More than 100 MPs threaten to halt welfare reforms in PM's biggest rebellion
Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform Bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1.
The rebellion, the Prime Minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels.
The amendment, published on Tuesday's order paper, notes there is a 'need for the reform of the social security system'.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Commons majority could be under threat by rebel Labour MPs opposed to his Government's welfare reform plans (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
But it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'.
There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said.
They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn.
Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee.
The MPs who signed the amendment 'want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill', Ms Abrahams said.
She added: 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.'
Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed the amendment.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading.
Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC).
Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
Those leaving the meeting insisted there was broad consensus in the room, with only few MPs standing up to make their opposition known.
The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'.
She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it.
Ms Kendall added: 'Above all, they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support.
'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour's benefit cuts may discriminate against disabled women, say charities
Downing Street's disability cuts will have a 'devastating' impact on women's health and dignity and could breach equality law, the government has been warned. Charities and disabled people's organisations including Scope, Spinal Injuries Association, Inclusion London, ME Association and WinVisible told the Guardian that tightening eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) would mean disabled women being discriminated against, due to their higher personal care needs compared with men. Under the new rules, to be voted on by MPs next week, a claimant must receive four points in a single daily living category to qualify for the payment. Washing below the waist will score just two – half the number given to needing assistance between the shoulders and waist. It means the new four-point rule won't take into account menstruation or some women's extra toilet requirements, such as incontinence from pregnancy, unless they have additional needs. More than 100 Labour MPs have signed a Commons bid to halt the cuts in their tracks, enough to threaten Keir Starmer's majority. Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on an amendment declining to give the welfare reform bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on 1 July. The rebellion, the prime minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. 'The proposed changes to the Pip assessment criteria ignore fundamental aspects of women's health and dignity,' said Dharshana Sridhar, campaigns manager at the Spinal Injuries Association. The decision to award fewer points for assistance with personal care below the waist overlooked the realities of menstruation, incontinence and intimate hygiene; needs that were especially complex and often more acute for women with spinal cord injuries, Sridhar said. 'By failing to recognise the distinct and disproportionate impact of these changes on disabled women, the proposals risk breaching the Equality Act 2010, both in terms of sex and disability discrimination, and the Public Sector Equality Duty. A benefits system that systematically disregards menstruation, personal care, and continence management for disabled women cannot credibly claim to meet its legal obligations to promote equality and eliminate discrimination.' Hat Porter, a spokesperson for the menstrual justice charity Irise, said: 'Already PIP applicants with conditions like endometriosis and fibroids face a much lower than average application success rate, with claimants' debilitating symptoms being dismissed as 'just a period'. 'Tightening the eligibility criteria would make it even harder to access financial support. For those who use Pip to cover the costs of carers or social care fees, having this lifeline stripped away could leave them without the support they need to manage tasks like changing period products. That would have a devastating impact on their dignity as well as health.' There are wider concerns that women will be more likely to miss out on Pip under the new rules, after the government's own impact assessment showed more women than men currently score fewer than four points on descriptors while getting a daily living award. The ME Association said that Pip's existing 'majority of the time' rule – which says a claimant must be unable to do an activity over half the time to qualify – would compound the discrimination against women. 'Menstrual symptoms, by definition, occur intermittently and may not affect a woman for over 50% of the time – meaning they are often excluded from consideration, regardless of how severely disabling they are when present,' said Ella Smith, the charity's welfare rights consultant. 'In practice, this could lead to many women losing eligibility under the proposed 4-point rule, not because their support needs are minor, but because those needs are dispersed across multiple activities or occur cyclically. With Pip being positioned to replace the work capability assessment as the sole gateway to assessing work capability, it is imperative that the new system takes account of intermittent yet profoundly disabling experiences such as menstruation.' Jessica Leigh, campaigns manager at Scope, said the charity had heard from 'hundreds' of disabled people who rely on benefits to afford sanitary products, incontinence pads, and needing to do more laundry. 'Disabled people are extremely concerned their personal hygiene and health will be among the many devastating costs of these cuts,' she said. The Pip changes come amid strained NHS community and social care, which several DPOs told the Guardian had already led to 'basic' hygiene being treated as a 'luxury' for some disabled women. Tumu Johnson, a spokesperson for Sisters of Frida, a disabled women's group, says: 'Disabled women have been told [by local councils] to wear incontinence pads instead of being provided support to use the toilet. They have also been told to use the hormonal pill to stop their periods instead of support to manage their menstruation the way they choose. We've heard from many disabled women who are scared that the Pip changes mean they could now lose vital personal care, on top of their other needs.' A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: 'The vast majority of people who are currently getting Pip will continue to receive it. We're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick and disabled people while always protecting those who need it most. 'At the heart of this is our review of the Pip assessment to ensure it is fit for the future. We will work with disabled people and a range of experts on this as we deliver our plan for change.'
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car makers call for planned easing of electricity costs to go further
Government measures to ease industrial electricity costs should go further to help end the 'structural disadvantage' faced by UK automotive companies, a representative body said. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) called for the proposed relief on standing charges included in the Industrial Strategy published on Monday – which will apply to battery manufacturing – to be extended to automotive manufacturing. It stated that UK automotive manufacturers pay more for electricity than anywhere else in Europe, and in excess of double the average. This is partly because of energy taxes which are six times higher and added more than £200 million to manufacturers' bills last year, the SMMT said. It stated: 'Rapid implementation of the reforms to industrial energy costs set out in the Industrial Strategy would cut the sector's electricity bill by a fifth, helping ease this structural disadvantage.' The SMMT added that compared with other major economies, the UK has the highest business rates and is 'among the worst for the burden of government regulation'. It called for the Government to 'recreate a competitive edge', declaring that 'the time now is for giant leaps'. SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: 'We welcome the Government's Industrial Strategy, a 10-year plan which answers our call for a long-term commitment to automotive manufacturing. 'With action to reduce electricity costs, upskill workers and unlock finance, it lays the foundation on which we can build our future. 'We now need to see the strategy implemented and at pace, because competitors will move fast so our window of opportunity will not remain open for long. 'The prize, however, in terms of jobs, innovation and economic growth – green growth at that – is worth the investment.'
Western Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Car makers call for planned easing of electricity costs to go further
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) called for the proposed relief on standing charges included in the Industrial Strategy published on Monday – which will apply to battery manufacturing – to be extended to automotive manufacturing. It stated that UK automotive manufacturers pay more for electricity than anywhere else in Europe, and in excess of double the average. We now need to see the strategy implemented and at pace Mike Hawes, SMMT This is partly because of energy taxes which are six times higher and added more than £200 million to manufacturers' bills last year, the SMMT said. It stated: 'Rapid implementation of the reforms to industrial energy costs set out in the Industrial Strategy would cut the sector's electricity bill by a fifth, helping ease this structural disadvantage.' The SMMT added that compared with other major economies, the UK has the highest business rates and is 'among the worst for the burden of government regulation'. It called for the Government to 'recreate a competitive edge', declaring that 'the time now is for giant leaps'. SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: 'We welcome the Government's Industrial Strategy, a 10-year plan which answers our call for a long-term commitment to automotive manufacturing. 'With action to reduce electricity costs, upskill workers and unlock finance, it lays the foundation on which we can build our future. 'We now need to see the strategy implemented and at pace, because competitors will move fast so our window of opportunity will not remain open for long. 'The prize, however, in terms of jobs, innovation and economic growth – green growth at that – is worth the investment.'
