Disposable vapes release MORE cancer chemicals than traditional cigarettes, shock research indicates
Vaping, long touted as 'healthier' alternatives to smoking, may actually be more toxic than traditional cigarettes.
Researchers at the University of California, Davis tested seven flavored e-cigarettes from three of the most popular brands and found the disposable vapes release more cancer-causing toxic metals than cigarettes.
One of the disposable e-cigarettes studied released more lead during a day's use than nearly 20 packs of traditional cigarettes.
The study's main author, Mark Salazar, a PhD candidate, said the levels were so high he 'thought our instrument was broken.'
The scientists analyzed the metals inside seven types of disposable devices from three of the most popular brands, ELF Bar, Flum Pebble and Esco.
Using an instrument to activate the disposable e-cigarettes and heat the internal liquid, they created between 500 and 1,500 puffs for each device. They found:
After using a device to simulate the equivalent of up to a week's use, the team found they contained the heavy metals nickel, lead and antimony.
The metals are used to make the devices' heating coils, which turns liquid in e-cigarettes into vapors that get inhaled. The metals then leach from the vapes into the liquid.
Vapor from three of the tested devices contained levels of lead and nickel above cancer safety limits, and two had elevated levels of antimony - an element used in batteries and as a flame retardant.
Esco Bars in particular were found to release four to 13 times more lead in their first 200 puffs than a pack of 20 cigarettes. This is the same amount of lead exposure as smoking 19 cigarettes in a single day.
And four devices sold by Esco had levels of lead and nickel linked to respiratory and lung diseases like asthma and lung scarring.
The researchers said while they only tested three out of 100 popular vape brands, the findings show concerning health risks for teens and young adults, who are most likely to use them.
All three heavy metals tested are considered potential carcinogens, meaning they could cause cancer. And all have been associated with lung cancer, while lead has been shown to increase the risk of lung, kidney and brain cancers.
Nickel has also been associated with nasal and sinus cancers.
Though vapes are higher in these heavy metals than cigarettes, decades of research suggests cigarettes are still more dangerous because they contain about 7,000 carcinogens compared to 2,000 in vapes.
Cigarettes have also long been proven to cause lung cancer, while research has not yet proven direct causation between vaping and the disease.
Brett Poulin, senior study author and assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Environmental Toxicology, said: 'Our study highlights the hidden risk of these new and popular disposable electronic cigarettes — with hazardous levels of neurotoxic lead and carcinogenic nickel and antimony — which stresses the need for urgency in enforcement.
'These risks are not just worse than other e-cigarettes but worse in some cases than traditional cigarettes.'
The study, published Wednesday in ACS Central Science, analyzed metal and metalloids - elements that have properties intermediate between metals and non-metals.
Using a device to heat and activate the e-cigarettes, they made each one generate between 500 and 1,500 puffs.
The average vape user does about 100 to 200 puffs in a day.
The team found vapors from three of the devices - ELF Bar Flavored, ELF Bar Clear and Esco Bar Flavored - exceeded cancer risk limits for nickel.
Meanwhile, Flum Pebble Flavored and Esco Bar Flavored exceeded these levels for antimony.
And Esco Bar Flavored and Esco Bar Clear had lead emissions that surpassed health-risk thresholds for 'non-cancer disorders.'
These include asthma and lung scarring fibrosis.
Mark Salazar, first study author and PhD candidate in Poulin's lab, said: 'We found that these disposable devices have toxins already present in the e-liquid, or they're leaching quite extensively from their components into e-liquids and ultimately transferred to the smoke.'
The CDC identified ELF as the most popular vape brand among teens and young adults in 2023 and 2024. And Esco Bars sold about $82million worth of products in the US in 2022, the latest data available.
No flavored e-cigarettes are legal for sale in the US, though the FDA has authorized a limited number of unflavored ones.
However, both varieties remain pervasive at convenience stores and through online retailers.
