High Court judge to rule on Athlone asylum centre on Wednesday
Lawyers for the State have told the High Court that there is a "serious risk to the dignity and safety" of asylum seekers if the government is not allowed to use special powers to fast-track refugee accommodation.
Aoife Carroll SC, for the State, on Monday asked the court to put a stay on the quashing of the use of a statutory instrument that had been used to speed up the establishment of a controversial refugee facility at Lissywollen, Athlone, Co Westmeath, which is designed to house up to 1,000 asylum seekers.
Advertisement
The original action was taken by Independent Ireland Westmeath Councillor Paul Hogan, among others, who successfully applied to the court in December for a finding that the expedited development was unlawful.
Cllr Hogan is taking the case against the office of the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth.
A Statutory Instrument is a secondary legislation, made by a Minister, modifying existing laws.
Cllr Hogan successfully claimed the Minister failed to adequately "screen" the project for potential environmental impacts and that the Minister lacked the expertise to carry out such assessments in an expedited manner.
Advertisement
Protests have been held in Athlone over the plan to further develop army-tent accommodation for the possible 1,000 asylum seekers, in up to 150 tents, on a site to the rear of an existing direct provision centre.
Ms Carroll on Monday said that while there had been 180 people in residence in December at the facility, only 137 remained and that amending legislation was presently to come before the Government.
Ms Carroll is applying to put a stay on the December order striking down the use of the statutory instrument used by the office of the Minister in expediting the development of the asylum centre.
Cllr Hogan, who secured 4.8 per cent of first preference votes running for Independent Ireland in Longford-Westmeath, claimed the ministerial process providing for the plan was "unlawful, irrational and a breach of fair procedures".
Advertisement
Oisín Collins SC with David O'Brien BL, instructed by solicitor Patrick Cunningham of PB Cunningham & Co, for Cllr Hogan, said the State should use existing planning laws to seek permission for the development rather than going to the High Court for a stay on the order quashing the statutory instrument.
Mr Collins said that if the court was to wait for corrective legislation it would be more productive to use planning laws, as the "appropriate mechanism".
Counsel said this did not mean the "shutting down" of the facility but rather the use of "appropriate enforcement notices".
Ms Carroll said that EU law requirements and legislative procedures were complied with but not entered into record, amounting to an "error" but that the situation was considered to be one of "emergency".
Advertisement
Ms Carroll said that the Minister was seeking a stay in circumstances where there are "significant risks that alternative accommodation could not be offered if the site was closed down".
Counsel said that the nature of the conceded breach in the use of the Statutory Instrument was "procedural, or technical, rather than substantial" and that legislation to correct the error was being put towards Cabinet "imminently".
Ms Carroll said that while the lack of a written environmental impact was an error, all other procedures had been adhered to. Ms Carroll said that there were "serious consequences for those involved and a serious risk to the dignity and safety" of the people residing at the Athlone facility.
Ms Justice Emily Farrell said she would deliver her judgment on the stay application on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
29 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Taoiseach says ‘nobody wins' if EU-US tariff dispute ensues
'Nobody wins' if the US-EU tariff dispute continues, the Taoiseach has said, as he said the bloc is focused on arriving at a 'negotiated settlement' with Donald Trump's administration. Micheál Martin said it is 'extremely important' to be able to provide certainty to the market and investors. Advertisement The EU is seeking a trade deal with the US before July 9th. Speaking to reporters in Brussels, Mr Martin said: 'Every effort has to be made to get a landing zone that we can live with. 'It's not ideal. It's not optimal. Europe doesn't want tariffs, but we have to deal with the situation that is before us.' He added: 'If a tariff dispute ensues, nobody wins. There is no painless tariff war.' Advertisement US President Donald Trump placed tariffs on the EU (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) Mr Martin, who stressed that the EU had to be united in its negotiations, said he detects an 'atmosphere' that is focused on getting a deal. The Taoiseach's comments come against the backdrop of the latest report from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), which said the strength of the economy will be tested by domestic challenges and a period of global uncertainty. While the Irish domestic economy appears to be in a relatively robust state, the ESRI said 'notable international and domestic risks are clouding the outlook'. It said global uncertainty has risen to 'very elevated levels' given the fallout from changing US trade policy and other geopolitical developments. Advertisement It added: 'This increase in uncertainty is likely to weigh on investment and consumer spending.' The body noted that Ireland has been somewhat insulated from tariffs so far because of the exclusion of pharmaceutical goods. It added that the relative importance of services in total Irish exports provides 'short-term protection from tariff impacts but raises concerns about non-tariff barriers to services trade being imposed in