'Vicious doxxing on dark web': DHS secretary Kristi Noem moves to military housing as ICE assualts surge; receives death threats from cartels, terrorists
US homeland security secretary
Kristi Noem
has temporarily moved out of her Washington, DC, residence after her address was published by the media, triggering what officials called 'vicious doxxing' and a surge in death threats.
Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said Noem is now staying in secure military housing due to escalating risks.
'Following the media's publishing of the location of Secretary Noem's Washington D.C. apartment, she has faced vicious doxxing on the dark web and a surge in death threats, including from the terrorist organizations, cartels, and criminal gangs that DHS targets. Due to threats and security concerns, she has been forced to temporarily stay in secure military housing,' McLaughlin told Fox News Digital, as cited by The New York Post.
'Secretary Noem continues to pay rent for her Navy Yard residence. It's a shame that the media chooses sensationalism over the safety of people enforcing America's laws to keep Americans," she added.
The relocation comes amid rising violence against federal immigration officers. Last week, Noem warned that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents 'are now facing a 1000% increase in assaults against them as they risk their lives to arrest the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Retro Lanterns: A Halloween Staple
topgadgetlife
Shop Now
Undo
In a post on X, she vowed the threats would not deter her department, 'We will not and have not let this violence stop us or slow us down. Everyday our law enforcement continues to enforce the law and arrest the most depraved criminals including pedophiles, terrorists, murderers, gang members, and sexual predators.'
The surge in threats aligns with recent data showing an 830% increase in assaults on ICE officials between January 21 and July 14, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. That period began the day after President
Donald Trump
returned to the Oval Office.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Trump runs into difficulty of Putin diplomacy
Agency: PTI Last Updated: New York, Aug 17 (AP) President Donald Trump walked into a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin pressing for a ceasefire deal and threatening 'severe consequences" and tough new sanctions if the Kremlin leader failed to agree to halt the fighting in Ukraine. Instead, Trump was the one who stood down, dropping his demand for a ceasefire in favour of pursuing a full peace accord — a position that aligns with Putin's. After calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump wrote as he flew home from Friday's meeting in Alaska that it had been 'determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up." It was a dramatic reversal that laid bare the challenges of dealing with Putin, a cunning adversary, as well as the complexities of a conflict that Trump had repeatedly boasted during his campaign that he could solve within 24 hours. Trump's position after the summit with Putin Few details have emerged about what the two leaders discussed or what constituted the progress they both touted. The White House did not respond to messages seeking comment Saturday. While European leaders were relieved that Trump did not agree to a deal that ceded territory or otherwise favoured Moscow, the summit allowed Putin to reclaim his place on the world stage and may have bought Russia more time to push forward with its offensive in Ukraine. 'We're back to where we were before without him having gone to Alaska," said Fiona Hill, who served as Trump's senior adviser on Russia at the National Security Council during his first term, including when he last met Putin in Helsinki in 2018. In an interview, Hill argued that Trump had emerged from the meeting in a weaker position on the world stage because of his reversal. Other leaders, she said, might now look at the US president and think he's 'not the big guy that he thinks he is and certainly not the dealmaking genius." 'All the way along, Trump was convinced he has incredible forces of persuasion," she said, but he came out of the meeting without a ceasefire — the 'one thing" he had been pushing for, even after he gave the Russian leader the 'red carpet treatment." Trump has 'run up against a rock in the form of Putin, who doesn't want anything from him apart from Ukraine," she said. Democrats call for consequences for Putin At home, Democrats expressed alarm at what at times seemed like a day of deference, with Trump clapping for Putin as he walked down a red carpet during an elaborate ceremony welcoming him to US soil for the first time in a decade. The two rode together in the presidential limousine and exchanged compliments. Trump seemed to revel in particular in Putin echoing his oft-repeated assertion that Russia never would have invaded Ukraine if Trump had been in office instead of Democrat Joe Biden at the time. Before news cameras, Trump did not use the opportunity to castigate Putin for launching the largest ground invasion in Europe since World War II or human rights abuses he's been accused of committing. Instead, Putin was the one who spoke first, and invited Trump to join him in Moscow next. 