Hobbs says Arizona will defend its Colorado River water, wants other states to accept cuts
The governor assembled a roundtable of water users and officials on May 13 to present what she called a unified front among the state's interests in defending Arizona's share of the Colorado River as time runs short for reaching a deal with other states that use the water. So far, states upstream from Arizona have not offered cutbacks beyond the limits that a paltry snowpack naturally extracts from their farmers.
'It's been more than a little frustrating,' Hobbs said. 'We've come to the table with real solutions, with real proposals. We have real skin in the game,' she said, including billions of dollars in water infrastructure upgrades and in conservation agreements that keep water in the river's reservoirs. 'The upper states need to be willing to take their share as well.'
Gathered at Central Arizona Project headquarters with representatives of cities, tribes, farms and hydropower interests — all reliant on the river water that flowing into the CAP's canal — Hobbs said the state seeks a compromise. Otherwise, supplies could become subject to litigation, an outcome she said she's preparing for in part by seeking a legal fund from legislators.
'We need a signal that we're prepared to defend our water, and that's a strong signal,' Hobbs said.
Negotiations lag: At odds over water cuts, Colorado River states still seek consensus as deadline nears
As the West has warmed and dried, the river that seven states and Mexico share has shrunk. It's a reality that has already brought significant supply cuts to Arizona in particular, and that the states and federal government are trying to address with a new shortage-sharing deal that must be in place by the time the old one expires next year.
U.S. Interior Department officials seek to publish a draft of a plan by summer, though it's unclear if the states will be able to agree on something by then or will simply wait to see what federal officials envision.
So far, the Rocky Mountain states known collectively as the Upper Basin have declined to specify new cuts they might take, because they say they already suffer the consequences of a reduced snowpack that shortchanges their farmers every year.
The federal government has paid some Lower Basin farmers and others to cut back on their demands from Lake Mead's storage bank, and the four Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming argue that their year-in, year-out hardship is unrewarded and largely invisible to water users in the Southwest.
Those state also were slower to develop water that the 1922 Colorado River Compact envisioned for them, and therefore continue to use less even as an age of aridification has threatened their ability to send the Lower Basin its compact-prescribed share each year.
'We have hydrologic shortage every year across all four states,' Colorado's river commissioner, Becky Mitchell, said at a February meeting of the Upper Colorado River Commission. 'These are forced cuts based on administration (of water rights) that are not compensated.'
Presented with that viewpoint, Hobbs rejected the claim that the Upper Basin is doing its part.
'That's water on paper,' the governor said. 'It's not real water. We're putting real water on the table and they're not, and they're not feeling any impact based on the system changes.'
Questions linger: Trump's funding freeze muddies water outlook on the drought-stricken Colorado River
Recognizing that the Lower Basin — Arizona, California and Nevada — use more of the water, those states have together proposed absorbing the first 1.5 million acre-feet of new cuts, enough water to support millions of households. But they want the Upper Basin to agree to share equally in any further cuts that might be necessary to keep the river flowing past Glen Canyon and Hoover dams in especially dry years. (Arizona's full allocation of Colorado River water, including on-river uses such as Yuma farms, is 2.8 million acre-feet. It is second to California's 4.4 million.)
So far, the Upper Basin has not agreed to send more water, and the former Biden administration did not include that option in the alternatives it began analyzing before leaving office.
Arizona Water Resources Director Tom Buschatzke said Trump administration officials appear ready to help reach a 'collaborative agreement.' Because the previous administration's initial approach did not suggest obvious risk of new cuts for the Upper Basin, he said, it may have reduced incentives to deal. Discussions with Interior officials now suggest that they're 'more willing to tweak alternatives' in a way that can prod collaboration.
'This administration is taking more of the tack that we asked for, which is to show risk for both basins,' Buschatzke said.
The two basins continue to talk, but he said he could not rate the chances of reaching a deal this summer.
The Central Arizona Project has already absorbed a reduction of nearly a third of its normal entitlement to the river, partly from voluntary conservation measures and partly because the expiring shortage-sharing agreement lumped the first steep cuts on Arizona. Those mandated cuts reflect the lower priority that the state accepted decades ago in its effort to secure federal authorization for CAP.