future US-EU negotiations'. The ESRI said it expects GDP to grow by 4.6 per cent in 2025 and 2.9 per cent in 2026, with exports growing by 5.4 per cent and 3.3 per cent respectively. Advertisement However, this would be revised downwards if trade wars with the US intensify. It said it expects the domestic economy to grow at a relatively slower pace than in previous reports. The baseline forecast is for Modified Domestic Demand growth of 2.3 per cent in 2025 and 2.8 per cent in 2026. Inflation is projected to average 2.0 per cent in 2025 and 2.1 per cent in 2026. The ESRI said there are two main challenges to the public finances – that they are heavily dependent on windfall corporation tax receipts and residential construction is not accelerating sufficiently quickly to meet housing need. Advertisement Mr Martin said the economic growth projects reflect the challenges of the trade and tariff dispute. 'That has caused ripples all over the world – and that's why we favour an agreement by July 9th.' He said that could change the trajectory of the economic forecasts. The ESRI has lowered its forecast for housing completions (PA) The ESRI also lowered its forecast for housing completions to 33,000 in 2025 and 37,000 in 2026, citing ongoing structural challenges, including production costs, supporting infrastructure, financing, and labour shortages, as contributing factors in its decision. These are significantly below the Government's own targets to deliver 303,000 homes by the end of 2030, scaling up from 41,000 this year to 43,000 in 2026, reaching 60,000 in 2030. Asked about the ESRI forecast, Mr Martin said Government is putting 'fundamental changes and measures' in train to deliver a sustained increase in housing over the 'next number of years'. 'That is the objective on housing. It is the number one issue facing us, and it is the big social and economic priority of government and of the country.'
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Ombudsman ‘utterly dismayed' by issues around children's needs
An ombudsman has said he is 'exasperated and utterly dismayed' at chronic issues around children's needs. Children's Ombudsman Dr Niall Muldoon called for the full and direct incorporation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child into Irish law as he questioned whether ongoing scandals around child homelessness and scoliosis waiting lists would be as severe this year if they had been addressed earlier. Advertisement Dr Muldoon told the Oireachtas Children's Committee on Wednesday that direct incorporation of the convention is 'the most important thing' that can be done to protect and safeguard the rights of Irish children. He said Ireland had already committed to these rights, but there was a need to put 'real force' behind the international obligations. Dr Muldoon told the committee: 'It will put children's rights at the heart of every decision within the public and civil service, and give us a stronger basis to ensure we are keeping our promises to children. 'For example, imagine if five years ago the State had to come up with a child and family-focused home strategy. Advertisement 'Would there still be 4,775 children in emergency accommodation today?' He added: 'Or if our recommendations around scoliosis as a children's rights issue, as far back as 2017, was made against the backdrop of direct incorporation, would there be the same crisis as there is today?' Dr Muldoon said Ireland should be able to better funnel resources to where they are 'needed most', adding that societies are judged on how they treat their most vulnerable. He said: 'As ombudsman for children, I am exasperated and utterly dismayed at the persistent chronic issues around access to affordable housing for children and families, at the unacceptable delays in access to vital surgeries and assessments of need in a country as well-off as Ireland economically. Advertisement 'We are now at a crossroads in terms of what can be achieved for children, and in the current climate of political uncertainty and change, it's more important than ever for the State to bed down its commitments on children's rights.'
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Northern Ireland nationalists fear focus on reconciliation stalling push for unity referendum
In Northern Ireland, it used to be the one goal that everyone could agree on: reconciliation. Whether the region stayed in the UK or united with Ireland, all sides acknowledged the need to heal wounds from the Troubles and to bridge differences between Catholics and Protestants. Even those who riled the other side invoked reconciliation. How could they not? It was self-evidently a good thing. Not any more. Increasing numbers of nationalists say the R-word has been hijacked and twisted to block their campaign for a referendum on unification. 'The goal of reconciliation is very worthy but it is being manipulated and bastardised,' said Kevin Rooney, the founder of Irish Border Poll, a group that lobbies for a referendum. 'It has become an undisguised unionist veto.' Rooney and others fear that an elusive, ill-defined rapprochement between Northern Ireland's two biggest blocs is morphing into a precondition that gives unionists and the Irish and British governments a pretext to dodge a referendum. For Rooney, such a precondition would entrench the status quo in an entity designed a century ago for unionist dominance – and paradoxically undermine reconciliation. 