logo
Inside The Global 2000: Trump's Tariffs Haven't Stopped The World's Growth… Yet

Inside The Global 2000: Trump's Tariffs Haven't Stopped The World's Growth… Yet

Forbes2 days ago

Donald Trump has used his first five months back in office to attack longtime allies like Canada, Mexico and the European Union, insisting the United States 'will no longer tolerate being ripped off.'
His posture with trade partners has been more competitive than collaborative, imposing or threatening heavy-handed tariffs under the pretense that they're running up trade deficits to enrich themselves at Americans' expense. He's right that U.S. manufacturing jobs have sharply dropped since the turn of the century, gutting industrial cities across America's heartland that have in turn flocked to him in voting booths. But it's hard to make the case that globalization has been a zero-sum game.
For the last 23 years, Forbes has compiled the Global 2000 list, ranking the world's 2,000 largest companies by revenue, profit, assets and market value, with equal weights for each of the four metrics. Twenty years ago, the 2,000 companies on the list combined to record $21.9 trillion in annual sales, $1.3 trillion in profit, $80.7 trillion in assets and $26.6 trillion in market value. Every half decade since, all of those numbers have steadily climbed, and this year's totals amount to records of $52.9 trillion in revenue, $4.9 trillion in profit, $242.2 trillion in assets and $91.3 trillion in market cap.
Much of that astounding growth, including more than doubling in revenues has taken place in the U.S., where the S&P 500 index is up fivefold in the last two decades. It's home to Walmart, the company with the highest 12-month sales in the world, Alphabet, the world's most profitable company, and Apple, the most valuable company as of April 25, when the data used to rank the list was compiled. (Nvidia, No. 47 on our list, has since surpassed it, with a market value nearing $3.5 trillion).
Now, leaders of many of the most prominent companies in the U.S. and around the world are fretting that a trade war could stunt that growth. Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said on its earnings call in May that 'higher tariffs will result in higher prices.' JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon devoted the majority of his annual letter to his macroeconomic and geopolitical concerns before even beginning to discuss his own company.
'America will be first—but not if it is alone,' Dimon wrote in a reference to Trump's 'America First' slogan. 'If the Western world's military and economic alliances were to fragment, America itself would inevitably weaken over time.' Last week at Forbes' annual Iconoclast Summit in New York, one of the world's greatest investors, billionaire Ken Griffin said the use of tariffs 'comes at a dear price to the U.S. consumer' and said 'shame on the administration' for criticizing McMillon in response to his comment about higher prices.
Dimon's cautionary tone shouldn't be ignored. JPMorgan has been the number one company on Forbes' Global 2000 for the past three years. His bank's stock is up 30% in the past year, while the top 100 American companies on the list have gained, on average, 10.5% in market value, underperforming the top 100 companies outside of the United States by three percentage points. In fact, since Trump took office, the S&P 500, which has swung wildly, has gained a mere 0.59%, versus nearly 20% gains for stocks in Europe and China. Over the past 10 years, the top 100 U.S. stocks on our list have an average cumulative return of 488% versus 143% average return for the top 100 stocks outside the United States.
As America's largest bank, with $4.4 trillion in assets, JPMorgan is the only company to rank in the top 20 worldwide in each of the four categories considered for the list. Berkshire Hathaway, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Saudi Aramco and Amazon make up the rest of the top five of the overall Global 2000.
Five of the top eight firms on the list are banks, even as the 'magnificent seven' tech companies make up most of the most valuable companies in the world by market cap. Tech giants are generally lighter on assets and don't get as much credit for that variable. Naturally, banking is the most represented industry, with 328 banks ranging from JPMorgan to $43 billion (assets) Keiyo Bank in Japan represented.
Another 134 companies classified as diversified financials made the cut, including Goldman Sachs (No. 20), Charles Schwab (No. 124) and Blackstone (No. 418). Tech is comparatively underrepresented, with 186 entrants distributed between the software and services, hardware and semiconductors categories. Of the 100 largest companies by assets in the world, 88 are banks, insurers or other financial institutions, giving them a built-in advantage. Banking profits have also been increasing for years thanks to high net interest margins in an environment with rising rates.
