
Migrant return hubs could be hijacked by Russian spies
Sir Keir Starmer is pressing ahead with plans to deport migrants to 'return hubs' in the western Balkans despite an MI6 warning that they could be hijacked by Russian spies.
Security advice from the intelligence service says the region is unsafe for migrant deportation schemes because of its proximity to Russia, government sources have told The Times.
The advice privately warned that the proposals would mean creating sensitive national infrastructure and facilities in 'a Russian sphere of influence' that could be infiltrated and targeted by agents working on behalf of the Kremlin.
Migrants sent to the region could also be targeted and exploited by President Putin's regime, the advice warned.
This month the prime minister confirmed revelations by The Times that the government was in talks with 'a number of countries' about return hubs, which he described as 'a really important innovation'.
Serbia, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are on a shortlist of about nine countries drawn up by ministers and officials as potential destinations to which rejected asylum seekers would be sent after all avenues of appeal have been exhausted in the UK.
Record numbers of migrants are crossing the Channel in small boats to reach Britain
SAMEER AL-DOUMY/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Albania had also been on the list but was ruled out by Edi Rama, its prime minister, this month.
A plan for offshore migrant hubs in the Balkans was blocked in light of MI6 concerns when the previous Conservative government drew up a shortlist of countries for a Rwanda-style deportation scheme in 2022.
The list included Albania and Moldova, according to a government official who worked on the proposals.
Separate security sources have said that the same concerns have been raised in response to Starmer's efforts to open return hubs in the region.
A government source who was briefed by security officials warning against the Balkans region said: 'The advice we got was you'd be sending people into a Russian sphere of interest.
'They cited critical UK national infrastructure, facilities and systems that would be set up that could be infiltrated by the Russians by installing agents and other personnel working in the interest of the Kremlin.
'You'd be planting a prime bit of British interest, British real estate, right into an area where Russia has the ability to control and influence much more than other areas in the world.
'The security view was that was not sensible or viable.
'It was based on the evidence that we've seen Russia being willing to use migration as a vehicle to exploit.
'Putting a massive processing site for immigration claims right next to a hostile state was not deemed sensible from a security perspective.'
MI6 is said to be concerned over plans relating to all of the western Balkan nations, according to a security source who pointed out that they are all former states of the communist Yugoslavia regime.
'The concerns are at different stages. Serbia is the worst, some of them are more of a threat than others,' the source said. 'This is the former Yugoslavia — the Russian links are pretty clear.
'There are hundreds of ways that Russia can influence these governments, whether it be digitally, physically, levels of corruption, live proxies by installing pro-Russian figures in governments or inadvertently influencing people to take a Russian frame of mind.
'Russia also uses organised gangs and there is a question about the capacity for these countries' law and order to handle those threats.'
They pointed out that President Vucic of Serbia is a close ally of Putin who has visited Moscow several times in the past year, most recently when he attended Russia's Victory Day parade in Red Square.
Presidents Vucic and Putin at the Kremlin in 2018
MIKHAIL SVETLOV/GETTY IMAGES
Another reason cited by security officials were rules allowing Russian citizens and passport holders to move freely in and out of Serbia, as well as reports of Russian arms being allowed to move freely through the country.
Britain began informal talks over return hubs with several countries, including Kosovo, this week.
President Osmani of Kosovo has said her country would be 'open' to talks over a potential deal to take Britain's failed asylum seekers.
However, experts have warned about the legal hurdles given that several European countries do not recognise the nation's independence and because it is not a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Downing Street is understood to have set a target to announce return hub destinations by the time Britain hosts a meeting of western Balkan leaders in London in the autumn, where illegal migration will be top of the agenda.