'It creates a perverse incentive for hardline loyalists to resist everything and threaten violence.' Under this scenario, tensions associated with the traditional summer marching season, or the Irish-language rap trio Kneecap's outspoken statements on British rule, or any number of controversies, can be harnessed as purported evidence that Northern Ireland is not ready for a vote on its constitutional future. Stalled momentum for unification compounds nationalist anxiety: in Northern Ireland, Catholic birthrates are dwindling, the Brexit shock has faded, and Sinn Féin faltered in Ireland's election last November, paving the way for a renewed Fianna Fáil/Fine Gael coalition government that is in no rush for a referendum. Simon Harris, the tánaiste, has said he does not expect a vote this decade and that it is not a priority. The taoiseach, Micheal Mártin, has emphasised not unification but the government's Shared Island Initiative, which promotes reconciliation and cross-border cooperation and infrastructure. Dublin, in other words, is not putting pressure on Keir Starmer's government for a referendum, which under the Good Friday agreement must be called if it appears that most people in Northern Ireland would vote to leave the UK. The combined vote share for Sinn Féin and the moderate nationalist Social Democratic and Labour party (SDLP) has hovered at about 40% since 1998, a stagnation that has persisted despite the number of Catholics overtaking Protestants, but dwindling support for unionist parties has tilted recent elections to pro-unification candidates. For nationalists who think the conditions for a referendum will soon be met, the focus on reconciliation has set off alarm bells. Colum Eastwood, an MP and former SDLP leader, criticised what he called a 'creeping normalisation' to make it a prerequisite. 'Reconciliation is a moral imperative for our whole society – the southern establishment can't use it to justify telling citizens in the north that we can't have a decent economy, jobs and public services,' he tweeted. Elaborating via email, Eastwood said creating a new, united Ireland could advance reconciliation. 'Will there be tension? Yes. Can we confront that in a way that promotes understanding and actually contributes to reconciliation? Absolutely. We shouldn't run away from that – we should be rushing into that space,' he said. Leo Varadkar, the former taoiseach, has urged the current Irish government to push for a referendum, saying the Irish state would not have been founded in 1922, nor would there have been a Good Friday agreement, if full reconciliation had been a precondition. A '50 plus one' vote in favour of unification would suffice, he told the Féile an Phobail festival in Belfast last week. 'A majority is a majority' but it would be better to have 'maximum consent', he said. Michelle O'Neill, Sinn Féin's Northern Ireland first minister, told a republican commemoration last weekend that the party remained 'laser focused' on unity and urged the Irish government to put the matter before a citizens' assembly. A report by Ireland's Future, a non-profit that advocates unification, notes that the Good Friday agreement does not insist on reconciliation before a referendum. 'Our view is that any such objective will only follow the transition to a new constitutional arrangement on our shared island. Reunification is a reconciliation project,' it says. However, others – unionists as well as some nationalists – say it would be reckless to call a vote for existential change unless and until Northern Ireland's sectarian tensions ease. 'Demands for a referendum will only add to communal polarisation and be entirely counter-productive,' said Liam Kennedy, a history professor at Queen's University Belfast. He cited the so-called peace walls that divide Catholic and Protestant areas and the region's 'unstable equilibrium' as warnings. 'We need a much higher degree of reconciliation to lay the foundations of a united Ireland that would work. It would be madness for the republic to take on the political and financial burdens of unification unless it was clear most people in Northern Ireland were either satisfied with or at least accepting of Irish unity.' David Adams, who helped to broker the loyalist paramilitary ceasefire in 1994, said segregated housing and education had 'corralled' Catholics and Protestants and embedded tribalism. 'There is no violence but we remain divided. Without some sign of reconciliation advancing I don't think the republic would touch this place with a barge pole.' Peter Shirlow, the director of the University of Liverpool's Institute of Irish Studies, said reconciliation had in fact progressed – he cited power-sharing at Stormont, integrated workplaces, mixed marriages – but that falling Catholic birthrates and static nationalist support had weakened the referendum push. 'There ain't going to be a border poll,' he said. Trevor Ringland, a former international rugby player and unionist politician who served on the Northern Ireland Policing Board, said some referendum advocates undermined reconciliation by legitimising IRA violence during the Troubles. 'They've been selling the message to young people that we had to kill our neighbours to achieve constitutional change.' Ringland said songs such as Get Your Brits Out by Kneecap – 'Brits out' was an IRA-era slogan – elided the British identity of many people in Northern Ireland. 'The kids think they're being edgy but edgy was being in the police, which meant you could get a bullet through you.' Northern Ireland needed more reconciliation before voting on constitutional change, Ringland said. 'Let's keep a focus on building relationships and future generations can decide where to take it.' Unity advocates, in contrast, believe constitutional change – to be achieved by winning elections in Northern Ireland and prodding the Irish government into action – is a task for the current generation. Rooney said: 'The Dublin establishment has been lukewarm about unity for quite a while – some basically want an easy life and don't want to think about the north at all. It's our job to win them over.'
