
USAID Cancelled Rape Survivor Kits For Congo Amid Rising Conflict
The emergency kits include medication to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, as well as unwanted pregnancies. The decision to cancel the contract for around 100,000 post-rape kits has not been reported previously.
The US Agency for International Development contract was intended to resupply Congo's war-ravaged eastern provinces for the year, and left thousands of health centres without provisions when fighting was escalating. The State Department, which manages USAID, did not respond to repeated requests for comment by email and text message.
Reuters spoke to officials at the United Nations and four other aid groups that treat rape survivors in eastern Congo for this story. A team also visited a site in South Kivu province to speak directly to healthcare workers and survivors.
"When you look into the eyes of a rape victim, you get the impression that her gaze is dead," one health worker in Congo, who declined to be named for fear of reprisals, said. "You never forget standing in front of that person and telling them that you don't have any medicine, that you don't know how to help them, and asking them to leave."
Rwanda-backed M23 rebels swept across the east of the country in January, seizing two major cities, in an escalation of a decades-long conflict. The UN has said that some 67,000 incidences of rape have been recorded since then with many more likely going unreported.
Sexual violence as a weapon of war in the Congo has been documented by generations of UN experts and aid groups.
Pipeline Disrupted
Trump ordered a 90-day pause on foreign aid after taking office in January and halted grants by USAID.
USAID's contract with a supplier for the kits was in the pipeline when billionaire Elon Musk, who at the time was spearheading a department to improve US government efficiency, said he was shuttering the agency in January.
According to the UN and other aid organisations, USAID immediately cancelled the contract, which would have resupplied thousands of health centres by March. Reuters has agreed not to name the supplier to avoid compromising its sensitive operations in Congo.
"When USAID decided to terminate the large funding they had for this American NGO, this American NGO immediately stopped all activities," said Noemi Dalmonte, the deputy representative in Kinshasa for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). "The pipeline got disrupted at a very unfortunate time."
The post-rape kits come in a box containing HIV medication to prevent infection within 72 hours, antibiotics and testing for sexually transmitted diseases and emergency contraception. The supplies paid for by USAID were meant to reach over 2,000 facilities.
"This kit is truly important to reassure the woman who has been really traumatized that she won't get AIDS, that she won't have an unwanted pregnancy, and that she won't contract venereal diseases," said Amadou Bocoum, the country director of CARE International.
The UNFPA shared a document with Reuters that indicated that only seven out of 34 health zones in North Kivu have a minimal supply of post-rape kits left. Less than one-in-four survivors' needs are currently being met. Only 13% of survivors that request help receive medication to prevent HIV within the recommended 72-hour window.
While the US State Department has said it will continue to support life-saving programs worldwide, the contract to supply post-rape kits to survivors remains cancelled.
Trump has said that the US pays disproportionately for foreign aid and he wants other countries to shoulder more of the burden. The US disbursed $65 billion in foreign assistance last year, nearly half of it via USAID, according to government data.
The UNFPA and other aid organisations are trying to raise around $35 million to cover the loss of funding from the United States from donors such as the Gates Foundation and other Western nations.
The consequences of the cancellation include survivor deaths, the spread of HIV, unwanted pregnancies, and unsafe abortions with high maternal-mortality risk, the UNFPA document said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
How the Republican spending bill super-charges immigration enforcement
By Ted Hesson How the Republican spending bill super-charges immigration enforcement WASHINGTON, - The major tax-cut and spending bill that Republicans hope to bring to final passage in the U.S. House of Representatives this week would devote an unprecedented $170 billion to immigration enforcement, according to an analysis by the pro-immigration American Immigration Council and a Reuters review of the bill text. DETENTION The bill, which passed in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday, would provide $45 billion for immigration detention to increase from the currently funded level of a daily average of 41,500 people to at least 100,000, by far the most on record. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which administers the immigration detention system, was over its funded capacity as of June 15, with 56,000 in custody. President Donald Trump, a Republican, visited a temporary detention facility on Tuesday dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" because of its location in the Florida Everglades, a subtropical wetland. Trump said other states could follow the same model as Florida, which quickly constructed large tents and expects reimbursement via federal emergency management funds. BORDER WALL The bill devotes $46.6 billion toward construction of a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. During Trump's 2017-2021 presidency, his administration built about 450 miles of border barriers although much of that replaced existing structures. The entire border spans 1,954 miles . Another $5 billion would go toward upgrading U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities and checkpoints. The number of migrants caught crossing illegally has dropped to record lows since Trump took office in January. HIRING MORE OFFICERS The legislation provides $30 billion for ICE's arrest and deportation operations - more than double the $10 billion appropriated for the agency this year. The funds would pay for the hiring and training of new ICE officers. The money could also be used to ramp up arrests across the country through partnerships with state and local law enforcement. While the Senate bill does not specify how many officers, the House version of the legislation had set a level of 10,000 ICE officers over five years. ICE has about 21,000 full-time employees, according to a budget document published in June. The measure gives $4.1 billion to hire more CBP personnel, including Border Patrol agents. REIMBURSEMENTS TO STATES The bill creates a $10 billion fund to provide reimbursements for spending use to support the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's efforts to secure the border. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, sent a letter in January to U.S. lawmakers requesting reimbursement for more than $11 billion the state spent on border security efforts. FEE INCREASES The legislation will raise fees for various immigration applications, potentially deterring or delaying some migrants from seeking legal status. The bill for the first time will create a $100 fee for an asylum application. Asylum seekers would also face a new $550 work permit fee. The American Immigration Council estimates asylum seekers would pay at least $1,150 over a five-year process to obtain asylum. Fees would also rise for programs that offer temporary legal immigration status and protection from deportation, which Trump generally opposes. People applying for Temporary Protected Status would see registration fees rise from $50 to $500. Those seeking humanitarian "parole" would have fees increase from $630 to $1,000. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'Often countries do not take position': Jaishankar slams global double standards on terrorism