'President Trump appears to have been played yet again by Vladimir Putin," said Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 'The President rolled out a red carpet and warmly greeted a murderous dictator on American soil and reports indicate he got nothing concrete in return." 'Enough is enough," she went on. 'If President Trump won't act, Congress must do so decisively by passing crushing sanctions when we return in the coming weeks." Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who is the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he supports diplomacy but 'peacemaking must be done responsibly." 'Instead of caving to Putin, the US should join our allies in levying tough, targeted new sanctions on Russia to intensify the economic pressure," he said. Republicans and Trump allies offer little response so far In Washington, the summit was met by little response from Trump's allies. Republican lawmakers who spoke out were largely reserved and generally called for continued talks and constructive actions from the Trump administration. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, wrote on social media after the summit that 'while the press conference offered few details about their meeting" she was 'cautiously optimistic about the signals that some level of progress was made." Murkowski said it 'was also encouraging to hear both presidents reference future meetings" but that Ukraine 'must be part of any negotiated settlement and must freely agree to its terms." Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and close Trump ally, offered that he was 'very proud" of Trump for having had the face-to-face meeting and was 'cautiously optimistic" that the war might end 'well before Christmas" if a trilateral meeting between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin transpires. 'I have all the confidence in the world that Donald Trump will make it clear to Putin this war will never start again. If it does, you're going to pay a heavy price," he said on Fox News. For some Trump allies, the very act of him meeting with Putin was success enough: conservative activist and podcaster Charlie Kirk called it 'a great thing." Some see a Putin win and a Trump loss But in Europe, the summit was seen as a major diplomatic coup for Putin, who has been eager to emerge from geopolitical isolation. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington, describing the talks as 'calm, without ultimatums and threats." Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said the summit was 'a distinct win for Putin. He didn't yield an inch" but was also 'a distinct setback for Trump. No ceasefire in sight." 'What the world sees is a weak and wobbling America," Bildt posted on X. (AP) GRS GRS (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 17, 2025, 10:45 IST News agency-feeds Trump runs into difficulty of Putin diplomacy Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
He earned a small towns trust. He owed $95 million in what authorities say was a Ponzi scheme
HAMILTON, N.Y. (AP) — For decades, Miles 'Burt' Marshall was the man you went to see in a stretch of upstate New York if you had some money to invest but wanted to keep it local. Working from an office in the charming village of Hamilton, down the road from Colgate University, Marshall prepared taxes and sold insurance. He also took money for what was sometimes called the '8% Fund,' which guaranteed that much in annual interest no matter what happened with the financial markets. His clients spread the word to family and friends. Have a retirement nest egg? Let Burt handle it. He'll invest it in local rental properties and your money will grow faster than in a bank. Marshall was friendly and folksy. He gave away gift bags with maple syrup, pickles and local honey in jars labeled with cute sayings like, 'Don't be a sap. For proper insurance coverage call Miles B. Marshall." 'He would tell you about all the other people that invest. Churches invest. Fire companies invest. Doctors invest,' said one client, Christine Corrigan. 'So you'd think, 'Well, they're smart people. They wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't okay to do ... Why are you going to be the suspicious one?' Then it all came crashing down. Marshall owed almost 1,000 people and organizations about $95 million in principal and interest when he filed for bankruptcy protection two years ago, according to the trustee's filings. This summer, the 73-year-old businessman was indicted on charges that his investment business was a Ponzi scheme. He could face prison time if convicted. Marshall's lawyers declined to comment. Total losses by Marshall's investors fall short of the multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme masterminded by Bernie Madoff. But they loom large in the small, college town of about 6,400 people and its largely rural surrounding area. Many investors were Colgate professors, laborers, office workers or retirees. Some lost their life's savings of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Corrigan and her husband, who own a restaurant 30 miles (48 kilometers) east, were owed about $1.5 million. Now they're wondering how someone who seemed so reliable, who held annual parties for his clients and even called them on their birthdays could betray their trust. 