Russia drops missile deployment moratorium amid tensions with Trump admin
Russia's foreign ministry announced earlier this week that it would no longer be bound by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. The U.S. had withdrawn from the treaty in 2019, but Russian officials had said they would avoid deploying short- and medium-range nuclear missiles so long as the U.S. did the same.
"The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy," Medvedev posted Sunday on X.
"This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps," he added.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov had initially floated dropping the moratorium in December, citing alleged "destabilizing actions" by the U.S. and NATO.
"Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of U.S.-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared," the ministry said in a statement at the time.
The INF treaty, signed in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, eliminated an entire class of weapons – ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers.
Medvedev's latest comments come amid an ongoing back-and-forth with President Donald Trump. The former Russian president had goaded Trump in a series of posts on X, claiming the U.S. was moving toward "war" with Moscow.
In response, Trump announced that the U.S. was redeploying two nuclear submarines to "appropriate regions" closer to Moscow.
The Kremlin released a statement downplaying Medvedev's comments soon afterward.
"We approach any statements related to nuclear issues with great caution," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said. "As you know, Russia holds a responsible position. President Putin's stance is well known."
"Russia takes the issue of nuclear non-proliferation very seriously," he added. "And, of course, we believe that everyone should be extremely careful when it comes to nuclear rhetoric."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
8 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump-backed Nawrocki assumes the Polish presidency and could steer a more nationalist course
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Conservative Karol Nawrocki will take office Wednesday as Poland 's new president, which could set the country on a more nationalist course — and cast doubt on the viability of the centrist government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Most day-to-day power in Poland rests with the prime minister, chosen by the parliament. However, the president holds the power to influence foreign policy and veto laws. Nawrocki, who was supported by U.S. President Donald Trump ahead of a narrow victory in a runoff election in June, is a 42-year-old historian who had no political experience prior to campaigning. He was not even a political party member until being approached by the conservative Law and Justice party that governed Poland from 2015 to 2023. Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic values. Many of them oppose abortion and LGBTQ+ visibility and say Nawrocki reflects the values they grew up with. The American conservative group CPAC held its first meeting in Poland during the campaign to give him a boost. Kristi Noem, the U.S. Homeland Security secretary and a Trump ally, praised Nawrocki and urged Poles to vote for him. His campaign echoed themes popular on the U.S. right. A common refrain from his supporters is that Nawrocki will restore 'normality,' as they believe Trump has done. U.S. flags appeared at his rallies. Nawrocki's quick political rise has not been without controversy, with reports linking him to underworld figures whom he met while boxing or working as a hotel security guard in the past. Nawrocki has also been linked to a scandal involving the acquisition of a Gdansk apartment from a retiree. Allegations suggest Nawrocki promised to care for the man in return but failed to fulfill the commitment, leading the man to end up in a publicly funded retirement home. Nawrocki's shifting explanations raised questions about his transparency and credibility. After the scandal erupted, he donated the apartment to a charity.
Washington Post
8 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump-backed Nawrocki assumes the Polish presidency and could steer a more nationalist course
WARSAW, Poland — Conservative Karol Nawrocki will take office Wednesday as Poland 's new president, which could set the country on a more nationalist course — and cast doubt on the viability of the centrist government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk . Most day-to-day power in Poland rests with the prime minister, chosen by the parliament. However, the president holds the power to influence foreign policy and veto laws. Nawrocki, who was supported by U.S. President Donald Trump ahead of a narrow victory in a runoff election in June, is a 42-year-old historian who had no political experience prior to campaigning. He was not even a political party member until being approached by the conservative Law and Justice party that governed Poland from 2015 to 2023. Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic values. Many of them oppose abortion and LGBTQ+ visibility and say Nawrocki reflects the values they grew up with. The American conservative group CPAC held its first meeting in Poland during the campaign to give him a boost. Kristi Noem, the U.S. Homeland Security secretary and a Trump ally, praised Nawrocki and urged Poles to vote for him. His campaign echoed themes popular on the U.S. right. A common refrain from his supporters is that Nawrocki will restore 'normality,' as they believe Trump has done. U.S. flags appeared at his rallies. Nawrocki's quick political rise has not been without controversy, with reports linking him to underworld figures whom he met while boxing or working as a hotel security guard in the past. Nawrocki has also been linked to a scandal involving the acquisition of a Gdansk apartment from a retiree. Allegations suggest Nawrocki promised to care for the man in return but failed to fulfill the commitment, leading the man to end up in a publicly funded retirement home. Nawrocki's shifting explanations raised questions about his transparency and credibility. After the scandal erupted, he donated the apartment to a charity.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Ukraine peace plan now runs straight through an old friend
