The Lake Winnipeg blame game
The extent to which our governments will go to avoid responsibility has reached new heights.
Lake Winnipeg is dying and, instead of rallying all interested parties and levels of government — including First Nations — to the rescue, a sordid skirmish is occurring before the courts.
The most absurd claim has come from the City of Winnipeg, which insists that the release of 220 million litres of raw sewage into the Red River last year had little effect on the pollution of Lake Winnipeg.
Such a preposterous assertion was made in defence of a $4.8-billion lawsuit by 11 First Nation communities who have a substantial stake in the health of the lake. Municipal, provincial and federal governments have been named as defendants in the suit.
Although this court case is focused on the 2024 spill, it has been nearly impossible to obtain an accurate picture of just what the city regularly spills into our rivers.
Recently, Free Press writer Julia-Simone Rutgers provided an in-depth article (From muddy to cruddy, May 10) summing up the sheer scale of releases of sewage, and the results are staggering.
In the last decade an average of 10 billion litres/year is now the operative figure that will be used by environmentalists and lawyers alike.
This can no longer be termed 'de minimus,' it is a disgusting reality that citizens of this fair city must bear.
For years the City of Winnipeg has got away with using the local rivers as its backup to a sewer infrastructure that is designed for a much smaller city and is unable to cope with the strains of increased pressure from growth and a changing climate. Federal dollars are pouring in for housing initiatives without supporting the requisite infrastructure.
The city received millions to address our housing crisis yet the $166 million MP Terry Duguid announced for infrastructure work barely scrapes the surface of the $3 billion needed to sustain our north end sewage treatment plant.
The frustration with government inaction set this lawsuit in motion, as no long-range tripartite funding arrangements have been negotiated, only dribs and drabs of cash committed to upgrade the treatment plant.
As far as achieving the separation of combined sewers, the city hired Jacobs Engineering to create a master plan which is designed for future generations to carry the majority of the financial liability.
By allowing this neglect to fester into a lawsuit, city hall and taxpayers will be faced with a colossal debt on top of the need to fix their sewage woes.
At least the gargantuan spill of February 2024 has triggered both provincial and federal regulations.
For much too long, the City of Winnipeg has found ways to avoid charges under federal and provincial environment laws. In this instance they are being applied but both are lacking in transparency.
Environment and Climate Change Canada enforcement officers laid one charge in April under the federal Fisheries Act, which prohibits the deposit of a deleterious substance into water frequented by fish. They will not comment on the charges.
The province also took a year to press charges against the city under the environment act and these are before the court, which may result in fines up to $500,000, but likely the fines will be waived as the regulators are part of the problem.
It will be a long time before we learn why such a misadventure was allowed to occur at the Abinojii Mikanah bridge last year. The city has certainly not been forthcoming and any attempt to directly reach waste and water officials have been circumvented.
Lawyers representing each level of government are scrambling before the Court of King's bench to shirk their responsibility in the $4.8-billion Lake Winnipeg lawsuit. The city has laid cross-claims against the province and feds, while the province has filed a cross-claim against the city and insist that First Nations water quality is a federal responsibility.
The blame game has begun.
Frankly, the public should feel embarrassed at the inability of our governments to show any leadership aimed at solving this existential crisis for our shared ecosystem.
Uniting to provide solutions for the common good has been usurped by political infighting and finger-pointing.
