logo
How WATER can put out the euphoria of FIRE - The key factor of early retirement

How WATER can put out the euphoria of FIRE - The key factor of early retirement

Mint26-05-2025

In recent years, the idea of FIRE – financial independence, retire early – has grown into a global movement. At its heart lies a simple yet powerful promise: save and invest wisely and escape the 9-to-5 grind decades before the traditional retirement age. For a generation grappling with burnout, rising living costs, and a craving for autonomy, the movement struck a deep chord.
But behind the glossy promise of early retirement lies a deeper question: What comes after? This is where the less-talked-about acronym WATER steps in: What after the early retirement? This is because while the numbers might work out on paper, life isn't lived on spreadsheets.
Let's take a step back and dissect the very foundation of the FIRE movement. It is composed of two parts: FI (financial independence) and RE (retire early). Of these, FI is the real goal, a worthy, empowering milestone. RE, on the other hand, deserves closer scrutiny.
Also Read | Is early retirement a good idea? Not for your health
FI: The true prize
Financial independence means reaching a point where we no longer need to work for money. Our passive income, whether from investments, rental income, or business dividends, covers our expenses. It gives us choices. And choice is the ultimate currency of freedom.
But this freedom is not necessarily about leaving work behind. Instead, it is about removing the compulsion to work. That is a fundamental shift.
Financial independence allows us to:
Achieving FI is the beginning, not the end. It is the launchpad, not the exit gate. It is where life, work and purpose can truly align.
RE: Retire early or repurpose energy?
The "retire early" part of FIRE is where things get tricky. While it is understandable why we might want to walk away from a high-stress or unfulfilling job, retirement, especially early retirement, should not be an escape plan. It should be a conscious transition into something more meaningful.
Many early retirees report an initial euphoria – long vacations, lazy mornings and no deadlines. But after the honeymoon phase, a new challenge surfaces: What do we do with all this time? That is when WATER becomes critical.
Here are some common post-retirement realisations:
The better model: FI + Passion
Rather than chase 'retire early," what if we aimed for FI + Purpose or FI + Passion?
In this model, we do not retire from work – we repurpose our energy. We shift from earning a livelihood to building a legacy. Productivity does not end – it evolves.
Also Read | How you can calculate your early retirement fund
WATER: Planning life after independence
Achieving FI is a financial goal. But WATER is a life goal. Once money is no longer a constraint, our days still need direction. That direction must come from within.
To navigate WATER, we must ask ourselves:
The answers may not be immediate. But sitting with these questions ensures that once we are financially free, we are not left wandering. Instead, we are walking a path of self-defined purpose.
The real win: Autonomy, not absence
The FIRE-vs-WATER conversation is not about abandoning the dream of financial freedom. It is about reframing the dream.
The real win is not retiring early – it's gaining autonomy over our time.
It's not about stopping work – it's about doing the work that matters to us.
It's not about withdrawing from the world – it's about re-engaging on our own terms.
Financial independence is powerful. But its true value lies not in early retirement, but in the freedom to live deliberately.
Conclusion: Moving beyond acronyms
Perhaps we need to move beyond acronyms. Beyond FIRE, beyond WATER. What we are really chasing is a life where money is not the master but the enabler.
Also Read | Investment and jugaad: How this Pune executive achieved financial independence at 46
So yes, let us chase financial independence. Let us save, invest and be prudent. But let us not retire from life. Once we have the freedom, we must use it to follow our passion, take creative risks, build something meaningful and give back.
Because at the end of the day, true freedom is not about walking away from work – it's about walking toward a life where our finances support our choices, not control them.
(Manuj Jain is a CFA charterholder and co-founder at ValueMetrics Technologies.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘FIRE' paints an attractive picture of achieving financial freedom early in life, but retirement shouldn't be the end goal
‘FIRE' paints an attractive picture of achieving financial freedom early in life, but retirement shouldn't be the end goal

CNA

time6 hours ago

  • CNA

‘FIRE' paints an attractive picture of achieving financial freedom early in life, but retirement shouldn't be the end goal

