Newark air traffic controllers briefly lose radar for 2nd time in 2 weeks
The air traffic controllers directing planes into the airport in Newark, N.J., lost their radar Friday morning for the second time in two weeks.
The Federal Aviation Administration said the radar at the facility in Philadelphia that directs planes in and out of Newark airport went black for 90 seconds at 3:55 a.m. ET Friday. That's similar to what happened on April 28.
That first radar outage led to hundreds of flights being cancelled or delayed at the Newark airport in the past two weeks after the FAA slowed down traffic at the airport to ensure safety.
Five controllers also went on trauma leave after that outage, worsening the existing shortage. It's not clear if any additional controllers will go on leave now.
The number of cancellations of Newark departures jumped from the low 40s to 57 after this latest outage to lead the country, according to FlightAware.com.
Newark ranks second in the number of cancelled arrivals with 60, but that number also increased Friday morning. Nearly 300 delays were reported at the airport. Officials said there have been more than 1,700 cancellations and delays at the airport this week.
WATCH | Union confirms previous loss of contact with planes:
Newark air traffic controllers lost contact with planes, union confirms
3 days ago
Duration 1:43
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a briefing Friday morning that the "glitch this morning at Newark" was caused by the same issues as last week, but it didn't disrupt flights.
"Everything went back online after the brief outage, and there was no operational impact," Leavitt said.
U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer blamed the problems that have plagued Newark on the lack of proper air traffic controller staffing and modern technology.
He said at a news conference Friday that there are currently about 20 controllers working, and that number should be in the 60s. And many of the lines connecting controllers to the radar are outdated copper wires. The New Jersey Democrat said the April 28 outage was caused by one of those copper wires getting fried.
"Our region is a key economic artery for our country. Yet this region ... one of the busiest air spaces in the world, as I mentioned, is running off a tower that's full of copper wire dating back to the 1980s with outdated and inefficient technology. And the region is short — and this is a big deal — the region is short about 40 air traffic controllers," Gottheimer said. He said the tower was built back in "the Brady Bunch era" in 1973.
The FAA said earlier this week that it is installing new fibre optic data lines to carry the radar signal between its facilities in Philadelphia and New York. Officials said some of the lines connecting those two facilities are outdated copper wire that will be replaced. But it's not clear how quickly those repairs can be completed.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced a multibillion-dollar plan Thursday to replace the country's aging air traffic control system to prevent problems like this from happening and give controllers modern technology. That plan includes installing 4,600 new high-speed connections and replacing 618 radars across the country.
Officials developed the plan to upgrade the system after a deadly midair collision in January between a passenger jet and an army helicopter killed 67 people in the skies over Washington, D.C. Several other crashes this year also put pressure on officials to act.
But the shortcomings of the air traffic control system have been known for decades. The National Transportation Safety Board has not determined that a problem with the air traffic control system caused that crash near Reagan National Airport.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
32 minutes ago
- CBC
White House hopes monthly U.S. jobs report to continue despite claim by labour statistics nominee
Donald Trump's selection as next commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) threatens to bring a new level of politicization to what for decades has been a nonpartisan agency issuing reports on the nation's economic health, according to Democrats and some economists. While many former Labour Department officials say it's unlikely that as commissioner of the department's Bureau of Labour Statistics, E.J. Antoni will be able to distort or alter the economic data, he could change the way it is presented. Antoni was nominated by Trump after the BLS released a jobs report on Aug. 1 that showed that hiring had weakened in July and was much lower in May and June than the agency had previously reported. Even as the rest of the report contained positive data points for the Trump White House, the president asserted, without evidence, that data had been "rigged" for political reasons and fired the then-BLS chair, Erika McEntarfer, who had been put in the position with bipartisan Senate support. McEntarfer's firing was criticized even by some Republican Congress members, including senators Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming and Thom Tillis of North Carolina. Antoni has been a vocal critic of the government's jobs data in frequent appearances on podcasts and cable TV. He has publicly said that the Labour Department should stop publishing the monthly jobs reports until its data collection processes improve, and rely on quarterly data based on actual employment filings with state unemployment offices. WATCH l Concerns that firing will have a chilling effect on data collection: Trump fires U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics head after weak jobs report 11 days ago Revisions common, understood by Wall Street The monthly employment reports are probably the closest-watched economic data on Wall Street, and can frequently cause swings in stock prices. When asked at Tuesday's White House briefing whether the jobs report would continue to be released, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration hoped it would be. "I believe that is the plan and that's the hope," Leavitt said. Leavitt also defended Antoni's nomination, calling him an "economic expert" who has testified before Congress, adding that "the president trusts him to lead this important department." Yet Antoni wrongly claimed in the last year of Joe Biden's presidency that the economy had been in recession since 2022; called on the entire Federal Reserve board to be fired for not earning a profit on its Treasury securities holdings; and posted a chart on social media that conflated timelines to suggest inflation under Biden was headed to 15 per cent. His argument that the U.S. was in a recession rested on a vastly