logo
Arizona's public health feels the weight of federal orders

Arizona's public health feels the weight of federal orders

Yahoo10-03-2025

Protesters gather at the Arizona Capitol on March 4, 2025, in opposition of recent executive orders targeted at the LGBTQ+ community, among other actions related to immigration and U.S. involvement in the Ukraine War. Photo by Brian Petersheim Jr. | Cronkite News
In Arizona – home to roughly 34,000 federal employees – President Donald Trump's orders can impact a massive workforce of health care professionals and the individuals who rely on their services.
Health care in the United States is a market commodity rather than the right of citizenship, available to those willing to pay. This model leaves others only with the basic package, historically creating worse health outcomes for people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, immigrants, people of lower socioeconomic status and those living in rural communities.
Public health depends on government regulation and support. It is about improving the quality of life of the population as a whole, focusing on minimizing gaps in health outcomes.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
On his first day in office, Trump signed orders terminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs across the federal government.
A wave of other directives followed, freezing funds for medical research and eliminating gender-affirming hormonal therapy, vaccine requirements and jobs in the public health sector.
The new anti-DEI directives prohibit specific words – such as socioeconomic, ethnicity, systemic, women, trauma, Black, Hispanic and disability – in grant applications for federal money.
According to Rachel Gur-Arie, an assistant professor at Arizona State University's Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, the directive slowed the application process and research.
'I might have to change the title of my proposal. I might have to change how I frame the whole proposal,' Gur-Arie said. 'It's like not being able to call a pineapple a pineapple. You call it a fruit that's yellow with a thorny top.'
The linguistic censorship will take researchers away from community engagement, Gur-Arie added, 'because researchers are going to have to constantly make sure they're translating the needs of the community into a language that is acceptable under this new kind of paradigm.'
Spokespeople from the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), the state's Medicaid program, declined to comment on the actions targeting DEI.
'If you stand your ground around the federal government right now, I'd say watch your back,' said James G. Hodge, a professor at ASU's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, while addressing the Rural Health Forum in Phoenix last month.
Trump dedicated his first weeks in office to funding freezes, firings and buyouts. None of these directives offers a roadmap for the process or elaborates on when it might end.
'It's very difficult to understand the impact of an order that is so non-specific and so broad that it encompasses virtually every federal grant that has ever been issued,' said Zaida Dedolph Piecoro, health policy advisor at Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs' office, during the forum.
While some sectors, such as the military and immigration enforcement, appear to be exempt from workforce reductions, public health workers are facing firings that lack precision. In one case, employees managing the country's bird flu response were fired, then reinstated shortly after.
'The answer right now is that we really need to wait for the courts to sort through some things … because there's just so much uncertainty,' Dedolph Piecoro said.
Some organizations that work with underserved communities and rely on multiple funding sources encourage everyone to prepare for the worst.
'We've been here before,' said Shomari Jackson, director of systems change at the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) in Phoenix. Jackson works with underserved communities in the north Valley ranging from those with disabilities to older adults. 'The pendulum always swings in favor and then swings away. It seems like it's swinging a lot faster and harder this time, but the YWCA's mission doesn't change.'
The state's political leaders responded in mixed ways. Democratic lawmakers are pushing back against the cuts, raising concerns about their long-term impact on public services.
Attorney General Kris Mayes is a part of a multistate coalition that has filed a second motion against the Trump administration over its federal funding freeze. Despite multiple court orders, hundreds of millions of dollars in grants from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) remain blocked.
'The Trump administration is blatantly ignoring court orders and continuing to withhold critical FEMA funds that states rely on,' Mayes said in a press release. 'This is illegal, dangerous, and puts lives at risk.'
Many Republicans support the reductions, and Arizona's GOP members in Congress favor the changes.
Trump proposed tax cuts and signed an order to 'reduce the scope of the federal bureaucracy,' which included requiring the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to terminate the Health Equity Advisory Committee.
'We have over 2 million Arizonans who are on AHCCCS,' said Beth Kohler, the CEO of the Arizona Association of Health Plans, in an interview to The Arizona Republic's political podcast The Gaggle. 'It's a $22 billion program.'
Arizona, a Medicaid expansion state, could lose significant funding due to federal budget reductions.
'We heard that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plan to cut the navigator budget from $98 million to $10 million,' said Daniel Derksen, director for the Arizona Center for Rural Health, during the forum. 'That means that there'll be fewer people available to help people with eligibility and enrollment, both for Medicaid but alsoand other marketplace plans.'
Derksen said he is very anxious about the Affordable Care Act expiring in December and the talks of the potential cuts to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), a formula that decides how much the federal government reimburses each state for Medicaid expenditures relative to the average per capita income.
By law, FMAP cannot go below 50% and is almost 65% in Arizona.
'The state cannot absorb any federal cost shifts for Medicaid. It is extremely difficult in the state of Arizona to increase revenue,' Dedolph Piecoro said. 'I believe now it takes a 60% threshold at the ballot to do anything that will increase revenue or, you know, act of God, I'm not sure.'
According to Dedolph Piecoro, it would be 'virtually impossible' to backfill the federal funding portion of Medicaid.
According to Derksen, '500,000 Arizonans (could lose) their Medicaid coverage if those proposed cuts go through. Between the Affordable Care Act cuts and the Medicaid cuts, we can double the number of uninsured, which I estimate right now at 750,000. … To me as a family physician, (it) is unconscionably high.'
On Feb. 10, Arizona families who rely on gender-affirming care received an email from the largest provider of gender-supporting services in the state, Phoenix Children's Hospital, announcing it is 'indefinitely pausing gender-affirming medical care, specifically puberty-blocking and gender-affirming hormonal therapy.'
The decision to halt the services was a direct response to the Jan. 28 directive titled 'Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.' The executive order prohibits gender-affirming care for people under the age of 19, yet according to Tami Staas, a mother of a transgender son and the executive director of the Arizona Trans Youth and Parent Organization (AZTYPO), adults are affected as well.
'I heard from a family of ours that their 20-year-old child, who was a patient at the Phoenix Children's Hospital, was told at their last appointment they have to be stepped off their hormones,' Staas said. 'What we're seeing is preemptive compliance without an executive order at this point.'
Cronkite News spoke to a representative at Phoenix Children's but could not independently confirm whether the hospital served and subsequently stopped serving adults as well.
'Phoenix Children's is bound by all federal laws and regulations for the provision of care to its patients. For this reason, Phoenix Children's is indefinitely pausing hormone therapy services within the Gender Clinic to ensure we are in full compliance with the recent executive order,' the hospital said in a statement sent to Cronkite News.
Staas, whose organization provides families of transgender children and youths up to 24 years old with peer support and helps parents cover costs for things such as name changes, saw the immediate effect of this decision.
'They were terrified for their kids,' Staas said. 'I talked to one family. Their child was on blockers and they had an appointment that week. Their appointment was canceled and they didn't know what they were going to do.'
Puberty blockers do not cause permanent changes. Stopping treatment allows the body to resume puberty based on the gender assigned at birth and can result in breast development or facial hair growth that can exacerbate dysphoria, according to Staas: 'They would become extremely suicidal and the fear of losing your child, that's what they're dealing with.'
One San Tan Valley mother, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to fear of retaliation, remembers her 18-year-old transgender daughter was 'thriving' just months ago.
The daughter, who started counseling at a young age and eventually started hormonal therapy at the age of 16, had found a good balance of estrogen and progesterone supplements for her.
'She looks amazing, she's thriving. She feels like herself now,' the mother said, referring to her daughter before the order. 'Her mental health is definitely stabilized. She's had three years now of no self-harming, no suicidal attempts, no suicidal thoughts and stuff … and then this blow … I'm scared, she feels targeted. She's terrified.'
The family is considering moving back to California or leaving the country: 'I have no problem taking her wherever it'll be safe.'
Prisma Community Care in downtown Phoenix announced Feb. 14 that it stopped providing gender-affirming hormone therapy to anyone under the age of 19. But it lifted its suspension only two days later.
Staas said she already saw families establishing care elsewhere: 'People looking to international care. Not only Mexico but Europe and other places. We have families who've established care with LA Children's, and what LA Children's does is they require a visit once a year in person, and then they'll do once a month telemed.'
However, California hospitals are also caught in a legal tug-of-war, discontinuing and restarting targeted services as Trump pushes new rules on hospitals while courts continue to block them.
Children's Hospital Los Angeles, which initially paused hormone therapy services, lifted the restrictions after a federal judge temporarily blocked Trump's order on Feb. 13.
The administration's attempts to ban gender-affirming care are not the only ones affecting the health of young Arizonans. Schools and universities requiring COVID-19 vaccines for in-person attendance can lose federal money under a Feb. 15 order mandating institutions develop a plan to end restrictions.
'Schools aren't really requiring that right now, but if you attempt it on COVID-19 vaccines, the executive order says, 'oh, well, we'll start stripping all of your Department of Education funds quickly,' Hodge, the law professor, said.
Hodge urged health professionals not to hide under a rock for the next four years but to look for other ways to meet health care goals.
'Get innovative, figure out how to accomplish public health objectives without necessarily running up against an administration,' he said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges

