
How to snatch a 10% dividend from cheap renewable energy trusts: INVESTING ANALYST
Renewable infrastructure trusts might have suffered of late, but that means some are offering bumper double-digit dividend yields.
Is this an opportunity and could the future still be looking bright over the long term?
In this column, William Heathcoat Amory, managing partner at Kepler Partners, says renewable infrastructure trusts could be a bargain if you know where to look.
Renewable infrastructure trusts have taken a beating in recent years. The main reason for this is not hard to discern: a whopping circa 5 per cent increase in interest rates since 2022.
This means that there are now a lot of interesting investments available to income investors that were not as high yielding previously.
Renewable infrastructure trusts use considerable amounts of leverage (mostly fixed rate), and so the prospect of a significant increase in the cost of borrowing when it needs to be refinanced, poses a longer-term challenge for the asset class, and has spooked some investors.
Those with short term borrowings are paying higher interest rates, and will be actively trying to sell assets to pay back these borrowings. The subdued sentiment means there are potential bargains to be found.
The rise and fall of renewable energy trusts
Fundamentally, renewables offer a high income, uncorrelated to equity markets and the economic cycle, with links to inflation.
This meant that in the previous low-interest rate environment, they were on every income investor's shopping list. Most trusts traded at significant share price premiums to net asset value (NAV), and trusts issued shares regularly to meet demand.
The sector mushroomed in size as a result. Nothing lasts forever though, and the current discounts to NAV are reflective of an inevitable readjustment, so that supply and demand for the shares of these trusts once again match.
As the graph below shows, this process has already started with buybacks widespread, albeit relatively slowly.
Consolidation is underway, with some trusts' shareholders having elected to realise assets over time and wind up. Others have the scale and quality that means they are likely to survive.
Why renewables trusts are trading at a discount
In contrast to traditional investment trusts which, when faced with a wide share price discount to NAV, have liquid underlying holdings which can be sold and the proceeds being used to buy shares back or return capital to shareholders, renewables trusts invest in hard assets – wind or solar farms.
As one might imagine, these are illiquid. Much like selling a house, sales can be achieved but take time – especially if one wants the best price.
This perhaps explains why discounts have persisted so long. Trusts are buying shares back, but perhaps not yet at a rate that has properly addressed the supply and demand imbalance.
According to a recent presentation on TRIG, InfraRed Capital Partners (the company's managers) said that, despite the market softening over the past six months, there is still a good level of interest in renewables assets, with private market investors paying prices that reflect current NAVs.
For TRIG, since 2022 the team have sold 10 per cent of the portfolio, (or £210million of assets) at prices which reflected a premium to NAV at the time of sale.
This suggests that valuations that make up NAVs are fair, although clearly this is an opaque market and much can change.
RENEWABLE ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE TRUSTS
Trust Total assets (£m) Discount to NAV % Dividend yield %
Aquila European Renewables 513 -23.5 8.0
Bluefield Solar 1,300 -24.4 9.6
Downing Renewables & Infrastructure 300 -28.6 7.2
Foresight Environmental Infrastructure 846 -30.9 10.4
Gore Street Energy Storage 813 -36.4 10.8
Greencoat UK Wind 4,420 -24.0 9.1
NextEnergy Solar 1,079 -30.4 12.9
Octopus Renewables Infrastructure 1,064 -30.7 8.8
Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG) 3,122 -29.8 9.2
SDCL Efficiency Income 1,095 -52.0 14.4
VH Global Energy Infrastructure 412 -35.3 8.6
Source: AIC, all data as at 30/05/2025
Big dividends are on offer - are they backed up?
The current discounts to NAV mean that for investors today, dividend yields are significantly higher than the yields that private market investors would expect.
So what then are the prospects for investors in these trusts?
As we highlight above, private market investors appear relatively sanguine on valuations. The discounts to NAV might reflect caution on gearing, which most trusts employ at a meaningful level.
By and large, trusts either have fixed structural gearing on an asset specific basis, which is being paid down over time. Or they have trust level gearing, which will either need refinancing at a point in the future or repaid.
