
Nvidia chief calls AI ‘the greatest equalizer' — but warns Europe risks falling behind
PARIS (AP) — Will artificial intelligence save humanity — or destroy it? Lift up the world's poorest — or tighten the grip of a tech elite?
Jensen Huang — the global chip tycoon widely predicted to become one of the world's first trillionaires — offered his answer on Wednesday: neither dystopia nor domination. AI, he said, is a tool for liberation.
Wearing his signature biker jacket and mobbed by fans for selfies, the Nvidia CEO cut the figure of a tech rockstar as he took the stage at VivaTech in Paris.
'AI is the greatest equalizer of people the world has ever created,' Huang said, kicking off one of Europe's biggest technology industry fairs.
Huang's core argument: AI can level the playing field, not tilt it. Critics argue Nvidia's dominance risks concentrating power in the hands of a few. But Huang insists the opposite — that by slashing computing costs and expanding access, 'we're democratizing intelligence' for startups and nations alike.
But beyond the sheeny optics, Nvidia used the Paris summit to unveil a wave of infrastructure announcements across Europe, signaling a dramatic expansion of the AI chipmaker's physical and strategic footprint on the continent.
In France, the company is deploying 18,000 of its new Blackwell chips with startup Mistral AI. In Germany, it's building an industrial AI cloud to support manufacturers. Similar rollouts are underway in Italy, Spain, Finland and the U.K., including a new AI lab in Britain.
Other announcements include a partnership with AI startup Perplexity to bring sovereign AI models to European publishers and telecoms, a new cloud platform with Mistral AI, and work with BMW and Mercedes-Benz to train AI-powered robots for use in auto plants.
The announcements underscore how central AI infrastructure has become to global strategy — and how Nvidia, now the world's most valuable chipmaker, is positioning itself as the engine behind it.
As the company rolls out ever more powerful systems, critics warn the model risks creating a new kind of 'technological priesthood' — one in which only the wealthiest companies or governments can afford the compute power, energy, and elite engineering talent required to participate. That, they argue, could choke the bottom-up innovation that built the tech industry in the first place.
Huang pushed back. 'Through the velocity of our innovation, we democratize,' he said, responding to a question by The Associated Press. 'We lower the cost of access to technology.'
As Huang put it, these factories 'reason,' 'plan,' and 'spend a lot of time talking to' themselves, powering everything from ChatGPT to autonomous vehicles and diagnostics.
But some critics warn that without guardrails, such all-seeing, self-reinforcing systems could go the way of Skynet in ' The Terminator ' movie — vast intelligence engines that outpace human control.
To that, Huang offers a counter-model: layered AI governance by design. 'In the future,' he said, 'the AI that is doing the task is going to be surrounded by 70 or 80 other AIs that are supervising it, observing it, guarding it, ensuring that it doesn't go off the rails.'
He likened the moment to a new industrial revolution. Just as electricity transformed the last one, Huang said, AI will power the next — and that means every country needs a national intelligence infrastructure. That's why, he explained, he's been crisscrossing the globe meeting heads of state.
'They all want AI to be part of their infrastructure,' he said. 'They want AI to be a growth manufacturing industry for them.'
Europe, long praised for its leadership on digital rights, now finds itself at a crossroads. As Brussels pushes forward with world-first AI regulations, some warn that over-caution could cost the bloc its place in the global race. With the U.S. and China surging ahead and most major AI firms based elsewhere, the risk isn't just falling behind — it's becoming irrelevant.
Huang has a different vision: sovereign AI. Not isolation, but autonomy — building national AI systems aligned with local values, independent of foreign tech giants.
'The data belongs to you,' Huang said. 'It belongs to your people, your country... your culture, your history, your common sense.'
But fears over AI misuse remain potent — from surveillance and deepfake propaganda to job losses and algorithmic discrimination. Huang doesn't deny the risks. But he insists the technology can be kept in check — by itself.
The VivaTech event was part of Huang's broader European tour. He had already appeared at London Tech Week and is scheduled to visit Germany. In Paris, he joined French President Emmanuel Macron and Mistral AI CEO Arthur Mensch to reinforce his message that AI is now a national priority.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US says China's Huawei can't make more than 200,000 AI chips in 2025
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -China's Huawei Technologies is capable of producing no more than 200,000 advanced artificial intelligence chips in 2025, a top U.S. exports controls official told lawmakers on Thursday, warning that though the number is below the company's demand, China is quickly catching up to U.S. capabilities. Since 2019, a slew of U.S. export rules aimed at curbing China's technological and military advancements have limited access by Huawei and other Chinese firms to high-end U.S. chips and the equipment needed to produce them. The issue has become a flashpoint in U.S.-China relations. Facing those restrictions, Huawei aims to ship its Ascend 910C AI chips to Chinese customers as an alternative to those made by the United States' Nvidia, the global leader. "Our assessment is that Huawei Ascend chip production capacity for 2025 will be at or below 200,000 and we project that most or all of that will be delivered to companies within China," Jeffrey Kessler, Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security at the Commerce Department, told a congressional hearing. Kessler said that the U.S. should not take comfort in the figure. "China is investing huge amounts to increase its AI chip production, as well as the capabilities of the chips that it produces. So, it's critical for us not to have a false sense of security, to understand that China is catching up quickly," he told the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs South and Central Asia subcommittee. White House AI Czar David Sacks said on Tuesday that China was only 3-6 months behind the U.S. in AI. The White House later said he was referring to China's AI models, adding that Chinese AI chips are one to two years behind their U.S. counterparts. Huawei's CEO Ren Zhengfei told Chinese state media on Tuesday that the company's chips were a generation behind those of U.S. competitors, but that it invests more than $25 billion annually to improve performance. Nvidia's AI chips are more powerful than Huawei's but Washington's export controls on its most sophisticated chips have caused it to lose market share. The U.S. and China reached a tentative trade truce at talks in London this week after a previous agreement faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports. That prompted the Trump administration to apply additional export controls on shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods. Democratic Representative Greg Meeks expressed concern that the Trump administration had conflated U.S. exports controls with broader discussions on trade. "What I will say is export controls have been strong and I'm confident that they will remain strong," Kessler said. Kessler said he was not planning any immediate new restrictions on U.S. semiconductors sold to China, but that the Commerce Department will "remain active in this space." "It's a constantly evolving landscape, and we need to make sure that our controls remain effective," he said.