Sales data reported by Reuters estimated $2.4billion worth of illegal vapes were sold in the US last year, which experts say is particularly concerning because they are not regulated or tested by any oversight agency so it's unclear what's in them.
About six percent of US adults - about 17million - vape, according to the latest CDC data.
And roughly six percent of middle school students and eight percent of high school students report vaping at least once in the last 30 days.
While they have generally been considered a safer alternative to smoking tobacco and promoted as a smoking cessation aid, recent research suggests e-cigarettes may increase the risk of heart and lung damage.
In a case study published this month, a New Jersey man died of what's thought to be the first documented case of lung cancer caused by e-cigarettes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Top Democrat Chuck Schumer rushed to the hospital
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was rushed to the hospital for dehydration as scorching temperatures in Washington, D.C., reach 100 degrees. The senator, 74, was at the Senate gym in the morning and reportedly 'got lightheaded,' according to his office. The top Democrat was taken to the hospital 'out of an abundance of caution,' his office continued in a statement. He's now back to work at the Capitol after being treated for dehydration.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
An Alaskan brown bear has a new shiny smile after getting a huge metal crown for a canine tooth
An Alaskan brown bear at the Lake Superior Zoo in northeastern Minnesota has a gleaming new silver-colored canine tooth in a first-of-its-kind procedure for a bear. The 800-pound (360-kilogram) Tundra was put under sedation Monday and fitted with a new crown — the largest dental crown ever created, according to the zoo. 'He's got a little glint in his smile now,' zoo marketing manager Caroline Routley said Wednesday. The hour-long procedure was done by Dr. Grace Brown, a board-certified veterinary dentist who helped perform a root canal on the same tooth two years ago. When Tundra reinjured the tooth, the decision was made to give him a new, stronger crown. The titanium alloy crown, made by Creature Crowns of Post Falls, Idaho, was created for Tundra from a wax caste of the tooth. Brown plans to publish a paper on the procedure in the Journal of Veterinary Dentistry later this year. 'This is the largest crown ever created in the world," she said. 'It has to be published.' Tundra and his sibling, Banks, have been at the Duluth zoo since they were 3 months old, after their mother was killed. Tundra is now 6 years old and, at his full height on his hind legs, stands about 8 feet (2.4 meters) tall. The sheer size of the bear required a member of the zoo's trained armed response team to be present in the room — a gun within arm's reach — in case the animal awoke during the procedure, Routley said. But the procedure went without a hitch, and Tundra is now back in his habitat, behaving and eating normally. Other veterinary teams have not always been as lucky. In 2009, a zoo veterinarian at Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium in Omaha, Nebraska, suffered severe injuries to his arm while performing a routine medical exam on a 200-pound (90 kilogram) Malaysian tiger. The tiger was coming out of sedation when the vet inadvertently brushed its whiskers, causing the tiger to reflexively bite down on the vet's forearm.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Expert reveals why cold showers on hot days could kill you
The first big heat wave of the summer has sent millions in the US looking for a way to cool down, but one expert says taking a cold shower could be a fatal mistake. A massive heat dome has trapped hot and humid air over more than half the US for days, sending June temperatures into triple-digits for the first time in decades for several major cities. Professor Adam Taylor from Lancaster University explained how trying to cool your body down by jumping into very cold water actually has the opposite effect. Instead of getting your body to release excess heat, suddenly shocking the body with a cold shower tricks the human body into thinking it should keep the heat trapped inside. According to Taylor, this can be deadly for people with high blood pressure and heart conditions. Moreover, there's a risk of organ damage when the body stays too hot for too long. While these events tend to be rare, there's an extremely common problem that washing in cold water can exacerbate - body odor and unclean skin. So, while a plunge into cold water may feel like relief in a heat wave, it might actually not be helping the human body at all. Our body's optimal temperature is around 98.6°F. This temperatures ensures our body systems can function properly. When the core gets too hot, the temperature regulating center of the brain starts sending nervous signals out to the blood