
How much home equity should I borrow in today's economy?
Withdrawing money from your home should always be done carefully, but especially so in today's economy.
Getty Images
While inflation may have cooled in April and in the months prior, the federal funds rate remains high and on pause, perhaps longer than many had anticipated. This has, in part, caused interest rates on everything from mortgages to personal loans and credit cards to remain elevated as well, giving Americans limited options for borrowing money affordably. During this same period, however, home prices have risen and the average home equity level has surged.
Now, at around $313,000, according to a March report, the median homeowner has plenty of money in their home to borrow from. And, unlike the rates on many other products, the interest owners will have to pay if they choose to borrow with a home equity loan or home equity line of credit (HELOC) is much lower. Interest rates on both have steadily declined in recent months, with HELOCs hitting a two-year low and home equity loan rates falling to a 2025 low this month.
So, if you need to borrow money, one of the cheapest ways to access a large sum in today's economy is with either a home equity loan or HELOC. But the current economic climate has multiple advantages and disadvantages and borrowing from your home equity, which causes your home to serve as collateral, can be risky if done without precision. Borrowers should determine how much equity to borrow in today's economy to prevent any threat of foreclosure. So how much should that be, then? That's what we'll analyze below.
Start by seeing how much home equity you could borrow here.
How much home equity should I borrow in today's economy?
When borrowing home equity, you should only borrow an amount that you can comfortably afford to repay, preferably over a shorter period to offset interest costs. While many home equity lenders will allow you to borrow 85% of your home equity, that doesn't mean you should or that you should even come close to that limit. Instead, determine what you have available in your budget to make monthly payments, calculate how much you need and attempt to find a middle ground between both figures.
That noted, the answer to this question is also a personal one, largely dependent on your view of the economy and predictions on what will happen over the lifespan of your home equity loan or HELOC. If you feel confident that inflation will continue to decline and that, eventually, interest rates will decline as well, then you may want to borrow more money. With a HELOC, after all, interest rates are variable and subject to change monthly. If you think rates will continue to drop, then borrowing more money now may not be as much of a concern on the assumption that repaying it will become more affordable over time.
This is less of a concern with a home equity loan since it has a fixed rate that will remain the same unless refinanced. But with a home equity loan, you'll need to make repayments immediately versus the interest-only payments required with a HELOC. That difference in repayment structure should be accounted for, too, especially as the economic climate changes frequently.
In short, home equity borrowing will only be as successful as your ability to pay back all that you've borrowed. Market conditions, interest rates, inflation and more can all impact that ability. Before getting started, then, calculate your monthly payment costs for both products (they have different rates) tied to what rates are available to you right now – and what those rates could look like over time. This will allow you to better determine short- and long-term affordability and help you more precisely determine an amount of equity to borrow that will fit your budget.
Compare your HELOC and home equity loan rate offers here to learn more.
The bottom line
Despite the average amount of home equity being high and the average home equity borrowing rate low in today's economy – a perfect combination for borrowers – homeowners should still be strategic in their approach and that extends to borrowing the right amount of equity for their financial circumstances. For some, that may mean borrowing right up to that 85% limit while, for others, it may be materially less. Each homeowner's financial situation is different but what remains the same for each is that the home will always serve as collateral. So only withdraw as much as you can easily pay back both in today's uncertain economic climate and in future ones to better ensure success.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe
Sometimes a public company has a controlling shareholder who wants to take it private by buying out all of the other shareholders, and that's always messy. 1 The controlling shareholder will to some extent be negotiating with herself: She will want to buy the company for a low price, but the company's shareholders will want to get a high price, but she's the controlling shareholder and can vote for the low price. There are standard solutions to the problem, but they are only partial solutions: In the past few months, I have written a few times about 23andMe Holding Co. as an illustration of these problems. 23andMe is a publicly traded genetic testing company that was once worth about $6 billion, but it has now fallen on hard times. Its founder, Anne Wojcicki, owns about 49% of the voting power of the stock, making her effectively a controlling shareholder. She offered to buy all the stock she didn't own, to take the company private and fix its problems 'outside of the short term pressures of the public markets.' But the board of directors, whose job was to find an 'actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,' didn't think her offer was good enough.


New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Trump-Musk Alliance Dissolves as They Hurl Personal Attacks
Pinned President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added, taking credit for Mr. Trump's election in a way that he never has before. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.


Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Steel Deal Seen Closing by Merger Deadline After Trump Pivot
Nippon Steel Corp. and United States Steel Corp. are on pace to finalize their $14.1 billion combination with US President Donald Trump's administration ahead of a deal deadline later this month, capping an 18-month saga to combine the steelmakers into the world's second-largest producer. Talks on the deal between the companies and the US government are ongoing and expected to reach a conclusion before a June 18 merger agreement deadline, according to people familiar with the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity given that talks are confidential. US Steel and Nippon Steel declined to comment. A Treasury Department spokesperson declined to comment.