While there hasn't been much movement at the top of Forbes' Global 2000, there were plenty of significant moves deeper into the list. Artificial intelligence chipmaker extraordinaire Nvidia moved into the top 100 for the first time, shooting up 63 slots to 47th to continue a fast rise through the rankings since its Global 2000 debut in 2006. Disney (71st) and Pfizer (73rd) are also back in the top 100 thanks to a profit rebound after sliding to No. 155 and No. 436 last year, though Pfizer's stock, with its $130 billion market cap, remains 60% lower than its pandemic-era record high in late 2021.
Moving in the other direction, BP tumbled 374 spots to No. 421 because its profit fell from $9.2 billion to a mere $399 million, hampered by falling oil prices and unexpected refinery outages. Intel similarly plunged from 107th to 488th after booking an astonishing net loss of $19 billion in the last 12 months. The floundering Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker has fallen well behind Nvidia in the AI arms race and has been unprofitable for five quarters in a row, reporting a $16.6 billion loss in last year's third quarter alone due to write-downs related to restructuring efforts that included laying off 15,000 employees and the depreciation of some manufacturing assets.
In terms of overall numbers, the United States is still first by a wide margin, with 612 companies on the list headquartered here, a slight drop from 621 last year. China is next with 317 companies represented, including firms based in Hong Kong.
In a slow year for IPOs, there aren't many notable newcomers to the list, but a handful include Smithfield Foods (No. 1,383), AI cloud computing firm CoreWeave (No. 1,799) and SiriusXM Holdings (No. 1,822), which spun off from Liberty Media last September. The highest-ranked new company to join the list is Irish firm Smurfit Westrock at 855th, a near 100-year old paper and packaging firm which formed as a result of a merger between Smurfit Kappa and Westrock last July.
Bankers are hoping that Trump's promises of deregulation will lead to more mergers and IPOs, which could create more movement on next year's Global 2000, but if this year's chaotic policy announcements persist, profits for the whole list could come down as more cash gets siphoned into governments' coffers due to tariffs. The U.S. remains the world's most powerful economy, and it's up to Trump and Congress to decide whether what is effectively the tax revenue from government heavy-handedness on trade deals, is worth sacrificing the economic gains the United States and its allies have long benefited from due to globalization.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?
Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk — two epic disrupters of U.S. politics and the automotive industry, respectively and vice versa. Over the past year, they united over the election and efforts to cut government spending. They parted ways amicably … and then started trashing each other. It escalated quickly with Musk suggesting that the president be impeached and that he is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein child-prostitution scandal. Musk later reportedly called the president before posting that he regretted some of his words: 'They went too far.' It was a remarkable breakup — incredible drama between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man, who had been the closest of allies for hundreds of days of campaigning and governing. To the extent that it was a reality TV train wreck, I'd just as soon leave it be. But since the primary business in Musk's remarkable portfolio is nominally an automaker, it actually matters in this industry we cover. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. Love it or hate it, this disruptive era in which we live is providing us all with some real-life experiments in economics — the likes of which we probably thought we would never see. For decades, basically everyone who went to college was taught in an economics or history class that widespread tariffs would do more harm than good. Trump argues for a different approach, and he's pursuing it. Or he's pursuing it to negotiate for something else. In either case, we're now seeing how that works: So far, there's been a lot of paralysis, especially among suppliers and foreign automakers, but also a big investment announced recently by General Motors. His political strategy has been unorthodox, yet he's won two electoral colleges and one popular vote. He's only the 21st president to win two elections. So he's had