Politico

time32 minutes ago

  • Politico

Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges

At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.

Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director
Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director

The Smithsonian Institution asserted its independence Monday evening in a statement that could be read as a rejection of President Trump's late-May firing of National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet. The Smithsonian's statement said the organization's secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch, "has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." The statement suggested that all personnel decisions will be made by Bunch, not Trump. The announcement came after a much-anticipated Board of Regents meeting to discuss the fate of Sajet. The Washington Post had reported that Sajet quietly continued to show up for work each day after Trump's social media post, which said he was firing Sajet for being 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI.' The Smithsonian's statement Monday did not explicitly state that Sajet would remain in her position, and the institution did not respond to a Times question on that subject. But the text of the statement is clear in its intent, beginning: "In 1846, the Smithsonian was established by Congress as an independent entity." It continues: "Throughout its history, the Smithsonian has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary. The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution." The Smithsonian's move comes shortly after the White House proposed a 12% reduction in funding to the Smithsonian in the 2026 budget — including the elimination of funding for the National Museum of the American Latino, which is in the development stages and aims to open on or near the National Mall; and the Anacostia Community Museum, which opened in 1967 and honors Black culture. The Smithsonian became a target for Trump beginning March 27, when he issued an executive order titled "Restoring truth and sanity to American history." That order demanded an end to federal funding for exhibitions and programs based on racial themes that 'divide Americans.' "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology," the order read. It also instructed Vice President JD Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian's 21 museums and the National Zoo in Washington. The order followed Trump's ongoing attempts to reshape federal cultural institutions, including his February takeover of the Kennedy Center. One major difference between the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian: The Kennedy Center's board is appointed by the president, but the Smithsonian's board consists of officials representing all three branches of government. Vance is on the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, as is Chief Justice John G. Roberts. "Since its inception, the Smithsonian has set out to be a nonpartisan institution," the statement Monday read. "As the nation's museum, the Smithsonian must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans. The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes." Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store