CAP Board President Terry Goddard told The Arizona Republic that what's left is critical to the region's health and the U.S. commitment to tribal water rights. He said he doubts it would be legal to further reduce canal flows to those users in the Phoenix and Tucson areas. Besides seeking conservation in other states, he said, it could be necessary to shift some of Arizona's next cuts to the Yuma area, which generally has older, superior water rights. Whether by cooperation or eventual emergency legislation, he said, it will be necessary to spread the pain.
'It's a time of shortage an everybody's going to pay the price,' Goddard said. 'We've already paid ours.'
Want more water news like this? Sign up for AZ Climate, The Republic's weekly environment and climate newsletter
Tribes including the Tohono O'odham, Ak-Chin and Gila River Indian Community attended the roundtable and said they have collaborated with cities and others to keep water in Lake Mead, and now it's incumbent on the United States to keep water flowing to them through the CAP canal.
Ak-Chin Chairman Gabriel Lopez said the Colorado is his tribe's only reliable source for irrigating its 16,000 acres of farms. The U.S. granted the water in a 1978 settlement meant to make up for other users' depletion of the groundwater that previously supported the community, he said, and is a sacred trust.
'Tribes like us hold senior water rights,' Lopez said. 'We expect these sacred and good-faith obligation agreements to be honored.'
Phoenix and Tucson officials noted that they have dramatically reduced per-capita use over decades and in recent years struck deals to keep some of their water in Lake Mead — a case that other cities around the watershed can also make.
A representative from the Arizona Power Authority said low water kept Hoover Dam from generating a third of its contracted power last year, driving up prices for replacement power. An attorney for Pinal County farm groups said their conversion to groundwater as a replacement for previous CAP cuts will be in jeopardy if there's no baseflow in the canal to help move the groundwater to where it's needed.
The economic development group Valley Partnership said it's the certainty surrounding CAP water that has allowed Phoenix and its ascendant semiconductor industry to thrive. Hobbs agreed, and said computer chip manufacturing in the area makes Arizona's water security a national priority.
'Our growing economy is not just important to Arizona, but it is important to the nation's economy, to national security, to moving manufacturing back to America,' Hobbs said. 'This conversation isn't just about Arizona. It's about our country.'
Brandon Loomis covers environmental and climate issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral.com. Reach him at brandon.loomis@arizonarepublic.com.
Environmental coverage on azcentral.com and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Sign up for AZ Climate, our weekly environment newsletter, and follow The Republic environmental reporting team at environment.azcentral.com and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Gov. Katie Hobbs says other Colorado River states must cut water use
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
17 hours ago
- Axios
ADL says Arizona is one of nine states "leading" in fight against antisemitism
Arizona is one of just nine states that meet the Anti-Defamation League 's standards for combating antisemitism, according to a new report the group released Friday. Zoom in: Arizona's policy strengths, per the analysis, included 2016 and 2019 laws barring state government contracts and investments with entities that boycott Israel, and a 2022 law applying that prohibition to universities and community colleges. The ADL also noted that in 2022, Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill that legally adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism. And in 2024, Gov. Katie Hobbs signed legislation banning "swatting" — making false reports to trigger an emergency law-enforcement response — at religious and educational institutions. The report also noted that Hobbs signed a bill this year barring encampments on university campuses, which was introduced in response to pro-Palestinian protests. The big picture: Only Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, New York, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia were designated "leading states" in the ADL's Ratings and Assessments Institute report. Between the lines: The report graded states on three areas — prioritizing fighting antisemitism, educating people about the Jewish experience, and protecting Jewish communities. Through their laws, policies and public commitments, "leading states" showed high alignment with the ADL's recommendations for responding to rising antisemitism. 29 states were classified as "progressing," showing alignment with some key pieces of the policy agenda and demonstrating "a clear path for future action," the ADL said. 12 states were categorized as "limited action," revealing significant legislative gaps. State of play: Hate crimes in the United States last year hit their second-highest total since the FBI started keeping data, the agency said this week. The numbers show that anti-Jewish hate crimes are still near or around record levels, analyst Brian Levin told Axios. An ADL audit found 122 antisemitic incidents in Arizona last year, compared with 163 in 2023 and 53 in 2022. Yes, but: The ADL has faced criticism from some more left-leaning Jewish organizations over its annual tally of antisemitic incidents, which also included campus rallies critical of Israel. States and universities are facing pressure to adopt laws and policies aimed at battling rising antisemitism, but critics say some of those recommendations may silence criticism of Israel. Some pro-Palestine and free speech advocates criticized Hobbs for signing the encampment bill. Caveat: The ADL said its index is not a ranking of "best" and "worst" states to live in or where it's safe or not for Jews. Instead, the group said it's "a tool for understanding and advocating for better policy." What we're watching: The ADL's Jewish Policy Index could prompt legislators in some states to respond with new laws and policy changes.


