Iran launches missiles at US bases in Qatar in retaliatory strike
IRAN fired missiles at a US air base in Qatar after promising it would respond 'proportionately and decisively' to President Donald Trump's weekend airstrikes on three of its nuclear facilities.
Qatar said the barrage at Al Udeid base — the biggest such US facility in the Middle East — was intercepted and that there were no casualties.
Al Udeid is the regional headquarters for US Central Command, which oversees the American military in the region, and is home to several thousand US service-members, though many staff had been evacuated.
Oil prices fell immediately after the attack, with Brent dropping 3.3 per cent to US$74.48 a barrel as of 6.10 pm. The attack included at least six missiles fired toward US military bases in Qatar, according to a person familiar with the matter. The UAE and Bahrain closed their airspace as a precaution.
Iran's missile strike on Qatar was telegraphed and had been expected by the US and its allies, according to another person familiar with western intelligence assessments who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations.
UK and US diplomatic missions advised Doha-based residents earlier in the day to shelter in place 'until further notice.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Iranian officials also suggested the move had a symbolic element. The number of missiles fired matched the number of bombs deployed by the US, and the Qatar strike 'poses no danger' to a 'friendly and brotherly country,' the state-run IRNA news agency said.
A Qatari government spokesman said on X that the base had been evacuated earlier.
The move comes after the US struck three major nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday night.
Tehran vowed to retaliate for what it called a 'grave mistake' by Trump in joining Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Abdolrahim Mousavi, chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, said in a video posted on social media by Iran's state broadcaster on Monday.
Trump had previously vowed to meet any retaliation with force 'far greater' than the US strikes on the nuclear sites. He also floated the possibility of regime change in Iran, although US and Israeli officials Sunday stressed that isn't their aim.
Israel had earlier ratcheted up attacks on various Iranian targets in the more than weeklong conflict, with the Israel Defense Forces warning residents of Tehran to expect further strikes in the coming days.
The Islamic Republic fired several missiles of its own at Israel, suggesting no immediate plans to pare back the hostilities.
Trump's decision to deploy bunker-busting bombs and cruise missiles on the country's three main nuclear sites on Sunday pushed the Middle East into uncharted territory and boosted risks in a global economy already facing severe uncertainty over his trade wars.
The US operation — which targeted nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — marked Washington's direct entry to the war that began on June 13 when Israel unleashed attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities, and killed senior commanders and atomic scientists.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the strikes had a 'limited' objective, focused on destroying Iran's atomic programme. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Iran and Israel agree to a ceasefire
People wave Iranian flags as they celebrate Iran's attack on a U.S. military base in the street in Tehran, on Monday, June 23. PHOTO: ARASH KAMOOSHI/NYTIMES Trump says Iran and Israel agree to a ceasefire WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said on June 24 that a ceasefire has been agreed between Israel and Iran. 'It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE... for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED!,' he said in a post on Truth Social. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
20 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Asian leaders sidelined at G7 summit amid global turmoil
OTTAWA, Canada: The G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, opened amid multidimensional crises. The summit epitomised the fragmentation and uncertainty that have come to characterise our age. Host, Canada, along with most of the other G7 members and Asian invitees, were looking to forge a baseline consensus on stabilising trade and the global order, while accommodating US concerns for a more robust and self-reliant defence and security posture. But events intervened. In the early hours of Jun 13, just prior to the summit's opening, Israel began its anticipated and feared assault on Iran's nuclear and security infrastructure. US President Donald Trump abruptly left the summit in the evening after its first day. The anticipated one-on-one meetings with many of the participants (including those between Indian Prime Minister Modi and Australian Prime Minister Albanese and President Trump) never took place. Trump appeared pleased that the agenda was set around his tariff threats, viewing the other participants as mere supplicants. Unable to meet up with Trump, Modi was deprived of an opportunity to represent the Global South in navigating shifts in global power dynamics. His participation was instead more important for restoring bilateral ties with Canada, which had been badly strained since the state-sponsored assassination of Khalistan separatists on Canadian soil. In the end, there was very little opportunity to forge a common consensus, especially as the host and other participants were wary of confronting – and fearful of provoking – the US president. MISSED OPPORTUNITIES Perhaps the single outcome referencing Asia, though indirectly, was Trump's meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The two leaders jointly unveiled the trade deal they had outlined earlier in Washington, but in addition, Trump pledged to safeguard AUKUS, despite the announcement of the Pentagon's review of the deal. The deal with the United Kingdom represents an outlying concession to Trump's demands for tariffs. Not only did the United Kingdom concede a 10 per cent tariff, but it also agreed to swallow the 25 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium pending improvements in some vaguely defined future. The United Kingdom agreed to cooperate in a game of prisoner's dilemma, exposing all the other 'prisoners' to a protectionist tariff baseline that other countries may be compelled to meet. There was no time or room to reach a broader consensus on security to address the challenges posed by China and Russia. Issues like securing supply chains and critical mineral stockpiles were afforded little time in the discussion. Newly elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung never had the chance to meet Trump, while Japan made no progress in securing an economic security arrangement with the United States. Nikkei concluded that the Japanese Prime Minister had come away 'empty-handed'. Trump, for his part, lamented the absence of Russian