
Dharmasthala mass burial case: Police say whistleblower ‘missing'; lawyers say no
On Wednesday, SP Dr Arun K said the whistleblower's whereabouts were unknown. The whistleblower's lawyers, however, said police's claim was false. They said the complainant is available to cooperate with the probe but police are not prompt in their response.
The SP cited Rule 7 of the Witness Protection Scheme, stating that enforcement of protection requires both the consent and active cooperation of the witness, neither of which had been forthcoming. On July 10, police had communicated the necessary procedures for extending protection to the complainant's legal representative, but since then, communication had remained limited to email and no concrete information on the complainant's current location.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dharmasthala mass burial probe: 4 YouTubers assaulted after clash with locals; hospitalised
MANGALURU: At least four YouTubers and camerapersons, who were actively covering the ongoing SIT exhumation process in the alleged Dharmasthala mass burials case, were assaulted in a clash with locals on Wednesday night. Dakshina Kannada SP Arun K said the assaulted persons have suffered minor injuries and the situation was brought under control after police resorted to mild lathicharge at Pangala Road in Dharmasthala, about 70km from Mangaluru. The district police officer said FIRs are being registered in Dharmasthala police station based on a complaint by YouTubers and for assault on a private channel reporter by members in support of YouTubers. With YouTubers extensively covering the SIT operation, local people have expressed resentment and raised slogans against those spreading "false propaganda" about the region. According to a statement from Digital Media for Democracy, a forum representing digital media voices in Karnataka, four independent reporters came under assault and have since been hospitalised. Concern raised by activist over leaks in probe IGP (Western Range) Amit Singh and SP Arun K visited the in the day, a Bengaluru-based social activist and YouTuber met the SIT and raised concerns about alleged "information leaks" from the probe into the alleged Dharmasthala mass burials. He noted that despite the SIT maintaining secrecy, several YouTubers were regularly reporting "updates". He urged the authorities to act against those spreading misinformation if the SIT did not leak any details. The SP said appropriate legal action will be taken and cases will be booked after verification of the videos of the clash.


The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Importance of invoking Section 15-A of SC/ST Act highlighted
Director of Prosecution, B. Ramakoteswara Rao, reviewed the progress of cases under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act pending in special courts from January to June 2025, in a meeting here on Saturday. Addressing joint directors of prosecution, Special Public Prosecutors (SPP) and officials of the Police and Social Welfare departments, Mr. Ramakoteswara Rao said a comprehensive understanding of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, including its amendments, the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, and the new Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 were essential to achieve the best outcomes. He highlighted the importance of invoking Section 15-A of the SC/ST Act and implementing victim protection measures to prevent witnesses from turning hostile. He also stressed on the mandatory use of video recording of witness statements during investigation and trial stages in order to improve the credibility of evidence and reduce the probe errors. Mr. Rao also spoke about filing appeals in cases of acquittal or inadequate sentencing, and the larger goal of delivering justice to the victims, among other aspects.


Hindustan Times
28-07-2025
- Hindustan Times
SIT questions complainant in Dharmasthala mass burial case
The interrogation of a former sanitation worker, who claimed to have buried hundreds of bodies in Dharmasthala village, continued for the second consecutive day on Sunday, with special investigation team (SIT) chief and director general of police (internal security) Pronab Mohanty personally questioning the whistle-blower, officials familiar with the matter said. The team also held detailed discussions with local authorities, scrutinised records of missing persons, and revisited earlier reports of suspicious deaths in the region (File photo) The SIT, which officially took over the case files from local police on July 25, has prioritised verifying the complainant's narrative before moving into more sensitive aspects of the probe. Officers said there are inconsistencies in the complainant's statements to the media and those given to police, thus multiple rounds of questioning is needed to establish a clear timeline. 'The complainant is at the centre of the case and his questioning will be the first step. Based on that, the next course of action will be decided,' an official in the know of the development said on condition of anonymity. The officer added, 'There are inconsistencies in his version of events. Before proceeding further, we need to establish a coherent timeline and verify the facts.' The team also held detailed discussions with local authorities, scrutinised records of missing persons, and revisited earlier reports of suspicious deaths in the region, officials said. Investigators also interacted with residents in and around Dharmasthala and inspected specific sites believed to be associated with the allegations, they said. The complainant, whose identity has been kept confidential, has been granted protection under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018. Local police have also approached the court for permission to conduct brain mapping and narco-analysis tests, though these procedures require the complainant's consent. 'The tests are being considered to assess the veracity of his account. But these will only be done if the complainant agrees and it will not be considered evidence in the court,' an officer said. The SIT, headed by Mohanty, consists of deputy inspector general of police (recruitment) MN Anucheth and IPS officers Soumyalatha SK and Jitendra Kumar Dayama. Twenty police personnel — inspectors, sub-inspectors, head constables and constables — from Udupi, Dakshina Kannada and Uttara Kannada have also been deployed to the SIT. The SIT is currently in the first phase of its investigation, focusing entirely on fact-verification, officials said, adding that the next phase, possibly involving the exhumation of alleged burial sites, will be initiated only after this phase is completed. 'Exhumation depends entirely on what emerges from the first phase,' an officer said. Officials said a dedicated SIT office will soon be established in Dharmasthala to coordinate further action. The present case originated from an FIR registered on July 4, based on a complaint by a former sanitation worker who alleged that he was forced to bury numerous bodies during his tenure in Dharmasthala between 1995 and 2014. According to the complaint, many of the deceased were allegedly victims of sexual violence and murder. The man also claimed that his own relative had been assaulted, prompting him to flee the town in fear. According to officers, further investigation could include the creation of a database of the potential victims and eventually a DNA database. But the process is expected to be tough. The SIT is also coordinating with local law enforcement to retrieve historical police records, including FIRs and missing persons reports from the period in question. The fact that Dharmasthala didn't have a police station until 2016, complicates this process. Investigators say this effort will involve combing through 20 years of documents, some of which may be incomplete or missing altogether. 'But before we get to that, it all depends on whether he can point out the locations as he claims. Only then will a database be meaningful. We've been told this area was also used to bury unclaimed bodies, so verification is going to be difficult. We're hoping that details from old missing persons cases and information shared with police helplines, especially in instances where first information reports (FIRs) were not registered, will help us build that database,' the officer added. According to investigators, while extracting DNA from remains is possible, finding the match would be tough. But the biggest challenge will be establishing rape and murder as only skeletal remains will remain. (With PTI inputs)