
Wolf Protection Downgrade Gets Green Light In EU
EU lawmakers on Thursday gave the green light to downgrading wolf protections in the bloc, which will allow hunting to resume under strict criteria.
Members of the Bern Convention, tasked with the protection of wildlife in Europe as well as some African countries, agreed in December to lower the wolf's status from "strictly protected" to "protected".
The downgrade came into force in March, and the European Commission moved immediately to revise related EU laws to reflect the change.
EU lawmakers approved the move by a majority of 371 to 162, with support from conservative, centrist and hard-right groups.
The law requires a formal rubber-stamp by EU member states -- which have already endorsed the text -- before entering into force, after which states will have 18 months to comply.
Green and left-wing parties voted against a change they denounce as politically motivated and lacking scientific basis, while the parliament's socialist grouping was split on the matter.
The European Union -- as a party to the Bern Convention -- was the driving force behind the push to lower protections, arguing that the increase in wolf numbers has led to more frequent contact with humans and livestock.
But activists fear the measure would upset the recovery made by the species over the past 10 years after it faced near extinction a century ago.
A trio of campaign groups -- Humane World for Animals Europe, Eurogroup for Animals and the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) -- denounced the vote as "a worrying precedent for European nature conservation."
"There is no data justifying a lower level of protection, but the EU institutions decided to ignore science," IFAW's Europe policy director Ilaria Di Silvestre said in a joint statement.
Echoing those concerns, Sebastian Everding of the Left group in parliament said the move "ignores effective coexistence tools".
"Downgrading wolf protection... panders to fear, not facts," he charged.
Grey wolves were virtually exterminated in Europe 100 years ago, but their numbers have surged to a current population of 20,300, mostly in the Balkans, Nordic countries, Italy and Spain.
Commission president Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the results of the vote on Thursday.
"With growing wolf concentrations in some areas, we should give authorities more flexibility to find balanced solutions between the aim to protect biodiversity and the livestock of local farmers," she wrote.
In late 2022, von der Leyen lost her beloved pony Dolly to a wolf that crept into its enclosure on her family's rural property in northern Germany -- leading some to suggest the matter had become personal.
In practice, the EU rule change makes it easier to hunt wolves in rural and mountainous regions where their proximity to livestock and sheepdogs is deemed too threatening.
Von der Leyen's European People's Party (EPP), which spearheaded the change, has stressed that member states will remain in charge of wolf management on their soil -- but with more flexibility than before.
To date, there have been no human casualties linked to rising wolf populations -- but some lawmakers backing the change warn that it may only be a question of time.
Spain's Esther Herranz Garcia, a member of the conservative EPP, cited figures showing that wolves attacked more than 60,000 farm animals in the bloc every year.
"The people who feed our country cannot be expected to work with this fear hanging over them," said France's Valerie Deloge, a livestock farmer and lawmaker with the hard-right Patriots group, where the rule change found support.
Socialist and centrist lawmakers -- while agreeing to back the changes under a fast-track procedure -- struck a more measured tone.
"This is not a licence to kill," Pascal Canfin, a French lawmaker with the centrist Renew group, told AFP. "We are providing more leeway for local exemptions -- wolves remain a protected species."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
a day ago
- DW
Italians vote on citizenship rules, labor laws – DW – 06/08/2025
Italian voters face questions on citizenship and labor laws in a referendum that must draw 50% turnout for results to be valid. PM Giorgia Meloni has urged supporters to skip the vote. Polls opened in Italy on Sunday, in a two-day voting session for a referendum that could change citizenship law and labor laws. The vote was triggered by an NGO-led grassroots campaign. According to Italy's constitution, a referendum can be called if a petition is signed by at least 500,000 voters. Results are expected after polls close on Monday at 3 p.m. local time (2pm UTC). Over 51 million Italians are eligible to participate in the vote, but the results are only binding with a 50% turnout. Italy has held 78 referendums, but the results of many of them were not enacted due to not reaching over 50% turnout. Italians voting on easing citizenship rules On the ballot are several questions related to the country's labor law, while immigration policy, a hotly contested issue in Italy, is one that has recieved the most attention. Italians will be asked if they support reducing the time required to apply for citizenship that makes it easier for children born to foreigners in Italy to obtain citizenship. Currently, a non-EU adult resident without marriage or blood ties to Italy must live in the country for 10 years before they can apply for citizenship. The referendum asks to reduce that to 5 years. Campaigners for the change in the citizenship law say it will help second-generation Italians born in the country to non-EU parents better integrate into a culture they already see as theirs. They say this reform would bring Italy's citizenship law in line with many other European countries, including Germany, adding that it would benefit around 2.5 million people. Italian voters will also choose whether they agree with greater worker protections against dismissal, access to higher severance payments, support for the conversion of fixed-term contracts into permanent ones, and about liability in cases of workplace accidents. Meloni's government urges abstention Politically, the center-left Democratic Party and other groups that oppose Italy's current government are backing the referendum and urging voters to pass the measures. But the governing right-wing coalition in Rome, led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, is advising its supporters and the wider public not to participate, essentially hoping that the vote does not reach the 50% threshold. Meloni has said she would go to the polls but not cast a ballot, a move that was widely criticized by the left as antidemocratic. Last month's opinion polls showed that only 46% of Italians were aware of the issues driving the referendums. Turnout is projected to be around 35%, which would be well below the target for the reforms to pass. Meloni does not back the citizenship measure. Her far-right party Brothers of Italy has sought to curb illegal immigration, while increasing the number of legal work visas for migrants. She praised the current system as "excellent law, among the most open, in the sense that we have for years been among the European nations that grant the highest number of citizenships each year." Edited by: Roshni Majumdar


DW
2 days ago
- DW
German govt to ask EU court to rule on migrant turnbacks – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.


DW
2 days ago
- DW
Germany: Car drives into crowd in Passau – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.