band in 2023. Liam continued: "And this time, we are going back to their court and we're going to beat them again." The band confirmed that this was their first time performing at a Welsh festival and referred to the crowd as their "Celtic brothers". They said: "Celtic brothers have to stand together as we can't trust the British government". The band later said there was a need for "international solidarity" now more than ever. "We are from west Belfast and Derry. Places that know colonialism all to well, as you know yourselves," they told the crowd. The band also said that they would "not stop talking" about Palestine, describing it as a genocide and led the crowd to a "Free, Free Palestine" chant. Green Man Festival concludes on Sunday, August 17. The Bannau Brycheiniog event will see the likes of Underworld, Wet Leg, CMAT, Perfume Genius, John Grant, Wunderhorse, Gwenno and English Teacher perform this year.


Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK sends Vladimir Putin warning ahead of Donald Trump summit in Alaska TODAY
Defence Secretary John Healey said today's face-to-face talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin was a 'first step towards serious negotiation' and ending the conflict Russia's Vladimir Putin has been given a warning by the UK ahead of a crucial face-to-face summit today with US President Donald Trump. The duo are set to meet at a remote military base in Alaska as European allies and the White House push for a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict. Speaking just hours before the talks, the UK Defence Secretary John Healey said Britain is prepared "to step up diplomatic and economic pressure" if Putin fails to act. The Cabinet minister told Times Radio: "The pressure now is on Putin to prove he wants peace. Today is a test of that. And we have worked hard in the run-up to this meeting in Alaska - intensifying diplomacy, stepping up military aid and being ready to step up economic pressure on Putin if he's not willing to act as he says he will." It comes after Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. Mr Healey added: "Our first priority is to continue to stand with Ukraine, to step up diplomatic pressure and economic pressure on Putin but also to keep a focus on the front line, while all eyes are on Alaska, because we can't jeopardise the peace by forgetting about the war." The Cabinet minister said today's face-to-face talks between Mr Trump and Putin was a "first step towards serious negotiation" in bringing the conflict to an end, adding that "talking" was the only way to solve a war, not "fighting". He shot down a question asking whether Britain's role was to "watch and wait", as he said the Government was leading the charge in military planning for a possible ceasefire and supplying military aid to the war-torn country. The US President and Russian despot are set to meet this evening (UK time) with the White House calling for a "peaceful resolution" to the three-year conflict. But with Ukraine excluded from the high-stake talks there are concerns among European leaders that Kyiv could be sidelined in negotiations over a ceasefire. Pressed on whether the Ukrainian wartime leader Zelensky had a veto over anything decided between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, Mr Healey said: "The Ukrainians are the ones who are fighting with huge courage, military and civilians alike. It's for President Zelensky and the Ukrainians to determine an end to the fighting and the terms on which that takes place." Asked about lessons can be learnt from the summit, he told BBC Breakfast: "I think the first lesson is that military and fighting solves nothing in the end, and that the end to war must come through talking must come through diplomacy. "And so today in Alaska is what I hope, we all hope to see, a first step towards serious negotiations. President Trump is doing what only President Trump can do by bringing Putin to the talks. "Now the pressure is on Putin. He's declared four times in the last six months that he wants peace, but he's been escalating the attacks on Ukrainian cities and killing Ukrainian civilians, as well as attacking the military with 1000s of drones each month launched into Ukraine. And so today is a day when really eyes are on Putin. Is he serious about what he says?" Asked whether Britain's role was to "watch and wait", he said: "No, the UK's role is to stand with Ukraine on the battlefield and in the negotiations, and prepare as we have been, leading 30 other nations with military planning for a ceasefire and a secure peace through what we call the Coalition of the Willing. "Our role is to lead the charge as we have been on more intensive diplomacy, to lead the charge on military aid to Ukraine so that we don't jeopardise the peace by forgetting about the current war, and being ready also to step up economic pressure on Putin if he's not willing to take the talks seriously." Yesterday Keir Starmer hosted Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy at Downing Street in a public show of support. The Prime Minister greeted the wartime leader with a warm hug and smile before a private breakfast in No10 discussing Wednesday's call with EU leaders and Mr Trump. A Downing Street spokesman said: "They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine." Russia's state-owned news agency TASS said yesterday Mr Trump and Putin will first hold talks - around 7.30pm UK time - attended only by interpreters. Putin is expected to attend the summit with close allies including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, aide Yury Ushakov and Defence Minister Andrey Belousov. Mr Trump and the Russian President are then expected to give a press conference at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base. TASS also reported yesterday that Mr Putin welcomed the US President's "energetic and sincere efforts" to stop the conflict. But the US President has already warned there will be "very severe consequences" for Mr Putin if he refuses to stop the bloodshed in Ukraine. He told reporters earlier this week: 'If I do not get the necessary answers during the meeting with Putin, there will be no next meeting.'


Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage makes demand of PM as he wants his 'cronies' in House of Lords
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wants to see representatives from his party in ermine-clad robes - despite him previously calling for the unelected House of Lords to be abolished Nigel Farage wants to nominate Reform UK peers to the House of Lords and has demanded Keir Starmer allow him to do so. The Reform UK leader wants to see representatives from his party in ermine-clad robes - despite him previously calling for the unelected House of Lords to be abolished. He now wants to be allowed to nominate people to the unelected chambers. The Clacton MP highlighted that the Green Party, which also has four MPs, has two working peers while the Democratic Unionist Party, which has only five MPs, has six members. Mr Farage said the situation amounted to a 'democratic disparity' that meant Reform UK had four MPs and controls ten councils, but has no one in the Lords, The Times reported. It comes after Nigel Farage's appearances on Sky News sparked thousands of complaints. Asked about Mr Farage's calls, Defence Secretary John Healey told LBC this morning that this was the "same Nigel Farage that called for the abolition of the house" and now he wants to put his "cronies" in there. He added: "I'm not sure that Parliament's going to be benefit from more Putin apologists like Nigel Farage, to be honest." The Prime Minister has control over political appointments to the House of Lords. Members can be suggested by the public and political parties and are then approved by the PM, before being formalised by the King. Rows have previously erupted after Prime Ministers have nominated their mates to become peers in the House of Lords. Ex-PM Boris Johnson faced anger for handing life peerages to his former aides in No10. He also made Evegeny Lebedev, the media mogul and son of billionaire ex-KGB agent Alexander, a peer in the bloated House of Lords back in 2020. Mr Starmer's government has promised to tighten the rules. In December, it has said political parties will now have to justify nominations to the upper chamber following years of rows over alleged cronyism. There is no obligation for the PM to appoint peers from opposition parties though usually they grant some to them. At the end of last year, Mr Starmer appointed 30 new Labour peers, with gongs for former aide Sue Gray and a number of former MPs. In his first round of political honours, the Prime Minister handed a life peerage to Partygate inquisitor Ms Gray, who served as his chief of staff for less than 100 days before being ousted after a string of internal rows. Mr Starmer also gave seats in the Lords to ex-MPs Thangam Debbonaire, Luciana Berger, Lyn Brown, Kevin Brennan, Steve McCabe and Julie Elliott, along with former Welsh first minister Carwyn Jones. The PM allowed the Tories to name six peers. Kemi Badenoch 's names included controversial "free speech" champion Toby Young and Prof Nigel Biggar, a staunch advocate of the culture wars. She also handed seats in the Lords to former Cabinet Minister Therese Coffey, who was deputy PM under Liz Truss. Mr Starmer also allowed Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey to nominate two new peers. In a letter to the PM, seen by The Times, Mr Farage has criticised Reform UK not being allowed to nominate anyone. He said: 'My party received over 4.1 million votes at the general election in July 2024 [and] have since won a large number of seats in local government, led in the national opinion polls for many months and won the only by-election of this parliament,' he wrote. 'The Greens, DUP, Plaid Cymru and UUP [Ulster Unionist Party] have 13 peers between them, but Reform UK has none. The time has come to address the democratic disparity that exists in the upper house.' Names on a possible Reform UK peers nomination list could include Ann Widdecombe, the former Conservative MP who is now Reform UK's immigration and justice spokesperson, and Nick Candy, a Reform UK donor and the party's treasurer, and Zia Yusuf, the party's former chairman. Lord Hayward, the Conservative peer and election expert, told The Times: "Just because Reform has a few MPs and is doing well in the opinion polls that does not mean that they are an established credible party that should be represented in the House of Lords. 'I think Starmer is entirely within his rights to wait and see how Reform actually does over the next few years before making a decision.' He added that of five Reform MPs elected in 2024, the party had already 'lost' two after they resigned. Lord Norton of Louth, a constitutional expert, told the newspaper there was a 'case for minor parties like Reform to have representation in the House of Lords'. 'The prime minister is the only person who writes the rules on this as it stands,' he said. 'Historically appointments to the House of Lords were in the gift of the Crown but that function has been passed to the prime minister. So any decision on whether to create Reform MPs would rest with him alone.' Lord O'Donnell, a former cabinet secretary, told the newspaper: 'It is a feature of our system that the prime minister can appoint whoever they like to the House of Lords. It is an area where I think we need greater checks and balances.' Baroness Fox of Buckley, a member of Mr Farage's Brexit Party who was nominated by Boris Johnson and sits as a crossbencher, added: 'Labour says it wants to improve the diversity of the House of Lords and this seems like a very sensible place to start. There can be no rational reason for Starmer to turn it down.'