Over the past decade, the FIRE movement (Financial Independence, Retire Early) has been gaining widespread popularity online, inspiring and motivating more people to manage their money better in order to retire sooner. Some fantasise about how they can 'fire' their boss once they retire early. Others dream of being able to stop working entirely to spend time on family or passion projects. There's nothing wrong with FIRE as a goal, but true financial freedom can look very different from the picture this ethos paints. NO LONGER TRAPPED BY OUR NEXT PAY CHEQUE The relationship between our work and finances is a tightly entwined one – most of us need our next pay cheque in order to cover our living expenses and bills, so we keep working. As such, it can be easy to equate the idea of 'financial freedom' with that of 'freedom from work'. But in reality, financial independence and early retirement are two distinct, different things. Not everyone wants to stop working. Studies show that purpose and productivity are essential for our long-term happiness – even post-retirement. Many who reach financial independence continue working, not because they have to but because they want to. But what financial freedom really gives us is the power to make decisions about how we work without worrying too much about financial repercussions. It allows us to choose roles that align with our values, take breaks when needed, or say no to toxic work environments. When we're no longer trapped by the need to rely heavily on our next pay cheque, we gain the freedom to work for our own growth and purpose. WHAT IS YOUR VERSION OF FIRE? The original FIRE ethos called for saving aggressively (usually more than half your income) and investing wisely so you can retire early. It sounded great in theory, but for most, it often required high income and extreme frugality. Today, the FIRE movement has evolved to encompass varying definitions of financial independence. It is no longer about reaching an end goal, but more about the type of lifestyle we desire and the level our finances will need to hit in order to support our aspirations. For instance, 'Lean FIRE' refers to a minimalist lifestyle where you retire with a lower budget. There's also 'Barista FIRE', describing a point where withdrawing from your savings and investments can cover your major expenses and bills, while you supplement the shortfall with part-time or passion-based work (such as being a barista). These newer variations of FIRE may seem like dilutions or compromises – but in reality, they are just as true to the core essence of financial freedom. True financial freedom empowers us with choice rather than demanding retirement. It should mean more options, not less. This shift in mindset can be liberating. Instead of chasing a retirement date or age, we can focus on building a lifestyle where money supports flexibility, purpose, and well-being rather than escape. Perhaps you might decide to stay in your current job, but negotiate fewer work hours that would allow you to care for your children or ailing parents. You might explore part-time roles, start a small business, or pull a Jeremy Tan and pursue advocacy for change (even if it's not as an independent candidate in a general election). ARE WE LOOKING FOR ESCAPE, OR A BETTER BALANCE? Out of all the people I know who've successfully achieved financial independence, the happiest ones are those who never quit working – but it's not because they particularly love slogging. A friend downsized his role to two days a week to spend more time looking after his mother after her cancer diagnosis. Another stopped chasing yearly pay increments and started mentoring juniors instead, finding deeper fulfilment in growing the next generation than a fatter pay cheque. Clearly, the real problem isn't work itself – many people find meaning, identity, and purpose through their work. Rather, it is the lack of control over what, how, when, and why we work that has us dissatisfied. Financial freedom can still mean not working at all, but it's important for us to understand that this isn't the only version of true freedom. Maybe it'll mean a smaller pay cheque, but while it may look to others like you're settling for less, you're in fact gaining more in time, autonomy, and peace of mind. Ironically, when we do work that we're passionate about – work that energises us instead of draining us – we are much more likely to stay the course. WE DON'T HAVE TO WAIT Even so, I get why FIRE remains so popular not just in Singapore but around the world. Trying to achieve financial security is getting trickier and trickier, especially in a world where inflation only seems to keep climbing and job stability is quickly vanishing in the face of repeated layoffs and the proliferation of artificial intelligence. That's why the FIRE movement appeals to millions of people around the world, because it seems to offer a solution. A way to regain control. But the core tenet of financial independence was never about never working again – it about never needing to work out of fear or survival. So instead of running towards an arbitrary finish line, consider the path you're on instead. Is there a way to redesign the way work fits into your life now? We don't have to wait until we retire, whether it's early or not.

4 Different Levels of FIRE Retirement and How To Pick the Right One for You
4 Different Levels of FIRE Retirement and How To Pick the Right One for You

