Trail camera captures striking glimpse of elusive jungle predator with rare coloring: 'So breathtaking'
A trail camera captured an incredible picture of a black jaguar, giving the world a glimpse of a beautiful beast with rare coloring.
As Outdoors reported, the photo shows a melanistic jaguar, meaning it has an increased amount of dark pigmentation. The animal is sitting and staring directly at the camera, seemingly posing for a portrait in Mamiraua, a portion of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil.
The World Wildlife Fund shared the photo on its United Kingdom Instagram page, and it quickly became a fan favorite. The post received thousands of likes, and commenters called the image "gorgeous" and "so breathtaking."
In the same post, the organization shared a photo of a jaguar with more common coloring, vividly highlighting the differences between the two animals' appearances.
According to the WWF, researchers have used trail cameras for 15 years to study jaguar populations throughout the Amazon. The 22 areas studied, which cover 2.5% of the Amazon basin, are home to more than 6,000 jaguars.
Jaguars are listed as Near Threatened on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species.
"Today, nearly 45% of all jaguars live in protected areas, but deforestation continues to fragment their habitat, leaving many populations isolated," the WWF wrote. "With data from camera trap research like this, WWF aims to stabilize and increase jaguar populations by 2030."
Trail cameras have become vital tools for ecological research, as they allow scientists to survey difficult-to-reach spots for extended periods with minimal resources. They provide valuable insight into what happens in specific habitats when humans aren't around.
In recent months, they have spotted a rare jaguarundi in Honduras and a clouded leopard in the Himalayas. They have also provided evidence of a potential freshwater turtle comeback in Australia and caught incredible footage of a chimpanzee using a tool in Gabon.
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dehorning Rhinos Cuts Poaching by 78% – Saving Thousands of Animals' Lives
Taking the relatively simple step of trimming the horns of wild rhinoceroses is enough to dramatically reduce the rate at which the animals are killed by poachers. Across 11 nature reserves in South Africa, scientists found that dehorning black (Diceros bicornis) and white rhino (Ceratotherium simum) populations saw a sudden, sharp reduction in poaching by an average of 78 percent. It was, by far, the most effective method of curtailing the illegal slaughter of these endangered animals, researchers found. "Dehorning rhinos to reduce incentives for poaching – with 2,284 rhinos dehorned across eight reserves – was found to achieve a 78 percent reduction in poaching, using just 1.2 percent of the overall rhino protection budget," says conservation biologist Tim Kuiper of Nelson Mandela University in South Africa. The rhino horn trade represents one of the most poignant examples of the destructive influence of human activity. The horns of these animals are made from keratin, like our own fingernails and hair; yet the perception persists among many cultures that they have medicinal value in spite of a complete lack of scientific evidence. Demand is so high that most rhino species on Earth are now at the brink of extinction due to poaching. Many different strategies for reducing poaching have been proposed, from 3D printing rhino horns to the death penalty for offenders. Kuiper and his colleagues conducted their study to determine the efficacy of the measures in place across 11 nature reserves in the Greater Kruger area – a landscape of about 2.4 million hectares wherein roughly 25 percent of all Africa's rhinos currently reside. The researchers documented the poaching deaths of 1,985 rhinos between 2017 and 2023. That's roughly 6.5 percent of the rhino population of the area. Most of the investment into anti-poaching measures focuses on reactive strategies – increased ranger presence, cameras, and tracking dogs. In the timeframe the researchers studied, these measures resulted in the arrests of around 700 poachers – but they did not significantly reduce the rate at which rhinos were killed, at least in part because of law enforcement corruption, the researchers say. However, when dehorning measures were enacted, poaching rates plummeted. Dehorning does not harm the rhino; it's a bit like having your nails trimmed or your hair cut. The horn's growth plates are left intact, so the keratin gradually regrows over time. Removing the horn removes the incentive to kill the rhino, since the horn is what the poachers want. When the rhinos were dehorned, not only did the rate of poaching decrease; so too did the rate at which poachers entered the area. However, dehorning was not a straight prevention measure. Because the horn grows back, 111 rhinos with horn stumps were still killed by poachers. Although the poaching rate of dehorned rhinos was lower, even a horn stump was sufficient incentive at least some of the time for the poaching syndicates. And while poaching rates were down in the regions where dehorning was active, poachers often moved onto other regions to try their luck elsewhere, evidence suggests. "It may be best," Kuiper wrote on The Conversation, "to think of dehorning as a very effective but short-term solution that buys us time to address the more ultimate drivers of poaching: horn demand, socio-economic inequality, corruption, and organised criminal networks." Rhino poaching is such a complex issue that no one solution is likely to fix it. Removing the incentive as a first step, however, seems like it may be an important piece of the broader solution. "It's important to check that our conservation interventions work as intended, and keep working that way," says ecologist Res Altwegg of the University of Cape Town. "For me, this project has again highlighted the value of collecting detailed data, both on the interventions that were applied and the outcome. It's such data that makes robust quantitative analyses possible." The researchers dedicate their work to the late Sharon Haussmann of the Greater Kruger Environmental Protection Foundation, who was instrumental to this collaborative research effort. The findings have been published in Science Advances. Worms Use Their Bodies to Build Towers as a Wild Survival Strategy Elusive LSD Fungus Finally Discovered on Flower We've Finally Seen The Skyscraper Tsunami That Shook Earth For 9 Days