Whichever way gearing is employed, owning assets that deliver high levels of cashflow, debt levels appear manageable over the short to medium term.
Underpinning dividends are the cashflows that arise from inflation-linked subsidies and the proceeds from electricity sales. In some parts of the world, particularly the US, future subsidy regimes appear to be being unpicked.
In the UK, we are in one of the foremost locations for wind power, and this – together with what Bill Gates called 'clever government subsidies that encouraged companies to invest' (in his book 'How to avoid a climate disaster') - is the reason why the UK has achieved a significant shift away from fossil fuel energy.
According to data from a great open-source National Grid website Iamkate, the UK's electricity supply has gone from 68.7 per cent fossil fuel based in 2012 to only 28.2 per cent in 2024.
What's on offer for UK investors?
For denizens of the UK, it is often missed that we are at the forefront amongst countries in the energy transition.
In particular, the UK is a significant leader in offshore wind, with installed capacity of offshore wind turbines far greater than the US in absolute terms, not just in proportion of the energy mix.
In Gates' view, offshore wind power is one of the most promising technologies that needs to be better harnessed around the world to achieve a significant reduction in carbon emissions.
As one might expect, within the renewable energy trusts, offshore wind represents a reasonable proportion of exposure.
Greencoat UK Wind for example has 45 per cent of its portfolio in offshore wind farms, which offer high investment returns and is one of the reasons the trust has been the best performer in NAV total return terms in the peer group over the last three and five years.
In early May this year, Ørsted announced that it had decided to discontinue its Hornsea 4 project in the UK in its current form due to the numbers not adding up in terms of investment return.
This would have become one of the biggest offshore wind farms in the world, and so its cancellation or delay represents a blow to government and the UK's ambitions for decarbonisation and energy security.
For shareholders in existing renewable assets, it's possible that this is a positive, in that there will be less generating capacity built out, and therefore higher long term electricity prices than would otherwise be the case.
For wind farms owned by the likes of TRIG and Greencoat UK Wind, a rough rule of thumb is that around half of wind revenues come from subsidies, and half come from the proceeds of electricity sales.
According to Iamkate, wholesale electricity prices have been relatively resilient over the past 12 months, at £82 per MWh, meaning that both trusts have been paying a covered dividend, and still repaying debt or re-investing in share buybacks or new assets.
Both have demonstrated resilience in terms of dividend cover through difficult periods like 2020, when electricity prices fell dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis.
The main attraction today is the high initial dividend yield, which as the table above suggests, many offer a multiple of the yield of the FTSE 100 (which yields 3.5 per cent at the time of writing).
Verdict: An interesting moment for defensive income
Renewables trusts offer a level of defensiveness to investors, not least because demand for energy is not likely to subside substantially.
The price of energy is hard to predict and can fluctuate, but there are comparatively low levels of volatility in renewable infrastructure's cash flows.
Renewable energy infrastructure assets typically have long economic lives, with low operating costs (especially compared to hydrocarbons) and over time generate a fairly predictable amount of energy.
This makes forecasting cashflows simpler than it would be compared to many other asset classes. In addition, subsidies for renewables have a direct link to inflation. This means that if inflation remains persistent, renewable energy cashflows should increase.
The result is that the income that renewable energy infrastructure assets produce can be resilient, and sometimes offer built-in upside sensitivity to inflation and energy prices.
Investor sentiment towards renewables is not strong for perfectly good reasons, mainly because of higher interest rates, but exacerbated by political noises coming from America. But there are two fundamental reasons why the future for renewables in the UK and Europe remains bright.
Firstly, de-carbonisation needs to happen, to reduce the harmful effects on climate change of future (and past) emissions of carbon dioxide.
Secondly, energy security is increasingly important. In a world where old alliances seem to count for nothing, no government wants to find themselves in a position where they have to rely on an allegiance which may no-longer exist.
Both of these themes provide a supportive backdrop for a long-term investment in renewable energy infrastructure. Across the renewables infrastructure sector, there are trusts exposed to different types of renewable technology and portfolios have different degrees of quality.