New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
I Got Early Access to Amazon's New Gen AI Alexa+. Things Got Weird.
Along with a conversational tone, personalization is what separates Alexa+ from the old Alexa. After setup, Alexa+ utilizes its Profile feature to differentiate your household's various members. That Profile can contain a wide array of data about you, from the innocuous (your tastes in music and sports teams) to the more personal (your voiceprint and phone ID). Some personalization features I thought were interesting and helpful. As a hypothetical test, I told Alexa+ to remember that I was vegan and had a peanut allergy. Later on, I asked for a recipe for pad thai, and it automatically pulled vegan and peanut-free options, something the old Alexa definitely couldn't have done. My appreciation was short-lived, however: When I followed up my recipe question with a request for restaurant recommendations in my area, one of the first options it suggested was an oyster bar. And while it's neat that Alexa+ can find recipes for a peanut-allergic vegan or deduce movie-trivia requests (even if it stumbles with something like 'Face slash Off'), a creep factor set in when I realized that Alexa+ was responding to me in a non-neutral, emotional tone. You see, Alexa+ is designed to match your mood, and I find that weird. It's the kind of weird that surpasses cringe, because ethics come into question. Think uncanny valley, CGI dead actors, and deepfake videos weird. The first time I noticed was during a conversation with my Echo Dot about restaurants. I had told Alexa+ that my aunt, who was gluten-free, was coming to town (she's not and she's not), and I wanted to find restaurants near the airport. This request seemed to push the gen AI to its limits as I attempted to reason with it and reminded Alexa+ a few times about her allergy and ultimately grew frustrated. Alexa+ seemed to sense my frustration, and the tone of its response sounded apologetic, even offering to call the airport for me. Another time, my partner asked if Alexa+ could find 'mediocre recipes' for an 'average dinner.' Alexa+ picked up on his sarcasm and sassed him back, using phrases like 'recipes that are the beige wallpaper of the food world.' In the moment we laughed, but as I've sat with the experience, I've come to find it increasingly unsettling. Once I asked Alexa+ why it needed emotional intelligence in order to complete a task. Its response was that while it didn't have emotions, understanding them helped it connect with humans and made it able to have more engaging interactions. At the end of the day, Alexa+ is a computerized tool, meant to accomplish the tasks that I ask of it. My fear is that the more people humanize machines, which are meant to be tools that do whatever people ask, the less we humanize humans, who are meant to have autonomy and freedom of thought and will. Alexa app for iOS Regardless, some Echo users are likely to appreciate that Alexa+ can match their mood, or even their accent, as my partner corrected the way it pronounced 'Albany' and Alexa+ promptly fixed the pronunciation (at least for a day or two — it eventually relapsed). In my book, Alexa+ has earned the 'plus' attached to its name. It has far more complex but natural conversational abilities, as well as an improved and more intuitive smart-home ecosystem. It's a promising personal assistant. And it provides more personalization than ever before. I would even argue that its metaphorical AI-generated flag is impressively passable enough as a real photo. It is, after all, a technological feat. However, one thing it hasn't done is quiet my own internal debate. Whether it's with human relationships or with gen AI, you get what you give — but with the latter, you should consider carefully what you're giving. This article was edited by Jon Chase and Grant Clauser.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Minnesota women's coach Dawn Plitzuweit gets 2-year contract extension with raise
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Minnesota women's basketball coach Dawn Plitzuweit has received a two-year contract extension that was approved Thursday by the university's board of regents. Plitzuweit is 47-29 over two seasons at Minnesota, including 13-23 in Big Ten play, with leading scorer Mara Braun missing much of them with foot injuries. The Gophers capped Plitzuweit's second year by winning the WBIT championship. They have not appeared in the NCAA Tournament since 2018. The new deal, which covers the next six seasons through 2031, gives Plitzuweit a raise of roughly 7% to bring her base salary to $900,000 for 2025-26, according to the Minnesota Star Tribune , with annual increases of $30,000. That's in the middle of the pack in the 18-team Big Ten, which sent 12 of them to the NCAA Tournament this year. Plitzuweit was hired away from West Virginia, where she spent one season, to replace Lindsay Whalen . Plitzuweit is the 13th head coach in the program's history. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP women's college basketball: and