However, there is increasing frustration at the centre of government over the lack of progress made by the Home Office on what form it wants return hubs to take.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
UK politics live: Labour reveals new nuclear programme and submarines ahead of Starmer defence review
Britain will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme, Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce. The government will unveil its strategic defence review today. Significant investment in the UK warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the government is expected to accept in full. Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said. The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades. From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven Astute-class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating. UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest £15bn in warheads The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme, the prime minister will announce today as the government unveils its strategic defence review. Significant investment in the UK warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the government is expected to accept in full. Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Ukraine has proved it doesn't need Trump
Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that Ukraine holds 'no cards in this war'. Well, they just played one hell of a hand. On Sunday, a clandestine drone operation hit as many as five different airfields deep inside Russian territory, striking at least eight and possibly dozens of Soviet-era nuclear-capable heavy bombers, which are today impossible to remanufacture. And the way Ukraine did so is worthy of a Robert Ludlam thriller. Its domestic security service smuggled in 150 First Person View (FPV) drones in concealed compartments on the top of multiple shipping containers, undetected by Russia's own sprawling counterintelligence organs, which were then loaded on the backs of articulated lorries and driven to within striking distance of their targets. At the push of a button, the tops of the containers popped off, allowing a swarm of lethal unmanned aerial vehicles to ascend which then struck their unsuspecting targets; lines of Russian bombers fully fueled and awaiting takeoff. The timing of this kinetic covert operation could not have been better from the Ukrainian perspective. Peace negotiations begin again in Istanbul with the Russians on Monday, even as Moscow continues to make clear it isn't interested in a 30-day ceasefire. Trump is said to be exasperated that a suddenly 'crazy' Putin won't end the war as a 'personal favour' to him and is growing weary of engaging in pointless diplomacy. But the US president has also made no statements about future security assistance to Ukraine, which badly needs three things only the US military-industrial complex can provide at scale: ballistic missile defence, GMLRS rocket artillery and howitzer ammunition. So Ukraine, it seems, is imposing its own bespoke penalties on Russia, hitting its adversary on supposedly impregnable ground and eliminating a good percentage of its irreplaceable bomber fleet. CBS News and Axios have reported that Kyiv did not inform the Trump administration of its plans, which took 18 months to pull together. This means that when Zelensky sat through that Two Minutes of Hate session delivered jointly by Trump and JD Vance in the Oval Office last February, he had this secret caper bouncing about in the back of his head. It's worth re-watching that confrontation in light of what just happened. Now, Ukraine has a much needed morale boost at a time when the war has ground down into one of attrition and Russia has launched its now annual summer offensive, which is making costly but consistent progress in the eastern Ukrainian region of Donetsk. Ukraine's capacity to bring the war home to Russia in such a bold fashion is also likely to encourage pro-Ukrainian Republicans who are growing anxious and impatient with Trump's dithering. Lindsay Graham, the Trump-whisperer senator from South Carolina who has drawn up a range of sanctions against Russia for Mr Trump to sign off, said: 'The ever-resourceful Ukraine used creative drone warfare tactics to successfully attack Russian bombers and military assets used to kill Ukrainian citizens and destroy their country.' This operation has demonstrated that Ukraine is very much still in the fight, whatever dour statements emerge from the White House. Mr Trump, easily distracted and unfocused on his best days, has told big and small lies about the war since the beginning of his second term, all damaging to the reality and perception that Ukraine is holding its own. He has said, for instance, that 'thousands of Ukrainian troops were surrounded' in Kursk when they were not, and claimed that Russia would have taken Kyiv in 'five hours' had Russian tanks not got 'stuck in the mud'. Ukraine's drone escapades have embarrassed Mr Trump, as well as Mr Putin, it seems. Ukraine's home-grown munitions are not only changing the nature of this war, but the nature of all future wars fought in the 21st century. A nation regarded for its IT and engineering sectors has adapted ingeniously to being outgunned and outmanned by an invading army. A few hundred thousand dollars worth of FPV drones have just eliminated approximately $7 billion of Russian kit, according to the SBU. No shambolic mineral or rare earths deals had to be struck for that to happen. Ukraine is mass producing its own variegated fleet of drones at scale using both its own coffers and money from seventeen Western countries – the UK among them – part of a 'drone coalition.' Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, is said to be mulling replacing the presidential daily briefings with video segments similar to those of Fox News, in a desperate effort to get the commander-in-chief to follow along with his own nationals security prerogatives. Russian nuclear bombers burning on the tarmac is surely one way to get even his attention.


STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
'One in four children in poverty' across a third of Scotland's Westminster seats
At least one in four children are living in poverty after housing costs across a third of Scotland's Westminster constituencies, new figures show. Analysis from Loughborough University reveals that two-thirds of MPs across the UK represent areas where child poverty affects at least one in four children. While devolved policies in Scotland, such as the Scottish Child Payment, have helped reduce overall poverty levels, a third of Scottish MPs still serve constituencies where more than 25% of children live in poverty. Constituencies with the highest child poverty rates in the UK include Birmingham Ladywood, Bradford West and Leeds South. In Scotland, the highest rates were found in Glasgow East, Glasgow South West and Glasgow North East. The annual analysis by the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University looks at local poverty rates after housing costs, which is seen as a more accurate assessment of disposable family income. The UK Government already release data that shows local poverty levels before housing costs are calculated. The report also finds that there is a an 'extremely high correlation' between the two-child limit to Universal Credit policy and the proportion of children in poverty in each constituency. Dan Paskins, vice-chair of the UK wide End Child Poverty Coalition, said: 'Each year this data presents a bleak picture of life for the UK's children. 'A record number are now in poverty and it's under the noses of our MPs, particularly Cabinet members: 80% of Keir Starmer's Cabinet represent constituencies with higher than average child poverty rates. 'The time for action is now, and the Comprehensive Spending Review, and forthcoming child poverty strategy should involve bold action. 'Due to the analysis' finding a strong correlation between child poverty rates in local areas and the number of children impacted by the two-child limit to Universal Credit, it is essential this policy is scrapped as soon as possible.' Speaking on behalf of Scottish members of the End Child Poverty coalition, John Dickie said: 'Child poverty is lower in Scotland and Holyrood policies are driving real progress, but these statistics are a stark reminder that across the country far too many children are still being left behind. 'Children are living in hardship in every part of Scotland and in some constituencies one in three children are still locked in poverty. 'We need to see the UK government step up to the plate with a child poverty strategy that abolishes the two-child limit as an essential starting point. 'Here in Scotland all the political parties need to commit to investing more in the Scottish child payment, childcare, housing and parental employment if Scotland is to meet the statutory child poverty targets that they all backed.' Across the UK, 31% of children in the UK are living in relative poverty, which equates to 4.5 million children. Overall, 42% of constituencies have a higher-than-average poverty rate. That includes the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer's constituency Holborn and St Pancras with a child poverty rate at 47%. Other Cabinet members, Secretary of State for Justice, Shabana Mahmood, Northern Ireland Secretary, Hilary Benn, Foreign Secretary David Lammy, and Pat McFadden, Lord Chancellor, all have child poverty rates of over 40%. The UK Government has promised to deliver a Child Poverty Strategy and drive down child poverty across the UK. A UK Government spokesperson said: 'No child should be in poverty – that's why our Ministerial Taskforce is exploring all levers available across government to give children across the United Kingdom the best start in life. 'As we fix the foundations of the economy to make everyone better off, our Get Britain Working plan and the landmark Employment Rights Bill will help people find and maintain better paid and more secure jobs with stronger rights. We have increased the National Living Wage and are capping how much Universal Credit can be taken for debt repayments to put more money in people's pockets and help families build a brighter future. 'Both of Scotland's governments must work together to help more people into work, while always supporting those who cannot.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'I welcome this report from the End Child Poverty Coalition. We are absolutely committed to meeting the 2030 child poverty targets and thanks to the actions we are already taking, families in the poorest 10% of households are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-26 and this value is projected to grow to an average of £3,700 a year by 2029-30. 'However our policies are having to work harder in the current economic context and as a result of decisions taken by the UK Government, such as keeping the two-child limit on Universal Credit which are holding back Scotland's progress. 'While the Joseph Rowntree Foundation predict child poverty will rise in other parts of the UK by 2029, they highlight that policies such as our Scottish Child Payment, and our commitment to mitigate the two-child limit, are behind Scotland 'bucking the trend'. 'We will publish our third child poverty delivery plan by the end of March 2026, setting out the actions to be taken between 2026-2031 to meet the 2030 targets. We will continue working closely with stakeholders, including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, to shape that plan.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country