As such it will pay to do a little research, and establish which have the highest quality portfolios but whose share prices have been dragged down unfairly with the peer group.
With discounts wide but dividend yields remaining resilient, this may be an interesting moment to add some defensive income to a portfolio.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves turning around UK's finances 'like Steve Jobs did for Apple', claims minister
Rachel Reeves will turn around the economy the way Steve Jobs turned around Apple, a cabinet minister has suggested ahead of the upcoming spending review. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle compared the chancellor to the late Apple co-founder when asked on Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips where the £86bn for his department is coming from. The package, confirmed ahead of the full spending review next week, will see each region in England granted £500m to spend on science projects of their choice, including research into faster drug treatments. Asked by Trevor Phillips how the government is finding the money, Mr Kyle said: "Rachel raised money in taxes in the autumn, we are now allocating it per department. "But the key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. "Just bear in mind that how Apple turned itself around when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. "Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. "Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector... they will create jobs in the future." The spending review is a process used by governments to set departmental budgets for the years ahead. Asked if it will include more detail on who will receive winter fuel payments, Mr Kyle said that issue will be "dealt with in the run-up to the autumn". "This is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years, so you're sort of talking about two separate issues at the moment," he said. 0:42 Scrapping universal winter fuel payments was one of the first things Labour did in government - despite it not being in their manifesto - with minsters saying it was necessary because of the financial "blackhole" left behind by the Tories. But following a long-drawn out backlash, Sir Keir Starmer said last month that the government would extend eligibility, which is now limited to those on pension credit. It is not clear what the new criteria will be, though Ms Reeves has said the changes will come into place before this winter. Mr Kyle also claimed the spending review will see the government invest "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". However, he said the chancellor will stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules - which rule out borrowing for day-to-day spending - meaning that while some departments will get extra money, others are likely to face cuts.


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spending review: Schools to get more funding but police warned to ‘do their bit'
Schools are set to receive a funding boost in the spending review, a Cabinet minister has indicated, as he insisted other public services must 'do their bit' amid concerns about cuts to other budgets. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said the Government will commit to investing 'the most we've ever spent per pupil' next week, but declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing. Facing questions from broadcasters on Sunday about which public services will be prioritised, Mr Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the Chancellor, they have,' the Cabinet minister told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a Government.' He pointed to the £1.1 billion extra funding already earmarked for police this year, warning that public services would be expected to 'do their bit' alongside Government as he defended Ms Reeves' stewardship of the country's finances. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Mr Kyle said. 'You see a Chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most… You will see the priorities of this Government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS receiving a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Economists have said the expected 2.8% annual increase in its day-to-day budget, which amounts to a rise of about £30 billion by 2028, or £17 billion in real terms, will see other departments squeezed. Speaking on Sunday, Mr Kyle said the schools system, along with an £86 billion funding package for research and development, would be top priorities as the Government seeks to 'invest in the future.' 'You will see in this spending review that we are investing the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system,' he told Sky News. Mr Kyle said Labour was 'absolutely laser-focused' on delivering manifesto pledges amid questions about how competing commitments will be balanced with little room for manoeuvre amid narrow fiscal headroom. Asked about the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament, the minister declined to guarantee Housing Secretary Angela Rayner's department would not face cuts. But he added: 'We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that.' He said the Government was also 'on the way' to delivering 13,000 new police officers, another manifesto pledge. Ms Reeves has acknowledged that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. She blamed the former Conservative government's stewardship of the economy rather than her self-imposed fiscal rules, which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. It comes after the Government announced science and technology sectors would receive new funding as part of an £86 billion package set to be confirmed next week. Mr Kyle's Department for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSIT) said the money would help research into new drug treatments and microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Tories accused Labour of copying their own plans in office over the commitment. Shadow technology secretary Alan Mak said: 'Labour's central budget announcement seems to be a reheat of Conservative plans just showing this Chancellor will copy and paste anyone's ideas to get out of the mess that she's put herself in. 'As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back.'


Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How £7 pints are destroying Britain's pubs
Brian Whiting can still remember the first time he had to charge more than £5 for a pint of Guinness in one of his pubs. 'There was a regular who would come in most days and read the paper,' he says. 'The day I put it up to £5, he turned around, walked out and never came back.' The reaction of his former customer just goes to show the depth of feeling about the price of a pint in Britain. However, for publicans, incidents like this are becoming increasingly common. What was once an easy-to-afford commodity has, for many households, become too expensive. Pub owners have been forced to repeatedly raise their prices in recent years after sharp increases in the cost of everything from beer itself to food, fuel and labour. Many fear this has thrust them into a doom loop, where they must keep raising prices to stay afloat despite the risk of driving away cash-strapped customers. 'It's becoming very toxic,' says Whiting, who runs a string of pubs across the South East. 'You're so frightened, you've got to put prices up ... but you've got no choice but to do it. 'I worry that people think that landlords and publicans are just creaming it and making money. We work on tiny margins and we're trying to survive ... No one wants to charge those prices. 'I'm not sitting on a yacht anywhere.' According to the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA), the average price of a pint across the UK rose above £5 for the first time this year. But for pub owners like Whiting, that figure seems strikingly low compared with what they actually have to charge. The days when he could sell a pint for £5 and turn a profit are now a distant memory. 'You'll get a 'cooking lager' for mid-£6, but anything premium now is going over £7 for us,' he says. James Ratcliffe, co-owner of The Black Bull in Sedbergh, Cumbria, agrees: 'Premium lager? We're at about £6.70 a pint now. 'When we first opened [in 2018], we had a pint on sale that was £4.95 ... We were worried about going over the £5 mark. 'The dilemma is that, yes, I can put [the price] up, and yes, people understand why it's going up, but there's a certain point where people say, 'I'm not going to pay it.'' Some large brewers have also been criticised for asking pubs to pay more. Diageo, the parent company of Guinness, was accused of unfairly imposing price rises on the hospitality industry earlier this year. Whiting warns the pint price doom loop is pushing customers out of pubs and into the supermarkets, where alcohol is significantly cheaper. 'It's not made life easy with supermarkets being able to sell booze so cheap,' he says. Even though pint prices are typically much higher in London, the situation is worse outside the capital and other cities, Whiting believes. 'A lot of people go into a pub in a city and don't even know what they're paying,' he says. 'They tap with their card, and off they go. In a village, everybody wants to know how much the cost of a pint is.' It comes amid a deepening crisis in Britain's pub industry. Nearly 300 pubs shut down across England and Wales in 2024 – the equivalent of six per week – according to the BBPA. Nic Sharpe, director of the St John's Tavern in Archway, north London, highlights the barrage of costs facing landlords. 'My energy costs went up by £40,000 last year,' he says. 'Across the board, my wages are £25,000 more. The business rates have just gone up. 'It's like, f------ hell, I'm up on revenue from last year, but it's wiped out by the amount of costs.' Sharpe's prices are approaching the £7 mark too. He currently sells a pint of Estrella Galicia lager for £6.50, which is cheaper than rival venues where he says he has been charged as much as £7.80 for the same brand. Higher taxes have compounded problems. Wage bills have become a particular worry in recent months after Rachel Reeves increased employer National Insurance rates. The changes, announced in her October Budget, took effect in April and have hit the hospitality sector hard. According to a survey by the major hospitality trade bodies, one third of firms in the sector are now operating at a loss. The Telegraph also recently revealed that some pubs have even had to start calling last orders as early as 9pm to save money on staff costs. 'We're living with [higher NI costs] now and we're passing it on, and we're having these conversations and I hate it,' says Whiting. 'The last thing I want to do is increase my beer price, I want my pub to be full of people.' Ultimately, Sharpe believes swathes of smaller businesses will simply go bust. However, as many search for a stay of execution, one thing is certain – further price rises for punters. 'We're knocking on the door of the £10 pint,' says Whiting. 'It's inevitable.'