success, whether some people like it or not. Same for Musk, of course: He approached the auto industry unlike anyone else — with an expensive electric car — had a couple of near-total collapses, and came out as the world's richest man and CEO of the world's most valuable automaker. That success helped propel his rocket business SpaceX and other ventures such as Starlink satellites and Twitter, which he bought and renamed X. But the disruptive move I'm watching was his decision to be an automaker CEO who got personally and financially involved in partisan politics. While new-vehicle sales skew to the affluent, when you sell something in the millions or tens of millions, a brand or model has to connect with a broad swath of people. And while there can be success with, say, a polarizing design, mass-market brands generally try to avoid alienating large chunks of their potential customer base. I've cited here before the story about Michael Jordan saying he didn't speak out on politics because 'Republicans buy sneakers, too.' In retrospect, he said it was just a funny line among friends. But the thing is that he wasn't wrong, and every business school graduate knows it. Musk, however, is not your typical MBA type. So out of his frustration with former President Joe Biden — who habitually sided with the UAW and its automakers against the U.S.-based global leader in EVs, even as he advocated for a carbon-neutral future — Musk threw an estimated quarter of a billion dollars behind the Trump campaign. That's an unbelievable sum of money to many of us, but when Trump won, it looked like the greatest bet ever. From late October to late December, Tesla stock more than doubled and its market cap approached $1.5 trillion. While Musk's political activism may have upset many of his loyal, environmentally motivated customers, there were a lot of reasons to be bullish on Tesla under Trump. It seemed likely that NHTSA and the SEC would take a more sympathetic view of the company's issues. Beyond that, Musk has refocused the company's future on artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and robotaxis. (Tesla said it plans to launch its service in Austin, Texas, on June 22.) A new administration with a deregulatory inclination toward self-driving cars was a significant tailwind. Now, those advantages for Tesla are gone or at least seemingly diminished. Structures that have legacy automakers paying to buy Tesla's credits for selling emission-free, fuel-efficient vehicles could be eliminated. (And let's not forget that Trump hinted at ending federal contracts with other Musk-affiliated companies.) Turning back to the auto business: The conventional wisdom is that Musk has now alienated all but the most apolitical consumers. Environmentally minded liberals might like EVs, but Musk's support of Trump (and the far-right Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany) has them seeking out other brands' offerings. There might have been an opportunity to become the preferred electric brand of the president's Make America Great Again movement — especially the tech-forward, high-income types and those motivated by the president's endorsement of the brand on the White House grounds. But after this month's blowup — with longtime Trump adviser Steve Bannon arguing to deport Musk — that notion seemed ever more remote. No fans on the left, no fans on the right. Is Elon out in deep water in an electric boat surrounded by sharks with no friends to bail him out? Maybe not. There is significant animus against Musk on the EV-inclined left, especially in the wake of his DOGE team's deep and sometimes chaotic cuts to government entities and programs. Certainly, protests at auto retail outlets are rare. The damage to stores is not acceptable, but it shows the intensity of the situation. But I still have to wonder how far consumers will follow those kinds of feelings. Michiganders, for instance, often assume that Americans prefer to buy American cars made by American (union) workers. But I've been to America, and most of them don't care. They want the best car for their money, whether it's American, German, Japanese or Korean. Some are clamoring for cheap Chinese cars: If Xi Jinping wants to pay for half of their EV, they ask, why not let him? So maybe they won't care about Elon's politics. Tesla sales are down a little this year, but some of that might be attributable to production hiccups. If the Model Y — the bestselling model in the world last year — provides a great value, they'll probably buy it regardless of what they think of the CEO. And now we get to find out. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump signs resolutions killing California's zero-emissions rules
Trump signs resolutions killing California's zero-emissions rules

