A quiet Tiananmen Square anniversary displays China's ability to suppress history
A former district council member, Chan Kim-kam, said customs officers questioned her at her shop on the eve of June 4 after she advertised small white candles for sale in an Instagram post titled, June, we don't forget.
It is only in Taiwan, a self-governing island that is claimed by China but runs its own affairs, that large June 4 gatherings can still take place.
The crackdown reinforced Communist Party control Tiananmen Square is a vast open space in the centre of Beijing with monumental, communist-era buildings along two of its sides and the mausoleum of Mao Zedong, who founded the communist era in 1949, on the south end.
University students occupied this symbolically important site in the spring of 1989. Their calls for freedoms divided the party leadership.
In retrospect, the decision to send in the troops marked a decisive turning point in the evolution of modern China, keeping the party firmly in control as it loosened economic controls.
Chinese officials have said the country's rapid economic development since then proves the decisions made at the time were correct.
Tiananmen Mothers, a group formed by relatives of the victims, disagrees.
It made an annual online appeal to the government, signed by 108 members, calling for an independent investigation into what happened on June 4, 1989, including a list of all who died.
The group also demanded compensation for the families and a legal case against those responsible for the deaths.
The Canadian and German Embassies in Beijing posted an image of a candle on large screens on their properties facing the street.
Hong Kong's once outspoken populace has been cowed A carnival showcasing Chinese food and products was held in Victoria Park, where tens of thousands of people used to gather in the evening for a candlelight vigil on the anniversary.
Hong Kong authorities first shut down the vigil during the COVID-19 pandemic and arrested the organizers in 2021.
The moves were part of a broader crackdown on dissent following monthslong anti-government protests in 2019 that turned violent and paralysed parts of the city.
You know, Hong Kongers have become silent lambs after 2019, said King Ng, who was at the park on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
11 minutes ago
- First Post
Cancelling contracts, making big disclosures: Who loses what in Musk-Trump breakup?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk have called time on their friendship in the most shocking of ways — social media posts were fired off, threats were made, and big bombshells were dropped. In the aftermath of it, Tesla stocks tanked, and the world's richest man's personal net worth declined. Yes, this breakup could be costly for both. Here's how read more The aftermath of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's breakup raises the question: Who has the most to lose? File image/Reuters No one believed that the Donald Trump-Elon Musk friendship would be one that would last forever. But the fact that it ended in the most spectacular of ways and that too so quickly was not anticipated. On Thursday (June 5), America's two most powerful men — one is the US president and the other is the world's richest man — spent time on social media trying to destroy each other's reputations with threats and secrets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Their spectacular breakup also means the end to perhaps the most powerful of alliances in the US with many pondering who emerges as the bigger loser in this spat. Does Trump have more to lose or will Musk be the one to suffer? A bromance turns nasty It was last July when Elon Musk endorsed Trump for president and became an integral part of his campaign machinery — who can forget Musk manically jumping around at Trump rallies, funding a massive super-PAC on his behalf. Later, when Trump became US president, he returned the favour by appointing Musk to take charge at Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). When Elon Musk attached himself to Trump many began speculating when these two massive egos would, eventually, clash and that their strategic partnership would flame out spectacularly. And crash and burn the relationship did. Since late May, Musk has been vocally critical of Trump's so-called big, beautiful spending bill. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk told the TV programme CBS Sunday Morning. But Trump kept his cool and bid adieu to Musk as he called time on his service to the White House. Once out of government, though, the Tesla chief took his criticism against the bill even further. He called the bill a 'd isgusting abomination ,' threatened to politically retaliate against its supporters, and argued it would increase the debt. Social media posts by US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are displayed on smartphones. Trump has threatened to revoke government contracts from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk as a public feud escalates over Musk's criticism of the Trump administration's policies. AFP The US president then shot back on Thursday, while he had a sit down in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ' I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said. 'He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He further stated, ' I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Trump then took the fight online, writing in one social media post, 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' And this led Musk to hit back. Musk argued, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election' and accused Trump of 'such ingratitude.' And that wasn't the end, the feud kept going with Musk levelling a serious allegation, '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Consequences of the big, nasty breakup But who shall suffer from this breakup? After all, it was a mutual relationship benefiting both individuals. Many analysts and Trump watchers believe Musk shall be the big loser from this breakup. In fact, as the two bickered on social media, Tesla shares slumped — dropping 14 per cent, wiping out roughly $150 billion in market value in one of the worst days in months. Analysts and pundits believed that the losses were an indication of what might be at stake for Musk. Musk's personal net worth also took a tumble on Thursday — it fell by nearly $34 billion, making him the biggest daily loser on Bloomberg's list of the world's 500 richest people. Trump could even take the fight further with cancelling government contracts with Musk's various companies, including SpaceX and Tesla. In fact, the US president even suggested this while feuding with Musk online. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California. If the Trump administration pauses government contracts, SpaceX will lose billions of dollars. Reuters According to data available, last year, Musk's companies were promised $3 billion in nearly 100 contracts with 17 government agencies. Additionally, Reuters reported that if Trump did go ahead with this move, about $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts would be at risk. In addition to hitting his businesses, this feud could also threaten Musk's stay in the US. Musk is not a natural-born American — he was born in Pretoria, South Africa and thanks to his mother, Maye Musk, obtained Canadian citizenship in 1989 when he was 17 years old. This helped him move to North America for his studies and eventually to the United States. It was only in 2002 that he became a naturalised US citizen. Moreover, Musk has already lost his fan base on the liberal side and now with the fight with Trump, he will also lose his Conservative supporters. This will be bad for Musk — personally and from a business standpoint. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 5, Elon Musk and Donald Trump ended their friendship in the most spectacular way. File image/Reuters But many also note that the Trump-Musk feud also has the potential to hurt the US president. How? When Trump was campaigning, Musk emerged as one of his major donors. The SpaceX chief spent more than $250 million to get Trump elected. Now imagine if he used that same financial clout against the US president. Musk could fund campaigns against Republicans, hurting Trump in the long run. Moreover, he could also align with fiscally conservative lawmakers to block Trump's signature tax bill in the Senate. Besides this, Musk could also use the time he has spent with Trump against him. After spending a lot of time closely with the US president, he could use information that the two shared to hurt Trump. He could make big revelations, which have the ability to hurt the US president. For instance, on Thursday, amid the online battle Musk claimed that the US president was part of the Epstein Files STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk could also use X against Trump — the X owner has more than 220 million followers compared to the US president's 105.6 million followers. As some note, Musk could use the platform to keep airing his grievances against Trump. In fact, on Thursday, he called for the impeachment of the US president and even asked his followers 'is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle?' It's left to be seen if Trump or Musk will win this battle, but for now, we can buckle up and wait for their next steps. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
The world's auto supply chain is in the hands of a few Chinese bureaucrats
In a hulking grey building just east of Tiananmen square in Beijing, a small team in China's Ministry of Commerce is deciding the fate of the global auto industry , one rare earth magnet export permit at a time. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets - a crucial component in electric vehicle motors - and it added them to an export control list in April as part of its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licenses. It falls to the Bureau of Industrial Security and Import and Export Control - which is part of China's Ministry of Commerce - to review export permits for the rare earth magnets, which are vital for car motors, wind turbines and even U.S. F-35 fighter jets. While dozens of licences have been issued since late April, executives, lobbyists and diplomats say they are only a small fraction of the applications that have flooded in from automakers, semiconductor companies and aerospace firms around the world since the tougher export controls were introduced. Washington says delays in issuing export licences show China is reneging on commitments made during trade talks in Geneva last month and it has retaliated with export curbs on plane engine parts and other equipment. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks by phone on Thursday as the escalating dispute over China's rare earth stranglehold threatened to derail the fragile trade truce agreed between the two superpowers. When the new rare earth magnet measures came in, the export control bureau had a total of just 30 staff, though this has since been doubled to around 60, according to two sources who were briefed on a meeting between the ministry and Chinese and European semiconductor firms last week. "We appreciate that MOFCOM has increased its resources to address demand and they're working hard and long hours on these issues," said Adam Dunnett, Secretary General of the European Chamber of Commerce in China, referring to the ministry. "But the reality is this is having a huge impact on a wide variety of sectors. It's something that could have been better planned and rolled out," he said. According to personnel records posted to the Ministry of Commerce's website in June 2024, there are only three senior officials within the bureau who can approve the export permits. The ministry's website lists the export licence bureau's office hours as: Weekdays, 8:30-11:30 a.m., 14:00-17:00 p.m. Reuters was unable to determine current staffing levels or whether more officials are now able to approve applications. The Ministry of Commerce did not respond to questions from Reuters on this subject. Chokepoint The global alarm over shortages underscores the enormous leverage China has acquired through its near-monopoly on rare earth production. It also reveals a complex bureaucratic process that has gone from checkpoint to chokepoint. "The process for our suppliers to apply for export licences for various rare earths ... since April, is complex and time-consuming, partly due to the need to collect and provide a lot of information," a spokesperson for Bosch, the German engineering and technology multinational, said last month. A Chinese-language guide to the process published by the Ministry in late March runs to almost 14,000 Mandarin characters. European auto suppliers alone have filed hundreds of requests since early April, with only about a quarter granted. These applications can range from dozens to hundreds of pages, according to sources who have either filed requests or been briefed about them. Public Ministry of Commerce guidelines require information including technical product descriptions, signed contracts. Descriptions of production facilities and photos of products are also encouraged. China's stated aim is to ensure dual-use items don't end up in military equipment, but officials are often overly cautious even though many applications clearly state commercial use, Dunnett said. "Another concern we have heard from some companies is that they are being asked for sensitive and excessive information that is part of their intellectual property which has led to delays in their applications," Dunnett added. While applications are meant to be processed in 45 working days, the ministry says applications related to national security will take longer, without defining how long. Strategic excuse Cory Combs, head of critical mineral and supply chain research at Trivium China, a policy research group, said it was not clear whether the delays were due to bureaucratic inertia or intentional weaponisation. "We do expect these applications to U.S. end-users to be reviewed on par with other countries and approved whenever they're not for military use," he said. "The issue here is that, is it quick enough for the Trump administration to believe that Beijing has not reneged on the Geneva agreement?" Some U.S. industry figures believe that the bureaucratic backlog is a "strategic excuse". "China can staff up as fast as they want, if they wanted to," said a source from the U.S. rare earths industry who declined to be named for sensitivity reasons. In public, Chinese officials have said the export controls apply to all countries, the implication being that they do not count as a U.S.-specific countermeasure under the Geneva agreement. Foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on May 30 that the rare earth export controls are "non-discriminatory and not targeted at any specific country". During the Geneva talks, however, China privately admitted that the rare earth export controls qualified as non-tariff countermeasures, according to a source briefed on the talks. Rare earths remain a core part of ongoing U.S.-China discussions, the person said. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for clarification. Chinese scholars openly admit that the rare earth export controls are retaliation for U.S. chip curbs. "It's a short-term form of leverage which doesn't hurt China, as the rare earths in question have relatively low monetary value," said Zhu Junwei, an international relations scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Chinese think-tank.
