Schoolgirl accused of terror found intervention session ‘triggering'
Rhianan Rudd, 16, 'could not get enough' of learning about German history before she was radicalised and later investigated by MI5 and charged for downloading a bomb-making manual and saying she wanted to blow up a synagogue, the court was told.
The teenager, who had a history of self-harm, was found with a ligature around her neck on May 19 2022 at a children's home in Nottinghamshire, five months after her charges were dropped when it emerged she had been groomed by an American far-right extremist.
Chesterfield Coroner's Court was told Rhianan had six sessions between March 4 2022 and her death with an intervention provider working on behalf of Prevent, a deradicalisation programme, who cannot be named and was referred to as Witness X in court.
Witness X gave evidence from behind a screen on Wednesday and agreed that Rhianan spoke with an American accent during their first session, which she developed from talking to the neo-Nazi, and said she 'lost her sanity' the day she 'entered the Telegram cesspit'.
Counsel to the inquest Edward Pleeth told the court it was recorded that Rhianan was 'shaking' after this session.
Mr Pleeth said it was noted that: 'It was triggering for her and brought out a lot of emotions and thoughts she had put away. She said she did not like what was discussed in the session.'
The court was told Rhianan did not like talking about terrorism because it was 'PTSD inducing' and she 'locked away her thoughts and feelings about the (criminal) trial'.
In their second session, the inquest heard Rhianan said she felt she 'had over-spoken which was triggering' and added: 'I'm not radicalised, I don't give two shits about anything to do with that subject.'
In later sessions, Witness X recorded that Rhianan said she was not triggered by the intervention sessions, she 'enjoyed' them, and spoke about her future, the inquest heard.
The witness agreed she had 'no concerns' from their final session on May 16, three days before Rhianan's death, that she would end her life.
She agreed 'there was nothing from this session that stood out' and 'no dialogue or behaviour (she) considered to be alarming or worrying'.
Rhianan had told Witness X she was 'hyper-aware' of far-right extremism and drew a timeline of her radicalisation in one of their sessions, chief coroner Judge Alexia Durran heard.
The court was shown a picture of Rhianan's drawing including a German scientist character from the game TF2.
In another session, the teenager told Witness X she had a 'three-day schizoid, was rocking back and forth' and when asked what that meant, Rhianan said she was 'fanatic', the inquest heard.
The court was told Rhianan had not been receiving Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) support while completing the Prevent sessions.
The inquest was told emails were exchanged between April 19 and 21 raising concerns that Rhianan's mental health had 'deteriorated' because she had been wearing camouflage around the residential home and wanted to visit London to get a visa so she could travel to Texas.
Witness X told the inquest: 'I was not aware of her wanting to travel to Texas, I was made aware about her wearing camouflage clothing.'
The inquest heard Rhianan told Witness X she had worn her camouflage clothing because all her clothes were in the wash.
Rhianan also told the case worker that the last time she had had contact with the American extremist, he told her he 'loved her' and she 'felt a gaping hole and very sad for a long time'.
The inquest continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
12 hours ago
- ITV News
Melania Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit over Hunter Biden's 'salacious' Epstein comments
Melania Trump has demanded that Hunter Biden retract comments linking her to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and threatened to sue him for over $1 billion in damages if he does not. Trump takes issue with two comments made by the son of former President Joe Biden in an interview this month with American journalist Andrew Callaghan. He alleged that Epstein introduced the first lady to her husband, President Donald statements are false, defamatory and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in a letter to Biden. Biden's remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm,' he wrote. Biden made the Epstein comments during a sprawling interview in which he lashed out at 'elites' and others in the Democratic Party he says undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign.'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Biden said in one of the comments Trump disputes. Biden attributed the claim to author Michael Wolff, whom Trump disparaged in June as a 'Third Rate Reporter.' He has accused Wolff of making up stories to sell books. Asked in a subsequent interview on Callaghan's Channel 5 News YouTube channel if he would like to apologise, Biden bluntly responded: "F**k that. That's not going to happen." The first lady's threats echo a favoured strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modelling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in letter is dated August 6 and was first reported Wednesday by Fox News Lowell, a lawyer who has represented Biden in his criminal cases and to whom Brito's letter is addressed, has been contacted for comment.
Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
TikTok migrant who taunted Brits filmed sick ‘how to kill your wife' rant for followers weeks before arriving in UK
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE TikTok migrant who taunted Brits from his hotel room was reported to police for telling men how to kill their estranged wives in a vile video filmed weeks before he crossed to the UK. Parwiz Hanifyar, inset, who we can reveal as the man behind the Alexandra420 account, even told 70,000 followers how to cover up their crimes in a video filmed in Germany. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 TikTok migrant Hanifyar in a taxpayer-funded hotel near Heathrow Credit: Tiktok 6 Hanifyar spouts his 'kill wife' advice on TikTok before it banned him Credit: TikTok 6 The TikTok asylum seeker smirking on dinghy to the UK The Afghan, in his early 20s, even urges them to sink booze before attacking them to get a softer sentence. The misogynist's tirade was streamed in Germany before he paid smuggling gangs to get him across the Channel last Saturday. Hanifyar is now in a taxpayer-funded hotel near Heathrow. Last night he faced calls to be deported after his TikTok video was reported to UK authorities. Hanifyar, who posted as Alexandra420 before his account was banned, told his 70,000 followers last month: 'A brave man does not allow his wife to marry another man, even have children and live with someone else.' He tells viewers to buy a household item, which The Sun is not naming, to use as a weapon. He then adds: 'Before I kill her, I drink a bottle of alcohol. "Don't get too much drunk. "Kill her immediately. 'When the police comes, they say, he was drunk. Illegal migrant LIVE STREAMS step by step channel crossing & boasts 'my dream was to come here' from 4 star asylum hotel "How many years of prison you will get? Seven years. "You will have academic courses in prison. 'After seven years, you have learned something, and you are only 30 and sexually very strong. 'Marry a new woman. You must do this technique.' These quotes are sickening. He is now in the UK and clearly a danger to women Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp MP said last night: 'These quotes are sickening. HIS SICK RANT "I will let her sleep first. Before I kill her, I drink a bottle of alcohol. I have never drunk alcohol in my life, but I teach you the technique to get less punishment. Just drink a bottle of it. Don't get too much drunk. Kill her immediately. When the police comes, they say, he was drunk. How many years or prison you will get? 7 years. During 7 years you will have academic courses in prison. After seven years you have learned something and you are only 30 years old and sexually very strong. Marry a new woman. You must do this technique." "He is now in the UK and clearly a danger to women. "He should be arrested and immediately deported.' Hanifyar lived in Berlin for up to three years before he was moved to France, then here. TikTok influencer Lemar was among residents who reported Hanifyar to German authorities last month. Lemar said: 'This man has been very cruel to Afghan women in Germany. 'He said horrific things on his streams. "I believed he should have been arrested in Germany, but instead he was able to leave.' Earlier this week we told how Hanifyar held a live Q&A from his room at the Crowne Plaza. He urged others to pay smugglers to reach the 'soft-touch' UK, adding: 'This is the best place. Tell your friends to come.' The Home Office said it does not comment on individual cases. 6 Hanifyar held a live Q&A from his taxpayer-funded hotel room Credit: Tiktok 6 The Crowne Plaza hotel near Heathrow Credit: Dan Charity
Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
I fear visiting Britain to promote my book, when speaking freely can get you in trouble
'New Zealand woman … and 6-year-old son detained by US immigration,' blared a recent story in the New Zealand Herald. So far, so scary. It seems the woman went to the US based on her marriage to an American. They divorced before she adjusted her status to permanent resident. When she tried to get back into the US from a trip to Canada, she and her son were detained by US Customs and Border Protection. She reportedly applied to re-open her green-card application on the grounds that she was allegedly a survivor of domestic abuse. She may or may not have a case. But the bottom line is that this is a complicated immigration case that will work itself out in due course, not an innocent tourist mum being blocked by the American jackboots of Leftist imagination. A few weeks ago, I was invited on a podcast in New Zealand. The other guests were Stephen Young, a professor at Otago University whose 'areas of research involve the intersection of Indigenous peoples … drawing from critical and social theories,' and Zane Wedding, 'an activist who's been involved in recent pro-Gaza rallies'. They appeared to want me as a proxy pinata for President Trump's highly successful (though controversial) policies to control the southern border and deport aliens here illegally. The podcast's premise was that Kiwi academics were being hassled at US airports. 