Hannity Downplays Musk vs. Trump by Asking if Bill Clinton Is in the Epstein Files
Sean Hannity weighed in on Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's rather dramatic Thursday by downplaying the former's Epstein List accusations against the latter — all while questioning if former President Bill Clinton might be on said list as well.
'We begin tonight with a flurry of activity today at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. And yes, let not your heart be troubled, I will address the battle between President Trump and Elon Musk. I know it's of such great international importance,' he said, rolling his eyes, atop his Fox News show.
'It got personal, Elon Musk claiming, 'Oh, Trump is in the Epstein files. That's the real reason they have not been made public.' Well, it's been well-known that Donald Trump said that Elon was angry over Trump's decision to end the electric vehicle mandate. I can certainly understand why Elon, you know, wants that in the One Big, Beautiful Bill, pretty obvious, pretty apparent, understandable difference,' Hannity said. 'And on the Epstein issue, wasn't it Donald Trump who booted Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago nearly 20 years ago because he was one of the first people to realize just how horrible Epstein really was? And by all accounts, he was kicked out because of his treatment of young women.'
'Now, Democrats and the media — I'm just thinking out loud here, I'm just wondering, putting two and two together — I truly wonder, if our old friend Bill Clinton, 'How you doin'? Good to talk to you?' You know he had a relationship with Epstein, that's been reported on. Is Bill Clinton in those files also?' he then asked. 'I can't say for sure, I haven't seen them, but if I was a betting man, I know where I'd put my money. Now if by some chance that Bill Clinton is in there, I wonder if he kicked Epstein out of his life as publicly as Donald Trump did? I guess if Donald Trump felt that Epstein had something on him, he probably wouldn't have kicked him out of his club. Inquiring minds, I think, they'll want to know that.'
In the end, like fellow Fox News talent Laura Ingraham, Hannity thinks this feud will all blow over sooner or later.
'I interviewed them together,' he recalled. 'The first thing I said to them, and talked about, and asked them, 'You do know that the media mob — the legacy media mob desperately wants to tear you guys apart and for you two to fight and to get a divorce?' And now the media mob is particularly elated.'
'Let's be very blunt here: Big deal. It's an online public spat between two very powerful men over what is, really, a policy difference. It got personal and still despite all about bad blood, I'm going to make a bold prediction — I could be wrong — I think that Donald Trump and Elon Musk, they'll work it out eventually, they'll become friends again,' Hannity concluded. 'These are two very talented individuals. Frankly, they don't need each other to be successful, but I do hope they work it out and set an example for the rest of the country.'
It's worth noting that both Clinton and Trump had been photographed with Epstein prior to his death.
The post Hannity Downplays Musk vs. Trump by Asking if Bill Clinton Is in the Epstein Files | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."
Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Impeachment wars
Rep. Jasmine Crockett's mere mention of a possible impeachment inquiry into President Trump has touched off negative reactions from some colleagues. "I think she's going to turn off a lot more people than gain," a House Democrat told us. Why it matters: House Democratic leaders are staying neutral. But many Democrats are allergic to the word after they impeached Trump twice only for him to return to power with full control of the government. Crockett (D-Texas), asked in a local news interview if she would pursue impeachment if Democrats retook the House in 2026 and she became Oversight Committee chair, said she would "absolutely at least do an inquiry." The other three candidates for the ranking member job on Oversight, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), told us they wouldn't go that far. 👿 "Turning this ranker race into a proxy for impeachment is unhelpful and unfair to her colleagues," said a House Democrat who predicted Republicans will "try to motivate their base by saying that a Democratic majority will inevitably lead to impeachment." Crockett told us the term "impeachment inquiry" would stress to the public the "next level of gravity" of the subject matter — such as Trump's pardons for big money allies and the Qatari jet scandal. "A lot of times we as Democrats can overthink stuff," Crockett said. "A lot of people ... felt like [Oversight Committee chair] James Comer was an embarrassment. But at the end of the day, who won the House?" The bottom line: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deferred to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), whose panel, he said, "has jurisdiction over impeachment."
Wall Street Journal
24 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Reagan's Diplomacy Returns
President Donald Trump's Middle East trip represents a fundamental break with the 'liberal internationalism' of his recent predecessors and returns the U.S. to the pragmatic foreign policy practiced by Ronald Reagan ('The Trump Doctrine of the Deal,' Review & Outlook, May 17). While the president may not use Reagan's idealistic language, his approach is similar to that outlined by Reagan's first U.N. ambassador, Jeane Kirkpatrick, who advocated cooperation with regimes that shared Washington's core interests regardless of their internal governance. Mr. Trump, a firm believer in peace through strength, is marrying restored deterrence, realistic strategic objectives and a commitment to commercial diplomacy to restore America's global standing after 25 years of overstretch and strategic missteps. His speech in Riyadh is a fitting antidote to President George W. Bush's 2005 inaugural address, which promised to 'end tyranny in our world' and diverted American attention from the rising threat of China and the return of great-power competition. Alexander B. Gray