Axios
18 hours ago
- Axios
Sandra Day O'Connor voted most influential figure in Arizona History Showdown
And the winner is … Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. State of play: The Arizona History Showdown is over, and the history-making O'Connor was voted by Axios Phoenix readers as our state's most influential historical figure. O'Connor easily dispatched Sen. John McCain, taking nearly 65% of the vote in the championship round. Between the lines: O'Connor is, of course, most famous as the first woman on the U.S. Supreme Court, and her lasting influence was primarily at the national level for her many years on the bench and her role in deciding major cases. But before she became a groundbreaking national figure, she was a highly influential state legislator, rising to Senate majority leader, and she went on to become a Maricopa County Superior Court and Arizona Court of Appeals judge, setting the stage for her Supreme Court tenure. Her legacy lives at the federal courthouse in downtown Phoenix, which is named for her, and the nonprofit Sandra Day O'Connor Institute, which was founded in her honor in 2009 to champion civics education and civil discourse. What they're saying: Scott O'Connor, the justice's son, told Axios that his mother's greatest accomplishments in the Senate included a statute-by-statute elimination of laws that were discriminatory against women, and major mental health legislation inspired by her time working for the Attorney General's Office at the Arizona State Hospital. Throughout her career, he said, his mother would find areas of need and do what she could to improve them. He called his mother the godmother of Arizona's judicial merit selection system, which voters approved in 1974. After she retired from the Supreme Court, Sandra Day O'Connor created the iCivics online education provider, which her son said is a major, but often overlooked, accomplishment. Jeremy's thought bubble: I left the voting to our readers, but if I'd filled out a bracket, my winner would've been longtime U.S. Sen. Carl Hayden. Hayden has been gone for so many years and Arizona has grown so much in the decades since his Senate career ended that it's easy to overlook how important he was to the state. He used his seniority to direct a lot of federal resources to what was, at the time, a very small state, and capped his career with the passage of the monumentally important Central Arizona Project. The bottom line: Thanks to all of our readers who made the Arizona History Showdown a success! As a native Arizonan and lifelong history nerd, this has been a labor of love and a longtime dream, and I'm glad that so many of you enjoyed it. 🗣️ You tell us: The bracket format was a lot of fun, and we'd love to use it again.


Axios
7 days ago
- Axios
Data centers could boost rising electricity costs
Electricity costs are rising nationwide, including in Arizona, and could get even higher for some amid the explosion in data centers powering AI and more. Why it matters: Surging power bills could further stress many Americans' budgets as pretty much everything else also gets more expensive. By the numbers: The nationwide average retail residential price for 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity rose from 16.41 cents to 17.47 cents from May 2024 to May 2025, per the latest available data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, a gain of about 6.5%. Some states had large increases, such as Maine (36.3%) and Connecticut (18.4%), while just five states had decreases. State of play: Arizona had one of the smallest electricity cost increases during that time, from 15.49 cents to 15.76 cents (1.7%). The intrigue: The Corporation Commission is preparing for the strain that data centers are expected to put on Arizona's energy grid. Possibilities include higher energy rates for data centers to pay for the extra infrastructure and power generation facilities they could necessitate, or allowing them to generate their own power. Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed legislation this year that would've waived some environmental and zoning regulations to make it easier for large industrial power users like data centers to place small modular nuclear reactors at their facilities. Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project and Tucson Electric Power this year announced that they're exploring the possibility of building a nuclear plant. Zoom in: There are several plans for massive new data centers in Arizona, including a 3,330-square-foot, $33 billion "data center corridor" in Eloy, which would be among the largest in the U.S. Project Blue, a proposed data center in Tucson, has faced public backlash over concerns about energy and water use. Zoom out: Electricity prices vary regionally and have many influences, including basic supply and demand, fuel rates and infrastructure costs. Yet many analysts point to power-hungry data centers as a driver of rising rates, especially in data center hotspots. That's partly because of data centers' immediate demand for energy, but also because grid operators are investing in new transmission lines and other gear to handle their expected proliferation — and passing those costs along to customers.