Q&A with Mary Meeker on the AI revolution
Mary Meeker, the famed internet analyst turned venture capitalist, on Friday published her first Trends report since 2019 — focused on the AI revolution.
Silicon Valley execs and investors are sure to pour over all 340 pages, but Axios chatted with Meeker this morning to distill some top takeaways.
What follows is an edited version of our conversation:
Axios: What was the most important thing you learned?
Meeker: "We've never seen anything like the user growth of ChatGPT, particularly outside the U.S., and it shows how the global dynamics of tech and distribution have changed.
I wasn't around for the evolution of the mainframe or mini-computer, but have read up on it and was around for the PC, desktop internet, mobile internet, cloud, and now AI. This is such a faster pace of change.
It's also fascinating to imagine what might have happened if Microsoft hadn't come in and given OpenAI capital and focused them on its cloud platform. Google was very early in AI, but it couldn't have launched a product that hallucinated like OpenAI did. Startups can do crazy things."
Does OpenAI have an insurmountable lead, at least in terms of consumer AI?
"Early leaders fail when they fall behind on innovation or price themselves out of the market, but OpenAI shows no signs of doing either. I think it and ChatGPT will be around for a long time.
That said, they also have intense competition the likes of which we've never seen before. Both startups and incumbents. Everyone is engaged. It's a period for lots of wealth creation and wealth destruction."
How should early-stage VCs try to suss out potential winners from losers?
"I recently rewatched one of Steve Ballmer's speeches at an early Windows conference where he kept repeating the word 'developers.' And he's right, that the companies that get the best developers often win. It's got to be the focus."
If people are key, and the U.S. is in a race with China, what do you think about the Trump administration's recent moves to block foreigners from studying here?
"America has to be a place where the brightest people in the world want to come ... Our tech ecosystem would not be where it is today without a lot of first-generation immigrants and even more second-generation immigrants.
I think this administration has shown an ability to make foundational calls, but then also to change. And I go back to the first Trump administration and its focus on immigrants who could really contribute to America in positive ways.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up
Every president thinks they can change the world – and Donald Trump has an even greater sense of personal omnipotence than his recent predecessors. But it's not working out too well for the 47th president. Trump might intimidate tech titans to toe the line and use government power to try to bend institutions like Harvard University and judges, but some world leaders are harder to bully. He keeps being ignored and humiliated by Russian President Vladimir Putin who is defying the US effort to end the war in Ukraine. Russian media is now portraying Trump as the tough talker who always blinks and never imposes consequences. The president also thought that he could shape China to his will by facing down leader Xi Jinping in a trade war. But he misunderstood Chinese politics. The one thing an authoritarian in Beijing can never do is bow down to a US president. US officials say now they're frustrated that China hasn't followed through on commitments meant to deescalate the trade conflict. As with China, Trump backed down in his tariff war with the European Union. Then Financial Times commentator Robert Armstrong enraged the president by coining the term TACO trade — 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Everyone thought that Trump would be on the same page as Benjamin Netanyahu. After all, in his first term he offered the Israeli prime minister pretty much everything he wanted. But now that he's trying to broker peace in the Middle East, Trump is finding that prolonging the Gaza conflict is existential for Netanyahu's political career, much like Ukraine for Putin. And Trump's ambition for an Iranian nuclear deal is frustrating Israeli plans to use a moment of strategic weakness for the Islamic Republic to try to take out its reactors militarily. Powerful leaders are pursuing their own versions of the national interest that exist in a parallel reality and on different historical and actual timelines to shorter, more transactional, aspirations of American presidents. Most aren't susceptible to personal appeals with no payback. And after Trump's attempts to humiliate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, the lure of the White House is waning. Trump spent months on the campaign trail last year boasting that his 'very good relationship' with Putin or Xi would magically solve deep geopolitical and economic problems between global powers that might be unsolvable. He's far from the first US leader to suffer from such delusions. President George W. Bush famously looked into the Kremlin tyrant's eyes and 'got a sense of his soul.' President Barack Obama disdained Russia as a decaying regional power and once dismissed Putin as the 'bored kid in the back of the classroom.' That didn't work out so well when the bored kid annexed Crimea. More broadly, the 21st century presidents have all acted as though they're men of destiny. Bush came to office determined not to act as the global policeman. But the September 11 attacks in 2001 made him exactly that. He started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — which the US won, then lost the peace. And his failed second term goal to democratize the Arab world never went anywhere. Obama tried to make amends for the global war on terror and travelled to Egypt to tell Muslims it was time for 'a new beginning.' His early presidency pulsated with a sense that his charisma and unique background would in itself be a global elixir. Joe Biden traveled the globe telling everyone that 'America is back' after ejecting Trump from the White House. But four years later, partly due to his own disastrous decision to run for a second term, America — or at least the internationalist post-World War II version – was gone again. And Trump was back. Trump's 'America First' populism relies on the premise that the US has been ripped off for decades, never mind that its alliances and shaping of global capitalism made it the most powerful nation in the planet's history. Now playing at being a strongman who everyone must obey, he is busily squandering this legacy and shattering US soft power — ie. the power to persuade — with his belligerence. The first four months of the Trump presidency, with its tariff threats, warnings of US territorial expansion in Canada and Greenland and evisceration of global humanitarian aid programs show that the rest of the world gets a say in what happens too. So far, leaders in China, Russia, Israel, Europe and Canada appear to have calculated that Trump is not as powerful as he thinks he is, that there's no price for defying him or that their own internal politics make resistance mandatory.