Dave Taylor has drawn attention to the pollution of rivers in Manitoba for several decades and is a regular contributor to the Winnipeg Free Press. Please see his blog at https://wpgsewage.wordpress.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Feasibility without First Nations isn't feasible
Opinion Earlier this month, the governments of Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan signed an agreement to explore the 'feasibility of a new west-east pipeline to bring western oil and gas to southern Ontario refineries and ports.' In a news release, Alberta premier Danielle Smith said: 'By advancing a Canadian energy corridor from Alberta to Ontario, we are securing long-term energy access for families and businesses, creating thousands of jobs, and opening new doors for trade and investment, while strengthening our position as a global energy leader.' There's only one problem, and it's a big one: Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew didn't sign it. So much for feasibility. Since the federal government's passing of the One Canadian Economy Act (Bill C-5), which promises to expedite approvals for projects deemed 'in the national interest,' provinces have been rushing to position themselves with Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet in the hopes their regional initiatives and economic dreams will come true. Ontario has even passed its own version of the federal bill, in what is surely a move to speed up approval for the Ring of Fire critical mineral project despite Indigenous opposition. The challenge for all of this — if you can call it a challenge — has been Canada's legal requirement under Section 35 of the Constitution to attain 'free, prior, and informed consent' when it comes to including and respecting Indigenous and treaty rights. Simply put, few provinces have partnership agreements with First Nations to build economic projects and, for those that do, these were made after lengthy and costly court battles, negotiations, and conflict. The federal bill, Ontario's bill and the 'feasibility' agreement between Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario has no First Nations, Métis or Inuit approval. In other words, they are not worth much and are simply a cause for conflict. To be honest, development occurred much quicker when Canada was genocidal. Until the past five decades, Canada never had a legal duty to consult Indigenous peoples on the land, water, the economy, or frankly anything really — so, it didn't. Since the country's founding in 1867 (and arguably before that), Canadian legislators took Indigenous and treaty land, moved people whenever and wherever, and made unilateral decisions on Indigenous lives and families all the time. When law got in the way, other laws were passed under the justification that Canada's national interests were paramount. This meant that swaths of Indian reserve lands were taken whenever a company, corporation, or the military wanted. Or, that masses of Indigenous leaders were imprisoned, Indigenous women were stripped of rights, and children were taken. All this happened blatantly. A few kilometres from where Winnipeggers sit was the St. Peter's Indian Band, whose lands in and around Selkirk were taken illegally in 1907 while the community was removed to what is now Peguis Indian Reserve. The tide started to change in the 1970s, when Canada's Supreme Court recognized that Indigenous title (and therefore law, government, and rights) existed and Canada had to start to act justly, humanely, and with consideration of their humanity. Things were supposed to be different — but old Canadian habits die hard. From the One Canadian Economy Act to the actions of provincial premiers, Canadian leaders continue to act as if Indigenous peoples are an afterthought, using age-old arguments that Canada's 'national interests' are paramount. That is, until Kinew — who has not shied away from interest in lucrative land and resource projects — refused to join his provincial counterparts. 'In other parts of the country with other levels of government, there's the commitment to maybe push things through with legislation first,' Kinew told media, explaining his decision. 'That puts other partners on the back foot.' Don't be confused. When Kinew says 'other partners,' he means First Nations, Inuit, and Métis rights holders. What the premier is doing isn't because he's First Nations, it's because he's trying to follow Canadian law. History has proven it's a tremendous waste of time, money, and energy to exclude Indigenous rights holders from conversations surrounding land, resources, and, frankly, the country. The first and most important 'project in the national interest' is to include Indigenous governments at the outset of every single decision this country makes. Anything else is illegal. An unprecedented step however requires an unprecedented idea. For Kinew, it's a Crown corporation (on par with entities such Manitoba Hydro and Manitoba Public Insurance) that can assemble Indigenous leadership to review and give approval of economic land and resource projects alongside provincial regulators. This 'Crown Indigenous corporation' would require buy-in and unity from Indigenous leadership — and seems to have almost immediately gained it. This week, the Southern Chiefs' Organization and the Manitoba Métis Federation came to an agreement to collectively 'advance economic reconciliation, protect Indigenous rights, and collaborate on major infrastructure and development projects across Manitoba.' That's no coincidence. That's First Nations and Métis holders on the front foot and reserving their spot at the table. Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Cision Canada
14 hours ago
- Cision Canada
/R E P E A T -- Media advisory - Canada to share latest developments in plastic pollution treaty talks/ Français
GATINEAU, QC, Aug. 14, 2025 /CNW/ - Media representatives are advised that members of the Canadian delegation participating in the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on plastic pollution (INC-5.2) will hold a technical briefing to discuss the outcomes of the plastic pollution treaty negotiations recently held in Geneva, Switzerland. The briefing will be on background only and is not for attribution. Event: Technical briefing via Zoom Date: Friday, August 15, 2025 Time: 11:00 a.m. Location: Via Zoom Media representatives are asked to register by contacting Environment and Climate Change Canada Media Relations at [email protected]. Once registered, reporters will receive the details to join the technical briefing. Follow Environment and Climate Change Canada on social media.
Cision Canada
a day ago
- Cision Canada
Media advisory - Canada to share latest developments in plastic pollution treaty talks Français
GATINEAU, QC, /CNW/ - Media representatives are advised that members of the Canadian delegation participating in the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on plastic pollution (INC-5.2) will hold a technical briefing to discuss the outcomes of the plastic pollution treaty negotiations recently held in Geneva, Switzerland. The briefing will be on background only and is not for attribution. Event: Technical briefing via Zoom Date: Friday, August 15, 2025 Time: 11:00 a.m. Location: Via Zoom Media representatives are asked to register by contacting Environment and Climate Change Canada Media Relations at [email protected]. Once registered, reporters will receive the details to join the technical briefing. Follow Environment and Climate Change Canada on social media.