President Vladimir Putin, blaming former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau. The opportunity to showcase the joint efforts of US allies to meet the security challenge – and in doing so, reinforce the framework of the global economy – slipped away, much like Trump himself. The summit ended without a comprehensive joint statement. Instead, the Canadian host had to make do with a Chair's Statement. The summit ended with six joint statements. The one on critical minerals failed to move much beyond the framework agreed to in 2023, despite the urgency of China's recent retaliatory imposition of export controls. Worthy but barely actionable initiatives on quantum computing and artificial intelligence served to dress up the relevance of the meeting, alongside a statement on combating wildfires – a topic particularly relevant to Canada and the province in which the summit was held. A SNAPSHOT OF TURBULENT TIMES The outcome of the summit in many ways belied the closing remarks by the host, Canadian Prime Minister Carney. Carney referenced the origins of the G7 fifty years ago at Rambouillet amid war in the Middle East, economic turmoil surrounding the end of Bretton Woods and stagflation resulting from the oil price shock of the Arab embargo. He called for a new era of cooperation to overcome the current economic challenges and claimed this new era had been initiated. But overall, the summit ended without rising to the challenge. There was little evidence that progress had been made in forging the 'resilience' that Carney called for to combat such challenges as climate change. The 'wildfire charter' joint statement – endorsed by Australia, India, the Republic of Korea and South Africa – fails to mention climate change. This, as much as the failure to agree on a joint statement with respect to Ukraine and a statement on the Middle East that failed to call for an end to the fighting, points to the limited cooperation among putatively 'like-minded' allies of the United States. The conclusion by one Canadian editorialist was that a G6 without the United States may have done more to advance international cooperation. When the G7 began, its members accounted for 75 per cent of global GDP – they now account for 45 per cent. When it began, the United States accepted the initiative of French President Giscard d'Estaing to address turmoil in the global economy. With the global economy again in turmoil – largely at the instance of US President Trump – the challenge is both to gain cooperation with the United States and to work cooperatively around the United States when required. On the evidence of this year's summit, it is not clear that the G7 provides the framework to do both simultaneously.
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
While You Were Sleeping: 5 stories you might have missed, June 24, 2025
Traces are seen in the sky after Iran's armed forces say they targeted The Al-Udeid base in a missile attack, as seen from Doha, on June 23. PHOTO: REUTERS While You Were Sleeping: 5 stories you might have missed, June 24, 2025 Iran fires missiles at US airbase in Qatar Iran launched a missile attack on an American air base in Qatar on June 23 that caused no injuries, and US President Donald Trump dismissed it as a 'weak response' to US attacks while urging Iran and Israel to make peace after 11 days of mutual hostilities. The attack on Al Udeid Air Base in neighbouring Qatar threatened to widen a conflict that began on June 13 with an Israeli strike on Iran targeting its nuclear programme and ballistic missiles. Iran had threatened to retaliate against the United States after US bombers dropped 13,600kg bunker-busters on Iranian underground nuclear facilities at the weekend, joining Israel's air war against Iran, and Mr Trump had raised the possibility of the Iranian government being toppled. 'We did not assault anyone, and we will never accept being assaulted by anyone,' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement. 'We will not submit to anyone's aggression – this is the logic of the Iranian nation.' READ MORE HERE Airlines face fresh upheaval as Iran attacks US airbase in Qatar Airlines scrambled to cancel flights and reroute planes on June 23 after several Middle Eastern nations closed their countries' airspace temporarily as Iran attacked the Al Udeid US military base in Doha, the latest upheaval to air travel in a normally busy region. On June 22, the US attacked key Iranian nuclear sites and Tehran responded on June 23 by firing several missiles at the US base without killing or injuring anyone. The escalating tensions are starting to affect airlines beyond the Middle East, where major flight routes have already been cut off since Israel began strikes on Iran on June 13. READ MORE HERE Starmer and Zelensky agree military production project in London Mr Volodymyr Zelensky and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a new defence co-production initiative on June 23 during a short visit by the Ukrainian president to London to discuss his country's defence against Russia. The two leaders announced the deal in the garden of Mr Starmer's Downing Street residence, where they also met Ukrainian troops being trained in Britain. 'I'm really proud that this afternoon, we're able to announce an industrial military co-production agreement - the first of its kind so far as Ukraine and the UK are concerned - which will be a massive step forward now in the contribution that we can continue to make,' Mr Starmer said. READ MORE HERE Japanese leader joins regional allies in skipping Nato summit Japan said on June 23 its Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has cancelled plans to attend this week's Nato summit, joining other Indo-Pacific countries in saying that their leaders will not attend and raising questions about future regional cooperation. Japan's foreign ministry announced the scrapping of Mr Ishiba's June 24-26 trip just three days after announcing he would attend the meeting in The Hague to 'reaffirm with Nato allies and others the recognition that the security of Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific is inseparable.' The decision came after US President Donald Trump joined Israel's air war against Iran and mooted the possibility of the Tehran government being toppled. READ MORE HERE WhatsApp banned on US House of Representatives devices, memo shows Meta Platforms' WhatsApp messaging service has been banned from all US House of Representatives devices, according to a memo sent to all House staff on June 23. The notice said the 'Office of Cybersecurity has deemed WhatsApp a high risk to users due to the lack of transparency in how it protects user data, absence of stored data encryption, and potential security risks involved with its use.' The memo, from the chief administrative officer, recommended using other messaging apps, including Microsoft Corp's Teams platform, Wickr, Signal, and Apple's iMessage and FaceTime. READ MORE HERE Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