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump signs resolutions killing California's zero-emissions rules

This story was originally published on Trucking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Trucking Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump moved to sever California's EPA waivers by signing a series of joint resolutions Thursday, rolling back the Golden State's strict truck and auto emissions policies. The president's signing of joint resolutions under the Congressional Review Act reverses the Biden administration's approval of California's Advanced Clean Trucks rule. That earlier rule called for requiring 75% of Class 8 trucks sold in the state to be zero-emissions vehicles by 2035. Another resolution also prevents the state's low-nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions rule for heavy-duty trucks from being implemented, per a statement by the president. The NOx rule intended to regulate emissions from manufacturers by cutting heavy-duty NOx emissions by 90% and overhaul engine testing procedures. The Trump administration has described his predecessor's environmental policies as overreach and unjustified mandates. Trump said the congressional moves he signed further restrict California from implementing a similar policy in the future. "Under the Congressional Review Act, the EPA cannot approve any future waivers that are 'substantially the same' as those disapproved in the joint resolutions," Trump said in a statement. "Accordingly, the joint resolutions prohibit the EPA from approving future waivers for California that would impose California's policy goals across the entire country and violate fundamental constitutional principles of federalism, ending the electric vehicle mandate for good," the statement said. In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared the federal measures illegal and moved to sue the federal government, seeking to pursue the state's zero-emission vehicle policy. Newsom signed an executive order on Thursday for the state to continue regulation requiring that 100% of sales of new vehicles be zero emission by 2035 for cars, pickup trucks and drayage trucks and by 2045 for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Trucking leaders applauded Trump for the measures. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association said the news was a big win for both men and women behind the wheel. 'Our 150,000 small-business members have been saying it all along—electric trucks just aren't a realistic option right now. They're too expensive, the charging infrastructure isn't there,' OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in an emailed press release to Trucking Dive. Industry advocates, including the American Trucking Associations and the Washington Trucking Associations, also warned that electric truck technology and charging infrastructure were not caught up to accommodate California's ambitious EV policies. 'We've done our part to reduce carbon emissions while keeping America's economy moving,' ATA President and CEO Chris Spear said in a press release. 'But what we need is federal leadership to set realistic and achievable national emissions standards. And today brings us one step closer toward that goal,' he added. Werner Enterprises truck driver Gina Jones shared a similar sentiment, speaking as part of the signing ceremony at the White House. 'We cannot allow one state's regulations to disrupt our entire nation's supply chain,' Jones said. 'Allowing California to do so would have [negatively] impacted the hundreds of thousands of truck drivers who deliver critical goods across the country each and every day.' Recommended Reading Congress revokes Advanced Clean Trucks waiver, creating ambiguity for refuse fleets Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

2 Volatile Stocks with Exciting Potential and 1 to Be Wary Of
2 Volatile Stocks with Exciting Potential and 1 to Be Wary Of

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

2 Volatile Stocks with Exciting Potential and 1 to Be Wary Of

A highly volatile stock can deliver big gains - or just as easily wipe out a portfolio if things go south. While some investors embrace risk, mistakes can be costly for those who aren't prepared. At StockStory, our job is to help you avoid costly mistakes and stay on the right side of the trade. That said, here are two volatile stocks with massive upside potential and one that could just as easily collapse. Rolling One-Year Beta: 1.18 With its iconic yellow machinery working on construction sites, Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) manufactures construction equipment like bulldozers, excavators, and parts and maintenance services. Why Are We Hesitant About CAT? Core business is underperforming as its organic revenue has disappointed over the past two years, suggesting it might need acquisitions to stimulate growth Demand will likely fall over the next 12 months as Wall Street expects flat revenue Competitive supply chain dynamics and steep production costs are reflected in its low gross margin of 29% At $360 per share, Caterpillar trades at 18.6x forward P/E. Check out our free in-depth research report to learn more about why CAT doesn't pass our bar. Rolling One-Year Beta: 1.69 Founded in 2009 and a publicly traded company since 2017, Sea (NYSE:SE) started as a gaming platform and has since expanded to offer a variety of services such as e-commerce, digital payments, and financial services across Southeast Asia. Why Are We Backing SE? Paying Users are rising, meaning the company can increase revenue without incurring additional customer acquisition costs if it can cross-sell additional products and features Grip over its ecosystem is highlighted by its ability to grow engagement while increasing the average revenue per user by 11.7% annually Free cash flow margin expanded by 27.3 percentage points over the last few years, providing additional flexibility for investments and share buybacks/dividends Sea's stock price of $154.03 implies a valuation ratio of 40.9x forward EV/EBITDA. Is now the time to initiate a position? See for yourself in our in-depth research report, it's free. Rolling One-Year Beta: 1.20 Founded in 1952, Distribution Solutions (NASDAQ:DSGR) provides supply chain solutions and distributes industrial, safety, and maintenance products to various industries. Why Will DSGR Beat the Market? Market share has increased this cycle as its 17.8% annual revenue growth over the last two years was exceptional Incremental sales significantly boosted profitability as its annual earnings per share growth of 24.9% over the last two years outstripped its revenue performance Free cash flow margin grew by 3.8 percentage points over the last five years, giving the company more chips to play with Distribution Solutions is trading at $27.77 per share, or 16x forward P/E. Is now the right time to buy? Find out in our full research report, it's free. The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025. While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today for free. Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store