India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
Elon Musk and Donald Trump fight in public, talk of ingratitude and Epstein files: Full story in 10 points
What began as one of the most high-profile alliances in American politics and business has now exploded into a bitter public feud. Elon Musk and Donald Trump, have gone from being vocal admirers of each other to trading personal attacks and explosive allegations across their social media platforms. The fallout began after Musk denounced Trump's flagship spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' prompting Trump to accuse the billionaire of 'betrayal' and 'ingratitude'.advertisementBut the drama didn't end there – Musk hit back with claims that Trump owes him for winning the election, and then dropped a bombshell allegation about Trump's name being in the sealed Epstein files. Trump, in turn, threatened to revoke federal contracts from Musk's companies, which also caused Tesla shares to nosedive. The whole event has now turned into one of the most public political clashes in recent memory – with real-world consequences for Washington, Wall Street, and Silicon this story, we will break down the big, big fight into quick 10-points.1. Once allies, now bitter foes From being the most popular political partners in the world just months ago, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are now fighting, and it is very public. Musk has been supporting Trump and working closely with him through his short stint as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk even declared: 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' But on Thursday, the alliance crumbled dramatically, as both men launched personal attacks against one another across their social media platforms – Truth Social and X. advertisement 2. Fallout over a 'disgusting' billThe fight was sparked by Musk's sharp criticism of Trump's key domestic policy – the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', a tax and spending proposal currently awaiting Senate approval. Musk labelled the bill a 'disgusting abomination' on X, slamming it for being bloated with 'pork' (a US political term for wasteful spending) and for adding to national debt. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong,' he wrote, urging citizens to call their lawmakers and oppose it. 3. Trump publicly expresses disappointmentAt a news conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump responded: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' he said. Trump suggested Musk only turned against the bill when it became clear that subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles – critical to Tesla's business – were being cut. 'He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem,' Trump added. 4. Musk says he never saw the bill, blames 'pork'Musk pushed back, saying he never even saw the bill before it passed and insisted his criticism had nothing to do with Tesla subsidies. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK,' he wrote. He argued oil and gas subsidies were untouched while clean energy support was removed, calling it 'very unfair!!' 5. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'Musk claimed Trump is being ungrateful, especially considering Musk's financial backing and endorsement during last year's elections. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. He said he spent around $277 million to support Trump and other Republicans. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. advertisement6. Epstein files bombshellThings escalated when Musk accused Trump of being mentioned in unreleased documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk posted on X, without providing evidence. The White House called the claim 'an unfortunate episode.' Trump previously admitted he had known Epstein but claimed they had a 'falling out a long time ago.' 7. Trump hits back with threatsIn response, Trump attacked Musk on Truth Social, accusing him of having 'gone CRAZY' and being 'ungrateful.' He claimed he asked Musk to leave the administration and threatened to cancel his companies' government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote. Shares of Tesla dropped by up to 18 per cent following the threat. advertisement8. Musk retaliates with drastic moves – then backtracksMusk replied on X that SpaceX would start decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft, used by NASA to transport astronauts. But hours later, he reversed course, writing, 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' The move reflected rising tensions, and how the feud was beginning to affect not just politics but key business operations tied to government partnerships. 9. Musk suggests forming a new political partyFrustrated with both Trump and traditional party lines, Musk floated the idea of starting a new political party. He ran a poll asking if it's time for a party that 'actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle.' He also endorsed a post suggesting Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance. This marked a significant shift from Musk's previous support and hints at a deeper rift within conservative politics. 10. Political and financial consequencesThe feud has exposed cracks between Silicon Valley's technocrats and Trump's populist base. Tesla investors voiced concerns, with former Musk supporter Ross Gerber writing: 'Can someone please take the phone away from him! wtf! Tesla is getting destroyed.' Others feared long-term damage to Musk's businesses and credibility. Meanwhile, Trump's meme coin also dropped in value, showing how the personal feud may have wider repercussions across politics, tech, and In