vessels and muscles in or near the skin – telling them to start activating their cooling mechanisms. If our core stays at high temperature for too long (around 102.2-104°F), this can lead to organ damage. So to ensure our temperature stays optimal, the body uses multiple techniques to cool itself down. For instance, the body radiates heat into the surrounding environment by electromagnetic (thermal) radiation. Approximately 60 percent of our body heat is lost this way. Sweating is another mechanism the body uses. Around 22 percent of our body heat is lost this way. When the air temperature around us exceeds our body temperature, sweating becomes the dominant mechanism for reducing core temperature. Any remaining body heat is then lost through a mixture of convection into the air or liquid the body may be in contact with and conduction into solid objects that the body may be in contact with. To support these mechanisms, our blood vessels change diameter. The ones closest to the skin dilate (widen) to allow more blood into them so they can get close to the relatively cooler surface of the skin. The body then works to circulate the blood so that heat from inside the body can be moved to the periphery to cool off. Similarly on our skin, the hairs remain flat to allow air next to the body to cool and be replaced, helping to dissipate heat. Cold shower? Of course, when the weather gets really hot outside, these biological mechanisms just don't feel like they cut it. Although diving into a cold bath or shower straight after being out in the heat might feel nice on your skin, it isn't doing what is needed to reduce the core temperature of the body. It might also be risky for some people. When exposed to cold, the blood vessels near to the skin constrict – reducing the blood flow into these areas. So, in the context of cooling the body down, jumping into a cold shower does the opposite of what needs to happen, as less blood is now flowing to the surface of the skin. This will hold the heat in and around your organs instead of getting rid of it. Basically, you're tricking your body that it doesn't need to cool down, but actually needs to conserve heat. Depending on how cold your water is, sudden exposure could even trigger dangerous consequences for some people. Exposure to cold water that is around 59°F can trigger the cold shock response. This causes the blood vessels in the skin (those in contact with the cold water) to constrict rapidly. The shock increases blood pressure as the heart is now pumping against increased resistance. This response can be particularly dangerous in people with underlying heart conditions, such as coronary artery disease. The cold shock response can also lead to an irregular heartbeat and even death when going from very hot to cold. Thankfully, these events are rare – and probably won't happen if you're just taking a cold shower or bath in your home. However, you might want to skip the cold plunge or avoid taking an ice bath on a hot day for this reason. Hot showers are also a bad idea on a warm day. Although it's sometimes said that a hot shower helps the body cool down faster, this unfortunately isn't true. Water that is warmer than the body is going to transfer energy in the form of heat into the body. This again prevents the body getting rid of heat – potentially increasing its core temperature. On a hot day, a tepid or lukewarm bath or shower is the way to go, evidence suggests 78.8-80.6°F is most effective. This helps bring blood to the surface to cool, without being cold enough to cause the body to think it needs to conserve its heat. Another reason to skip a cold shower on a hot day is that it might not help you get clean. When we get hot, we sweat – and this sweat mixes with sebum, another skin product and the bacteria on our skin, which produces body odor. Cold water has been shown to be less effective at removing and breaking down sebum and other debris on the skin, compared to warmer water, which means bad body odor will persist. Cold water also causes the skin to tighten. This might potentially trap sebum and dirt within the pores, leading to blackheads, whiteheads, and acne. However, warm or lukewarm water can help dissolve and loosen material in the pores. As you plan your escape and recovery from the heat this week, a lukewarm or cool shower or bath, rather than a cold shower, is a safer and more effective choice. This will allow your body to dissipate heat away from your core without harm. Equally, if you do feel the need to go cooler, do it gradually so you aren't shocking the body's automatic temperature regulation system into action. Turning the temperature down gradually if you want to go cold, or slowly placing an arm or leg in at a time can help with this process. This article is adapted from The Conversation, a nonprofit news organization dedicated to sharing the knowledge of experts. It was written by Adam Taylor, a professor of anatomy at Lancaster University.