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump withdraws nominee to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, who has close ties with Elon Musk
Trump withdraws nominee to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, who has close ties with Elon Musk President Trump has pulled his nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Elon Musk, as NASA administrator. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump calls Elon Musk a 'fantastic guy' amid drug use allegations President Trump said he didn't know about Elon Musk's alleged drug use and backed the billionaire's cost-cutting. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump has pulled his nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Elon Musk, as his nominee to serve as administrator of NASA. The White House confirmed the withdrawal on May 31 and said Trump will soon announce a new nominee to lead NASA. No reason was provided for parting ways with Isaacman, who led and financed private astronaut missions Polaris Dawn and Inspiration4, which was carried out by Musk's SpaceX. The withdrawal, first reported by the news website Semafor, comes after the 42-year-old Isaacman already cleared the Senate Commerce Committee in April and appeared on track for a full Senate vote. 'The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars," White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston said in a statement. "It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda, and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon." More: Elon Musk's rise and fall: From Trump's chainsaw-wielding sidekick to a swift exit The move comes a day after Musk, a business partner and friend of Isaacman, left the White House after spending four months as a senior White House adviser overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk joined Trump for an Oval Office news conference to mark the end of the billionaire Tesla and SpaceX CEO's tenure in the White House. Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who has proven influential in many Trump decisions, raised alarm about the status of Isaacman's nomination in an X post, hours before the White House confirmed it was being withdrawn, writing, "There is reason to believe that Isaacman may be facing retaliation because of his friendship with Musk." More: Trump's pick to head NASA has been to space twice: Recapping billionaire's missions Isaacman, founder and CEO of the payment processing company Shift4 Payments, undertook his first private space venture in 2021, when he was commander and financier of the world's first all-civilian extended mission to space. In 2024, he returned to space with an all-civilian crew of amateur spacefarers with the Polaris Dawn missions, which he jointly funded with SpaceX. The Polaris Dawn mission got off the ground on Sept. 10 with the help of a Falcon 9 rocket, which propelled the crew to orbit on a SpaceX Dragon capsule from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The crew also included pilot Scott 'Kidd' Poteet and mission specialists Sarah Gillis and Anna Menon. NASA has lacked a full-time administrator since Bill Nelson, NASA administrator in the Biden administration, stepped down on Jan. 20 when Trump was inaugurated. Contributing: Eric Lagatta of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison @joeygarrison.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Money Moves the Middle Class Should Make as Elon Musk Steps Down From DOGE
Elon Musk is scaling back his involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to refocus on his business ventures, which have taken a hit in recent months. Read Next: Find Out: While DOGE lacks formal agency status and congressional backing, Musk's reduced role may still signal a shift in political focus around federal cost-cutting. For middle-class Americans, this shift is worth watching, especially as new budget proposals, potential changes to the federal tax code and debates over entitlements take center stage. Here are five money moves the middle class should make as Musk steps down from his leadership role at DOGE. Even as Elon Musk scales back from DOGE, government spending cuts are moving forward — just not in the way many, including Musk, had hoped. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' cuts funding for key public programs like housing, education and food assistance, while boosting defense and infrastructure spending. For the middle class, that means less support from government programs and no meaningful tax relief. For example, according to the Tax Policy Center, middle-income households would receive an average tax cut of about $1,800, or about 2.4% of their after-tax income, under the bill. In contrast, households in the top 5% of earners would see their tax bill cut by an average of $21,000, or 4.3% of their after-tax income. Now is the time for households to review their household budget and plan for potential gaps. Households and individuals who rely on tax credits, student aid or healthcare subsidies should prepare for potential changes and explore ways to build financial resilience in case these safety nets are reduced or eliminated. Be Aware: Given the potential for policy shifts and economic volatility, it's prudent for middle-class households to bolster their emergency savings. Financial experts commonly recommend setting aside three to six months' worth of living expenses to navigate unforeseen challenges, such as unexpected expenses or income disruptions resulting from changes in federal programs or economic downturns. According to experts at Vanguard, 'If you spend $5,000 per month, your first emergency fund savings milestone should be $2,500 to cover spending shocks. For your longer-term goal of an emergency fund that will cover income shocks, aim to save $15,000 to $30,000 total.' DOGE's initiatives included attempts to reform entitlement programs. Although Musk has stepped back, discussions around modifying Social Security and Medicare continue. For example, according to an analysis by the Medicare Rights Center, an advocacy organization, earlier versions of Trump's bill included proposals that 'would strip health coverage from nearly nine million people with Medicaid and Affordable Care Act plans.' Healthcare advocates also said, 'CBO (Congressional Budget Office) projected that taken together, these proposals would cause 13.7 million people to become uninsured.' However, the final number of how many people could lose healthcare coverage hasn't yet been tallied. Middle-class Americans, especially those nearing retirement, should stay informed about potential changes and consider consulting financial planners to understand how adjustments might impact their retirement plans. Without Musk, DOGE layoffs could still have a significant impact on the economy. Cresset Capital market analysts found that 'the ultimate economic impact will depend on the final scale of workforce reductions, the ability of the private sector to absorb workers and whether government service disruptions affect broader economic activity.' With uncertainties surrounding federal policies, the same market analysts recommended 'maintaining a diversified portfolio and a long-term investment horizon.' Specifically, middle-class investors should also consider a diversified portfolio of assets, including stocks, bonds and other instruments, to protect against market volatility and policy-driven economic fluctuations. Understanding the implications of federal initiatives like DOGE is essential for middle-class Americans. By staying informed and consulting a financial advisor, individuals can better anticipate policy changes instead of reacting to the latest headlines. A well-informed perspective enables proactive decision-making and strengthens the ability to advocate for policies that reflect their financial interests and long-term goals. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 5 Money Moves the Middle Class Should Make as Elon Musk Steps Down From DOGE Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