Medscape
7 hours ago
- Medscape
210-Day Flood Health Risks: What Doctors Must Know
Flood exposure is linked to increased risks for hospitalisation for all causes and for 10 specific conditions, with relative risks ranging from 1.11 to 1.61 and persisting for up to 210 days. An analysis of 300 million hospitalisation records from 747 communities in eight countries and territories showed that floods accounted for as much as 0.27% of all-cause admissions. Background Floods are the most frequent natural disaster, with approximately 23% of the global population exposed to floods with depths > 0.15 m during once-in-100-year flood events. Projections indicate that the severity, duration, and frequency of floods will escalate due to increasingly frequent extreme precipitation events and rising sea levels caused by global warming. In addition to the direct health impacts caused by the physical force of floods or related accidents, emerging evidence suggests that flooding may have broad indirect effects on human health. Current epidemiologic studies on flood-related health impacts focus primarily on disease incidence, mainly digestive diseases, infectious diseases, and mental disorders. Understanding the impact of flooding on hospitalisation risk is crucial for healthcare providers to prepare for increased demand following such events. METHODOLOGY: Researchers examined daily hospitalisation data from 2000 to 2019 in 747 communities across Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, New Zealand, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam, averaging 13 years of follow-up per community. The analysis included 300 million hospitalisation records, with a flood day defined as any day from the beginning to the end of flood events in each community. Associations between flood days and daily hospitalisation risks were estimated using a quasi-Poisson regression model with a non-linear distributed lag function, followed by a random-effects meta-analysis. TAKEAWAY: The cumulative relative risks [RRs] of hospitalisation after flood exposure were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.15-1.38) for all causes, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.21-1.5) for cardiovascular diseases, and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.39-1.86) for diabetes. Associations were modified by climate type, flood severity, age, population density, and socio-economic status, with stronger effects observed in communities with higher population density or higher socio-economic status. Flood exposure contributed to up to 0.27% of all-cause hospitalisations, 0.41% of cardiovascular disease hospitalisations, and 1.93% of diabetes admissions. Health impacts persisted for up to 210 days after exposure ended, except for infectious diseases (90 days) and mental disorders (150 days). IN PRACTICE: 'Health service providers should anticipate increased health risks during and after floods and prepare for the heightened service demands, possibly through strengthening capacities in medical supplies, human resource management, and triage strategy. Public health institutions should closely monitor the reasons for hospitalisation after floods as a method for disease control and efficient resource allocation in the aftermath of floods. Policymakers should prioritise enhancing health system resilience to natural disasters, recognising that overwhelmed health systems after floods can lead to severe disease burden and even avoidable deaths,' the study authors wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Yuming Guo, PhD, and Shanshan Li, PhD, of the Climate Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and included Paulo Saldiva, MD, PhD, of the Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo in São Paulo, Brazil, and was published online on April 08, 2025, in Nature Water. LIMITATIONS: The Dartmouth Flood Observatory dataset, which primarily checks events mentioned in news reports, may under-represent flooding, particularly in South America. The exposure assessment was conducted at the community level rather than at the individual level, as the exact residential addresses were kept confidential. Similarly, a community may have both flooded and non-flooded areas, which has the potential to lead to underestimation of risk. DISCLOSURES: The study was supported by the Australian Research Council, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and National Research Council of Thailand. The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
News24
10 hours ago
- News24
Good news for penguins: How fishing restriction could increase colony's fishing grounds
Recent fishing closures around the Stony Point penguin colony in Betty's Bay could be good news for endangered African penguins, potentially increasing their access to food. Nicole McCain/News24 Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