'You look at life differently after this happens. It's like, 'Who do you trust?'' said Dennis Sullivan, who was owed about $40,000. 'It's sad because of what he's done to the area.' Marshall and his wife lived in a brick Victorian, blocks from his office. Aside from insurance and tax preparation, he rented more than 100 properties and ran a self-storage business and a print shop. His parents had run an insurance and realty business in the area and the Marshall name was respected locally. Though he quit college, he was a federally enrolled tax professional. To many in the area, he seemed knowledgeable about money and kept a neat office. 'He had French doors and a beautiful carpet and a big desk and he just looked like he was prosperous and reliable," Corrigan said. Marshall began taking money from people to buy and maintain rental properties in the 1980s. People got back promissory notes — slips of paper with the dollar amount written in. Withdrawals could be made with 30 days' notice. People could choose to receive regular interest payments. Participants saw the transactions as investments. Marshall has called them loans. For many years, Marshall made good on his promises to pay interest and process withdrawals. More people took part as word spread. Sullivan recalls how his parents gave Marshall money, then he did, then his fiancee, then his fiancee's daughter, then his son, and even his snowmobile club. 'Everybody gets snowballed into it,' Sullivan said. A number of investors lived in other states, but had connections to the area. The promise of 8% returns was unremarkable in the '80s, a time of higher interest rates. But it stood out later as rates dropped. Marshall told a bankruptcy proceeding that he assumed appreciation on his real estate would more than cover the debts. 'That's obviously false now," he said, according to filings, "but that's what I always thought.' The money stopped flowing by 2023. Marshall filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection that April, declaring more than $90 million in liabilities and $21.5 million in assets, most of it in real estate. He explained in a filing that he had been been hospitalized for a 'serious heart condition' that required two surgeries, costing him $600,000. As news of his illness spread, there was a run on note holders asking for their money back. The bankruptcy trustee, Fred Stevens, blamed Marshall's insolvency on incompetent business practices and borrowing from people at above-market rates. The trustee contended that by 2011, Marshall was using new investment money to pay off previous investors, the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme. Prosecutors claim Marshall falsely represented the profitability of his real estate business and had his staff generate "transaction summaries' with bogus information about account balances and earned interest. Money was funneled into his other businesses and he spent hundreds of thousands of investors' dollars on personal expenses, including airline travel, meals out, groceries and yoga studios, according to prosecutors. Marshall's clients feel betrayed. 'We left it there so that it would accumulate. Well, it accumulated in his pocket,' Barbara Baltusnik said of her investment. Marshall pleaded not guilty in June to charges of grand larceny and securities fraud. He's accused of stealing more than $50 million. Marshall's home and properties were sold as part of bankruptcy proceedings, which continue. People who gave Marshall their money stand to recoup around 5.4 cents on the dollar from the asset sales. Potential claims against financial institutions are being pursued, according to the trustee. Baltusnik said she and her husband were owed hundreds of thousands of dollars and now she wonders how she will pay doctors' bills. Sullivan's mother moved in with him after losing her investment. In Epworth, Georgia, retiree Carolyn Call will never see money she hoped would help augment her Social Security payments. She found out about Marshall though an uncle who lived in upstate New York. 'I'm just able to pay my bills and keep going," she said. "Nothing extravagant. No trips. Can't do anything hardly for the grandkids.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Market outlook: How will D-Street react to Alaska meeting, GST announcement? Here is what experts say