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Tuesday slammed the global community's selective approach to terrorism, saying some countries only take strong positions when they themselves are targeted read more External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Tuesday slammed the global community's selective approach to terrorism, highlighting how some countries only take strong positions when they themselves are targeted. #WATCH | Washington, DC | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "It is a fact that often countries do not take a position when some other countries are victims of terrorism, which they would do when they themselves are. In that respect honestly, we have been much more consistent and… — ANI (@ANI) July 2, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It is a fact that often countries do not take a position when some other countries are victims of terrorism, which they would do when they themselves are,' Jaishankar said while speaking to the media in Washington DC after attending the Quad foreign ministers' meeting. Jaishankar said India's diplomatic approach has largely maintained the same response to terror attacks abroad as it does for those on its own soil. 'In that respect honestly, we have been much more consistent and principled,' he added. Jaishankar emphasised the importance of pushing for a more unified global response to terrorism. 'Many of them are not doing it or not doing it sufficiently enough, and part of diplomacy is to exhort them, encourage them, persuade them, motivate them to do that,' he said. 'That is why it's important to speak up, and to carry them with us to the best possibility,' he added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Jaishankar, referring to Operation Sindoor post Pakistan-backed Pahalagam terror attack, said India has sent an unambiguous message that it will not tolerate terrorism in any form. #WATCH | Washington, DC | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "...What we have communicated very clearly is we mean it when we say there is zero tolerance for you look back at the Prime Minister's address to the nation after the cessation of firing on the 10th of May, there… — ANI (@ANI) July 2, 2025 '…What we have communicated very clearly is we mean it when we say there is zero tolerance for terrorism…If you look back at the Prime Minister's address to the nation after the cessation of firing on the 10th of May, there were some very clear messages which came out of that…It's really for the terrorist groupings and for their sponsors to absorb and reflect on those messages,' said Jaishankar. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rejecting the idea of publicly outlining India's next steps, Jaishankar said, 'I don't think we are going to spell out — if this happens, we will do that. No government does that.' Jaishankar said at the Quad foreign ministers' meeting he told his partners that India had the right to defend itself against terrorist activities and hold the perpetrators accountable. 'With each of my counterparts, I have shared with them the sense that the nature of the terrorists challenge, the fact that we have confronted it over multiple decades and that we are very resolved today to respond to it very firmly and we have the right to defend ourselves,' he said. #WATCH | Washington, DC | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "...With each of my counterparts, I have shared with them the sense that the nature of the terrorists challenge, the fact that we have confronted it over multiple decades and that we are very resolved today to respond to it very… — ANI (@ANI) July 2, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The perpetrators of terrorism must be held accountable, they must be brought to justice and that's important because we have to communicate to the world that what we did on 7th May, the objective of Operation Sindoor is that if there are terrorist attacks, we will act against the perpetrators, the supporters, the enablers. That message was conveyed with great clarity,' he added. Jaishankar further said the issue of US President Donald Trump brokering the ceasefire between India and Pakistan did not come up at the meeting, although he maintained that a truce was decided in the meeting between the DGMOs of two countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During the press conference, Jaishankar also hailed the all-party delegations to convey India's message after Operation Sindoor, saying it conveyed a strong message of national unity. #WATCH | Washington, DC | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "I have spoken about the all-party delegations in very much value and appreciate what they serves our national interest. When you have a broadband set of people who speak with one voice abroad, it conveys a… — ANI (@ANI) July 2, 2025 'I have spoken about the all-party delegations in India…We very much value and appreciate what they did…It serves our national interest. When you have a broadband set of people who speak with one voice abroad, it conveys a strong message of national unity. It underlines a certain seriousness about responding to terrorism… You saw the political pluralism of India come together on an important issue and send a strong unified message and I think that was something really great and it's something which quite apart from being a minister, honestly, as a person, as an Indian citizen, I applaud that,' said the external affairs minister. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. India struck several terror hideouts and eliminated more than 100 terrorists. Earlier today, the foreign ministers of all Quad countries unequivocally condemned the April 22's ghastly terror attack, which claimed 26 lives. 'We express our deepest condolences to the families of the victims and extend our heartfelt wishes for a swift and full recovery to all those injured. We call for the perpetrators, organisers, and financiers of this reprehensible act to be brought to justice without any delay and urge all UN member States, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant UNSCRs, to cooperate actively with all relevant authorities in this regard,' the statement said. With inputs from agencies


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India needs to be careful after US-Vietnam deal: Experts
India needs to tread carefully in its trade negotiations with the United States, keeping in view the terms proposed under the latter's trade deal with Vietnam, trade experts say. As per the new trade pact announced by President Donald Trump , the US will impose a flat 20% tariff, besides a 40% tariff on transshipped goods from Vietnam. Beyond a deviation from the previous commitments under the 2000 US-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), where Vietnamese goods were subject to 2-10% tariffs, the new deal seeks to tax transshipped goods, which differs from the rules of origin on which tariffs or duty concessions are based. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ултрапреносими 2-в-1 таблети - 50% отстъпка в последния ден LYH Купете сега Undo "The terms are that Vietnam will pay the United States a 20% tariff on any and all goods sent into our territory, and a 40% tariff on any transshipping," Trump said in a post on X. "India needs to be cautious as these transshipment tariffs could be a different form of 'rules of origin', which could have a detrimental impact on our pharmaceutical and electronics exports where the import component is high," said trade expert Biswajit Dhar. Live Events Indian trade negotiators are in the US since last week to thrash out a deal before the July 9 deadline for an interim deal to avoid US reciprocal tariffs, but India has hardened its stance to protect its sensitivities.