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

4 Different Levels of FIRE Retirement and How To Pick the Right One for You

FIRE, short for Financial Independence, Retire Early, is more than a one-size-fits-all movement. 'The goal of FIRE is to hit the level of financial security and independence so that you can retire before the traditional retirement age (usually around 65 years old),' said Meg K. Wheeler, CPA, and founder of The Equitable Money Project. Read More: Find Out: Wheeler explained, 'This is done by getting rid of all debt and saving and investing enough to generate earnings that will fund your expenses in retirement. Most FIRE followers will aim for saving 25 [times] of their expected annual retirement expenses.' Whether someone dreams of retiring in their 30s or wants the freedom to leave a stressful job early, here are the four different levels of FIRE retirement and how to pick the right one for you. LeanFIRE is the most minimalist version of early retirement, where individuals save just enough to cover their essential living expenses, typically between $25,000 and $40,000 per year. It's ideal for those willing to embrace a frugal lifestyle in exchange for maximum freedom. 'If you're a minimalist who genuinely loves simple living, DIY home fixes, and free activities and hobbies for fun, this could be a good fit,' said Lawrence Klayman, founding partner of Klayman Toskes PLLC. 'You might also consider geographic arbitrage. For example, instead of retiring in Florida, you could live in lower-cost Georgia, with its similar beaches and weather.' Discover Next: Traditional FIRE aims to accumulate sufficient savings to support a modest, middle-class lifestyle without needing to work. It's a balanced approach for those who want early retirement without making extreme sacrifices or excessive luxuries. 'FIRE, or 'regular' FIRE, is the middle path,' said Jason Breck, owner of 40 North Media. Breck said he is implementing the FIRE Method. 'You're financially independent with room to breathe. You can say yes to a spontaneous trip, a nice dinner out, or upgrading your phone without guilt. That usually means a $1 million to $2 million nest egg and spending between $40,000 and $80,000 a year.' Breck explained, 'FIRE fits people who want balance. Maybe you're raising kids or just want a little margin in your life. You're still mindful of money, but you're not saying no to every latte or family vacation.' ChubbyFIRE offers a more comfortable version of early retirement. It's ideal for those who want financial freedom but aren't interested in strict frugality. 'Think of this as the balanced approach,' Wheeler said. 'The goal is still to save and invest enough to retire early, but without sacrificing all of your joy today, or in the future. Folks following the ChubbyFIRE method focus on balancing their debt pay down and investing while still spending money on things they want today, and they set themselves up for a more moderate lifestyle in retirement.' FatFIRE is the most financially ambitious version of early retirement, designed for those who want to stop working early without giving up a high-end lifestyle. It typically requires a large investment portfolio and is best suited for high earners who can save aggressively. Isheeta Borkar, owner and author of the blog Travelicious Couple, with her husband, said the couple has been targeting FIRE for some time now. They have been traveling slowly around the world. 'FatFIRE is living it up,' Borkar said. 'Think five-star trips, expensive dinners, and the freedom to say 'yes' to pretty much anything that calls to us. It's a little difficult to achieve for most.' Choosing the right FIRE path begins with understanding the numbers and tracking current expenses to determine how much is truly needed to retire. It's also important to assess risk tolerance; while LeanFIRE may sound appealing, it can feel too restrictive over time. 'FIRE often comes with low-income years,' Breck said. 'Take advantage by converting traditional IRAs to Roths while your tax rate is minimal.' Life stage matters, too, as FatFIRE might be unrealistic in one's 20s but more attainable by their 40s. Most importantly, individuals should think beyond the numbers: what kind of life do they actually want to wake up to each day? 'Want to upgrade to FIRE or ChubbyFIRE?' Breck said. 'I tell people to try spending like that for six months. If your portfolio holds up and your values still align, step up.' More From GOBankingRates 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on 4 Different Levels of FIRE Retirement and How To Pick the Right One for You Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Suze Orman Says Retiring Early Is the 'Biggest Financial Mistake' You'll Ever Make — 'You Might Need $10 Million...Just So You'll Be Fine'
Suze Orman Says Retiring Early Is the 'Biggest Financial Mistake' You'll Ever Make — 'You Might Need $10 Million...Just So You'll Be Fine'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Suze Orman Says Retiring Early Is the 'Biggest Financial Mistake' You'll Ever Make — 'You Might Need $10 Million...Just So You'll Be Fine'

Back in 2018, when gasoline was still under $3 and your grocery bill didn't make you break out in hives, Suze Orman went on the "Afford Anything" podcast to share her unfiltered thoughts on the financial independence, retire early movement—better known as the FIRE movement. "I hate it. I hate it. I hate it. And let me tell you why," she told host Paula Pant. Then came the mic drop. Orman didn't just question retiring early—she called it a massive error in judgment. "I think it is the biggest mistake, financially speaking, you will ever, ever make in your lifetime." Don't Miss: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — And if you're thinking she was only warning people with shaky finances or no backup plan, think again. Suze made it clear that even multimillionaires aren't immune from future uncertainty. "Listen, if you have $20 [million], $30 [million], $50 [million]—I'm not kidding—I have a few of those people. I'll give you permission," she said. "But if you don't have at least $5 million, really, you might need $10 million to retire early today..." she said. Based on her math, you'd need around $350,000 a year after taxes to cover care, living expenses, and everything else. If you only have $1 million earning 4%, that's just $40,000 a year—nowhere near enough. To generate the kind of income she's talking about without dipping into your savings, Orman calculated that you'd need at least $5 to $6 million. "So really you might need $10 million just so you, if you're making 5% on that money and after tax, you'll be fine without touching your principal." Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . And let's pause on that. She said that in 2018—before the pandemic, before 7% inflation, and before the $20 minimum wage trend swept parts of the country. That was back when average rent was still barely four digits in many cities. So if Suze thought you'd need $10 million just to be "fine" back then, what would she say now? With rents up 25% in major cities since the pandemic, and everything from car insurance to rotisserie chickens doubling in cost, early retirement might look less like sipping coffee on a beach and more like praying your HVAC doesn't break in July. Sure, plenty of people in the FIRE community have successfully retired in their 30s or 40s with way less than $10 million. But Orman's point wasn't about whether it's possible—it's about whether it's sustainable through a few recessions, health crises, and bad market years. "You get hit by a car. You get cancer. You get divorced. You have a parent that you have to take care of," she warned. "Things happen."She wasn't fear-mongering. She was reminding listeners that life throws curveballs—and that financial independence isn't just about math. It's about margin. It's about resilience. You don't have to agree with Suze Orman to admit she made a good point. If $5–$10 million was her baseline for early retirement seven years ago, in what now feels like the "old economy," then the FIRE finish line might be a little farther away than some people want to believe. So if you're banking on quitting work forever in your 30s because you hit a $1 million net worth... you might want to re-run the numbers. Suze already has. Read Next:Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace — Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Suze Orman Says Retiring Early Is the 'Biggest Financial Mistake' You'll Ever Make — 'You Might Need $10 Million…Just So You'll Be Fine' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store