Global art sales plummeted by 12% in 2024, says industry report
Global sales of art and antiques have fallen for a second consecutive year, declining by 12% in 2024 to an estimated $57.5 billion, according to the latest annual Art Market Report by Art Basel and UBS.
'It's been a very challenging year overall,' Clare McAndrew, the founder of the research firm Arts Economics, who authored the report, told The Art Newspaper.
The year marked the third-largest contraction of the global art market in the past 15 years, the report found, eclipsed only by the years of the 2009 recession (-36%), and the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic (-22%), and on par with the 12% drop recorded in 2012.
Sales fell in almost every region, with China most affected, seeing a decline of 33%. Sales in the US, the world's largest art market, decreased by 9%, and slid by 10% in both France and Italy, and 15% in South Korea. 'Despite Brexit-related challenges,' per the report, the UK contracted by a more moderate 5%, and has retained its position as the second-largest art market.
As the report lays out, the dynamics of last year's contraction broadly mirror those of 2023, when total sales fell by 4% with the highest price points most affected, due to 'ongoing geopolitical tensions, economic pressures and shifting buying behavior.'
The once-booming contemporary sector was hit hard, with sales at auction dropping by 36% to $1.4 billion, their lowest level since 2018. Amid a return to more tried-and-tested names, McAndrew noted a growing aversion to risk among buyers.
'Several dealers spoke of a lack of curiosity among clients,' she said. 'They say they used to fight with collectors for works at artists' studios. Now everyone wants to buy someone they've already heard of. The appetite for the unknown isn't there anymore.' The report notes that galleries are more heavily relying on their top three best-selling artists due to 'more selective buying by collectors.'
However, while sale value is down, trading volume grew by 3%, reflecting greater activity at lower-priced segment of works priced under $50,000.
Auction houses last year sold 20% less by value but 4% less by volume, according to the report. A similar trend was seen in the gallery sector, and hinted at the emergence of a more balanced and democratic ecosystem: Dealerships with the smallest turnovers, under $250,000, saw the greatest increase in sales, with a 17% boost, while those with a turnover exceeding $10 million experienced a 9% decline.
However, these small gains are undermined by plummeting profitability across most of the art and antiques market, as prices for virtually all aspects of the business, from shipping to rent, have increased.
Other positives to take away from the report, McAndrew said, are the increased sales of work by women artists in the primary market, up 3% year-on-year.
While the art market experienced regular fluctuations, the report also shows that for the past decade, it has struggled to reach its 2014 peak, despite a significant increase in wealth among the collecting class, especially billionaires.
Reflecting on the future of the art market, one dealer is quoted in the report as saying: 'Existing young collectors are no longer buying paintings. With the bursting of the contemporary art bubble, there is a high reliance on older collectors who prefer Modern and Post-War art… (but) many of these collectors are in their 60s and 70s, so I am worried about what the art scene will look like 10 years from now.
'On the other hand, we know there is a high proportion of wealthy people who have no experience in purchasing art, and the challenge for dealers is how to reach them, rather than focusing on existing art collectors.'
Read more stories from The Art Newspaper here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
43 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Artists who got almost $1,500 a month under a basic income pilot say their work improved
For about 2,000 artists and creative arts workers in Ireland, a weekly stipend provided through a basic income program has been a lifeline for years. Now, it's almost over. The pilot program began in 2022 under Catherine Martin, Ireland's former minister for tourism and culture. Martin allocated about $28 million to the arts sector following the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were randomly chosen and given an unconditional stipend of €325, or about $370, weekly for three years. During that time, participants met periodically via Zoom to discuss how the additional income had affected their livelihoods, careers, and ability to meet basic needs. The final session was held this month before the program's conclusion in August. Artists and cultural workers who attended the session grappled with what their lives would look like after August, but they hoped government officials would extend the program. "We need no further pilots. People need a UBI now to face and deal with the many social, economic, and ecological crises of our world," Reinhard Huss, the organizer of UBI Lab Leeds, which sponsored the event alongside Basic Income Ireland, UBI Lab Arts, and UBI Lab Network, told Business Insider. New developments in AI are reshaping the job market, replacing some entry-level positions. Tech industry leaders like Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have said implementing a universal basic income will be essential in the near future when AI supplants jobs in most industries. A universal basic income offers an entire population recurring, unconditional payments regardless of an individual's socioeconomic status. Ireland's program, like many others in the United States, is a guaranteed basic income, which targets certain segments of the population for a set period of time. Impact of Ireland's basic income program for artists Jenny Dagg, a sociologist lecturing at Ireland's Maynooth University, authored a new report that provides insights into participants' reactions to the program. She gathered data from over 50 of the 2,000 recipients. Although the report outlined nearly a dozen key impacts reported by program recipients, Dagg highlighted five