exaggerated measure of housing inflation, based on newly purchased home prices, to artificially make the nation's gross domestic product appear smaller than it was. "This is actually maybe the worst Antoni content I've seen yet," Alan Cole of the centre-right Tax Foundation said on social media on Tuesday, referring to his recession claim. Many economists share, to some degree, Antoni's concerns that the government's jobs data has flaws and is threatened by trends such as declining response rates to its surveys. The drop has made the jobs figures more volatile, though not necessarily less accurate over time. "The stock market moves clearly based on these job numbers, and so people with skin in the game think it's telling them something about the future of their investments," said Brian Albrecht, chief economist at the International Center for Law and Economics. "Could it be improved? Absolutely." Katharine Abraham, an economist at the University of Maryland who was BLS commissioner under president Bill Clinton, said updating the jobs report's methods would require at least some initial investment. The government could use more modern data sources, she said, such as figures from payroll processing companies, and fill in gaps with surveys. UBS economist Alan Detmeister estimates that BLS is now collecting about 18 per cent fewer price quotes for the inflation report than it did earlier this year. He thinks the report will produce more volatile results, though averaged out over time, still reliable. Ex-commissioner doubts data can be changed William Beach, who was appointed BLS commissioner by Trump in his first term and also served under Biden, said he is confident that BLS procedures are strong enough to prevent political meddling. He said that when he served as commissioner, he didn't see the figures himself until two days before publication. "The commissioner does not affect the numbers," Beach said. "They don't collect the data. They don't massage the data." Regarding the odds of rigging the numbers, Beach said, "I wouldn't put it at complete zero, but I'd put it pretty close to zero." WATCH l Will Trump wait for Fed chair Powell's term to end before acting?: Why Trump wants to get rid of Fed Chair Jerome Powell | About That 26 days ago U.S. President Donald Trump has been increasingly critical of Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell. Andrew Chang explains why Trump is so upset with the man he nominated in 2017, and explores the way in which the president could attempt to remove Powell. Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters. Before launching his political career, Trump frequently accused Barack Obama's administration of juking the stats to produce more favourable economic reports, without providing evidence. As president, Trump has frequently assailed the Federal Reserve chair he nominated back in his first term, Jerome Powell. Antoni requires Senate confirmation. Sen. Patty Murray, a senior Democrat, called on Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Republican chair of the Senate health, education, labor and pensions committee, to hold a confirmation hearing for Antoni as soon as possible. It took about six months after McEntarfer was nominated in July 2023 for her to be approved. She was confirmed in an 86-8 vote, meaning she had support from dozens of Republicans.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Trump's unusual Nvidia deal raises new corporate and national security risks, lawmakers and experts say
U.S. President Donald Trump upended decades of U.S. national security policy, creating an entirely new category of corporate risk, when he made a deal with Nvidia to give the U.S. government a cut of its sales in exchange for resuming exports of banned AI chips to China. Historically, the U.S. government made decisions to control the export of sensitive technologies on national security grounds. Those decisions were viewed as non-negotiable; if a technology was controlled, companies could not buy their way around those controls, no matter how lucrative the foregone foreign sales. On Monday, Trump raised the prospect of ending that era, saying he would allow Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the U.S. government receiving a 15 per cent cut of the company's sales of some advanced chips in that country. He made a similar deal with Nvidia's smaller rival AMD. He also told reporters he was open to allowing Nvidia to sell a scaled-down version of its current flagship Blackwell chips to China. Months earlier, his own administration had banned the sale of H20 chips to China, reversing the decision in July as part of what the government said were negotiations on rare earths. The latest move drew condemnation from U.S. lawmakers in both parties who warned that it risked creating a pay-for-play framework for the sale of sensitive technologies to U.S. adversaries, a concern echoed by analysts and legal experts. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' said U.S. Representative John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on China. Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, the ranking Democrat on the same committee, said that 'by putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.' To be sure, the Trump administration has said the national security risks of resuming H20 sales are minimal because the chip was sold widely in China. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick last month described the H20 as Nvidia's 'fourth-best chip' in an interview with CNBC. He said it was in U.S. interests for Chinese firms to keep using American technology. Legal? But the deal is extremely rare for the U.S. and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making, after pressuring executives to invest in American manufacturing and demanding the resignation of Intel's CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, over his ties to Chinese companies. It is unclear whether Trump's move is legal. The U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from levying taxes and duties on articles exported from any state. Trade lawyer Jeremy Iloulian said it is hard to tell if this would be considered an 'export tax' or some other form of payment without knowing more about the agreement. 'Up until today, there has never been a consideration of how much companies need to pay to receive an export license,' Iloulian said. Added Kyle Handley, a professor at the University of California San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy: 'It sure looks like an export tax to me ... they can call it whatever they want. It really looks a lot like the government is skimming a little bit off the top.' When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15 per cent of revenue to the U.S., a company spokesperson said, 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets.' 