After championing Vladimir Putin indefatigably for months, Donald Trump is poised this week to punish Russia's invasion of Ukraine for the first time. But it is India, not Russia, that appears likely to bear the brunt. Facing a self-imposed deadline – shortened from 50 to 12 days – the US president has until Friday to unveil measures aimed at forcing Putin to consider a ceasefire. With bipartisan support in Congress for tough sanctions, Mr Trump has threatened to throttle Russia's war economy by imposing 100 per cent tariffs on any country buying its oil. Such a move would have a significant impact, says Timothy Ash, associate fellow at Chatham House, an international affairs think tank: 'Russia's exports would slow to a trickle. Its fiscal revenues would stop almost completely. We would see major runs on banks and the currency come under severe pressure.' Focus on Moscow's oil exports But, he adds, while the impact on Moscow would be severe, it would also unleash turmoil on world markets, send oil prices sky-rocketing and chill the global economy. So outlandish did the threat seem that investors initially dismissed it as bluster from a president long open about his warm relations with Putin. But in recent days, he has begun shaping a more modest sanctions package targeting states whose purchases of Russian oil help fund the war. So far his focus has been selective. He has avoided threatening China – Russia's biggest energy customer – and Turkey, the third largest. Instead, he has singled out India, the second-largest buyer. Last week, Mr Trump raised tariffs on Indian goods to 25 per cent, above the rate applied to Asian competitors, and promised an additional penalty for Delhi's oil purchases from Russia. 'They're fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not happy,' he told CNBC on Tuesday, saying he would unveil the new tariff within 24 hours. India's role in sustaining Russia's economy is clear. Before the 2022 invasion, Russian oil accounted for just 0.2 per cent of India's imports; today it is 45 percent – around two million barrels a day – bringing £41bn in revenue last year, according to Delhi's Global Trade Research Initiative. Even so, China buys more – 47 per cent of Russia's oil, compared with India's 37 per cent. Mr Trump's circumspection as far as Beijing is concerned probably reflects geopolitical caution: Washington and Beijing only recently stabilised relations after a damaging trade war and Mr Trump is hoping to stage a triumphant summit with Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, before the end of the year. That he feels freer to confront India suggests ulterior motives. Despite the president's warm personal ties with Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, US relations with the country he leads have soured. Trade negotiations have stalled, frustrating Mr Trump. He was also reportedly incensed when Pakistan, not India, praised his mediation and even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize after the India-Pakistan clashes in May. Mr Modi, by contrast, played down Mr Trump's role and has paid the price for his perceived ingratitude. In June, Mr Trump invited Asim Munir, Pakistan's powerful army chief, to lunch at the White House, pledged to improve relations with India's chief enemy and announced plans to help develop its oil reserves. Scepticism over Mr Trump's sudden concern about Indian oil imports is heightened by his previous reluctance to impose new sanctions on Russia – or even uphold the old ones. Enforcement of existing restrictions has significantly weakened since he returned to the White House, critics say. Not only did he decline to appoint a new head of the State Department's Office of Sanctions Co-ordination, he has also proved reluctant to coordinate with the EU on sanctions enforcement, European officials complain. 'He feels played and he's angry' Front companies helping Moscow evade restrictions have proliferated, critics say – a claim the White House denies. Some analysts believe Mr Trump has had a genuine change of heart, after concluding that only meaningful pressure on Putin – who believes he has the battlefield advantage – will bring him to the negotiating table. With some experts warning a Russian victory is no longer unthinkable, the president seems determined to act. 'I think Trump has come around to the realisation that convincing Putin to back away from his maximalist war aims will take more than nice conversations,' said Charles Kupchan, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a prominent US think tank. 'I think in many respects you're looking at an American president who feels played by Putin, and he's angry. And now that he has pivoted, he does not want to go down in history as the American president who lost Ukraine.' Whether focusing on India alone will work is doubtful, particularly as Mr Modi shows no sign of yielding. Mr Trump insists that secondary tariffs could cut Russian oil revenues enough to force Putin to rethink his strategy. 'If energy goes down enough, Putin is going to stop killing people,' he said last week. 'If you get energy down, another $10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.' But experts warn that tariffs and sanctions alone may not be enough, certainly if they are imposed on India alone. As Mr Kupchan notes: 'Increasing economic pressure is necessary, but it's only one plank of a set of policies. The more important element is getting arms to Ukraine and helping it build its own military-industrial base. 'I don't think we can strangle the Russian economy. Ultimately, Ukraine needs the capability to stop Putin.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