major takeaways during the Zoom session. Dagg said that recipients who received money from the program reported more stability and "significantly reduced" financial stress. It relieved their anxiety about fulfilling their basic needs. Participating in the pilot program also allowed artists to re-prioritize how they spend their time and what they choose to focus on. "The opportunity to focus more on their specific creative interests opened new possibilities and career trajectories," the report said. Artists said the added income allowed them to spend more time "researching, experimenting, taking risks, and failing," which has improved the quality of their work. Artists, the report said, also felt more confident in themselves and their work during the program. "Many recipients talk of feeling empowered, of being in control of the choices within their lives, and envisioning a viable career path longer-term," the report said. Recipients even reported better mental health, which led to improved sleep quality and lowered stress levels. What's next for Ireland's basic income program With the end of the program fast approaching, recipients of the weekly payment are reckoning with what how their lives might change. "Across art forms, recipients report concerns about financial stability and sustaining the momentum of their careers when, or if, the basic income scheme ends," Dagg's report said. This month, Basic Income Ireland called on the government to immediately implement a universal and unconditional basic income for the country. A spokesperson for the UBI Lab Network said the pilot program's success shows that basic income is a viable option. The campaign group shared a proposal for introducing a universal basic income to Ireland. "As the pilot shows, basic income works and people need a UBI now to face and deal with the many social, economic, and ecological crises of our world. The Network will continue to help demonstrate basic income within communities and show how it is a sustainable policy," the statement said. Patrick O'Donovan, Ireland's minister for arts and culture, said he would evaluate the data collected throughout the pilot program and create proposals for the government regarding the next steps. "I am heartened by the responses of the Basic Income recipients in this paper," O'Donovan said in the May report. "This research will add to the evaluation being conducted by my department, which to date clearly shows that the Basic Income Pilot has been an effective support for the artists in receipt of it."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dividend King Federal Realty Has a High Yield and Industry-Leading Business
Federal Realty has the longest dividend increase streak in the REIT sector. The company focuses on quality over quantity and is a skilled developer and redeveloper. Federal Realty's dividend yield is notably higher than the REIT industry average. 10 stocks we like better than Federal Realty Investment Trust › Federal Realty (NYSE: FRT) is not the largest real estate investment trust (REIT) you can buy. It isn't even the largest REIT in its strip mall niche. It actually has a fairly small collection of properties in its portfolio. And yet it stands head and shoulders above every other REIT when it comes to its dividend. Here's why now is a good time to consider adding Federal Realty and its industry-leading business to your portfolio. Federal Realty owns strip malls and mixed-use properties, which generally include apartments and offices in the mix with retail. Some of the REIT's individual properties are quite large developments with multiyear projects on them. Others are simple strip malls where locals go to meet their everyday needs, like buying groceries or getting a haircut. From this perspective, Federal Realty isn't particularly differentiated from its competitors. That changes when you see that it only owns around 100 properties, which is generally a much smaller portfolio than its closest peers. However, those properties are particularly well located, with Federal Realty's assets having a higher average income around them and higher average population density. In other words, its portfolio is focused in wealthy areas with lots of residents nearby, which is exactly where retailers want to be located. The strength of Federal Realty's portfolio today is highlighted by its occupancy rates. After dipping during the coronavirus pandemic, they are now back above that level and closing in on 20-year highs. Occupancy ended the first quarter of 2025 at 93.6% but is expected to close in on 95% as the year progresses. Even during the pandemic, when non-essential businesses were closed by the government in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19, Federal Realty's occupancy didn't fall below 89%. The real story, however, is Federal Realty's dividend, which has been increased annually for 57 consecutive years. That makes the REIT a Dividend King, which alone is an impressive feat. But there's two more nuances here. First, Federal Realty has the longest dividend streak of any REIT. Second, it is the only REIT that is a Dividend King. Having a small, well-positioned portfolio has clearly paid off. Federal Realty didn't just buy 100 or so properties 57 years ago and sit on them for half a century. It is actually a quite active buyer and seller of assets. The key to its long-term success is what it does with the assets it buys. Usually Federal Realty buys well-located properties that need a little love and attention. That could be as simple as a coat of paint and more focus on tenant quality. A refresh of a property's exterior to make it look up to date goes a long way in attracting customers and tenants. But often the capital investments being made are far more extensive. Federal Realty will usually add to the properties it buys in some way. That can include adding apartments and offices above street-level retail space. It can involve tearing down an entire property and rebuilding it from scratch. Or it can be as simple as getting the permitting to make changes, which alone adds value to a property. When Federal Realty believes that it can sell a property for