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide,' the spokesperson added. A spokesperson for AMD said the U.S. approved its applications to export some AI processors to China but did not directly address the revenue-sharing agreement and said the company's business adheres to all U.S. export controls. 'I think it's fair to say that everything now in this administration seems negotiable in ways that were not the case before,' said Sarah Kreps, a professor at the Brooks School of Public Policy at Cornell University. 'I don't think this is unique in that this will be the last kind of deal like this that we see.' 'Slippery slope' Equities analysts said the levy could hit margins at chipmakers and set a precedent for Washington to tax critical U.S. exports. 'It feels like a slippery slope to us,' said Bernstein analysts, who expect the deal to cut gross margins on the China-bound processors by five to 15 percentage points, shaving about a point from Nvidia and AMD's overall margins. 'Naturally, not only chipmakers but also companies selling other strategic products to China will wonder if the remittance model could apply to their industries,' said Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager at Gabelli, which holds shares in Nvidia. 'For sellers of strategic products to China, remittance could be a burden - or a lifeline to preserve market access to huge and growing opportunities in China,' Susanto said. (Reporting by Karen Freifeld in New York, Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru and Alexandra Alper in Washington; Additional reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York; Writing by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Sayantani Ghosh and Matthew Lewis)
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Trump will visit the Kennedy Center on the day honorees are announced
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump is set to make an announcement Wednesday at the Kennedy Center, where this year's honorees for its annual award are being revealed. Trump avoided the Kennedy Center Honors during his first term after artists said they would not attend out of protest. This year, the Republican president has taken over as the Kennedy Center's new chairman and fired the board of trustees, which he replaced with loyalists. In a Truth Social post on Tuesday, Trump teased a name change for the centre, formally the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, and said it would be restored to its past glory. 'GREAT Nominees for the TRUMP/KENNEDY CENTER, whoops, I mean, KENNEDY CENTER, AWARDS,' Trump wrote. He said work was being done on the site that would be 'bringing it back to the absolute TOP LEVEL of luxury, glamour, and entertainment.' 'It had fallen on hard times, physically, BUT WILL SOON BE MAKING A MAJOR COMEBACK!!!' he wrote. In a statement on its social media feed, the Kennedy Center said it is 'honored' to host Trump, who will be visiting for the third time since January, and hinted that he would announce a construction project. 'Thanks to his advocacy, our beautiful building will undergo renovations to restore its prestige and grandeur,' the venue said. 'We are also excited to be announcing this year's INCREDIBLE slate of Kennedy Center Honorees.' It is unclear how this year's honorees were chosen, though Trump had indicated he wanted a more active role. Historically, a bipartisan advisory committee selects the recipients, who over the years have ranged from George Balanchine and Tom Hanks to Aretha Franklin and Stephen Sondheim. A message sent to the Kennedy Center press office asking how this year's honorees were selected wasn't returned Tuesday. The Kennedy Center did post this on social media, however: 'Coming Soon ... A country music icon, an Englishman, a New York City Rock band, a dance Queen and a multi-billion dollar Actor walk into the Kennedy Center Opera House ...' In the past, Trump has floated the idea of granting Kennedy Center Honors status to singer-songwriter Paul Anka and Sylvester Stallone, one of three actors Trump named as Hollywood ambassadors earlier this year. Anka was supposed to perform 'My Way' at Trump's first inaugural and backed out at the last moment. The Kennedy Center Honors were established in 1978 and have been given to a broad range of artists. Until Trump's first term, presidents of both major political parties traditionally attended the annual ceremony, even when they disagreed politically with a given recipient. Prominent liberals such as Barbra Streisand and Warren Beatty were honoured during the administration of Republican George W. Bush, and a leading conservative, Charlton Heston, was feted during the administration of Democrat Bill Clinton. In 2017, after honoree Norman Lear declared that he would not attend a White House celebration in protest of Trump's proposed cuts to federal arts funding, Trump and first lady Melania Trump decided to skip the Kennedy Center event and remained away throughout his first term. Honorees during that time included such Trump critics as Cher, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Sally Field. Since taking office for a second time, Trump has taken a much more forceful stance on the Kennedy Center and inserted himself into its governance. Besides naming himself chairman and remaking the board, he also has indicated he would take over decisions regarding programming at the centre and vowed to end events featuring performers in drag. The steps have drawn further criticism from some artists. In March, the producers of 'Hamilton' pulled out of staging the Broadway hit musical in 2026, citing Trump's aggressive takeover of the institution's leadership. Other artists who cancelled events include actor Issa Rae, singer Rhiannon Giddens and author Louise Penny. House Republicans added an amendment to a spending bill that Trump signed into law in July to rename the Kennedy Center's Opera House after Melania Trump, but that venue has yet to be renamed. Maria Shriver, a niece of the late president Kennedy, a Democrat, has criticized as 'insane' a separate House proposal to rename the centre after Trump. Recipients of the Kennedy Center Honors are given a medallion on a rainbow ribbon, a nod to the range of skills that fall under the performing arts. In April, the centre changed the lights on the exterior from the long-standing rainbow to a permanent red, white and blue display. ___ Italie reported from New York. Annie Ma And Hillel Italie, The Associated Press