'A number of our universities are now advising academics to clean their social media profiles, travel with burner phones, and reconsider attending US conferences altogether,' they said. Their implication was that research would grind to a halt, tourism would dry out, and sundry other disasters would result from the alleged border crackdown. But when I researched the claims, practically nothing came up. Yes, a May 2025 article alarmingly said 'NZ travellers warned of increased detention risk at US border', and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade's travel advice for the United States is set at level 2, 'exercise increased caution'. But the Ministry said that in the year to that point, '24 New Zealand passport holders have sought our assistance because they have experienced immigration difficulties in the US … Typically, we would see 14-25 cases per year.' No crisis there. Indeed, a government spokeswoman said that 169,000 New Zealanders had travelled to the US in the year to March 2025 – up from 168,000 for the same period a year earlier. The global Left is panicking about the US president or secretary of state using powers in immigration law to deny visas or entry to foreigners who endorse or espouse terrorism or undermine our national security or foreign policy. They seem to believe that the United States, uniquely among nations, is obliged to admit foreigners who rail against our system of government and capitalism, and advocate for radical foreign political causes. We don't. We have rules which visitors are asked to respect, or else they're not welcome. Meanwhile, the rest of the Anglosphere is policing speech not just about politics, but about statistical and biological truth. I worry more about free speech there than here. Armed with facts, I was easily able to counter the narrative that the US was a threat to free speech. In fact, I told the podcast hosts that I was more afraid of speaking in New Zealand – or Australia, Canada, and Great Britain, the rest of the 'Five Eyes' of English-speaking countries that share intelligence data. To promote my new book, The Ten Woke Commandments (You Must Not Obey), I will be speaking in the US and Europe. In the United States, our First Amendment protects my free speech. I'll go to the Five Eyes countries if invited, but with trepidation, because several of the woke commandments I urge readers to reject in the book appear to have become state-sanctioned truth in some of these countries. Deviation from that dogma, or adherence to factual truth that threatens some sub-group's subjective sense of safety, can result in cancellation, ostracisation – or, in some cases, legal trouble. In Australia, the case of Tickle v Giggle grinds on. It boils down to a website for women being sued by a biological male who wants access to the site. Commenting on the case might be risky – 'transgender vilification', defined as 'a public act that could incite hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule towards people who are transgender', is against the law in New South Wales. Kirralie Smith, head of the Australian group Binary, says she's had 'vilification' complaints against her 'for calling male soccer players 'male''. In my book, I discuss gender ideology in two chapters. I state the fact (not opinion) that mankind is a sexually dimorphous species with only two sexes. If one bloke in Scotland finds it offensive, could that be 'stirring up hatred' – an offence under their Hate Crime and Public Order Act? I'd hope not, but the fact the question even has to be asked is chilling to free expression. In the chapter titled 'You Will be 'Woke' to Imaginary Oppression', I use hard data to debunk myths about crime – who are the victims, and who are the perpetrators. In Britain, a data point in the debate about migration is the rate of crime by foreign compared to UK-born men. Whatever the true statistics are, they might cause someone offence – but that does not make them false. Facts are facts. Their purpose is not to vilify, but to inform policy. The Free Speech Union is fighting to protect ordinary Britons who state factual truths or express their opinions. The British Government, meanwhile, seems determined to crack down on negative views of mass migration if they are injudiciously expressed. In Canada, former PM Justin Trudeau's government suppressed free speech over Covid mandates and advocated an Online Harms Act that would create a new hate-crime offence with a maximum sentence of life in prison. His Liberal Party successor, Mark Carney, seems little better. And in New Zealand, they have a Human Rights Act under which using 'words which are threatening, abusive, or insulting' or 'inciting racial disharmony' are offences. Such laws naturally chill free speech, because the definitions and lines are rarely clear, absent court cases of which no one wants to be the guinea pig. The New Zealand Law Commission has been looking at extending the categories protected under the Human Rights Act to 'people who are transgender, people who are non-binary and people who have an innate variation of sex characteristics'. But while people with disorders of sexual development indubitably exist, the concepts of 'transgender' or 'non-binary' require a belief – that humans have a 'gender' which sometimes doesn't match their biological sex, and that human beings can exist without being of either sex. These are convictions of faith, not facts that can be proven or disproven empirically. Despite the panic from the Anglophone Left, the home of free speech remains the United States. It's in the rest of the ex-British Empire where it is in jeopardy. Simon Hankinson is a senior research fellow in The Heritage Foundation's Border Security and Immigration Center and author of The Ten Woke Commandments (You Must Not Obey) from Academica Books