an attractive price, it will do so and then go on the hunt for another property that it can work on to improve its value over time. In other words, Federal Realty's portfolio is in a near-constant state of flux. And the inherent push is for the improvement in the quality of its portfolio. Management knows from experience that well maintained and located properties attract tenants, customers, and buyers, and that is the REIT's guiding star. Given the quality of Federal Realty's business model, highlighted by its Dividend King status, the shares don't go on sale very often. Today the dividend yield is 4.6%, which is notably higher than the S&P 500 index's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 1.3% and the average REIT's 4.1%. Federal Realty's yield is also near the high side of the range over the past decade. If you are looking for a reliable dividend backed by a high-performing business, Federal Realty should probably be on your short list today. Before you buy stock in Federal Realty Investment Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Federal Realty Investment Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Federal Realty Investment Trust. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Dividend King Federal Realty Has a High Yield and Industry-Leading Business was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bobby Harrison: MS revenue is anemic even before new tax cut takes effect
It should not be a surprise that what was touted as the largest tax cut in state history might be resulting in less revenue to fund Mississippi's vital services such as education, law enforcement and health care. Perhaps a bit of clarification is needed. In recent years, three separate tax cuts have been touted by leaders as 'the largest tax cut in state history': a $416 million tax cut in 2016 and a $525 million tax cut in 2022. But neither is no longer the state's largest tax cut. That was passed earlier this year during the 2025 legislative session. The 2025 tax cut has not yet gone into effect. So, in other words, three times in less than a decade, legislators have passed 'the largest tax cut in state history.' Mississippi's current anemic revenue collections can be attributed to one of three things: an economic slowdown, those major tax cuts, or a combination of the two. The economic slowdown seems logical. After all, billions of federal dollars flowing into the state as part of COVID-19 pandemic relief are drying up. Then there is the issue of the tax cuts. In the 2016 session, the Legislature approved a tax cut for corporations and on personal income totaling $416 million in 2016 dollars. The portion of that tax cut currently being phased out is for corporations. The 2022 tax cut, though, was all on personal income. Based on the May 2025 revenue report released by the staff of the Legislative Budget Committee, corporate taxes for the current fiscal year are down a staggering $237.5 million or 29% with one month left in the fiscal year. No doubt, there are other factors contributing to such a large decrease, but it is safe to assume the reduction in the corporate tax passed in 2016 is a contributing factor. Despite the income tax cut also being phased in, income tax collections are up slightly this year: $34 million or 1.7%. But do not get too excited. Over the prior two years, income tax collections dropped by $253 million. In fiscal year 2023, the income tax accounted for 35% of general fund revenue compared to 28% for the last fiscal year. The goal of legislative leaders and of Gov. Tate Reeves is to eliminate the income tax, and that most likely will occur by 2040 under the massive tax cut passed earlier this year. Meanwhile, buoyed by the drop in the corporate tax, it is likely that the state will end the fiscal year on June 30 collecting less revenue than it did the previous year for only the sixth time since 1970. Revenue collections normally go up just as in most years there is inflation instead of deflation. Inflation drives higher tax collections. Overall, through 11 months of the fiscal year, revenue collections are down $78.7 million or 1.1%. There is a chance that decrease could be offset in the month of June, but it is not likely. Even if it is offset, it cannot be disputed that revenue is slowing. The last fiscal year and this fiscal year, the collections have been bolstered by interest earnings on the state's deposits. For the current fiscal year, the state is collecting $20 million or 15.8% more in interest earnings than it did the previous year. And that is saying something since in the previous year the state collected $68.7 million or 84.4% more than it did the year before that. Proponents have argued that the tax cuts would spur the economy and result in higher revenue collections in other areas such as on the sales tax. But there is not clear evidence of that occurring. Despite what seems like many flashing warning signs, lawmakers who supported the massive 2025 tax cut would tell you there is nothing to see here, no need to be concerned. Lawmakers and Reeves like to point out that the state has more than $1 billion in reserves. They cite those funds and say, of course, we have the money to eliminate more than one-third of the state revenue stream. But they have consistently discounted the billions in federal funds that have poured into the state because of the pandemic. Those funds, which are no longer available, helped build that surplus they dwell on. Because of that surplus, the state in the short term can absorb any lost revenue from the tax cuts. And, incidentally, Reeves can go on national television and brag about 'eliminating' the income tax. But the question is what will be the impact of the tax cuts in 10 years when Reeves and most of the legislators responsible for the tax cut have retired from public services and are drawing their state retirement benefits? Will they still be bragging about passing the state's largest tax cuts three times? This column was produced by Mississippi Today, a nonprofit news organization that covers state government, public policy, politics and culture. Bobby Harrison is the editor of Mississippi Today Ideas.