Markets are set for a strong start on Monday, with both global and domestic factors likely to lift investor sentiment. The twin triggers include Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day announcement of GST reforms and the 'understanding' reached between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Alaska meeting Trump and Putin held a close to three-hour meeting in Alaska, which, even though, did not produce a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, ended with what Putin described as an 'understanding'. Trump called it a "very good meeting" but stressed that 'there's no deal until there's a deal.' He added, "We had a very good meeting today, and I think a lot of points were negotiated on behalf of Ukraine. There's no deal until there's a deal," noting that he plans to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders soon. Putin, meanwhile, cautioned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' GST reforms announced by PM Modi On the domestic front, markets are expected to react positively to PM Modi's pledge of rate cuts under GST 2.0 by Diwali. Speaking from the Red Fort on Independence Day, Modi announced that GST rates will be lowered on everyday-use goods as part of reforms to the eight-year-old tax system. Quoting Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, PTI reported that the government plans to introduce two slabs, standard and merit, plus special rates for certain items, replacing the current four brackets of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28%, while luxury and sin goods will continue to attract an additional duty. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo Market reaction to Trump-Putin meeting Kranthi Bathini, director-equity strategy at WealthMills Securities, said the meeting between Trump and Putin is a positive development. 'These are complex problems and cannot be resolved in one meeting. The agreement to meet again with calm markets," Bathini told ET. Anuj Gupta, Director at Ya Wealth Global Research, pointed to Trump's statement about delaying tariffs on China for buying Russian oil as another encouraging sign. Gupta noted that India, another large buyer of Russian crude, has faced a total 50% tariff and penalties on Russian imports but was not mentioned this time. Sunny Agrawal, head - retail fundamental desk at SBI Securities, said the absence of any fresh negative development is a relief. He said that Trump's statement that 'he will not have to think of retaliatory tariffs on countries buying Russian oil right now but may have to in two or three weeks' now offers at least a temporary relief to countries like India." He told ET that the additional 25% tariff on India scheduled to begin on 27 August may now be on the backburner. Christopher Wood, global head of equity strategy at Jefferies, said the Trump administration's 50% tariff on Indian imports is not a reason to sell. Instead, he argued, it's an opportunity to buy. "It is only a matter of time before Trump backs off the stance, which is not in America's interest.' How will GST impact markets Agrawal of SBI Securities said the move to a two-slab GST structure (5% and 18%), plus a 40% slab for sin products, will support consumption. "Few categories like large TV, AC, cement, automobiles, etc are likely to get cheaper, as they are shifted from 28% category to 18%. Moreover, reduction in GST rates on insurance products also will ease burden on consumers. Cheaper cement prices can have a multiplier effect on various sectors like real estate, roads/highways/infra as cost of production is likely to reduce and the same can be passed on to the consumer," he told ET. He cautioned, however, that the reforms must be implemented quickly. If not, festive season sales could be delayed as consumers wait for lower prices, temporarily affecting demand. Gupta and Bathini also praised the move, saying GST relief during the festive season will spur consumption and aid the wider economy, with FMCG and autos likely to gain. Market outlook Indian equities broke a six-week losing streak last week, finishing with gains of over 1%. Experts believe Monday's session will reflect optimism from both global and domestic developments. Santosh Meena, Head of Research at Swastika Investmart, said the Nifty is forming a strong base. "The immediate resistance lies at the 20 and 50-day moving averages (DMAs) clustered around 24,700-24,800. A decisive break above this level could trigger a short-covering rally towards 24,950, 25,080, and 25,225. Immediate support is at the 100-DMA of 24,575, with the crucial support level remaining at 24,350," he said. Anand James, chief market strategist at Geojit Investments, however, expects further weakness. "Directional moving indicators are still in favour of more downsides with 24,000 and 23,560 as potential downside supports attracting prices lower," he said. He added, "That said, the last week saw several attempts to push higher, giving us reversal hopes. Apparently none of those moves managed to successfully close above the 24670-720 band, the near term congestion resistance, they did manage to bring parabolic sar under the price, lending a positive bias." The analyst further said that the market has shown even better signs of resilience having had the highest number of Nifty 500 constituents closing above 10 day SMA, since 24th July. "Incidentally, the Nifty had tumbled from the 25,200 region on that day. This would be the objective we would be aiming, should we clear above 24,720 on Monday." Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
